Topic: Z9 Series Full and Mini Modded Efudd NO-DEV FEE 100% - Individual Clocking - page 2. (Read 2171 times)

Nothing is abandoned, The threads will go on, I am not wrong and will post all the details in the next day or so. The law and the licenses speak for themselves. I am verifying the details thru legal channels before I post more. Unfortunately for efudd it is not good for his files and if he chooses to fight it he will have to spend some money in federal court to try to stop it, his state court has no jurisdiction here. I have many rights under the law and copyright that allows me to use the package whether Jason recognizes them or not it is the law.

I predict this will be another abandoned thread once chipless realizes that he’s wrong. Just like his Alternative Energy thread lmao

It has a lot to do with it because that file is a LGPL protected file and removing it and replacing it doesn't protect your contents, that file to begin with was part of a library package and by you removing it from the package is a modification and replacing it with the same name under the LGPL, I don't know why you are trying to claim it is not. I will have the full details once I get it all back from being looked at for violations of the existing license's.  Unfortunately for you this person knows much more then you and I on this matter since he holds numerous copyrights including work I have done and numerous patents for arm and apple technology. You obviously cant grasp the fact you screwed up and I can legally use and distribute the files in the released package.

You may think your dealing with an idiot because the way I am on this forum but you are very wrong about me and my understanding and education on matters. I have as much experience at this as you do the only difference is the type of device we are dealing with including experience is evidence processing where analyzing this type of situation was part of my job.

A filename does not equate to the contents... so report away.... since the contents of the file named 'libnss_mdns_minimal.so.2' shipped in my firmware has absolutely nothing to do with the the GNU 'libnss-mdns'. You are unfortunately incapable of grokking the semantic.

This will be my last response to you, so enjoy your freedom to make more crap up.

-j

I wasn't asking how to stop it, I was informing you that your claim of separation from the open source program is much more intimate
then you claimed and that indeed your files take over cgminer 100% in an attempt to turn an open source program into your own pay program. This appears that you are claiming another's work (cgminer and Bitmain's) as your own. Which the copyright of Bitmain's is clearly shown the firmware is copyrighted. I will also be reporting your LGPL violation for the libnss_mdsn_minimal.so.2 file and library package.

Story of his life

Just because you don’t know how does not mean it can’t. Try contacting a technical resource to give you clue.

Kill lcgm, stop the auto restart by renaming it, run cgminer. Voila, factory firmware.

-j

Jason,

You need to be a little more specific on what parts of the code you claiming copyright, you cant claim the whole files because most or many of the commands are common routines or otherwise known to the general public already. So please be a little more specific.
Also the files are not covered  under the 17 U.S. Code § 1201 as ruled by the courts already

"if the circumventor obtains access to the copyrighted material through a copyright owner-sponsored method, even if that access is illegally obtained, the circumventor is merely bypassing permission of the copyright owner and does not violate the DMCA"

and

The courts have also ruled that since you did not encrypt the files there is no violation either under DMCA or 17 U.S. Code § 1201.

So basically we are back to the copyright only. I will have more in the next few days once I hear back from legal sources.

Your lgcm does not allow cgminer to run either if killed so the relationship between them is more then you are trying to claim. In fact if I kill the process cgminer stops and then restarts with the lgcm also restarted. Therefore at this point your files took control over an opensource file 100% and their relationship is a little more intimate then you lead on.

Notice how while he pulled the download link, he left his crypto address for donations. Lmao.

chipless,

Sadly, you are still wrong. As the basis of your argument is that the whole distribution ("firmware package") is GPL, when it is not. Further, Communication between lcgm and its associated library and cgminer  do not occur by "exchanging complex internal data structures" for example. They are in fact, not interlinked in that manner. They can, actually, run completely standalone from cgminer, and vice versa. The fact that they are two separate processes is another example of this.

So yeah. Here are some other examples that you will likelyfind reason to ignore.

A linux distribution (which is all this firmware is), is not by itself GPL'd. The individual components within may be, or may have other licenses associated with it. One example is while the kernel is GPL, cgminer is GPL, other components have different licenses. The packaging in that scenario is not "all GPL" as you are continuing to misunderstand.

A linux distribution that ships with apache, will have a combination of GPL and Apache License depending on the content within. nginx, another common webserver/swiss army knife is under a BSD type license, but yet included in many distributions. OpenSSH, another common component distributed in linux distributions, is specifically not GPL, but rather a BSD type license.

You see, a given OS distribution can have unique components within it that have differing licenses. This is part of why I have stated that my claim is on 'lcgm' and the contents that are named 'libnss_mdsn_minimal.so.2' for obfuscation purposes.

If your argument were true, RedHat, SUSE, Caldera, Gentoo, and any other common linux distribution would all be in violation for having "GPL" and "non-GPL" code running on the same computer, from the same distribution.

It really is sad if you cannot see the differences here.

