Topic: Your best ICO experience - page 14. (Read 2309 times)

It is difficult to answer this question. But I adhere to some rules for myself.
1. How smartly the smart contract was created
2. Openness of the company, they do not hide behind a screen of the Internet.
3. Ratings, as a rule in rating sites appear worthy candidates.
There are a number of rules, but these are already enough that a beginner has entered the course of the matter and did not lose too much money for bad ICO

First Principle:Read the whitepaper,more than one time
Second Principle: Do not invest too much money in a single project
Third Principle: Control your risk!

That's all my experience from many failure investing projects..!

I invested in the EOS in the zero period. After entering the stock exchange, x6

Choose the MLM ico or original ICO is the good choice? I have join the INS project and think it will be grow fast

Cпacибo зa инфopмaцию

So far, what I have gained from my experiences are to pay close attention to the team. I give teams the benefit of the doubt. I understand the identity issue that happens. However, things become questionable when they get irritated & reactive when asked about their coin (exchanges, moon, whitepaper) instead of being responsive & proactive. That is very important.

The best ico so far for me was Deep Brain Chain. It is a fresh project, released before NewYear. The maximum it was around 50X in 2 week from ico. Right now the price is dumped, but it's still around 25X which is very good result for the couple of weeks from ico end.

I hope that my current investment in the DIW token will be the best in the current year
Since I hope strongly for this project.

I this month in the first I participated in ICO and hope that my choice was successful and it will be a positive experience

Yes I was have a best experience in investing at electroneum ico because of I got profits more then 200% in that so I am too happy now because of electroneum ico.

Waves is fine, but I wish there were more projects on the platform. Fees for lease are not enough to keep the faith into this alt. I do think it has a lot to offer, but need a push up that other coins are receiving.

my best ICO so Far is powerledger,

Didn’t expect this at all? Although I knew about all these “things”, but I also got caught. Now I’m better studying details about the company.

I haven't face such rudeness from ICO teams but I faced many failed ICO in my signature campaigns but with respect to those ICO I invested they gave me good earnings with just enough time, I think we should carefully study every ICO we want to look for.

My best ICO in 2017 was UTK (utrust) but we still wainting for the payment. They raised 500M UTK and they reach the hard cap that time. So we will called it a successful ICO in 2017.

You have good indicators. If there is a profit, then this is the right choice. How much time does it take to analyze the project?

There are many ICOs so you have to do lots of research and reading. However the potential is high as you can acquire tokens at the lowest price. If you are interested, have a look at HOQU, currently rated very highly by most ICO rating websites: https://www.hoqu.io/?ref_id=0c1d51f3465bda51aac7f3016f84a20e

Best ICO experiences will deal successfully in many different points; as in was there a profit, were questions answered in a respectful and knowledgable way, were terms and conditions originally outlined in the white paper followed as described in the ICO’s roadmap, were payment transactions seem less and secure, were the participants like minded individuals who added value to the ico or its communicative platform. These many points all add up to the success of any ICO, and rarely if ever does an ICO dot every ‘i’ of these points. With that said, ICO’s do evolve as they progress in funding, therefore timelines are a natural mutable point of any ICO within reason as funding may dictate the speed of the details of an ICO’s progress. CEO’s, Dev’s, Admin’s having the knowledge and respect to communicate with potentially thousands of people per day and this is naturally an exhausting type of role to be in. With that said, a valuable tool to enact is a Q&A section where the public may answer their own questions. This latter point is lacking in the ICO’s of today. Either the Q&A is absent or is understatedly written and not a form of efficient and cohesive communication. When this occurs, frustration develops within these microcosms of communities we call ICO’s.

sometimes ico can give x1000

That is very good but compared to what happened on NEO, Let me understand something, is that neogold or just NEO, if is neogold I think is scam we can pay attention to what is not promising.