Hello Everyone,
I am a young entrepreneur and I want my niche to be online P2P gambling, with no house edge. I believe this is a system where by provably fair sites can remove some of the stigmas associated with skill-based and chance games, as well as provide educated people (statisticians for example) and long-run method by which to make real returns from their knowledge despite an economy that undervalues their skills (even though they're paid more than the poultry that goes for average these days).
Anyhow, I understand that there are many counterpoints and draw backs from what I have said. We are aware that gambling has ruined lives before. Yet, recently governments (UK, Canada, Italy, etc.) has begun to offer online gaming as a way to generate taxes. Does government ownership of gambling make it more legitimate? Are the government's imposed limits a big difference in when it comes to the application of these devices? Are some governments/regions/jurisdictions more progressive than others?
This conversation is of particular interest to me so thank you for any and all input.
Open Ocean
As a young entrepreneur where is your profit going to come from if you provide a platform that has exactly zero house edge? You will have variances of profits and losses but in the long run you will make exactly zero minus your costs for running your service. And any intelligent statistician will quickly deduce that he can't beat your game without counting cards or cheating in some way because there is zero house, and therefore, player edge.
I am unaware of what online gaming services the UK government has recently started to offer, but I am eager to learn. I know that Totesport was owned by the UK government until a few years ago, I believe it was set up by Sir Winston Churchill way back when, so it would not surprise me that they are now offering online gaming services, but please, do share with me who or where.
All this talk in favour of regulation does make me chuckle. Well actually it grates me. The UK Gambling Commission is appalling. They regulated canbet, people lost thousands, they regulated bodugi, same thing, and betbutler, same thing and the latest book that this has happened to is 666bet with that squeaky clean character Harry Redknapp plastered all over their website. And what has happened to them? Gone! With it's customers balances throwing out empty promises just like the other aforementioned bookmakers in a vague threat to the Gambling Commission saying, 'Give us our license back and we will pay our customers'.
The UK Gambling Commission forced itself into law in December 2014 so that all online gambling accessed in the UK requires the provider to have a license and pay 15% tax, whether they are located offshore or not. Undoubtedly this will be passed on to the customer in terms of worsening odds/limits/promotions etc. This has caused the likes of pinnacle sports to suspend it's services to UK customers which is horrible news because those guys take large stakes and offer industry best odds, unlike their UK high street counterparts who limit the smart money as quick as they can cotton on.
Anyway, I digress. Bitcoin seems to me an ideal platform for gambling but having said that I haven't done any gambling with any gambling sites with bitcoin. Why? Too many variables, namely exchange rates and lack of trust in providers. Ideally somewhere like sportsbookreview or casinomeister would adopt a bitcoin only section or some similar bitcoin gambling watchdog would come on the scene and start successfully applying pressure during customer disputes. Because frankly, if the guys who are regulated run off with the money, it's going to be even easier in the bitcoin world surely?
Will the whales want to place a bet at a bitcoin gambling site? Only if they trust them. How is that trust going to be earned?