-j

LOL... No I didn't steal his code I disabled part of it and put it back out in the same exact package he had it in. I never took a penny from any dev fee.... I'm not embarrassed at all. The link was removed and will be replaced with an alternate option for users.

You and fudd are missing some parts that fudd don't want to recognize under the GPL …. It was illegal for him to release the firmware in the beginning period....

He has no rights distribute the firmware unless he follows the GPL of the original package.

The license covers of 100% of the package he started with. Which clearly states if he redistributes the GPL'd work in the package as a complete package then he must follow the GPL and can not add additional terms to the package that exceed the GPL, but if he would have separated his stuff from the package and distributed it differently it wouldn't matter. He can argue all he wants copyright but he at most has copyleft rights which allows me to do what I did. He is restricted from distributing the package commercially unless he follows the GPL, maybe I will just file a takedown on him since he don't want to follow the GPL and is illegally distributing the package.

Read on it here or elsewhere the info is the same

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License

"The distribution rights granted by the GPL for modified versions of the work are not unconditional. When someone distributes a GPL'd work plus their own modifications, the requirements for distributing the whole work cannot be any greater than the requirements that are in the GPL."

"Copyleft applies only when a person seeks to redistribute the program. Developers may make private modified versions with no obligation to divulge the modifications, as long as they do not distribute the modified software to anyone else. Note that copyleft applies only to the software, and not to its output (unless that output is itself a derivative work of the program)"

"By contrast, pipes, sockets and command-line arguments are communication mechanisms normally used between two separate programs. So when they are used for communication, the modules normally are separate programs. But if the semantics of the communication are intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger program."

cgminer is open source and he is combining his code in memory to cgminer making it 1 larger program. I can go on but there is no reason to and fudd needs to suck it up and accept what happens with his releases where he used the Bitmain firmware as his base. He needs to create a new base to work from or follow the license of the package he started with. He started with someone elses work and so will I regardless of his claim, maybe he should take his own advice and build the whole package from scratch then he cant whine.



 

So let me get this straight.....

chipless steals code, and by proxy money directly from fudds pockets for something he has earned by putting the work in

then gets indignant when called out about it

and is now threatening things like an angry teenager on an internet rampage


Chipless...you do realize you are 100% in the wrong? Wait why am I asking, you know you are or you wouldnt have removed the link...

You have lost this battle so badly you have nothing left to hang on to other than some empty threats, if I was you I would be so embarrassed I would never post again.

Go fish.

-j

You think it is all funny but part of it wasn't so funny, I never posted personal details, no city, no state, or any other information that could lead to you, as far as the bash just wanted to inform you of the data in case you had a problem with your system it is on a few sites. The search skills are right on, I know everything I need to about you. You still own the beamer?

Lol.

The humor here is the massive blustering in private message and then here about “criminal actions” and “not a threat, a guarantee”. Yet, you have apparently just tried to do what you claim I did. How is that going to work out for you?

The better part is I actually respected your “command” (you made it clear that it was not a request, your words) and then you attempted to “cause harassment” by your (see how “you are” does not fit here?) own actions.

As far as the quote goes, I submitted that myself to bash.org (which was started and is run by friends of mine) in 1999; it is quite hilarious in the context.

As to the rest, you might want to work on your internet searching skills as they are not properly calibrated.

-j

Man I had a little respect for you until I just found out about your assault on a female in 2014. Only a pussy would do that. How did it turn out anyways? Innocent? Guilty? Tell us more JLB. I would rather be called a thief, criminal, or whatever you want but man, I sure wouldn't want to be known as a woman beater. Or is it a different Jason? it looks like you need the money more then being free, that dam house payment and the attorneys fee or fines can add up quick...You go your way and I will go mine.... Good Luck

Also if this is associated with you, you may want to check your systems because you may have a bug or virus sending data to sites on the internet

Subject: Req For Winframe Account
  Hi Jason,
  Can U pl... Create this account Immediatly.
  User Id : crapolxx
  Password :crapolxx
  Other Info
  1) User Full Name:Claudia Rapolxx

I believe you meant "you're", not "your". HTH. HAND.

-j

That link is gone and any results of harassment from it will come back on you guaranteed, whether it was on a link or not you took it upon yourself to use it for harassment purposes on this forum. Bottom line is you crossed the line here and as I said if any harassment comes to me or my family, you and me have a real big legal problem bigger then your pussy civil action, guaranteed. That's not a threat either it is a guarantee I will take legal action. Same with the pussy wannabe rocketman.

In 25 yrs on the internet your the first baby I have seen cry copyrights violations on any forum that deals with custom firmware and other related hardware/software topics. I have a backup plan already because anyone who mods the firmware can use it for their own personal use and your copyright claims don't mean shit as long as they don't redistribute it.

And just to be clear, "chipless", you posted a link to your name in one of your threads. It's now "public" by your own definitions of what makes something public.

You can stop sending me PMs threatening "criminal actions". The only thing criminal here is your own stupidity.

-j