[XPM]unofficial jhPrimeminer thread - page 27.

travisio

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: ivanlabrie on August 19, 2013, 01:21:09 AM

Hi there guys Cheesy

I finally got a cpu upgrade in the form of an i7 3820 which I run at 4.4ghz.
What are the best settings for the avx 7.1 miner?

Couldn't find up to date specific settings...
Thanks in advance!

EDIT: well, look what happens when running it.
http://i.imgur.com/V1bJKUY.png

I think you just have to run the vcredist_x64.exe contained in the .zip file.

ivanlabrie

hero member

Activity: 812

Merit: 1000

Hi there guys Cheesy

I finally got a cpu upgrade in the form of an i7 3820 which I run at 4.4ghz.
What are the best settings for the avx 7.1 miner?

Couldn't find up to date specific settings...
Thanks in advance!

EDIT: well, look what happens when running it.

baloo_kiev

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Quote from: bcp19 on August 18, 2013, 09:26:14 PM

Quote from: baloo_kiev on August 18, 2013, 09:13:38 PM

Still getting the best results (measured by 4-ch/h) with mumus' version 4 under wine.
I'm on Ubuntu x64 and AMD Opterons.
Performance per core for v4 is about 2k 4-ch/h compared to ~800 for v7.1 (both wine and native linux).

that is because V4 adds all 4ch and up for 4ch total and V7 is only 4ch.

Still about 2x speedup for v4 even after subtracting 5ch+ shares from 4ch.

bcp19

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: baloo_kiev on August 18, 2013, 09:13:38 PM

Still getting the best results (measured by 4-ch/h) with mumus' version 4 under wine.
I'm on Ubuntu x64 and AMD Opterons.
Performance per core for v4 is about 2k 4-ch/h compared to ~800 for v7.1 (both wine and native linux).

that is because V4 adds all 4ch and up for 4ch total and V7 is only 4ch.

baloo_kiev

sr. member

Activity: 476

Merit: 250

Still getting the best results (measured by 4-ch/h) with mumus' version 4 under wine.
I'm on Ubuntu x64 and AMD Opterons.
Performance per core for v4 is about 2k 4-ch/h compared to ~800 for v7.1 (both wine and native linux).

dudeguy

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: Fernandez on August 18, 2013, 11:27:55 AM

Can somebody point me to the best version for Windows 7 32 bit on Core i3-540?

You don't have AVX so I suggest 7.1 instead of the 7.1 AVX

Leave it on stock settings overnight. Don't forget to press C after your auto tune has stabilized (after about 20 min). Pressing C will auto tune your L1 Cache. Write the results down and be sure to include that all other settings were on stock.

Fernandez

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

Can somebody point me to the best version for Windows 7 32 bit on Core i3-540?

bengtåke

sr. member

Activity: 309

Merit: 250

confused developer

Quote from: hasle2 on August 17, 2013, 05:58:55 PM

I am having issues redirecting the output on linux. I built from the latest sources (thanks for setting it up for linux guys

) and run it like so:

Code:

jhprimeminer -o http://ypool.net:10034 -u user.w -p x -t 4 > out 2>&1 < /dev/null &

but nothing is showing up in the out file. Any suggestions? I would really like to have it running in the background an be able to check a file for the status as I control my linux boxes by ssh.

You could use an utility called screen, it allows you to run a process in a virtual terminal that you can detach and attach to, and watch some process running in it. Like

Code:

screen jhprimeminer -o ypool.net -u blabla -p bla

then press CTRL+A+D when its running to detach, to reattach it again you can type screen -rd, that wont solve your piping problem (not sure why that isnt working), but you can attach to it at any point and watch the output at least.

bcp19

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

Quote from: geofflosophy on August 17, 2013, 09:27:26 PM

Quote from: bcp19 on August 17, 2013, 08:22:39 PM

I switched over to 7.1 and when I ran the bat file to start it, the miner seemed to be working normally but my system acted like it was overloaded. Took over 20 seconds to bring up internet explorer after I clicked on it and almost as long for it to close. Is this normal for 7.1?

I ran 7.1 all day today running on all eight threads without any lag issues, but in the past I've had problems with lag when running on all threads, which is why I usually run it with 6. I don't think it should surprise anyone that your computer lags when it's trying to run at max capacity.

That's just it though, I did not experience this slowdown with V3, V4, V5 or V6. I never tried V7 but V7.1 near killed it. I tried it on 3 different comps with the same result so I'm back to V6 for now.

mhps

hero member

Activity: 516

Merit: 500

CAT.EX Exchange

Quote from: mhps on August 16, 2013, 09:49:40 AM

Quote from: Sterling on August 08, 2013, 02:24:38 PM

Uhhhh, what's going on?

I got this on an E5620 with -t 4 -s 3000000, about 8 hours after starting the miner

v7.1 win8

I just lost 10 hours by a similar but difference error. The error message is

Code:

Restarting thread 0
Sirve/Test ratio:0.0 / 100.0% - New PrimorialMultiplier: 2

then repeat for every other thread. then repeat forever.

Can I avoid the error by turning off the PrimorialMultiplier auto searching?

geofflosophy

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: bcp19 on August 17, 2013, 08:22:39 PM

I switched over to 7.1 and when I ran the bat file to start it, the miner seemed to be working normally but my system acted like it was overloaded. Took over 20 seconds to bring up internet explorer after I clicked on it and almost as long for it to close. Is this normal for 7.1?

I ran 7.1 all day today running on all eight threads without any lag issues, but in the past I've had problems with lag when running on all threads, which is why I usually run it with 6. I don't think it should surprise anyone that your computer lags when it's trying to run at max capacity.

bcp19

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

I switched over to 7.1 and when I ran the bat file to start it, the miner seemed to be working normally but my system acted like it was overloaded. Took over 20 seconds to bring up internet explorer after I clicked on it and almost as long for it to close. Is this normal for 7.1?

hasle2

full member

Activity: 122

Merit: 100

I am having issues redirecting the output on linux. I built from the latest sources (thanks for setting it up for linux guys

) and run it like so:

Code:

jhprimeminer -o http://ypool.net:10034 -u user.w -p x -t 4 > out 2>&1 < /dev/null &

but nothing is showing up in the out file. Any suggestions? I would really like to have it running in the background an be able to check a file for the status as I control my linux boxes by ssh.

reb0rn21

legendary

Activity: 1901

Merit: 1024

I see there is V7 version with AVX, anyone did AVX2 optimization for haswell, AVX2 should be a lot faster compared to AVX?

psyc

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

hello guys have any suggestions for set 8-core AMD Opteron?

maco

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

Quote from: dudeguy on August 17, 2013, 02:43:56 AM

Quote from: maco on August 17, 2013, 01:11:46 AM

How is everyone doing with this? I see this thread has jumped quite a bit since X3Maniac's post.

Anyone satisfied with XPM earnings @ ypool?

I'm so so about it. I got terribly unlucky waiting over 2 weeks for a block on the HP builds staying up to date on every release so I went to Ypool. I likely would have made more XPM solo mining but I just couldn't risk a GPU miner coming out and never having the same ability to make up for my lost time making no XPM with the three processors I have here. Tuning this miner is a bitch. I've gone through dozens of combinations and used every indicator at my disposal to test mining effectiveness. Nothing is set in stone and most of it is luck however I find anything that isn't a server, or high end processor likes a sieve size under 1000000. That's my experience. It's late so I probably made no sense.

I haven't tried these optimizations that much but I would say if you got no other alternative, try V4 posted here.

Try these, I found them effective with my optimizations -primes 100000 and -s 100000 with -d 8
But I am sticking with solo for now. Hope that helps you out :]

dudeguy

member

Activity: 182

Merit: 10

Quote from: maco on August 17, 2013, 01:11:46 AM

How is everyone doing with this? I see this thread has jumped quite a bit since X3Maniac's post.

Anyone satisfied with XPM earnings @ ypool?

I'm so so about it. I got terribly unlucky waiting over 2 weeks for a block on the HP builds staying up to date on every release so I went to Ypool. I likely would have made more XPM solo mining but I just couldn't risk a GPU miner coming out and never having the same ability to make up for my lost time making no XPM with the three processors I have here. Tuning this miner is a bitch. I've gone through dozens of combinations and used every indicator at my disposal to test mining effectiveness. Nothing is set in stone and most of it is luck however I find anything that isn't a server, or high end processor likes a sieve size under 1000000. That's my experience. It's late so I probably made no sense.

geofflosophy

sr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 250

Quote from: maco on August 17, 2013, 01:11:46 AM

How is everyone doing with this? I see this thread has jumped quite a bit since X3Maniac's post.

Anyone satisfied with XPM earnings @ ypool?

Mine have been pretty good, I haven't done a good job of keeping track but to give you an idea I started with GMP v5 on a 2.3 GHertz i7 laptop (6 threads dedicated to mining) and have 4.28 in my balance and 2.05 in my unconfirmed. My guess is 1-1.5 XPM per day or so.

maco

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

How is everyone doing with this? I see this thread has jumped quite a bit since X3Maniac's post.

Anyone satisfied with XPM earnings @ ypool?

mhps

hero member

Activity: 516

Merit: 500

CAT.EX Exchange

Quote from: rwessels on August 16, 2013, 04:02:09 PM

Invalid Share

From what I've heard you should check the date, time, CMOS time, maybe even timezone etc. of your machines.

Topic: [XPM]unofficial jhPrimeminer thread - page 27. (Read 180201 times)