[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1224.

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 15, 2014, 10:43:43 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:55:07 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:36:35 PM

Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go

Whats going to happen?

Think about it.

It will dump?

my brain hurts from reading all of this...

Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions

Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in? Cheesy

I didnt sell all... I was playing the swings and gaining a few hundred at a time but i sold and then the price went up while i was sleeping and i fat fingered my buy back and screwed myself. So i have been watching and trying to buy back at as very little loss as possible. I dont want to buy back when there are people pumping it only to dump it. I have faith in this coin and was trying build my stash more. But if they are driving up the price to hold it there then ill buy back now and count my losses. Just looking for advice from the pros.

Also this is the first time ive seen these buy walls on this coin

Unless you are friends with the whales that do the actual pump..., then the only good strategy is buy and hold....

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 15, 2014, 10:43:43 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:55:07 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:36:35 PM

Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go

Whats going to happen?

Think about it.

It will dump?

Quote from: stealth923 on June 15, 2014, 10:40:11 PM

my brain hurts from reading all of this...

Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions

Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in? Cheesy

I didnt sell all... I was playing the swings and gaining a few hundred at a time but i sold and then the price went up while i was sleeping and i fat fingered my buy back and screwed myself. So i have been watching and trying to buy back at as very little loss as possible. I dont want to buy back when there are people pumping it only to dump it. I have faith in this coin and was trying build my stash more. But if they are driving up the price to hold it there then ill buy back now and count my losses. Just looking for advice from the pros.

Well someone bit 5k off of that .00145 buy wall an it didn't get pulled.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 15, 2014, 10:36:49 PM

Quote from: stealth923 on June 15, 2014, 10:34:06 PM

So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.

So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.

ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...?

DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork!

Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a

waste of time...

So what your saying is XC will copy #dorks closed source code? I see. Huh

Edit: just so everyone knows, this is the first peak that ATC has given into any Rev 2 specifics.

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:55:07 PM

Quote from: Mwalshe89 on June 15, 2014, 09:36:35 PM

Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go

Whats going to happen?

Think about it.

It will dump?

Quote from: ForReal on June 15, 2014, 10:21:52 PM

my brain hurts from reading all of this...

Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions

Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in? Cheesy

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Quote from: CryptoGretzky on June 15, 2014, 10:36:49 PM

this should be the background for the website or the reddit at least

+ 1000

this is a great looking wallpaper..although I do not like the looks of the one lil floaty thingy over the X that kinda looks like it might be a sperm...remove the tail looking thing from that round circle plz.. else we have sperm on our wallpaper. Other than that, phenominal !

stealth923

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Quote from: stealth923 on June 15, 2014, 10:34:06 PM

So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.

So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.

ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...?

DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork!

Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a waste of time...

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: stealth923 on June 15, 2014, 10:34:06 PM

So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.

So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.

ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...?

CryptoGretzky

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 10:00:21 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 09:43:10 PM

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.

Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7335393

Quote from: darylluke on June 15, 2014, 09:12:45 PM

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread Wink

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Shocked

Lets set the record straight

#1. XC is not a scam coin.

#2. XC's XNode technology is still under development

#3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code.

#4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

This is the thing that the DRK fudster kept on harping about. How can people not EMPHASIZE this point!!! #4... is the key to shut all the DRK fudster up all together.

stealth923

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 10:00:21 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 09:43:10 PM

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.

Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7335393

Quote from: darylluke on June 15, 2014, 09:12:45 PM

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread Wink

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Shocked

Lets set the record straight

#1. XC is not a scam coin.

#2. XC's XNode technology is still under development

#3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code.

#4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.

So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.

evtrmm

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

So much for "Community"

Put that as Twitter wallpaper

ForReal

member

Activity: 87

Merit: 10

Quote from: fourdegrees11 on June 15, 2014, 10:12:11 PM

this should be the background for the website or the reddit at least

+ 1000

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Every time this coin is on the move a new pile of FUD is delivered. We need this rise to be slow and steady.

they feel the need to protect their precious from the XC..its a good thing we are looked at as a strong competitor.

fourdegrees11

newbie

Activity: 23

Merit: 0

Every time this coin is on the move a new pile of FUD is delivered. We need this rise to be slow and steady.

shockstar

full member

Activity: 141

Merit: 100

I can't believe these FUDers are at it again. Sigh. ATC Keep up the good work.

brother3

hero member

Activity: 980

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 10:00:21 PM

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 09:43:10 PM

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.

Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7335393

Quote from: darylluke on June 15, 2014, 09:12:45 PM

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread Wink

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Shocked

Lets set the record straight

#1. XC is not a scam coin.

#2. XC's XNode technology is still under development

#3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code.

#4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins

I don't know how you put up with all this but I am glad you can rise above and steadily deliver stellar work!

Hats off and thank you Grin

bitcad4u

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 255

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 09:43:10 PM

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.

Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7335393

Quote from: darylluke on June 15, 2014, 09:12:45 PM

XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.

~darylluke.

its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread Wink

would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins.

Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Shocked

Funny...considering I see a cinni dev in here who has invested some into XC...

pookielax31

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 500

ATC...... we are not worthy... hahaha KEEP the goodshsit up my man.. ur one of the best devs... always deliverign despite the Bullshit you have to deal with that no other DEV oes... keep it up XC FTW

atcsecure

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 500

Quote from: atcsecure on June 15, 2014, 09:43:10 PM

I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.

Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.

Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins

Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7335393