ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control - page 6.

seriouscoin

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: seriouscoin on March 27, 2014, 03:36:47 PM

Also would the IRS have to do analysis of the whole blockchain to properly identify the validity of certain tax payers?

Say in the change example, if C is a new address which IRS would not know until C is "spent"

In order to claim it as a long term gain, Holiday will say C is just change from previous tx between A and B.

IRS has to then analyze if what he said is true by checking C's previous tx....

Well the IRS got themselves into this mess. I'm sure they can simply hire more bureaucrats at the expense of the taxpayers to solve these problem. Wink

Or some financial institute will lobby to be a bitcoin "bank" where you can spend your btc from your acct and thus IRS will trust the account records of the bitcoin "bank"

seriouscoin

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: DannyHamilton on March 27, 2014, 03:29:51 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: seriouscoin on March 27, 2014, 03:08:34 PM

OP, how do you handles change tx?

How do you convince the IRS that certain tx are just "changes" hence those tx outputs are still considered long term.

I make a transaction from A to B with change going to C.

I control the private keys for A. I control the private keys for C.

How much more proof do you need?

I have a 2 BTC output in my wallet that was purchased for $2 ($1 per BTC)

I have a 2 BTC output in my wallet that was purchased for $2000 ($1000 per BTC)

I need to make a 0.05 BTC payment to someone and the current exchange rate is $500.

How to I properly create the transaction for zero gain/loss, and what is the cost basis of each the new unspent outputs?

Ask someone who can code Bitcoin transactions / do math! Wink

Obviously there will be limitations as to what a "wash client" will be able to accomplish, but I see no reason people shouldn't try to use one if they are trying to abide by their local tax laws and reduce their tax burden at the same time.

Also note, btc is divisible up to 8 decimals..... its not like how you treat stocks.

seriouscoin

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Also would the IRS have to do analysis of the whole blockchain to properly identify the validity of certain tax payers?

Say in the change example, if C is a new address which IRS would not know until C is "spent"

In order to claim it as a long term gain, Holiday will say C is just change from previous tx between A and B.

IRS has to then analyze if what he said is true by checking C's previous tx....

DannyHamilton

legendary

Activity: 3472

Merit: 4801

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: seriouscoin on March 27, 2014, 03:08:34 PM

OP, how do you handles change tx?

How do you convince the IRS that certain tx are just "changes" hence those tx outputs are still considered long term.

I make a transaction from A to B with change going to C.

I control the private keys for A. I control the private keys for C.

How much more proof do you need?

I have a 2 BTC output in my wallet that was purchased for $2 ($1 per BTC)

I have a 2 BTC output in my wallet that was purchased for $2000 ($1000 per BTC)

I need to make a 0.05 BTC payment to someone and the current exchange rate is $500.

How to I properly create the transaction for zero gain/loss, and what is the cost basis of each the new unspent outputs?

seriouscoin

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: seriouscoin on March 27, 2014, 03:08:34 PM

OP, how do you handles change tx?

How do you convince the IRS that certain tx are just "changes" hence those tx outputs are still considered long term.

I make a transaction from A to B with change going to C.

I control the private keys for A. I control the private keys for C.

How much more proof do you need?

what if C is also an address that you already have, "not new address"
Also how do you handle refund?

The address is being reused which makes it harder to audit.

Bottom line is, can this new wallet client manage at tx level and throw out addresses completely?

seriouscoin

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

OP, how do you handles change tx?

How do you convince the IRS that certain tx are just "changes" hence those tx outputs are still considered long term.

The_Gloomfrost

member

Activity: 90

Merit: 10

I like the part which incentivizes buying coins when the price is relatively high. Your downside is essentially covered by future tax breaks. Nice!

BitEscrow

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Changes nothing? Keep believing what you want to believe you retards. It means you can no longer run around; prancing like idiots saying you own everything.

acoindr

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Peter R on March 26, 2014, 08:24:19 PM

I am hoping DeathAndTaxes and BCB provide comments, but my understanding now is that LIFO and FIFO are legal techniques used to simplify tax accounting. You always have the option to pay taxes on the actual gain for each piece of property that you sell or trade.

VERY good point! True, there is always the option to be as anal with accounting as you like for tax purposes, and that's generally preferable.

Quote from: Peter R on March 26, 2014, 08:24:19 PM

What I am less certain of is this: what are your legal obligations if you exchange property in a single transaction without realizing a capital gain?

Good question, but I'd imagine as long as you could meticulously show there was no gain, then that's just what it is.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: acoindr on March 26, 2014, 08:04:48 PM

I don't think this would work. This tax attorney advises using the FIFO method and nothing else for bitcoins.

Levitin said that fact that each bitcoin was unique with a different cost basis would have complex (read: useful) tax accounting repercussions:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.5919137

I am hoping DeathAndTaxes and BCB provide comments, but my understanding now is that LIFO and FIFO are legal techniques used to simplify tax accounting. You always have the option to pay taxes on the actual gain for each piece of property that you sell or trade.

What I am less certain of is this: what are your legal obligations if you exchange property in a single transaction without realizing a capital gain?

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: acoindr on March 26, 2014, 08:04:48 PM

I don't think this would work. This tax attorney advises using the FIFO method and nothing else for bitcoins.

I don't follow his reasoning.

Quote from: quoted tax attorney

Because bitcoins are fungible, you run into the problem of tracing the cost of each bitcoin you hold.

Yet stock shares are fungible and the specific lot method is definitely allowed for stock shares.

acoindr

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1002

I don't think this would work. This tax attorney advises using the FIFO method and nothing else for bitcoins.

Quote

The biggest issue for most bitcoin users is determining their basis. Because bitcoins are fungible, you run into the problem of tracing the cost of each bitcoin you hold. You cannot just arbitrarily choose your basis. The IRS will permit you to use the FIFO method (First in, First out). Any other method such as LIFO or Average Cost Basis is not advisable, particularly now that we know foreign currency rules do not apply

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote from: Peter R on March 26, 2014, 03:51:44 PM

In this article, Georgetown Law professor Adam J. Levitin states that since bitcoin outputs are unique, each output could be subject to a different tax liability depending on its cost basis. He argues that this decreases fungibility,

I think Levitin's argument is false. In my mind, the fungibility property of money is only relevant in exchange between parties. I think it only matters to the receiving party. To the receiving party, it is immaterial how long the giving party has owned it, nor how much capital gain the giver needs to pay.

While I have no specific education in the matter, it would seem to me that money's fungibility property is useful only in that it trivializes the receiver's assessment of the money's quality aspects. If a received bitcoin is indistinguishable from any other received bitcoin, the receiver need only think about overall quantity rather than quality of each bitcoin.

The giver needs to evaluate the quality of each bitcoin, but that determination is not coupled in time to the transaction. Indeed, this decision process is something that could plausibly be automated according a policy decision by the giving party - perhaps via some mechanism such as the ZGL wallet.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

In this article, Georgetown Law professor Adam J. Levitin states that since bitcoin outputs are unique, each output could be subject to a different tax liability depending on its cost basis. He argues that this decreases fungibility, but I argue that this gives validity to the concept of ZGL coins. ZGL coins are dynamically fused by wallets with ZGL support to be "current" so that using them results in a capital gain/loss of identically zero.

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/03/why-bitcoin-can-no-longer-work-as-a-virtual-currency-in-1-paragraph/359648/

hello_good_sir

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 531

More useful would be to something that attempts to maximize the capital gains that you report, up to a threshold.

In the US you pay 0% on long-term capital gains until your income gets to something like $72,000 for married people, and then the rate jumps to 20%. Let's say that you make $50,000 per year. I would want the software to ensure that I use coins such that I come out with exactly $22,000 in capital gains. That way I pay no capital gains taxes this year and it also reduces my future tax liability.

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Thanks for expanding your thought. I didn't catch the implication when you stated that Holliday's post 'blew your mind' in that there other thread.

This is a really cool idea. I hope a SW team picks it up and runs with it.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: ?? on ??

Let's assume a ZGL wallet exists and is functional.

Will these wash transactions need to be reported to the IRS? Obviously, it makes no sense to report them, but I've never known bureaucracy to make much sense. I'm assuming they will want to actually see the capital gains offset the capital losses, but I don't like assuming things.

My thinking is that spending ZGL coins would not be subject to any reporting requirements, although I'd like to hear DeathAndTaxes or BCB's opinion on this matter. There is provably zero gain/loss on each transaction. If you have a capital loss (or zero gain) on a normal transaction, at least here in Canada, you aren't required to report it.

If you were audited, then you'd have a paper trail that proves the transactions were all zero gain/loss and that you were correct in reporting nothing.

To readers: I am not a lawyer, accountant or tax specialist.

RodeoX

legendary

Activity: 3066

Merit: 1147

The revolution will be monetized!

This is an interesting idea. I use the "first out" accounting method for calculating my tax. It may be possible to better my tax situation using something like this. I could spend certain coins to control my income from capitol gains in a given year. At least I think that's right.

Peter R

legendary

Activity: 1162

Merit: 1007

Quote from: smooth on March 26, 2014, 03:44:05 AM

Small correction to how you stated it though. You have to have not just "some" coins purchased below and above, but a sufficient number. which depends on the relationship between the current price and the prices at which they were purchased. Which is to say your little solver needs constraints on a and b.

Thanks for helping to improve the accuracy of that statement Smooth. I have updated the OP to reflect (it is important to be precise with our logic).

As a note to readers, the ZGL-wallet (zero-gain/loss wallet) does not allow you to permanently avoid paying capital gains taxes. Instead, it allows you to defer realizing capital gains over a long sequence of day-to-day transactions, effectively lumping the gain/loss in a much smaller number of events where a gain or loss was realized (bitcoin/dollar trades).

ZGL-coins are created in real time (they are "current") such that at the moment of creation (spending) your gain/loss is identically zero. In other words, ZGL-coins are currency.

Note also that this wallet would be difficult to use when bitcoin is consistently making all-time highs (e.g., such as November 2013).

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: Peter R on March 26, 2014, 01:26:31 AM

The idea is that if you have some coins purchased below the current price and some coins purchased above the current price, then it is always possible to create a new coin that is a linear combination of your existing coins that has a gain/loss for tax purposes of identically zero.

Good idea.

Small correction to how you stated it though. You have to have not just "some" coins purchased below and above, but a sufficient number. which depends on the relationship between the current price and the prices at which they were purchased. Which is to say your little solver needs constraints on a and b.

A simple example would be if you have coins at purchased at 1 and coins purchased at 100 when the current price is 2. You need a lot more of the 1 coins to make this work. I don't think you can realize losses by just doing a quick round-trip trade either, due to the wash sale rules, though I think you can realize gains that way.

But in many (less contrived) instances this should work and should greatly reduce the number taxable events, especially on small transactions like buying a cup of coffee.

Topic: ZGL wallet: achieve zero gain/loss for tax purposes with coin control - page 6. (Read 9466 times)