XZC optimised ccminer (full hashrate reporting and +15% income) - page 6.

Dr_Victor

sr. member

Activity: 954

Merit: 250

Read PM, pls.

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Ok I'm gonna do it from now.

Just give me time to setup the whole test protocole.

With 1070, bothexact same GPU serie. Bought at same time, always been used the same way.

One on DJM and the other on XZCMod

patacca

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

I'd love for you to test a 1080ti on MPH (another pool is fine but MPH has like 80% of the network hashrate so you shouldn't have problems running a test for 24hrs only) with that miner and another 1080ti on the same pool with djm miner with an nvidia driver older than 388 because that version is apparently giving some problems.

I am currently having over 5 xcz per day with 18x 1080ti and I want to know if there can be an improvement.

Thanks

Bulletdodger

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

Hey guys,
so do you want me to do some more testing?

Just tell me what kind of setup do you want and I can try it.

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Most profitable coin today xzc

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Hi

Thank you for offer, but I already send it for free to bulletdodger.

I won't give more free copy as people can just spread it for nothing already.

du44

full member

Activity: 251

Merit: 100

I am testing 21.5 mh with opensource ccminer, pool - efficiency with pool - 100%, but looks like effective hashrate ~15% lesser than i can see in the miner by 15%, If you send me miner first - i can test it and paste comparsion here.

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

Yes I confirm the results.

Still showing 0% when the other one is showing 15~20% fail.

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

we made more tests today.

A good 0% fail with our MoD vs 19% fail with DJ MoD.

5 copy left.

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: ivakar on October 31, 2017, 12:24:10 AM

Quote from: kalymist on October 30, 2017, 06:28:40 PM

because MPH is getting too much hash, if someday it get attacked, all the xzc network will be touched.

And that's not good at all for long therm stable decentralisation.

If suprnova could get half of what MPH gets now, which is like 85% of the global hashrate, it might be a good thing for everyone.

Also many people are saying that MPH is having fun with the number (man got too much power in handz)

supernova cheating as well, for about 20% so it almost the same here, not a big difference for that pool
the mph has such a big commission to withdrawal and possible cheats with hashrate(

it is a pity there is now another pool Angry

I was charged 0.0003 BTC for the automatic withdrawal last week at MPH. Don't consider that anywhere near "big". Do they charge more if you withdraw the Zcoin directly?

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

We are actualy working on a new pool.

News incoming as soon as possible.

ivakar

hero member

Activity: 756

Merit: 507

Quote from: kalymist on October 30, 2017, 06:28:40 PM

because MPH is getting too much hash, if someday it get attacked, all the xzc network will be touched.

And that's not good at all for long therm stable decentralisation.

If suprnova could get half of what MPH gets now, which is like 85% of the global hashrate, it might be a good thing for everyone.

Also many people are saying that MPH is having fun with the number (man got too much power in handz)

supernova cheating as well, for about 20% so it almost the same here, not a big difference for that pool
the mph has such a big commission to withdrawal and possible cheats with hashrate(

it is a pity there is now another pool Angry

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

This is all nice and all from a hash distribution perspective but does not mean you get "way better income" by switching to suprnova...

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

because MPH is getting too much hash, if someday it get attacked, all the xzc network will be touched.

And that's not good at all for long therm stable decentralisation.

If suprnova could get half of what MPH gets now, which is like 85% of the global hashrate, it might be a good thing for everyone.

Also many people are saying that MPH is having fun with the number (man got too much power in handz)

dragonmike

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 556

Quote from: kalymist on October 29, 2017, 02:25:41 AM

Also, every new xzc should move to suprnova.

It's way better income.

Can you possibly explain that bit?
Why would suprnova be "way better income" than miningpoolhub? I've been happy with MPH so far... auto-converts to BTC and auto cash-out is nice and cheap...

Bulletdodger

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

Ok, guys - I agree, I'll see if I can run 2 rigs in parallel.

kalymist

full member

Activity: 462

Merit: 100

It's based on tpruvot.

-i 19 for xzc mining.

yes I agree, it was about the pool luck, for the outstanding earnings.

Anyway, the miner is working great with this algo.

zer0k

sr. member

Activity: 349

Merit: 250

Quote from: Bulletdodger on October 30, 2017, 09:40:49 AM

Hey guys,
so I went ahead and tested the modified ccminer, and I must admit - I am getting better results!

I mined with 2x 1070s, core +190, mem - 300.

First I mined with modified cc miner and I got 0.3 coins in 24 hours,
and then I mined 28 hours (I was working and forgot to turn of the miner) with old cc miner and got 0.61 coins total.

Which means at 24 hours it was probably 0.58 coins total.

Speed with OLD miner: around 3450 khs total
Speed with NEW miner: around 3500 khs total

I can upload screenshots if you guys want.

Thanks

During that time period the difficulty changes every block, and your pool has different luck, etc.

A fair test involves pointing separate cards at each pool at exactly the same time

patacca

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: Bulletdodger on October 30, 2017, 09:40:49 AM

Hey guys,
so I went ahead and tested the modified ccminer, and I must admit - I am getting better results!

I mined with 2x 1070s, core +190, mem - 300.

First I mined with modified cc miner and I got 0.3 coins in 24 hours,
and then I mined 28 hours (I was working and forgot to turn of the miner) with old cc miner and got 0.61 coins total.

Which means at 24 hours it was probably 0.58 coins total.

Speed with OLD miner: around 3450 khs total
Speed with NEW miner: around 3500 khs total

I can upload screenshots if you guys want.

Thanks

I am sorry but there must a mistake somewhere, maybe you/your pool just got lucky in that 24 hour period.
An hashrate of 3500 Kh/s even considering no fees and no bad shares will produce ~0.3239 XZC per day given the current difficulty, you can try it for yourself http://whattomine.com/coins/175-xzc-lyra2z?utf8=%E2%9C%93&hr=3500.0&p=300.0&fee=0.0&cost=0&hcost=0.0&commit=Calculate https://www.crypto-coinz.net/crypto-currency-statistics/

So if you are getting an higher profit that means that either you have a much higher hashrate (and ccminer and the pool are reporting it wrong Huh

) or you've made some mistakes in the calculations

I would suggest a 48h period.
Also could you tell us what kind of ccminer (and what parameters, like the intensity) you are using for comparison?

Bulletdodger

sr. member

Activity: 337

Merit: 250

Hey guys,
so I went ahead and tested the modified ccminer, and I must admit - I am getting better results!

I mined with 2x 1070s, core +190, mem - 300.

First I mined with modified cc miner and I got 0.3 coins in 24 hours,
and then I mined 28 hours (I was working and forgot to turn of the miner) with old cc miner and got 0.61 coins total.

Which means at 24 hours it was probably 0.58 coins total.

Speed with OLD miner: around 3450 khs total
Speed with NEW miner: around 3500 khs total

I can upload screenshots if you guys want.

Thanks

Topic: XZC optimised ccminer (full hashrate reporting and +15% income) - page 6. (Read 23010 times)