Pages:
Author

Topic: Yacoin Price about to Jump - page 2. (Read 10323 times)

sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Vod is a liar
May 17, 2013, 06:34:23 PM
Go YAC, I think nows the time to buy.  Thoughts?
sr. member
Activity: 347
Merit: 250
May 17, 2013, 06:16:45 PM
So when moving to the new client, new coins created from that point forward will exist in the forked blockchain only? ...coins found before the fork will be valid in either blockchain? I need to do a bunch more reading.

No, we're not doing anything with the blockchain.  We're just continuing to improve the client since the original developer dropped the ball.  The only case where forking the blockchain is needed is when changes that wouldn't be compatible with the existing client are needed.  No such changes are needed or planned for YAC.  Blocks mined will with either client will be in the same YAC blockchain.

The term "fork" in our case is the term GitHub uses when someone takes one person's source repository and wants to work on it as a separate repository of their own.  Nothing to do with the blockchain!  Just the source code for the client is being forked, because we're interested in continuing to improve it and are leaving the original (uninvolved) developer behind if he's not going to take the lead.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 03:39:38 PM
Here's a couple quotes of WindMaster (who's currently working on the hard fork of YAC and future development https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206577.40) on GPU mining YAC and about his attempt to get GPU mining to work during the early days of release.

For clarification, I forked the source code for the YACoin client to continue development since the original developer pulled a Houdini after the coin's launch (something that will be familiar to anyone watching any of the recent alt-coin launches).  Many people in the crytocurrency community will know the term hard fork to mean forking the blockchain and/or implementing incompatible changes that would require everyone to upgrade to continue using the correct blockchain.  No such changes are planned for YAC, everyone is free to continue to use whichever YAC client they wish.  I just think mine will be the better choice once we've finished ironing out some bug fixes and added features in the coming days and prepare for a more formal release that will be worth upgrading to.  The "official" YACoin client is, umm, a bit rugged.

Ya I'm still learning much about crypto-curreny and actually looked up more about forking before I posted about your work on /r/yacoin. I used your words 'unofficial client fork' there. I should probably check the other places I posted and correct it.

So when moving to the new client, new coins created from that point forward will exist in the forked blockchain only? ...coins found before the fork will be valid in either blockchain? I need to do a bunch more reading.
sr. member
Activity: 347
Merit: 250
May 17, 2013, 01:37:51 PM
Here's a couple quotes of WindMaster (who's currently working on the hard fork of YAC and future development https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206577.40) on GPU mining YAC and about his attempt to get GPU mining to work during the early days of release.

For clarification, I forked the source code for the YACoin client to continue development since the original developer pulled a Houdini after the coin's launch (something that will be familiar to anyone watching any of the recent alt-coin launches).  Many people in the crytocurrency community will know the term hard fork to mean forking the blockchain and/or implementing incompatible changes that would require everyone to upgrade to continue using the correct blockchain.  No such changes are planned for YAC, everyone is free to continue to use whichever YAC client they wish.  I just think mine will be the better choice once we've finished ironing out some bug fixes and added features in the coming days and prepare for a more formal release that will be worth upgrading to.  The "official" YACoin client is, umm, a bit rugged.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 11:25:01 AM
How is Yacoin cpu mining only and doesnt work with gpu mining?  I thought litecoin was suppose to be cpu mining only coin and everyone was told gpu's would not work on litecoin now look at litecoin.

Getting GPU mining to work with YAC has proved to be more difficult than most expected and while it's not impossible that there are those out there doing it, there's no proof of it and no one has come forward showing it can be done.
Here's a couple quotes of WindMaster (who's currently working on the hard fork  (client fork) for YAC and future development https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=206577.40) on GPU mining YAC and about his attempt to get GPU mining to work during the early days of release.


This one I'm unsure about.  I thought for sure that if there were a significant number of GPU implementations floating around, someone was going to post one by now (as a claim to fame) as soon as GPU mining would have become unprofitable (which by my calculations is probably getting close to becoming unprofitable as YAC prices drop).

Anyone that has followed my posts through the days after the coin launched knows that I experimented with GPU implementation of scrypt+chacha20/8(N,1,1), the hashing algorithm used by YAC.  I never got as far as making it work with cgminer or mining with it.  I just created a basic OpenCL kernel (no cgminer interface), performed some benchmarks at various values of N, didn't bother doing any major optimizations, and decided I needed something that would go significantly faster (my GPU farm only consists of 24 Radeon 5850's and 24 Radeon 6950's), as it took me about 1.5 days to do it and difficulty was already skyrocketing.  At that point I dropped it and went straight to writing a Verilog implementation for FPGA's, knowing that I could probably only pull that off up through N=32 and would have a limited time to make it happen (in the end, I got about 1.5 days of FPGA mining in before N=64).

We won't know for sure until someone posts a modified cgminer what their hash rates ended up.  I stopped mining altogether at N=64, as that basically killed viability of my FPGA implementation.  I can still place'n'route an FPGA design at N=64 but the projected clock rates from the Xilinx tools are dramatically slower than for N=32 with nearly 4x the logic area (meaning only 1/4 as many parallel computation cores are possible in the available logic area) and it just doesn't look like it would be worth the effort.  N=128 won't even place'n'route, the design is just too dense.  So at this point I'm going to state that I believe N=64 kills profitability of any FPGA attempt (with current FPGA technology) and N=128 isn't even routable and placeable on current FPGA technology (at least without going to off-chip memory, DDR3 or otherwise).

Currently I get far more YAC by buying it up on BTER than I would by mining, with any of the technologies I have available.  My GPU farm is mining LTC right now.  If there are indeed GPU farms mining YAC, I'd be expecting them to start switching back to LTC or BTC for profitability reasons either now or in the near future (well, unless YAC value goes way way up).

So, that's about all the answers I have at the moment.

Looking at the graphed data, it appears that N very roughly approximates Moore's law (with some step lengths being shorter than 18/24 months, and others being larger).

Assuming my data is correct, what is everyone's opinion of N's growth? Does it seem realistic to a) keep GPUs out and b) keep CPU mining feasible?

Offhand, for question (b), it appears from your data that CPU mining continues being feasible for quite a long time.  Your data shows 512MB needed to calculate a hash in the year 2023, and that's an amount of RAM that I think everyone probably has available today for hashing.  Disclaimer - I haven't double-checked that your data is correct.

On question (a), I doubt 512MB needed to hash is enough to exclude GPU's, especially a decade out.  It may be enough to keep GPU's from having a huge massive advantage over CPU's once both technologies start having to hit slow external RAM and not fast internal L1/L2 caches, but we won't know for sure until we see what the future holds for GPU development, amounts of RAM on GPU's (and thus how many simultaneous hashes can be calculated in parallel), whether GPU's start getting massive quantities of fast L1/L2 cache like CPU's, what the ratio of L1/L2 cache in CPU's vs. GPU's looks like in a decade, etc..  Probably too early to tell.  We also need to see some of the GPU implementations or adaptations of cgminer released so we can see what they're achieving for hash rates.  Unlike Litecoin, where (almost) everyone derived their OpenCL implementation from Reaper, for YACoin, I suspect there were multiple independent adaptations of cgminer that occurred with no direct contact between the people performing each implementation.  Too early to tell on that as well, or determine exactly how widespread GPU mining of YACoin actually was/is.

The possibility also exists that other technologies other than CPU and GPU options come into existence and widespread application during that timeframe that we can't yet anticipate, or that someone could identify a TMTO shortcut in scrypt+chacha20/8, as happened with the TMTO shortcut for scrypt+salsa20/8 that made GPU's practical for calculating Litecoin hashes.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
May 17, 2013, 11:14:23 AM
How is Yacoin cpu mining only and doesnt work with gpu mining?  I thought litecoin was suppose to be cpu mining only coin and everyone was told gpu's would not work on litecoin now look at litecoin.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
Shitcoin Maximalist
May 17, 2013, 10:49:07 AM
Quite the bounce.

legendary
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1028
Duelbits.com
May 17, 2013, 08:59:15 AM
I've got no more coins to buy, bought all already  Embarrassed

Anyway, some dump was expected, I had hard time thinking would I sell some to rebuy when it drops but decided to not do it. Some coins were bought at .00035 yesterday so I've expected someone to cash out at almost 80-90%. But scale is higher now and lot of coins are bought around 0.0006 and now around 0.0005. You know what that mean  Grin
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 08:40:21 AM
What is happening right now on bter.com is quite the contrary the title implies.

Happened earlier. The price even went down to 0.0003 and then back up to 0.00065. That is more than a 100% increase in price.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
DTC unofficial team
May 17, 2013, 08:39:30 AM
What is happening right now on bter.com is quite the contrary the title implies.

Someone is dropping price just to buy a lot, don't think that it is a trend.
member
Activity: 106
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 08:39:23 AM
Moving over some more cash to bter to buy more YAC. Hope it gets there in time.
sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
May 17, 2013, 08:38:13 AM
What is happening right now on bter.com is quite the contrary the title implies.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
DTC unofficial team
May 17, 2013, 08:37:34 AM
Meh, let the apples fall and pick them up at 40.

Are you trying to drop price to 40? Are you that bad guy whom I'm fighting with?  Grin
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 08:34:40 AM
Currently it is far cheaper and easier for me to mine something else and buy yacoins... With my phenom ii 955 BE I could get about 3 coins a day, but with all four cores running, it probably uses ~ 120-130 watts at the wall. At current prices that is only .0013 btc worth of yac a day. I can mine that in about 3 hours with one of my 7790's that only consumes around 60-70 watts.

Either mining is overrun with people who don't pay their own power, or the demand for yacoins isn't strong enough yet (thus price is too low).
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
The cryptocoin watcher
May 17, 2013, 08:34:16 AM
Meh, let the apples fall and pick them up at 40.
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
May 17, 2013, 08:06:39 AM

You know coin is strong when one dumps over 1% of supply on exchange and no one really gives a damn.  Cheesy



..and another 62k dump just now... That guy isn't paying attention lol.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
May 17, 2013, 01:49:42 AM
yacoin is going up.

From 0.00039 yesterday to 0.00065 right now and still going strong.

and still going strong, omnomonom
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
May 16, 2013, 09:34:49 PM
yacoin is going up.

From 0.00039 yesterday to 0.00065 right now and still going strong.
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Vod is a liar
May 16, 2013, 09:30:08 PM
YAK'ety YAK, Don't talk back!
237
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
May 16, 2013, 12:01:18 PM
0.002 BTC is definatly possible in the next weeks. It's nice to have a CPU coin, and now that developers are
interested YAC is going to get some attention.
Pages:
Jump to: