only 28 BTC buy wall on MP. https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/mintpal/xcbtc
hahahaha...but nothing people want to buy!!! down..down..down = dead
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 1363. (Read 1484238 times)
June 06, 2014, 06:13:04 AM
hahahaha...but nothing people want to buy!!! down..down..down = dead
June 06, 2014, 06:10:50 AM
when dev online, everything will change. 
June 06, 2014, 06:06:33 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
sooner the top people dump its better right ?
The shaking process couldn't continue endless but its always over when price is at steady and sustainable floor. 100K floor was broken badly yesterday and that has been caused not by shaking the weak hands nor by whales trying to get more. Too much competitors advertising anon features are playing the nerve and much are about to run, although no one of them have yet delivered the stuff they are claiming to be depict. As time is going on XC becomes to look overdue and belated and ppl are getting out, 90% here for quick buck and will be selling in lower hesitation if the next broken floor dips behind the dump traces. The last downward momentum XC needs to crack is to broke the 80K threshold. Once just 200K from the top 10 wishes to exit, that provokes a huge avalanche to whatever lowest lows the mass effect can drown the panic to. Shaking the hands is over its just an awaiting a top bag decision. Average investors are hesitate to buy i doubt rev 2.0 ups the trend if 80-90k will be crashed again
June 06, 2014, 05:58:05 AM
only 28 BTC buy wall on MP. https://bitcoinwisdom.com/markets/mintpal/xcbtc
June 06, 2014, 05:36:58 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
sooner the top people dump its better right ?
Exactly, they create panic to increase their position. If big holders are confident it show the true potential of coin.
when people will understand 100k is a solid ground now, the price will rally to 200k sat next few days.
The timing was perfect to create a big panic moove because the market grow too fast and next big news was far enought to accumulate lower safely.
Speculation will start again soon and buyers will run after paper.
June 06, 2014, 05:31:12 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
sooner the top people dump its better right ?
June 06, 2014, 05:29:48 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
Agreed, Thanks for sharing. 
June 06, 2014, 05:28:28 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
sooner the top people dump its better right ?
June 06, 2014, 05:19:23 AM
June 06, 2014, 05:19:13 AM
top 10 richest adress continue to buy , they had 29.74% of market yesteday and 30.54% today. i think it's a good sign.
June 06, 2014, 05:17:45 AM
which XC logo is the final winner?
Vote issue continued yet..
June 06, 2014, 05:15:04 AM
I don't like to say it but pricewise it's getting worse everyday and big dumps continue....
I have hit my max leverage point on buying XC. Are we just seeing back and forth trading with the same coins? Or is there a few whales dumping?I honestly feel like option 1 is most likely the case, but I would love to hear some insight into the current market situation with XC.
Thanks for your time
June 06, 2014, 05:04:22 AM
I don't like to say it but pricewise it's getting worse everyday and big dumps continue....
June 06, 2014, 05:01:55 AM
we are already testing 100k again i think it will be like yesterday, price will fall but later we will reach 130-140k again
i think it will be like yesterday, price will fall but later we will reach 130-140k again June 06, 2014, 04:45:30 AM
gmaxwell, I think it would be great if you could spare some of your time to review Darkcoin's code once Evan has completed it.
I have no doubt that you would be able to provide valuable constructive feedback to Evan. Collaboration I see is the key to evolution and advancing ourselves in the crypto technology space - I am sure with both of your minds together something great could happen!
I will, if someone remembers to point me to it— ideally if it also comes with a high level design document so I don't have to extract all the behavior from the code (doing so is very time consuming).I have no doubt that you would be able to provide valuable constructive feedback to Evan. Collaboration I see is the key to evolution and advancing ourselves in the crypto technology space - I am sure with both of your minds together something great could happen!
As an aside, and apart from the privacy tech—
Whats with the claims here that the subsidy was changed after some millions of coins were created? Thats pretty damning if true— shades of Solidcoin.
The whole too-low-initial-difficulty plus exponential distribution thing seems to be a trope now. Bitcoin's initial difficulty was high enough (relative to existing hardware and software) that it couldn't even keep up with its 10 minute target during the first year. If I were crazy enough to launch an altcoin I'd set it so that the real mining didn't begin until it crossed some somewhat reasonable difficulty to reduce the land grab intensity, because it smells pretty fishy otherwise.
June 06, 2014, 04:21:13 AM
gmaxwell, I think it would be great if you could spare some of your time to review Darkcoin's code once Evan has completed it.
I have no doubt that you would be able to provide valuable constructive feedback to Evan. Collaboration I see is the key to evolution and advancing ourselves in the crypto technology space - I am sure with both of your minds together something great could happen!
I will, if someone remembers to point me to it— ideally if it also comes with a high level design document so I don't have to extract all the behavior from the code (doing so is very time consuming).I have no doubt that you would be able to provide valuable constructive feedback to Evan. Collaboration I see is the key to evolution and advancing ourselves in the crypto technology space - I am sure with both of your minds together something great could happen!
As an aside, and apart from the privacy tech—
Whats with the claims here that the subsidy was changed after some millions of coins were created? Thats pretty damning if true— shades of Solidcoin.
The whole too-low-initial-difficulty plus exponential distribution thing seems to be a trope now. Bitcoin's initial difficulty was high enough (relative to existing hardware and software) that it couldn't even keep up with its 10 minute target during the first year. If I were crazy enough to launch an altcoin I'd set it so that the real mining didn't begin until it crossed some somewhat reasonable difficulty to reduce the land grab intensity, because it smells pretty fishy otherwise.
June 06, 2014, 04:07:28 AM
Best 3 will be in another contest for us to pick
June 06, 2014, 04:04:40 AM
which XC logo is the final winner?
June 06, 2014, 04:00:04 AM
Nobody is concerned that basically all Gmaxwell's criticisms apply equally, if not more, to XC?
XC doesn't even purport to be trustless, and the overall implementation hasn't even been comprehensively described.
As he has said cryptonote and zerocash technology are the only novel and workable decentralised and trustless solutions thus far. A 'dynamic trust network' is neither trustless (the whole point of bitcoin and derivative technologies) nor decentralised since it relies on certain nominated nodes to provide specific tasks.
Everybody seems to be drinking a nice big cup of smug over the weaknesses of darkcoin (of which there are legion) while avoiding taking a look in their own back yard.
XC doesn't even purport to be trustless, and the overall implementation hasn't even been comprehensively described.
As he has said cryptonote and zerocash technology are the only novel and workable decentralised and trustless solutions thus far. A 'dynamic trust network' is neither trustless (the whole point of bitcoin and derivative technologies) nor decentralised since it relies on certain nominated nodes to provide specific tasks.
Everybody seems to be drinking a nice big cup of smug over the weaknesses of darkcoin (of which there are legion) while avoiding taking a look in their own back yard.
Yes, I think it would be valuable for the XC team to engage seriously (and respectfully) with Gmaxwell's post. In fact, we should invite him to review XC's tech when it's more fully developed. It would be a real opportunity to benefit from his expertise.
I also think we should take his criticisms seriously when developing the coin. Is there a better model than the dynamic trust system? Can we come up with one? Perhaps, and we'd do well to consider it long and hard.
that's a good idea.
Gmaxwell is an expert on Anonymous technology.
June 06, 2014, 03:58:33 AM
Not sure why you think drk fud is going to help XC succeed. XC is not an established coin yet, drk weakness will only make people more cautious to gamble on XC.
But , here's to hoping I guess .
no, drk fud (?) will not help XC's development.
hope dev can release the V2 3 weeks later?
and open source it if we are strong enough ...
Jump to: