This thread is proving to be interesting:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2112517
Topic: YaCoin Investigation (Read 5363 times)
ehh why would you suspect minerd..
Something to make perfectly clear:
There is absolutely no reason to suspect anything other than minerd at this point (and the evidence so far is fleeting). Yacoind is fine.
There is absolutely no reason to suspect anything other than minerd at this point (and the evidence so far is fleeting). Yacoind is fine.
It is not exactlt FUD! See here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.2109275 that bugger Limitless did it!
WOW dude you clearly have some kind of agenda against Limitless, you wont listen to anything anybody is telling you about the thread, Limitless started the thread with a link to a well know github repo not compiled binaries, other people posed binaries in the thread, in what universe is the OP responsible for what random people do on the internet. 
I direct your attention
===> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/breaking-news-definitive-proof-of-yacoin-fud-campaign-202255
===> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/breaking-news-definitive-proof-of-yacoin-fud-campaign-202255
why are there two threads?
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yacoin-bitcoin-stealing-claim-list-facts-only-202089
should not both OPS work together to make one post? or lock one sticky the other?
stop all the fud.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yacoin-bitcoin-stealing-claim-list-facts-only-202089
should not both OPS work together to make one post? or lock one sticky the other?
stop all the fud.
if i was a betting man, i'd put my money on the oversized "antivirus free" minerd.
Betting on irony?
Themida ("protection software") is used intentionally as a code obfuscator, preventing detailed analysis of the binaries. Hence, the suspicion.
nocompare / Jr. Member / Posts: 14 / yacoin developers are a bunch of crooks, steals 900 BTC
https://blockchain.info/address/1RPrtamTACe1TcqkX2FmWVtRzmQJ6CfRx
I am quitting bitcoin.. Lost bitcoin in bitcoin 24.. lost bitcoin in blockbet.. NOW SOMEONE HACK MY WALLET
I am quitting bitcoin.. Lost bitcoin in bitcoin 24.. lost bitcoin in blockbet.. NOW SOMEONE HACK MY WALLET
He lost BTC on bitcoin-24? Strange... I got my BTC(20.50) from Bitcoin-24 less than 24 hours after having requested them when he reopened the exchange to allow withdrawals.
Not buying a word of what that dude says.
I can confirm "cpuminer-scrypt-jane-win32.zip (modified minerd to mine yacoin on multiple computer)" does not talk to the given host below, at least not within the first 30 minutes. Ran it with wireshark and a filter of ip.dst == 31.170.160.169
host bitcoin-ticker.netne.net
bitcoin-ticker.netne.net has address 31.170.160.169
bitcoin-ticker.netne.net mail is handled by 0 mx.000webhost.com.
host bitcoin-ticker.netne.net
bitcoin-ticker.netne.net has address 31.170.160.169
bitcoin-ticker.netne.net mail is handled by 0 mx.000webhost.com.
THIS IS NOT REAL. Not one legitimate person has shown any proof. I've looked at every host file, data source, etc.. and there is nothing malicious about the YAC files from when they were released. If you downloaded from somewhere else than that might be different. The original links are perfectly fine. STOP LYING.
+1, only 1 screenshot was posted and that only showed that there was 'something' detected. No one has given any screenshots of transactions out of any of there wallets.
I think this was just a well orchestrated FUD against YAK
Round 1: +10 for YAC and.... -1000 for FUD dudes
Obviously YAC is causing a stir and people desperately want in--- Just mine it foo! Mine them Yacs!
I'm still waiting for an online merchant please start accepting so I can buy some stuff?
Someone should send https://cookies4coins.net/ an email, eh?
Looking at the transactions on the blockchain, I noticed all of the addresses that sent bitcoin to 1RPrtamTACe1TcqkX2FmWVtRzmQJ6CfRx received funds right before they were "stolen". Ofc, I haven't checked all of them, but will check a few more to be sure.
Not really well orchestrated... it was very amateurish and included 2-3 guys at most.. some of those accounts are operated by same person, they used perfectly same style and had same english level.
And even whole idea was amateurish, you can't do that on forum filled with lot of geeks. It can last for half an hour but that's nowhere near enough to fulfill your plans.
And even whole idea was amateurish, you can't do that on forum filled with lot of geeks. It can last for half an hour but that's nowhere near enough to fulfill your plans.
THIS IS NOT REAL. Not one legitimate person has shown any proof. I've looked at every host file, data source, etc.. and there is nothing malicious about the YAC files from when they were released. If you downloaded from somewhere else than that might be different. The original links are perfectly fine. STOP LYING.
+1, only 1 screenshot was posted and that only showed that there was 'something' detected. No one has given any screenshots of transactions out of any of there wallets.
I think this was just a well orchestrated FUD against YAK
THIS IS NOT REAL. Not one legitimate person has shown any proof. I've looked at every host file, data source, etc.. and there is nothing malicious about the YAC files from when they were released. If you downloaded from somewhere else than that might be different. The original links are perfectly fine. STOP LYING.
maybe antivirus friendly minerd
if i was a betting man, i'd put my money on the oversized "antivirus free" minerd.
Betting on irony?
betting on the minerd that is more than doubled in size.
For what it is worth:
from this page: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yacoin-windows-7-x64-ssse3-and-avx-support-x86-miner-201027
this link: https://mega.co.nz/#!pUMBkbbY!cMJYcFqPCMr1idZBr30VsFw0tLY7y63J0N4RVNYMUBc
$ sum *.exe
03133 350 minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe
45517 351 minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_ssse3.exe
$ md5sum *.exe
9e8878a529978dcbc943e93ccb65aa33 *minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe
1b5a6331149a462e15498909c1462754 *minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_ssse3.exe
run as:
./minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe -a scrypt-jane -o http://mineyac2.dontmine.me:8080 -O myuser
made only these connections over the course of 8 hours.
TCP 192.168.1.27:57598 54.215.7.83:8080 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.1.27:57599 54.215.7.83:8080 ESTABLISHED
stat(2) appears to not show any of bitcoin, litecoin, terracoin wallets touched
(as in stat'ing continuously from another process in case of touch'ing back)
Shrill claims from either side are pretty useless.
Compiling from source increases the comfort factor, but it is no guarantee unless you read and
understand all the code first. To do that you have to be both capable and (a priori) interested enough.
from this page: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yacoin-windows-7-x64-ssse3-and-avx-support-x86-miner-201027
this link: https://mega.co.nz/#!pUMBkbbY!cMJYcFqPCMr1idZBr30VsFw0tLY7y63J0N4RVNYMUBc
$ sum *.exe
03133 350 minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe
45517 351 minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_ssse3.exe
$ md5sum *.exe
9e8878a529978dcbc943e93ccb65aa33 *minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe
1b5a6331149a462e15498909c1462754 *minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_ssse3.exe
run as:
./minerd_scrypt_jane_x64_avx.exe -a scrypt-jane -o http://mineyac2.dontmine.me:8080 -O myuser
made only these connections over the course of 8 hours.
TCP 192.168.1.27:57598 54.215.7.83:8080 ESTABLISHED
TCP 192.168.1.27:57599 54.215.7.83:8080 ESTABLISHED
stat(2) appears to not show any of bitcoin, litecoin, terracoin wallets touched
(as in stat'ing continuously from another process in case of touch'ing back)
Shrill claims from either side are pretty useless.
Compiling from source increases the comfort factor, but it is no guarantee unless you read and
understand all the code first. To do that you have to be both capable and (a priori) interested enough.
Site bitcoin-ticker.netne.net has been redirected to 127.0.0.1 in my hosts list.
I would suggest doing that, then backing every wallet in your system and transferring to a new wallet if you believe you have been compromised. Common sense.
And yes having an unencrypted bitcoin wallet (or any wallet) with substantial funds is stupid. Double facepalm worthy.
I would suggest doing that, then backing every wallet in your system and transferring to a new wallet if you believe you have been compromised. Common sense.
And yes having an unencrypted bitcoin wallet (or any wallet) with substantial funds is stupid. Double facepalm worthy.
Could you please tell me how I go about redirecting a url to my localhost?
Totally uninterested in whether it happened or not. The problem here is 10.000 morons downloading pre-compiled code and running it without the developers having a shred of credibility. Even if it's fine THIS time it's bound to happen very soon considering all you have to do is announce a new 'coin' and post a link and BAM, you got 10k people installing your virus and thanking you for it.
Completely agree with you here. I have been having the same thought for the past few days. 
if i was a betting man, i'd put my money on the oversized "antivirus free" minerd.
Betting on irony?
Jump to: