Pages:
Author

Topic: yla1974 bun. (Read 639 times)

jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
February 07, 2019, 01:54:17 PM
#29
If the forum does not prohibit sale accounts, then it is profitable them
The forum doesn't have any profits from the sale of accounts as it has no connection with members who decide to trade their accounts.
The forum encourages us not to sell accounts but doesn't state it's against the rules,but definitely if one is caught in the act,its a straight red tag.
I think the rules on account sales should be changed and it should be made known that it's against the rules and should not be done
Thanks for your support. You are absolutely right. The scams should stop.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
February 07, 2019, 01:49:02 PM
#28
He bought an account on the forum in the month of July 2018. There is evidence. Looks like the previous owner acted like a crook. Used plagiarism. Due to the fact that it is not the account that is being punished but a person, is there any sense in punishing with permabun new owner, for what he did not do.?
Thanks.

Your friend has done this,
So it's only natural to get a ban.
Is this enough to prove your friend is guilty...?


account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yla1974-909172[yla1974]

Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23574141
ETH wallet:0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3

Bitcointalk username:yla1974   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yla1974-909172;

calculations:

Signature Campaign:8231.707317

Partial payment: 1182.6544  

Remaining Tokens Amount: 7049.052917


Accounts Connected:

fantom1962 , yla1974 , alex bond , ligator19840208 , pit19521506 , miramax-10 , viktoriya1945  

Proof:
AFTER hours of investigation I've linked only 4/7 accounts ...

Which four?

Code:
[color=red]0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3[/color]
0x5cc9565f9fd0af0e2f2721af9d6dad6bd1821686
0x546ab5233a660b6ea6752064851bbc9ce5fc68d0
0x58e4248ac427c4c88fbacfdfec6611b430fe9388

yla1974 ligator19840208 miramax-10 viktoriya1945  

Quote
Code:
http://archive.is/z6PIJ#selection-9021.11-9021.54




WOW THE SPREADSHEET IT'S GONE! maybe he has powerful friends.


@fantom1962. is now banned for plagiarism: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46441905

also adding this



Done with  DdmrDdmr tool

+ Adding 3 alts


+ 3 accounts: vavan1974muz, aligator2017, Webcelerator.

Humaniq token transactions to the same wallet: https://etherscan.io/address/0x6190dc10745828d54a486ec58d0e9b4871aae2ae#tokentxns
Data can be found on Humaniq Signature Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GUa7COUdyhZffiiEALO9x_GiYahGr5ZSj5q0UJ0sB3U/edit#gid=0
#093 0x5Cc9565F9Fd0af0E2F2721aF9D6dad6bD1821686 pit19521506
#116 0x58E4248Ac427C4C88FBAcfDFEC6611B430fe9388 Webcelerator.
#117 0x546Ab5233A660b6Ea6752064851BBC9ce5fc68d0 vavan1974muz

Suretly tokens transactions to the same wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0xe120c1ecbfdfea7f0a8f0ee30063491e8c26fedf?a=0x58e4248ac427c4c88fbacfdfec6611b430fe9388
Data can be found on Suretly Signature Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Neq7KivGjqkNPfZCrkWpOEsYXBZKBUHsfM83-u5S6rU/edit#gid=1750124709
#046 0x5Cc9565F9Fd0af0E2F2721aF9D6dad6bD1821686 ligator19840208
#064 0x58E4248Ac427C4C88FBAcfDFEC6611B430fe9388 viktoriya1945
#076 0x546Ab5233A660b6Ea6752064851BBC9ce5fc68d0 aligator2017
#115 0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3 fantom1962.

