Your opinion of trading bots... | Bitcointalksearch.org

bonker

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 502

Quote from: evilscoop on April 22, 2013, 09:47:56 AM

Sorry if this is off topic
can someone tell me were we can get "safe/reputable" bots from ?
So far ive not found anything I trust, other than coding a strategy on goxtool...but that not quiet the same

I'm banging them out in PHP for Gox and Bitstamp so far. I code like a retard, but the bots work ok. Let me know if you want something special

evilscoop

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Sorry if this is off topic
can someone tell me were we can get "safe/reputable" bots from ?
So far ive not found anything I trust, other than coding a strategy on goxtool...but that not quiet the same

bonker

hero member

Activity: 784

Merit: 502

FFS people, allowing bot are what makes bitcoin exchanges fantastic. Its impossible to use bots on traditional markets due to red-tape and costs. They've been keep the small players out of the picture for years.

Now Bitcoin takes bots I can finally experiment with some algos and make some green!

Bots wont crash the market, kill bitcoin etc, they are what will help drive bitcoin into the economic mainstream!

Dudes! this is where the innovation be at!! WooHoo!

Pteppic

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 10

Quote from: yucca on April 21, 2013, 08:29:52 AM

MtGox should perhaps consider limiting bid/ask orders that a user can place per hour or day. So bots would be allowed provided they didnt spam.

There is now a limit of 6 orders per minute that is in force at mtgox. Any bots operating on gox are within that limit.

odolvlobo

legendary

Activity: 4438

Merit: 3387

Quote from: 101111 on April 21, 2013, 10:37:58 PM

It is the intent of the bot writer that may be good or bad, not the bot.

The network should be bot-friendly, and people should be free to use them or not as they see fit for their purposes.

The exchanges are evolving to meet market conditions, and while some bots may be a nuisance now, or even outright detrimental, in the long run they will only help strengthen the network.

A major problem with exchanges is lack of liquidity. This lack of liquidity is a source of volatility. Add liquidity and you reduce volatility. Bots (and other forms of high-frequency trading) add liquidity and reduce volatility.

101111

hero member

Activity: 525

Merit: 500

It is the intent of the bot writer that may be good or bad, not the bot.

The network should be bot-friendly, and people should be free to use them or not as they see fit for their purposes.

The exchanges are evolving to meet market conditions, and while some bots may be a nuisance now, or even outright detrimental, in the long run they will only help strengthen the network.

Tsaoulas

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Bot's are useful when you set them to buy and sell at certain prices,minimizing risk while away from pc.

Evo

newbie

Activity: 22

Merit: 0

Just so it's not an abusive bot, I see no problem.

yucca

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 21, 2013, 03:09:07 AM

Quote from: yucca on April 20, 2013, 06:27:17 AM

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 20, 2013, 01:59:00 AM

The positive for the exchanges would be?

Well the exchanges like them, bots pay fees too.

Funny you mention this. Do you ever notice how may of those bot orders never go through? They are strictly there as false place holders and continue to change as the market changes and they cancel the orders and add them back in at a different price? So actually I would say on a percentage of traffic and stress on the system vs completed orders - bots are a complete nuisance to the exchanges.

That's a fair point. I have been visualising the live stream and often see bids/asks placed either side of the trade line, they appear as diagonal geometric patterns in the price/time domain comprising of many small orders. Obviously the bot creator is trying to make an analogue system from the disreet one. So some bots are quite spammy and will add to server load. I cant visualise cancel nor see the userid of the order creator, but I'm assuming many orders are cancelled as the bot tracks either side of the tradeline waiting for fast deviations.

The bot I am working on would not operate like this, it will place single well chosen bid/asks and of course cancel them instead of let them hang if the order is not fulfilled in time.

MtGox should perhaps consider limiting bid/ask orders that a user can place per hour or day. So bots would be allowed provided they didnt spam.

MKEGuy

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Quote from: yucca on April 20, 2013, 06:27:17 AM

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 20, 2013, 01:59:00 AM

The positive for the exchanges would be?

Well the exchanges like them, bots pay fees too.

Funny you mention this. Do you ever notice how may of those bot orders never go through? They are strictly there as false place holders and continue to change as the market changes and they cancel the orders and add them back in at a different price? So actually I would say on a percentage of traffic and stress on the system vs completed orders - bots are a complete nuisance to the exchanges.

yucca

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 20, 2013, 01:59:00 AM

The positive for the exchanges would be?

Well the exchanges like them, bots pay fees too.

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 20, 2013, 01:59:00 AM

The reason other then pure greed that they exist?

Correct, but it's the same reason that motivates human traders too. And the greed always starts in the mind of the human.

Quote from: MKEGuy on April 20, 2013, 01:59:00 AM

Can anyone come up with an legitimate negatives to them being removed from practice?

I really do think they add depth and stability to the market. Bots are unfeeling and logical. The only trouble comes when all their stop losses kick in at once, but the same is true for human daytraders too.

I can't see any firm logical argument against bots? Am I missing something?

MKEGuy

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

So again - the good for bitcoin and everyday users and people who want it to succeed would be?

The positive for the exchanges would be?

The reason other then pure greed that they exist?

Can anyone come up with an legitimate negatives to them being removed from practice?

yucca

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Some porn for MKEguy: Cheesy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8N72t7aScY

BTCVirgin

newbie

Activity: 20

Merit: 0

With complete disregard to "MKEGuy's law" ---- (sorry, maybe this needs a new thread)

Can anyone recommend somewhere I can get hold of a novice friendly bot and learn how to operate it?

desired_username

hero member

Activity: 886

Merit: 1013

The traditional markets are plagued by the bots as well.

It would be beneficial to ban them from bitcoin exchanges.

TsuyokuNaritai

hero member

Activity: 574

Merit: 500

Quote from: yucca on April 19, 2013, 03:43:47 PM

Quote from: botlove on April 19, 2013, 03:25:06 PM

If you've employed bots on DNNBitcoin then you are breaking "MKEGuy's law" as stipulated in first post Cheesy

:

Quote

Please leave your opinion out if you are currently using one because chances are you just love it

Isn't it just vote disenfranchisement to bias the debate in the OP's preferred direction?

I'm curious what everyone else thinks of MKEGuy's law. Please leave your opinion out if you are currently using it because chances are you just love it and will praise it no matter what.

jmw74

full member

Activity: 236

Merit: 100

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:37:39 PM

Quote from: dataphile on April 19, 2013, 03:29:29 PM

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:16:48 PM

As long as you want Bitcoin to stay highly volatile and useless as a currency, then they are fine. They will constantly attract DDOS attacks, if you enjoy that kind of thing.

I detect no reasoning behind these claims.

1. Use Bots to cause volatility using algos.
2. Volatility causes panic buying/selling.
3. Panic attracts DDOS attacks and in turn amplifies panic. (This is speculative, but generally accepted.)
4. Market crashes.

Load of nonsense. Don't listen to this guy.

A "bot" is simply a program that makes trades for you. While it may be possible to design an abusive bot, and I'm sure they exist, that doesn't mean bots in general are bad in any way.

And how blind do you have to be to make the argument "Because bots are used for evil, bots are bad", when I'm sure you see the folly in "Because bitcoins are used for evil, bitcoins are bad".

yucca

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:37:39 PM

1. Use Bots to cause volatility using algos.

Please expand, how can algos cause volatility, to move the market costs you, no way around it (except fro DDOS).
If you sell cheap or buy dear then you will move the market, you need deep pockets for this, not bots.

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:37:39 PM

2. Volatility causes panic buying/selling.

Yes both in humans and bots if the swings exceed stop loss thresholds.

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:37:39 PM

3. Panic attracts DDOS attacks and in turn amplifies panic. (This is speculative, but generally accepted.)

I do not understand this. How can panic attract DDOS? I think It's the other way round; DDOS causes panic as people and bots dont want to get left in the lag and sell out.

yucca

full member

Activity: 217

Merit: 100

Quote from: botlove on April 19, 2013, 03:25:06 PM

The right bots are a very very good thing.

Please note: DnnBitcoin went down only about a week before the pop. There would have been a ton of coins automatically bought and sold during the pop, if there had been more botters online. That would bring more stability, and more liquidity, smaller margins, more competition. Hell, I'll pay somebody $500 if they fix DNNBitcoin and make it public again. =) It's simple - you know the market manipulators want to move that price up and down for profit... that's a hell of a lot harder and more expensive when there are thousands of small bot orders in between the MMs and their margins. =)

Good point well made botlove, they do add inertia and depth to the market, making it more difficult for price manipulators.

P.S.
If you've employed bots on DNNBitcoin then you are breaking "MKEGuy's law" as stipulated in first post Cheesy

:

Quote

Please leave your opinion out if you are currently using one because chances are you just love it

cbeast

donator

Activity: 1736

Merit: 1010

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.

Quote from: dataphile on April 19, 2013, 03:29:29 PM

Quote from: cbeast on April 19, 2013, 03:16:48 PM

As long as you want Bitcoin to stay highly volatile and useless as a currency, then they are fine. They will constantly attract DDOS attacks, if you enjoy that kind of thing.

I detect no reasoning behind these claims.

1. Use Bots to cause volatility using algos.
2. Volatility causes panic buying/selling.
3. Panic attracts DDOS attacks and in turn amplifies panic. (This is speculative, but generally accepted.)
4. Market crashes.

Topic: Your opinion of trading bots... (Read 2141 times)