You may not like CSW... - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Syke

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1193

Quote from: gentlemand on May 26, 2019, 05:23:12 AM

Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him.

Right, it's not 100% proof. More like 99.999% beyond a reasonable doubt proof. It's extremely likely that *only* Satoshi has block#0 private key. CSW obviously lacks that key and thus extremely unlikely to be Satoshi.

mihori

copper member

Activity: 13

Merit: 0

Quote from: RawDog on May 26, 2019, 02:47:12 AM

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

NEVER A FACT!!!!!!

RawDog

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1026

Quote from: thecodebear on May 26, 2019, 07:22:25 PM

It's a fact: CSW is a scammer.

You will be sued next.

RawDog

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1026

Quote from: pushups44 on May 26, 2019, 02:54:59 PM

Also, it seems a little weird to me that a lawyer would throw the word "slavetards" so often, given that the profession is bound by a code of ethics.

lololololol. 'code of ethics' Huh

!!! Haven't you seen what lawyers are doing these days? e.g. Avenatti?, Comey? WTF? Are you blind?

thecodebear

hero member

Activity: 2100

Merit: 813

Quote from: RawDog on May 26, 2019, 02:47:12 AM

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

That is a seriously deluded person right there, just like his hero Craig Wright.

The fact that Craig Wright paid a couple hundred bucks (or whatever the fee was) and filled out a form means nothing. Literally you could have done the same thing as he did. So could I. So could anyone. All he did was fill out a US government form and pay the fee to file it. He is no more satoshi than I am.

It's a fact: CSW is a scammer.

bitbollo

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 3537

Nec Recisa Recedit

Quote from: ?? on ??

Not a bad suggestion mate. But that is not always the way it goes. The buy low sell high strategy was alive since the first day of any industry. I respect your opinion. But if you are rich^ or a financially stable person then you don't need to mind the bear market status and wait until the 18,000 USD and upmarket comes back.

Honestly, if you are a passionate person with Bitcoin, you won't see it as an investment opportunity. It is an adoption to the innovation of the finance, an electronic currency not an investment scheme.

Quoted for reference. Completely OT. Discussion here is not related price speculation.

pixie85

hero member

Activity: 2170

Merit: 528

Most of topics made by OP are meant to be controversial and attack bitcoin or people posting here. He knows that no patent was given to Craig but still he posts about it to make you all come and try to correct him. If you want a discussion don't waste your time here. You will try and counter his arguments and he'll still in the end say that he was right from the start or leave this thread and disappear and come back next week to inform us that Bitcoin is stupid.

squatter

legendary

Activity: 1666

Merit: 1196

STOP SNITCHIN'

Quote from: RawDog on May 26, 2019, 02:47:12 AM

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

How does this factually prove anything about Satoshi? Cheesy

The US copyright office will award you the same copyright registration if you pay the fee. They simply act as a record keeper of who files copyright registrations. The validity of any given copyright claim and disputes over ownership are matters for the federal court system, not the copyright office. The copyright office doesn't care and they aren't making a judgment as to who Satoshi really is.

BitBustah

hero member

Activity: 1218

Merit: 534

Quote from: gentlemand on May 26, 2019, 05:23:12 AM

Quote from: bitbollo on May 26, 2019, 04:54:39 AM

If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi Cheesy

Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him.

Ultimately the only power Satoshi has left is his however many coins so it would be relevant. Beyond that he's been left far behind and that's what he wanted all along.

I'm not saying I believe Craig but isn't it possible that the keys were lost or destroyed. There is a lot of speculation that his partner Dave had them until he died as well.

pushups44

sr. member

Activity: 854

Merit: 281

Quote from: RawDog on May 26, 2019, 10:17:41 AM

Quote from: Kakmakr on May 26, 2019, 03:24:53 AM

Ah, the forum Troll is back. Grin

"the forum Troll"
As if there is one, primary 'the' forum Troll. I am honored.

Quote from: Jating on May 26, 2019, 06:25:56 AM

Hey, where have you been? Grin

Glad you all missed me. I've been helping CSW get his patents and trademarks together.

Quote from: pushups44 on May 26, 2019, 02:56:50 AM

But you're not a lawyer,

hahahah. Funny enough, I am a lawyer!

If you are a lawyer, that's interesting. Other lawyers have a different take than you, clearly. Also, there are different specializations, so being a lawyer does not mean your perspective necessarily carries weight. Also, it seems a little weird to me that a lawyer would throw the word "slavetards" so often, given that the profession is bound by a code of ethics. Maybe you went to a law school and decided to go another route professionally?

bitbollo

legendary

Activity: 3276

Merit: 3537

Nec Recisa Recedit

Quote from: gentlemand on May 26, 2019, 05:23:12 AM

Quote from: bitbollo on May 26, 2019, 04:54:39 AM

If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi Cheesy

Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him.

Ultimately the only power Satoshi has left is his however many coins so it would be relevant. Beyond that he's been left far behind and that's what he wanted all along.

It prove only ownership of an address, yes of course, but eventually this will be one of the best proofs to show.
Imagine if there are more "satoshi" addresses able to sign a message in the same time...
Personally I don't think such scenario could be classified as a simple "proof of ownership" of these addresses.

RawDog

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1026

Quote from: Kakmakr on May 26, 2019, 03:24:53 AM

Ah, the forum Troll is back. Grin

"the forum Troll"
As if there is one, primary 'the' forum Troll. I am honored.

Quote from: Jating on May 26, 2019, 06:25:56 AM

Hey, where have you been? Grin

Glad you all missed me. I've been helping CSW get his patents and trademarks together.

Quote from: pushups44 on May 26, 2019, 02:56:50 AM

But you're not a lawyer,

hahahah. Funny enough, I am a lawyer!

maldini

sr. member

Activity: 952

Merit: 308

I actually don't want to argue about this anymore, why is everyone trying to find out Satoshi? what's in it for them?
All speculate without clear data and evidence, satoshi has a bitcoin in his cup and try to prove it to your speculation to prove it. And in my opinion CSW doesn't have it.

pushups44

sr. member

Activity: 854

Merit: 281

Quote from: Indamuck on May 26, 2019, 07:15:12 AM

He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator. Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.

The problem with this theory is that he'd have to be an unmitigated masochist to deal with the constant humiliations of being mocked and called Faketoshi without even so much as moving the first bitcoins. Ockam's Razor suggests he does not have the private keys he claims to have.

Indamuck

hero member

Activity: 1120

Merit: 554

He was obviously around during the early days of bitcoin but most people don't think he was the original creator. Of course signing those early keys would have done away with the doubters but he could have always obtained the keys from the real satoshi since most suspect he is dead.

Jating

hero member

Activity: 2842

Merit: 772

Quote from: RawDog on May 26, 2019, 02:47:12 AM

But you cannot say he is not Satoshi the inventor of Bitcoin. After all, look at all of his patents and now even the US government is awarding copyrights to him which can ONLY be given to the original author. It's a fact: CSW is Satoshi.

Cry all you like, you won't change the facts.

Hey, where have you been? Grin

But what you are stating is not a fact. CSW is not Satoshi and no matter how many patents/copyrights he file we all know that is not the originator of bitcoin and the whitepaper. Grin

traderethereum

hero member

Activity: 2870

Merit: 574

Vave.com - Crypto Casino

Bitcoin doesn't need to be patent, and the original inventor doesn't need to prove himself as the inventor of bitcoin.
The real Satoshi Nakamoto still prefers to remain in the dark and don't tell anyone that he is the real inventor of bitcoin.
I only smile to see many people tried to prove that they are the real Satoshi Nakamoto, but they cannot sign in into the wallet of Satoshi Nakamoto itself.
That is strange, why the owner of the wallet cannot sign into his own wallet and it doesn't make sense hahaha Grin

I don't care who will be the real Satoshi Nakamoto because I think he will not reveal himself to public easily and he likes to stay in the grey side as ordinary people which other people don't know who is he.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3014

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: bitbollo on May 26, 2019, 04:54:39 AM

If you are not able to prove ownership of a bitcoin address .... you're not satoshi Cheesy

Proving ownership of an address proves... ownership of an address. Nothing more. Whoever signs Satoshi's address could have obtained the private keys from him.

Ultimately the only power Satoshi has left is his however many coins so it would be relevant. Beyond that he's been left far behind and that's what he wanted all along.

pushups44

sr. member

Activity: 854

Merit: 281

Quote from: Kakmakr on May 26, 2019, 03:24:53 AM

Ah, the forum Troll is back. Grin

Ok so the guy has some money to file a Copyright claim on the Bitcoin White paper, obviously something that can be done by the average Joe on the street with some money to burn.

As far as my knowledge about Copyright is concerned, it can be challenged with a little bit of money too. Wink

It is also a criminal offense if you file a claim for something and you cannot show that you have a legitimate ownership of the thing you are claiming ownership of.

As far as I know, CW has not signed a single Bitcoin address that is known to have been used by Satoshi Nakamoto and he even gave false information on owning a early Bitcoin address and the real owner came forward by signing that address... Grin

If you read the OP's previous messages, he makes it clear that he believes CSW is actually Satoshi. He has also bashed bitcoin as an investment since 2013 I believe - meaning he may have missed out on the massive bull run of 2017.

He's entitled to believe CSW is Satoshi. And I will remain a skeptic of that claim, until CSW moves funds or signs messages from the first blocks.

antisocial77

jr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 4

getting patents is nothing if the tech is new. ibm and alibaba gets tons of patents because there are so many things to discover or create.csw is a trash thats all.

Topic: You may not like CSW... - page 2. (Read 9967 times)