@darkota You can't see the forest for the trees. It's ok to be biased and silly, but to say that sdc isn't even an anonymous cryptocoin competitor is asinine. You guys have a great thing going, no doubt... but keep looking in your rearview mirror because shadow is there and creeping up while your still saying it's not happening.
Having the entire SDC blockchain de-anonymized is not a great start to promoting a privacy-based crypto coin.
Just because the SDC devs say they "fixed" their code, how can one be sure unless a peer review or audit of the code by a neutral (unbiased) 3rd party that is reputable does the inspection?
Of course the SDC developers are going to say "All is good" in the SDC source code, by publicly releasing their code on mainnet they essentially said "all is good" prior to the fatal exploit was found by Shen N.
How can one expect to garner confidence in devs who allowed a fatal exploit that de-anonymizes their entire blockchain?
I guess there is a sucker born every minute, as the saying goes...that's how.
Great article mate. 
this is just silly bitcoin had a bug, monero had a bug etherum has a new bug every week nobody seams to care, that they have large market caps, but for some reason there is a huge problem with shadow having a bug in the past.
wow much green