So there's no need to ask more about your friends, everything has been proven.
My friend bought an account in July. But this is not interesting to anyone. It is much easier to throw mud at a person who was already robbed by a fraudster.
Please, bun it all connected.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
February 07, 2019, 01:46:08 PM
#27
Are you sure you are able to answer for everyone on the forum? Forum users are robbed, indicating the rules, which states that the purchase of an account is not prohibited. And in fact, not guilty is punished. The user was left without money, and received a ban, for the actions of the fraudster seller. And you say that the forum has nothing to do with it? The forum allows this to occur, and thus contributes to fraud. You worship the forum rules, but you yourself do not follow them. You can not always ban a person who is not guilty, and did not violate the rules of the forum. Permanent ban, this is for the individual, but not for the account, as it is written in the rules! So where is the logic in the punishment of a non-wine and deceived person?

Still waiting for you to answer on how the forum profits from account sales.

Do they take a small part of the scammer’s profit?
Do they even recommend people to buy accounts?

No? Then, they don’t profit shit from people like “your friend”; If you haven’t noticed yet, the ban will stay regardless of what you say. That - unlike what you said - is indeed a fact.
It is not possible to control who makes a profit in a place with fraudsters. Easier to prohibit trade accounts.
I do not ask anyone to cancel the ban, it is meaningless. Where there is no responsible, there is no order.
The only thing I would like to convey is the benefit for all. Ban account trading if you are unable to regulate it!
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1302
February 05, 2019, 12:43:26 AM
#26
If the forum does not prohibit sale accounts, then it is profitable them
The forum doesn't have any profits from the sale of accounts as it has no connection with members who decide to trade their accounts.
The forum encourages us not to sell accounts but doesn't state it's against the rules,but definitely if one is caught in the act,its a straight red tag.
I think the rules on account sales should be changed and it should be made known that it's against the rules and should not be done
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
February 04, 2019, 11:16:59 PM
#25
He bought an account on the forum in the month of July 2018. There is evidence. Looks like the previous owner acted like a crook. Used plagiarism. Due to the fact that it is not the account that is being punished but a person, is there any sense in punishing with permabun new owner, for what he did not do.?
Thanks.

Your friend has done this,
So it's only natural to get a ban.
Is this enough to prove your friend is guilty...?


account: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yla1974-909172[yla1974]

Link: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23574141
ETH wallet:0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3

Bitcointalk username:yla1974   https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/yla1974-909172;

calculations:

Signature Campaign:8231.707317

Partial payment: 1182.6544  

Remaining Tokens Amount: 7049.052917


Accounts Connected:

fantom1962 , yla1974 , alex bond , ligator19840208 , pit19521506 , miramax-10 , viktoriya1945  

Proof:
AFTER hours of investigation I've linked only 4/7 accounts ...

Which four?

Code:
[color=red]0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3[/color]
0x5cc9565f9fd0af0e2f2721af9d6dad6bd1821686
0x546ab5233a660b6ea6752064851bbc9ce5fc68d0
0x58e4248ac427c4c88fbacfdfec6611b430fe9388

yla1974 ligator19840208 miramax-10 viktoriya1945  

Quote
Code:
http://archive.is/z6PIJ#selection-9021.11-9021.54




WOW THE SPREADSHEET IT'S GONE! maybe he has powerful friends.


@fantom1962. is now banned for plagiarism: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.46441905

also adding this



Done with  DdmrDdmr tool

+ Adding 3 alts


+ 3 accounts: vavan1974muz, aligator2017, Webcelerator.

Humaniq token transactions to the same wallet: https://etherscan.io/address/0x6190dc10745828d54a486ec58d0e9b4871aae2ae#tokentxns
Data can be found on Humaniq Signature Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1GUa7COUdyhZffiiEALO9x_GiYahGr5ZSj5q0UJ0sB3U/edit#gid=0
#093 0x5Cc9565F9Fd0af0E2F2721aF9D6dad6bD1821686 pit19521506
#116 0x58E4248Ac427C4C88FBAcfDFEC6611B430fe9388 Webcelerator.
#117 0x546Ab5233A660b6Ea6752064851BBC9ce5fc68d0 vavan1974muz

Suretly tokens transactions to the same wallet: https://etherscan.io/token/0xe120c1ecbfdfea7f0a8f0ee30063491e8c26fedf?a=0x58e4248ac427c4c88fbacfdfec6611b430fe9388
Data can be found on Suretly Signature Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Neq7KivGjqkNPfZCrkWpOEsYXBZKBUHsfM83-u5S6rU/edit#gid=1750124709
#046 0x5Cc9565F9Fd0af0E2F2721aF9D6dad6bD1821686 ligator19840208
#064 0x58E4248Ac427C4C88FBAcfDFEC6611B430fe9388 viktoriya1945
#076 0x546Ab5233A660b6Ea6752064851BBC9ce5fc68d0 aligator2017
#115 0x23B13556f69987b689C1E2f883E9B3d8d615A5a3 fantom1962.

So there's no need to ask more about your friends, everything has been proven.
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
February 04, 2019, 03:39:07 PM
#24
Are you sure you are able to answer for everyone on the forum? Forum users are robbed, indicating the rules, which states that the purchase of an account is not prohibited. And in fact, not guilty is punished. The user was left without money, and received a ban, for the actions of the fraudster seller. And you say that the forum has nothing to do with it? The forum allows this to occur, and thus contributes to fraud. You worship the forum rules, but you yourself do not follow them. You can not always ban a person who is not guilty, and did not violate the rules of the forum. Permanent ban, this is for the individual, but not for the account, as it is written in the rules! So where is the logic in the punishment of a non-wine and deceived person?

Still waiting for you to answer on how the forum profits from account sales.

Do they take a small part of the scammer’s profit?
Do they even recommend people to buy accounts?

No? Then, they don’t profit shit from people like “your friend”; If you haven’t noticed yet, the ban will stay regardless of what you say. That - unlike what you said - is indeed a fact.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
February 04, 2019, 02:54:03 PM
#23
If the forum does not prohibit sale accounts, then it is profitable for them. So fraudsters thrive. Fact is a fact.
I'm not looking for justice, she's not here. I want to reach the moderators. Stop contributing to scammers! If you do not do this, will call the entire forum scamners.
Stop sales account!
Fact? How exactly does the forum profit from account sales?
Are you sure you are able to answer for everyone on the forum? Forum users are robbed, indicating the rules, which states that the purchase of an account is not prohibited. And in fact, not guilty is punished. The user was left without money, and received a ban, for the actions of the fraudster seller. And you say that the forum has nothing to do with it? The forum allows this to occur, and thus contributes to fraud. You worship the forum rules, but you yourself do not follow them. You can not always ban a person who is not guilty, and did not violate the rules of the forum. Permanent ban, this is for the individual, but not for the account, as it is written in the rules! So where is the logic in the punishment of a non-wine and deceived person?
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 6830
January 26, 2019, 08:42:30 AM
#22
If the forum does not prohibit sale accounts, then it is profitable for them. So fraudsters thrive. Fact is a fact.
I'm not looking for justice, she's not here. I want to reach the moderators. Stop contributing to scammers! If you do not do this, will call the entire forum scamners.
Stop sales account!
Fact? How exactly does the forum profit from account sales?
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 26, 2019, 05:17:58 AM
#21
In this case, the forum acts as a fraud, as well as the previous owner of the account. If trade in accounts is allowed, then there must be order. Rules create for their execution, for all right? As I understand it.
If you buy a car from a stranger, and you are shot for it on the street, taking for the previous owner. It is right?
No, that analogy is not right. A better analogy is if the previous owner threw sand in the crankcase causing the engine to blow up some time later after you bought it, then blaming the car's manufacturer for allowing used car sales. The moral of the story is, when buying a used car from a stranger, check the oil first, if only to make sure it is in fact oil and not sand.
It is convenient to interpret the rules to those who write them, but the fact remains. Failure to regulate trade accounts, and there is aiding fraud. It’s not for me to judge you, time will judge. I would reconsider the question of trading accounts. People do not like when they are deceived, and it does not honor our forum.


You are asking for help that would work almost like a state justice. The fact that it is not totally forbidden does not mean that the buying and selling of accounts are encouraged. Regulating this trade would bring responsibilities that the forum does not want to have.

