but this is just a ripoff copy
How do you come to this conclusion? I'm really curious about this.
Did you read about what the goals of this project are?
Well, not fixing the little things is a sign of second rate Devs, for example:
(1) After many months the Windows wallet crashes on exit.
(2) After many months the Windows wallet triggers warnings from Avast about web sites that are accessed.
Fix this shit, please.
Comical isn't it? The wallet is completely unstable, and crashes at random.
Malwarebytes also triggers warnings, and blocks the wallet.
You would expect more from a simple clone coin since the hard work has already been done for them.
yep,this shit is really exactly the same shit of SDC,i recall SDC was not even care to fix it and some SDC users still suffering with the randon crashed due to their unstable wallet now
Difference is that SDC developers never took peoples money and said they were going to fix those issues. SDC never said they were the best or going to be the best anon system. They didn't tell people to buy their rubbish ICO. They never promised anyone anything, so that they would be supported. They just went out and innovated the anon space. But sure, attack it and them, because that makes sense....idiot!
The stupid problems you are speaking of don't even matter until its going to be used by the masses. Funny thing is the bitcoin client is still rubbish to use against 3rd party software....Its just not shit that even matters yet! But sure make it a argument point. Your idiot developer comes to the SDC thread and says "we will fix the flaws in sdc" haha, the flaws that exist are not priorities like you scumbags think they are.
Go and take a look at linux issues and exploits and then look at how low on the priorities list they are haha....some of you people are really stupid!! But sure, this project is going somewhere...
