Pages:
Author

Topic: Your Bitcoin Client of Choice (Read 2130 times)

legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
February 12, 2013, 08:12:02 AM
#43
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?
The day they disappear... well good luck  Smiley
If you keep a backup of your wallet, I don't see why that would be a problem?
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
February 12, 2013, 07:37:16 AM
#42
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?
The day they disappear... well good luck  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801
February 12, 2013, 07:32:37 AM
#41
. . . Online wallets make me nervous.
Why?
member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
February 12, 2013, 03:04:27 AM
#40
Ive found electrum to be pretty neat, no need for storing and updating multiple wallets, no need to leave the computer on for days updating the blockchain, and if you lose your wallet you can get it back by typing in a string of random words that are easy to write down.

Online wallets make me nervous.
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
February 10, 2013, 04:14:22 AM
#39
I use blockchain.info Smiley
newbie
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
February 10, 2013, 02:19:19 AM
#38
1) Bitcoin QT
2) Electrum
3) Blockchain
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
February 09, 2013, 04:09:26 PM
#37
too many options!!
newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
February 09, 2013, 03:19:06 PM
#36
I'm liking Armory for the offline feature but I originally found it searching for deterministic wallet hoping to find one where I could use my own seed so I don't have to write it down.

Is there a client that can generate a wallet from a specified seed? The length of the seed doesn't matter but I want to be able to generate it from an ASCII string of a the required length. I have memorised an algorithm that I use to generate any length of string so I don't have to remember a long phrase or write it down.
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
February 09, 2013, 02:14:29 PM
#35
Armory. After all, what good are your bitcoins if they aren't secure?  Wink
I use BitcoinQT .. just saying i used Armory
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
February 09, 2013, 12:22:27 PM
#34
Armory is nice  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 298
Merit: 250
February 09, 2013, 12:13:38 PM
#33
Bitcoin-QT on the server and MultiBit on the desktop.
newbie
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
February 08, 2013, 10:56:58 PM
#32
 Bitcoin-QT here! Haven't had any issues with it.
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
February 08, 2013, 08:20:46 PM
#31
Armory hands down.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
February 08, 2013, 07:03:18 PM
#30
Been using Bitcoin-QT since started playing with Bitcoin, early 2011.
Kept it running inside a VM.
legendary
Activity: 882
Merit: 1001
February 08, 2013, 12:37:40 PM
#29
No matter what your main client is, I think people should run Bitcoin-QT to support the network!

As more people come on board I imagine we will need more nodes.
Hopefully some more big servers will be set up to take the load.
As I understand it, just being a node really doesn't have any significant impact at this point. If your not mining, there's not much of a point in being a node. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
newbie
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
January 29, 2013, 01:23:26 PM
#28
At first I started using BitcoinQT, for about one year. Then I switched to Electrum because I got tired of updating the blockchain. When you were not online for a few days it took some time to do so...
And by the current growth of the blockchain it might even take longer in the future.
hero member
Activity: 955
Merit: 1002
January 29, 2013, 12:50:53 PM
#27
I use blockchain.info but with the bulk of my bitcoins stored in a brainwallet (address as a watch only).
I also keep the blockchain up to date on the Satoshi client because I want to contribute to the network
full member
Activity: 124
Merit: 100
January 29, 2013, 12:34:57 PM
#26
bitcoind. it uses much less memory and cpu.
Good point man, did you compare all of them?

Being resource wise is essential these days.

Though the storage space is one extra parameter to consider..
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
January 29, 2013, 02:07:24 AM
#25
No matter what your main client is, I think people should run Bitcoin-QT to support the network!

As more people come on board I imagine we will need more nodes.
Hopefully some more big servers will be set up to take the load.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
January 28, 2013, 10:00:43 PM
#24
i tried the satoshi client, but the download took forever(never finished it), and I found out about electrum, been using it since then
Pages:
Jump to: