Topic: XSPEC x200 this year - page 4. (Read 2131 times)

There's no point in me creating it, its dumb and I can just as easily troll you without making a new account. I would guess someone got the idea from my response to you. Not sure why you're even responding to them as they are clearly trolling you.

Do you think maybe the mods aren't interested in verifying some random trolls request about IP addresses and usernames?

Actually, it's most likely you.  You edited my response then almost instantly there's a fake account similar to mine that does the same thing and edited my response.


Again, I messaged a moderator to confirm that this is my ONLY account and the ONLY IP that I post from, but didn't get a response back a month ago.  Here is verification ( https://imgur.com/a/nXQ4O ) to confirm.   If you want to help me find another moderator, you can summon them and I agree to letting them post publicly to confirm this is my only username/IP that I post from and have  

I take it you will do the same!   I will message a few other moderators/admins, will you agree also to let the moderator publicly announce any usernames that you have?  So I can link them this thread and they will post?

I can't tell if he made another account and is trolling his other account... or if hes just engaging with another troll. Either way, I'm not sure why hes entertaining responses.

Wow, 3 accounts for FUD of Spectrecoin with a terrible name, and thats just what we know about.

Thats like virgin level 1000, stay in parents basement for 3 decades, achievement unlocked status!

This is outright cringy, and reflects poorly on yourself.  Keep it up!  It's becoming even more of a bargain since you posted this (currently at $0.56)

This is outright cringy, and reflects poorly on the coin.  Keep it up!  It's crashing harder since you posted this (currently at $0.56)

Lmao, shows how desperate people are.  They have to create a name similar to mine in order to disguise the truth.

Anyways, trying to fool the people is not in the best interest of people and reflects poorly on the user themselves.  The facts in this thread can't be hidden,  it just shows how low people go in order to hide bargains from people.

This coin is A GREAT BARGAIN.  It's an utter GREAT COIN, and the users here are trying to fool people (as seen in the above user trying to use a similar name as me)

Lmao, shows how desperate people are.  They have to create a name similar to mine in order to disguise the truth.

Anyways, trying to fool the people is not in the best interest of people and reflects poorly on the coin itself.  The facts in this thread can't be hidden,  it just shows how low people go in order to scam people.

This coin is CRASHING HARD.  It's an utter SCAM COIN, and the users here are trying to fool people (as seen in the above user trying to use a similar name as me)

This coin is absolutely a BARGAIN.  It is at $0.59 and is barely getting cheaper more each day.  You don't see this type of sale in the other coins.

It seems people are FINALLY realizing and seeing the true intentions of this coin and that it is a solid project.  The people here really uncovered in these threads the true level of expertise by JBG in this coin.  Bitcoin Skull corrected my son for his prediction a few months back when it would hit $0.90, but its even BETTER than that.


I don't see this coin hitting more than a few cents lower in the next month or two.

Same, me too bro. Glad you're coming around. Can't wait for 1.4, you should join the discord and come discuss. 

Don't try and make light of the situation.  Honest to God, I never will and never have bought this shitcoin.  Especially after the revelations that came out the past few weeks lol.

Don't pretend like you're not buying lol. 

This coin is absolutely CRASHING.  It is at $0.59 and crashing more each day.  You don't see this type of crash in the other coins.

It seems people are FINALLY realizing and seeing the true intentions of this coin and that it is a scam.  The people here really uncovered in these threads the true lack of tech in this coin.  Bitcoin Skull heckled me for my prediction a few months back when it would hit $0.90, but it crashed even WORSE than that.


I don't see this coin hitting more than a few cents in the next month or two.

You don't even realise that you're contradicting yourself. Glad you're not going to reply anymore here!

XSPECT was hyped a lot in January, but like some other hyped privacy coins such as PIVX and ONION it’s price performance since then has been disappointing. I can’t see it doing any more than 2-5x this year. I’ve put my allocation for privacy coins into bigger coins such as XMR and ZCASH.

ZClassic was a special case I think, where there was a hard fork of ZCL into Bitcoin Private with BTCP given 1:1 to the 4 million ZClassic coins and 17 million Bitcoin coins - and it was thought BTCP would list at $200 plus, and maybe get to the value of Bitcoin Cash. But BTCP is only worth $93 today, and ZCL is only worth $17 so you’re out of pocket if you bought ZCL for more than $100 before the fork. What will happen with that is unknown now, but yeah it would have been good if you’d bought ZClassic cheap and sold at the $200 with the BTCP hype or in the unlikely event that BTCP does a BCH!

So every coin that dropped that much must be dead? From the height of the alt market to now, a bearish alt market?  Sick stats  


I clearly explained what happened with JBG and yet somehow you still have questions. JBG said mid Feb that the end-Feb release window looked good. He planned on pulling some long days to grind through and complete it since he got set back from some 1.3 bugs. Someone close to him passed away so he stepped away for a week or two in February.

Just so you're with me: At this point that means there approximately TWO WEEKS of LONG NIGHTS finishing 1.4 left. So, when he comes back in March, he announces what happens and says 1.4 is going to be delayed. He says its going to take OVER a week, but hes not going to give an exact window because he needs to gather his thoughts and take a log of what still needs to be done and doesn't feel up to pulling long nights. He was dealing with a loss for the last two weeks, are you so daft that you'd think when he gets back he'd be 100% in the mindset of picking back up immediately? I've coded C# projects and even after a couple days its hard to get back to where I was and get a handle on things. JBG then made an official announcement about the bringing on of new developers and decentralizing the development to help whats currently ailing the project and said a 1.4 announcement will follow soon.

If you can't get a grasp on baby-fed information, you're either slow or a troll. I'm not going to bother responding to you repeating the same sentence over and over because you can't come up with a thoughtful response. This will be my last response to you because while I'll engage thoughtful discussions, this has quickly devolved into you acting like a child.

Jan 13 2018: 5.46 USD
March 08 2018: 0.63 USD

It is a nonsensical cryptocurrency that will never really be appreciated. I do not believe that Xspec will be valued. This is impossible.

I thought you would have answered only on things you knew, like stated on your first sentence?


I thought you would have answered only on things you knew, like stated on your first sentence? If you can't even check how much money the donation address has received and he already trasferred before replying, not worth discussing this one with you, I am wasting my time.


I thought you would have answered only on things you knew, like stated on your first sentence?


I thought you would have answered only on things you knew, like stated on your first sentence?


The reason I am replying, which I said also in other posts, is because of people like you, who are going around and talk without having the knowledge. It's just annoying. So if you want me here, please continue.

The other thing which is crazy to me is that people like you don't understand that I am doing your community a favor. You are now forced to create a more transparent workflow, which will be helpful for your community in the long run, if it lasts. Or jbg will run away with the money and the project will fail. In both cases, I am helping you. And if the first case happens and is done well, I am probably going to buy XSPEC.

Its just a hype coin

I'm just a community member so I can only respond to what I know:


I really have no idea what you're going on about. JBG has never "mixed up" 1.4 code with Stealth Staking. Not sure what you even mean by that.


If you were actually doing your research instead of camping BCT to spread FUD about XSPEC specifically (the reason you made this account), you'd see that JBG said this when asked:

Question: Not sure why have you mentioned bug fixing for 1.3, because like two weeks ago you said 1.4. is still expected end of February?

"Originally i was thinking i could pull a crazy week and get it done. I probably got a week to a week and a half behind working on v1.3 bugfixes and i thought i could pull long days for the rest of feb and get it done but life got in the way and i could pull no days for a while and right now i'm not really up to pulling long days. It will be over a week, just to make it clear that it's not imminent. Other than that, I don't think it's a good idea for me to give any indication right at this moment, because I need to take stock of what work remains and get a clear idea myself. I'll give an update as soon as I'm able."

He followed up and said a specific announcement about 1.4 will follow in the next few days.


What? Automatic ring size determination for stealth transactions was included in the 1.3.4 update list that was bundled into 1.3.5 release.


JBG already responded to 20 years of dev experience claim, so now you've switched to "someone" now told you it was 25 years and hes in his 20's. Mandica, who knows more about JBG than you and google do, has verified that hes not in his twenties.



JBG has already made it clear that Bryce's work will be shown when the time comes with a Ghostpaper and the code. An XSPEC community "longstanding member" isn't a merit for showing someone a game-changing proof of code to. 


Hahahaha, "independent reviews of his code". A random person on the internet who claims to be a software dev looking at a github repository is not as merited as you're making it out to be. Also, using the evidence YOU just provided, one of the threads states this:

It's true that it's a lot of library updating, but it's not like the developer only changed a handful of simple codelines, which preshpr1nce's thread makes it sound like.

The negative aspects for me when looking at the git repository are two things:
1. The developer is not good at commenting his commits, and even though the codebase was forked, he should also get better at commenting the code changes he makes
2. There were no commits after January 30st

However, the activity shown in the repository between December and January seems to show genuine efforts by a busy developer and the claims by preshpr1nce's post, while not being inherently wrong, seem to be largely exaggerated.

Soon JBG will only be rewarded through results-based payments from Staking Donations and then it will be up to a council to decide whether or not his changes and updates were worth the payment. Whether or not you think the 100k was worth the last few months of development work by JBG and Brycel is irrelevant because its all opinion based.



Again, not sure what you're referring to here, but before JBG's leave of absence, they had not withdrawn any XSPEC from the donation address from until recently. Which was what I assume the "no reward comment" stemmed from.


If he is thats a decision only he can make and know. As of now it looks like hes helping to develop a solid core team of developers for the project so I'd say no for the immediate future.


Not sure where this comes into play, she was the original founder of the project so I assume she holds a decent amount of coins.


I find it hilarious that in your original post you said:


Not only did you continue to respond to that thread, but you've now been a part of countless other threads while continuing to spread the same uncertainty and doubt that was the basis of your first thread. I find it laughable to claim that you have no horse in the race but yet you created a fresh account for the post and have continued to slam XSPEC since then. I appreciated the research in the first post but its clear that NOTHING is going to be good enough for you, or the other usual suspect fudders. My intentions are clear because I believe in the project, but what are yours?