Whoever buys an account knows the risks it runs. Do not try to hold the forum responsible for your risky, and stupid, decisions.

"Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!"
If the forum does not prohibit sale accounts, then it is profitable for them. So fraudsters thrive. Fact is a fact.
I'm not looking for justice, she's not here. I want to reach the moderators. Stop contributing to scammers! If you do not do this, will call the entire forum scamners.
Stop sales account!
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 526
January 22, 2019, 07:01:50 PM
#20
In this case, the forum acts as a fraud, as well as the previous owner of the account. If trade in accounts is allowed, then there must be order. Rules create for their execution, for all right? As I understand it.
If you buy a car from a stranger, and you are shot for it on the street, taking for the previous owner. It is right?
No, that analogy is not right. A better analogy is if the previous owner threw sand in the crankcase causing the engine to blow up some time later after you bought it, then blaming the car's manufacturer for allowing used car sales. The moral of the story is, when buying a used car from a stranger, check the oil first, if only to make sure it is in fact oil and not sand.
It is convenient to interpret the rules to those who write them, but the fact remains. Failure to regulate trade accounts, and there is aiding fraud. It’s not for me to judge you, time will judge. I would reconsider the question of trading accounts. People do not like when they are deceived, and it does not honor our forum.


You are asking for help that would work almost like a state justice. The fact that it is not totally forbidden does not mean that the buying and selling of accounts are encouraged. Regulating this trade would bring responsibilities that the forum does not want to have.

Whoever buys an account knows the risks it runs. Do not try to hold the forum responsible for your risky, and stupid, decisions.

"Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!"
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 22, 2019, 04:44:09 PM
#19
In this case, the forum acts as a fraud, as well as the previous owner of the account. If trade in accounts is allowed, then there must be order. Rules create for their execution, for all right? As I understand it.
If you buy a car from a stranger, and you are shot for it on the street, taking for the previous owner. It is right?
No, that analogy is not right. A better analogy is if the previous owner threw sand in the crankcase causing the engine to blow up some time later after you bought it, then blaming the car's manufacturer for allowing used car sales. The moral of the story is, when buying a used car from a stranger, check the oil first, if only to make sure it is in fact oil and not sand.
It is convenient to interpret the rules to those who write them, but the fact remains. Failure to regulate trade accounts, and there is aiding fraud. It’s not for me to judge you, time will judge. I would reconsider the question of trading accounts. People do not like when they are deceived, and it does not honor our forum.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 22, 2019, 04:37:54 PM
#18
~

Almost every account of the "farm" (I guess all sold now) are now banned:

alex bond for plagiarism

fantom1962. for plagiarism
yla1974 for plagiarism
miramax-10 banned plagiarism no confirmation
viktoriya1945 for plagiarism
Webcelerator. banned plagiarism no confirmation


We did it! Cheesy

Missing some accounts on this list, if we dig more I guess we can finish them
If the accounts are really connected, I think it is worth punishing the fraudster.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 22, 2019, 04:36:26 PM
#17
Hello. My friend's account was banned.

Your "brother" Criptomen was banned because of plagiarism and now it's happened to your "friend". Do your relatives have other accounts?

What we have? The guy bought an account. Has not violated any rules of the forum. The account received the ban through the fault of the former owner who received $ 3000 for it. Why should the rules allow the trading of accounts, if not respected property rights? Who benefits from trading accounts on the forum?
Why do we need rules that do not work? It already looks like a fraud.
Who is punished with a ban?
You are right, the same thing happened to my brother. But there was proven his fault, and not the previous owner. He made a mistake in the translation, and it was given for plagiarism.
legendary
Activity: 2534
Merit: 1517
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
January 20, 2019, 07:20:45 PM
#16
~

Almost every account of the "farm" (I guess all sold now) are now banned:

alex bond for plagiarism

fantom1962. for plagiarism
yla1974 for plagiarism
miramax-10 banned plagiarism no confirmation
viktoriya1945 for plagiarism
Webcelerator. banned plagiarism no confirmation


We did it! Cheesy

Missing some accounts on this list, if we dig more I guess we can finish them
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
January 20, 2019, 07:06:30 PM
#15
Hello. My friend's account was banned.

Your "brother" Criptomen was banned because of plagiarism and now it's happened to your "friend". Do your relatives have other accounts?

What we have? The guy bought an account. Has not violated any rules of the forum. The account received the ban through the fault of the former owner who received $ 3000 for it. Why should the rules allow the trading of accounts, if not respected property rights? Who benefits from trading accounts on the forum?
Why do we need rules that do not work? It already looks like a fraud.
Who is punished with a ban?
legendary
Activity: 4536
Merit: 3188
Vile Vixen and Miss Bitcointalk 2021-2023
January 20, 2019, 12:39:01 PM
#14
In this case, the forum acts as a fraud, as well as the previous owner of the account. If trade in accounts is allowed, then there must be order. Rules create for their execution, for all right? As I understand it.
If you buy a car from a stranger, and you are shot for it on the street, taking for the previous owner. It is right?
No, that analogy is not right. A better analogy is if the previous owner threw sand in the crankcase causing the engine to blow up some time later after you bought it, then blaming the car's manufacturer for allowing used car sales. The moral of the story is, when buying a used car from a stranger, check the oil first, if only to make sure it is in fact oil and not sand.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 20, 2019, 11:02:54 AM
#13
He bought an account on the forum in the month of July 2018. There is evidence. Looks like the previous owner acted like a crook. Used plagiarism. Due to the fact that it is not the account that is being punished but a person, is there any sense in punishing with permabun new owner, for what he did not do.?
Thanks.

Fine. Think of it as banning the previous owner and buying a banned account.
In this case, the forum acts as a fraud, as well as the previous owner of the account. If trade in accounts is allowed, then there must be order. Rules create for their execution, for all right? As I understand it.
If you buy a car from a stranger, and you are shot for it on the street, taking for the previous owner. It is right?
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
January 17, 2019, 05:21:20 PM
#12
He bought an account on the forum in the month of July 2018. There is evidence. Looks like the previous owner acted like a crook. Used plagiarism. Due to the fact that it is not the account that is being punished but a person, is there any sense in punishing with permabun new owner, for what he did not do.?
Thanks.

Fine. Think of it as banning the previous owner and buying a banned account.
jr. member
Activity: 65
Merit: 1
January 17, 2019, 05:06:26 PM
#11
He bought an account on the forum in the month of July 2018. There is evidence. Looks like the previous owner acted like a crook. Used plagiarism. Due to the fact that it is not the account that is being punished but a person, is there any sense in punishing with permabun new owner, for what he did not do.?
Thanks.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1655
Rêlêå§ê ¥ðµr MïñÐ
January 16, 2019, 07:28:02 PM
#10
Copy:
I have sent an email to the email address on same day when tweet was publish but still not yet received any response from them.
Original:
I have sent an email to the email address on same day when tweet was publish but still not yet received any response from them.

Copy:
I really feel sorry that I did not participate in this campaign, this coin was really good, but I did not catch it, and now I'm late.
Original:
I really feel sorry that I did not participate in this campaign, this coin was really good, but I did not catch it, and now I'm late.

Copy:
I joined the signature campaign. The Project is promising hope it will be a success one in the future.
Original:
I joined the signature campaign. The Project is promising hope it will be a success one in the future.

Copy:
This is very great news for all who participate in ICO [PRO]! congratulations dev team, good job!
Original:
This is very great news for all who participate in ICO [PRO]! congratulations dev team, good job!

Copy:
I have already change mine. So we have more than a week to prepare for the ICO. I hope donors will be ecstatic by its platform and from the looks of it, TaaS will be under the radar of wise investors.
Original:
I have already change mine. So we have more than a week to prepare for the ICO. I hope donors will be ecstatic by its platform and from the looks of it, TaaS will be under the radar of wise investors.
Pages:
Jump to: