Pages:
Author

Topic: xkcd's bitcoin hole (Read 21846 times)

hero member
Activity: 575
Merit: 500
The North Remembers
January 06, 2012, 12:42:26 AM
#83
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 250
January 05, 2012, 12:17:29 PM
#82
and there's still a decent amount left at the old hole that hasn't been touched in a while... uh oh  Undecided
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 504
^SEM img of Si wafer edge, scanned 2012-3-12.
January 05, 2012, 09:44:23 AM
#81
There's a new bitcoin address at the hole.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
June 14, 2011, 09:24:23 AM
#80
What amuses me about this is that we can still send bitcoins to that address, and there is nothing he can do to stop us
I think it would be more amusing if you sent them to my address. There's nothing I can do to stop you either and I'm holding a frog in my avatar.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1031
Rational Exuberance
June 13, 2011, 06:34:43 PM
#79
What amuses me about this is that we can still send bitcoins to that address, and there is nothing he can do to stop us
edd
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
May 19, 2011, 01:22:16 PM
#78
I think the main point to take away from this is that he considers his bitcoins "profit."

What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?

Your interpretation of edd's comment is very different from mine. I read it as, "He is thinking of his bitcoins as real money, not pretend internet money. That means there is a good chance he will accept them in trade in the future."

SunAvatar got my point. (I'm also hoping he'll spend them on some coffee so I can profit, as well.)
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
May 19, 2011, 01:12:10 PM
#77
No, I'm not randall - I just refreshed the link and saw the msg.

Quote
Thank you for all the kind donations!

I took down my address because I would prefer to
experiment with Bitcoin as a regular, anonymous user.

I put up an address here because someone on IRC asked,
but I don't want an xkcd.com donation address to be
seen as an endorsement of Bitcoin to xkcd readers.

As a bitcoin user, I stand to profit from encouraging
waves of new adopters who drive up bitcoin prices.
I'm uneasy about this conflict of interest; for
the moment, I'd rather stay a normal user.

Again, thank you to everyone who sent me bitcoins
before I took this down! I'll try to use them for
something fun and geeky.

<3 Randall
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
youtube.com/ericfontainejazz now accepts bitcoin
May 19, 2011, 12:55:26 AM
#76
What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?
Perhaps Randall finds himself satisfied with the comics themselves and seeks no other reward. Perhaps he didn't want to make money off of his, albeit less then ostensible, endorsement of Bitcoin, considering that doing so might hurt his credibility. Perhaps, like Bill Waterson, he didn't want to exploit his creation and transmogrify it into another soulless Garfield.

good points all around.  Yeah, too many zombie Garfields roaming the funny pages.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 18, 2011, 03:43:43 PM
#75
* mizerydearia supports this reply with 0.01 witcoi...oh wait, wrong site.
I shamelessly displayed a bitcoin address in my signature for a reason, you know.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 507
May 18, 2011, 03:39:26 PM
#74
What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?
Perhaps Randall finds himself satisfied with the comics themselves and seeks no other reward. Perhaps he didn't want to make money off of his, albeit less then ostensible, endorsement of Bitcoin, considering that doing so might hurt his credibility. Perhaps, like Bill Waterson, he didn't want to exploit his creation and transmogrify it into another soulless Garfield.
* mizerydearia supports this reply with 0.01 witcoi...oh wait, wrong site.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
May 18, 2011, 12:41:02 PM
#73
What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?
Perhaps Randall finds himself satisfied with the comics themselves and seeks no other reward. Perhaps he didn't want to make money off of his, albeit less then ostensible, endorsement of Bitcoin, considering that doing so might hurt his credibility. Perhaps, like Bill Waterson, he didn't want to exploit his creation and transmogrify it into another soulless Garfield.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
May 18, 2011, 12:29:31 PM
#72
I think the main point to take away from this is that he considers his bitcoins "profit."

What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?

Your interpretation of edd's comment is very different from mine. I read it as, "He is thinking of his bitcoins as real money, not pretend internet money. That means there is a good chance he will accept them in trade in the future."
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 251
youtube.com/ericfontainejazz now accepts bitcoin
May 18, 2011, 11:45:59 AM
#71
He was on #bitcoin-otc yesterday (I was so excited!) He said he took it down because he didn't want to endorse something purely for profit. He is still using bitcoin, though.

I think the main point to take away from this is that he considers his bitcoins "profit."

What is wrong with profiting from his comic strips?  How could that possibly cause exploitation?  What is wrong with profit?  Is he some type of communist?  Why would he open the black hole in the first place?
edd
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1001
May 17, 2011, 07:55:32 AM
#70
He was on #bitcoin-otc yesterday (I was so excited!) He said he took it down because he didn't want to endorse something purely for profit. He is still using bitcoin, though.

I think the main point to take away from this is that he considers his bitcoins "profit."
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
PGP OTC WOT: EB7FCE3D
May 17, 2011, 07:49:51 AM
#69
His black hole is gone? The page is blank! http://xkcd.com/bitcoin/

but not deleted. subtle and decent but still a link to bitcoin project
visiting this page returns a web page (content or empty, it's not a 404 reply)
donator
Activity: 826
Merit: 1041
May 17, 2011, 06:28:46 AM
#68
He was on #bitcoin-otc yesterday (I was so excited!) He said he took it down because he didn't want to endorse something purely for profit.
I don't get it. If he thinks it's wrong to endorse Bitcoin for profit, why would he want to visit #bitcoin-otc?

Anyway, he received 360 BTC in donations (about $2800 at the current MtGox rate).
hero member
Activity: 482
Merit: 501
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
May 16, 2011, 09:30:07 PM
#66
He was on #bitcoin-otc yesterday (I was so excited!) He said he took it down because he didn't want to endorse something purely for profit. He is still using bitcoin, though.

I guess the bitcoin "things just got real" for him ... Grin

If they weren't worth anything he wouldn't have bothered with taking it down ... who got the bitcoin? I hope xkcd benefits somehow.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
May 16, 2011, 09:07:58 PM
#65

Just curious:  does anyone still have the bitcoin address so I can have a look and see if he spent his bitcoins?



Just search the block chain for 13.37, 3.14, 1.41, etc. Cheesy

Anyway elewton above already said he did: "But it payed out to 150 to and address and 50 to another, then misc."
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1076
May 16, 2011, 09:02:10 PM
#64

Just curious:  does anyone still have the bitcoin address so I can have a look and see if he spent his bitcoins?

Pages:
Jump to: