Topic: ^^^ You just haven't gone far enough. (Read 356 times)

The ironic thing is, God knows all this about you and me... and everybody else. God - Almighty - sent His Heavenly begotten Son, Jesus - Almighty - into humility as one of us. Jesus lived the life we couldn't, and because He is God with the Father, He took the punishment for all of us for all the wrong things we have done.

What we have done doesn't mean anything any longer. The fact that we are all lying pieces of shit doesn't matter any longer. There is one thing that matters. It simply is believing the truth that Jesus did the work, took the punishment and finished it. There isn't any condemnation any longer for any of us for things we did wrong, or believed wrong... except the one. The one is not believing that Jesus did it for us.

The third Person of God is the Holy spirit. His job is to gently entice us to believe about Jesus. If we reject His coaxing, that's the sin we will be punished for throughout eternity. Jesus took the punishment for the rest of the sins... all of them. He could do it because He is God Almighty. God won't punish for them a second time.

Why didn't Jesus take the punishment for the sin against the Holy Spirit? Because God created us with an aspect of "Godness" that gives us free will as He has. And He isn't going to take free will away from us, because there are all kinds of animals around that don't have free will. We are the "animal" that has free will. That's why the Holy Spirit coaxes. He is set by God to leave us our free will, at least regarding God and salvation.

The thing that I am writing here is a condensation of the major thread of the Bible. The Bible is this "               " thick. My condensation of the theme of it will be lacking. But I hope that you get the idea.

So, you see? I can offer, coax, explain, hope (for you), etc., that you will change. But the choice to reject is yours. I MUST accept your decision.

Hope so.  The thing is, unless I could really really mean everything I 'said' I believed, God would certainly know it and would (rightly) condemn me as a lying piece of shit.  I'll have to just hope that He (or St. Peter or whoever) would recognize that I did my best to make sense of things and pick out what I though was right and good in what I was exposed to.  And, conversely, pick out things which seemed bad and scammy and try to stand against them both within religion and within secular life.  Time will tell.

I respectfully accept your choice, as does God.    

Well, I guess I'm fucked.

- At the resurrection there will be a formal judgment that simply shows the judgment the people set on themselves here on earth by the time they died.
- Points in a judgment towards Heaven include:
- - Faith that God exists.
- - Understanding that people made mistakes before God (sinned).
- - Faith in Jesus pain and death and resurrection, and forgiveness for all mistakes made.
- - At least a little sincere doing of good works based on faith in Jesus.
- What a person believes and does in life determines his position in the resurrection.
- Only God can judge if there was enough faith for Heaven.

That's approximately it, except to say that God wishes that everyone were saved for Heaven, and so He will judge all the circumstances of everybody as innocent until proven guilty, with the best Heavenward construction on everything. But, God is also just, right to the point of dividing "soul and spirit, joints and marrow" to make the right judgment.

Having a rich family who can give the priest some money to get your soul out of purgatory?  Some of the scamary around religion makes the covaids scammers look honest.

That said, it is pretty evident to me that at this time people who have 'faith in Christ' or whatever seem to be correlated with those who have the confidence to buck the new-age religion of scientism.  And it almost never seems that such people are motivated by money...nor do they seem animated by support from any formal established Christian church either I must say.  Not the '501' ones for sure.

You won't be laughing when you find that it is you down there. But we don't really want that for either of us, do we? So...

To be fair, what does it take to get to Heaven? Simple question. There are only a handful of things. What do you think they are?

I will literally laugh really hard, if someone like you didn't even pass the trials to enter heaven xD

Imagine deliberately spouting bible verses in these kind of conversation, but in the end, you end up in hell. KEKW

I'm starting to understand at least a little about your seriousness. You seem to seriously consider your ignorance as something that you must bolster. I don't know this for sure. But it's something that you are coming along quite well in this direction.

It's okay, man. It's way more comfortable for anybody to remain in the matrix. Go ahead. Remain a slave, and turn your energies to supporting lies. But the end for you will be destruction... Revelation 21:8:
But destruction for you is good... if you don't change. We don't want liars in Heaven, and neither does our Father. So, consider things very seriously.

But... I always take things seriously. I just can't help it.

Sorry, I hadn't realised this was another joke thread. But I should have, based on the below. I can tailor my future replies accordingly, if you wish?



Not true.
Not really a lie, just outdated. Global total is now approaching 4 million.

This one is true!

Not true.
Not true.
Not true.
No idea what you're talking about.
Not true.

Not true.
Not true.

You mean, if you don't like the facts, then you have to scour the darkest, weirdest corners of the internet, where struck-off ex-professionals and other discredited individuals reside, in order to find "facts" that agree with your pre-established conclusion?

So that's it. Hey, man, don't take this so seriously. Depending on what you are smoking, your ability to distinguish between things will probably work itself out when you stop smoking.

The problem with this thread title is that it has a floating context depending on which thread people post to at which times... and it can look kind of weird.

However, in the USA, freedom of speech is such without repercussions... the First Amendment. The reason the courts win adjudications against free speech users is that they bypass the free speech idea, and hit the person with something else, and then apply the hit to the man after it hits the person.

Like Idi Amin (one of the most brutal despots the world has seen, was Ugandan president) said
 "There is freedom of speech, but i cannot guarantee freedom after speech"

In case anyone wants to have a quick glimpses of Guantanamo Bay with the Military tribunal room towards the end of video
https://youtu.be/T99E3QvRoHA

Good points. But truth only fits opinions that are right.

It is in human nature to look for validation and support of our ideas. I don't really know why, but we try to find people who think like us. And if we face too much confrontation we get into a defensive mode. Deleting a thread is probably just because he doesn't want to be reminded that so many other people have the opposite opinion and might make fun of him for it. Having freedom of speech also means that we will have a lot of different opinions and need to argue from time to time to find a middle way.

^^^ Thank you. We can easily see by the natural cures that the whole thing was always a bunch of BS from the start. But now the vaccine is turning millions into hospital victims, something the virus could never do. All because they believed.

My questions have to do with what the world will be like when they finally start dying from the vaccines in VISIBLE droves. As it is now, they can hide the fact of the deaths being vaccine deaths, because of the way things are working. But when will they have to admit that it is the vaccines killing the people, just because the evidence and the number of deaths increases tremendously as the vaccines increase?

Or will people continue to believe their doctors even when there are only 50 million left in the States? What will happen then? This might take to the the end of Trump's second term. As has been noted elsewhere, There are more Dems getting vaxxed, so there will be fewer of them voting in 2024. Of course, the Dems are quite clever. They have dead people voting now, so it just might a majority of dead people voting then.

They've got a blind-mans-buff grope-fest going on on Philma's privately curated self-moderated thread about whether vaxxers or anti-vaxxers are going to take the hit on this thing.  I rarely comment on self-moderated wank-fest threads, and I think this open thread spawned from that one.  So...

It is pretty obvious that the same people who cooked up the virus had _earlier_ cooked up the so-called 'vaccine'(*).  This is a who's-who of Western-associated military/industrial complex actors.  They are shady as fuck, and have been involved in all kinds of past malfeasance from the anthrax stuff on down.  Now people will talk a little about Dr. Fausti's measly $3M or whatever funding the Wuhan gain-of-function research which is at least being blamed by many for the 'SARS-cov-2'.  What almost nobody will mention is that Fausti's $3M pales in comparison to the $39M which Peter Daszak's 'Eco-Health Alliance' middle-man got from the U.S. DOD.

Upshot:  Anyone who is stupid enough willingly take an injection developed by the same group of people who funded the development of the virus which is supposed to justify the injection pretty much deserved to be eliminated from the gene pool.


* Clearly, back in the early days, they didn't know if it would fly to re-label their gene therapy as a 'vaccine' and thus ride the zero-liability train associated with 'vaccines'.  Trump, in his earlier sales-pitching of this thing, used to use the word 'therapeutics' (and others) just in case.  Turned out they yes, people are stupid enough to switch to the term 'vaccine' even for a gene therapy which doesn't even provide immunity.

Self-moderated threads are for sad-ass losers who know going in that they cannot sustain an argument.  It's pretty self-evident.

Interestingly, one can reliably predict the attitudes and personalities who are correlated with that sort of behavior.  Not surprisingly, people who are politically aligned with philosophies of 'equity' are well represented.  Basically people who need a crutch in order to be intellectually competitive are drawn to this philosophy.  Censorship and 'cancel culture' help provide the crutch they need.

I almost never read or participate in a 'self-moderated' thread because such a thing is intellectually repugnant.  It's also often times a tactical or strategic tar-baby.  I'm glad it is allowed on this forum, however, because it is a great filter for separating the intellectual wheat from the intellectual chaff.

first of all
its good to see you admit there is no magnetics in the vaccine
but now your saying its the bodies own iron accumulating in the vaccine area

um
the amount of 'free iron'  in the blood moving around the body is equal to 2grams spread out. for it to accumulate in one spot. even lets say half of your bodies amount.(1gram)
would require half of the blood supply to accumulate.
in short your arm would swell up to the size of a 1 gallon container.

also the way that iron is transported via haemoglobin. the 'attraction' part is aimed within the body. meaning the repelling part would keep magnets away/prevent sticking

but yea unless your arm has swollen up like a watermelon your still not going to notice any attraction/repelling