| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Smart Contracts - just a buzzword or are they applicable to the real world? Development & Technical Discussion
Op, Ethereum's flavor of smart contracts, i.e. as a Touring complete, universal…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 19, 2018, 09:41:21 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
So, I believe it is not about how PoW is better than PoS. Rather it is about how…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 19, 2018, 08:22:16 AM |
|
|
|
An analysis of bitcoin blockchain height divergence from its standard behavior Development & Technical Discussion
How far can possibly bitcoin blockchain height diverge from the ideal one- block…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 16, 2018, 06:04:05 AM |
|
|
|
An analysis of bitcoin blockchain height divergence from its standard behavior Development & Technical Discussion
This sounds similar to a paper I wrote in 2014, so you might be interested in th…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 19, 2018, 04:54:15 AM |
|
|
|
An analysis of bitcoin blockchain height divergence from its standard behavior Development & Technical Discussion
No worries, I didn't put it that way, it is just always a possibility specially…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 19, 2018, 07:19:18 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
So, I believe it is not about how PoW is better than PoS. Rather it is about how…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 18, 2018, 03:01:41 PM |
|
|
|
"gujun algorithm"(a RSA algorithm variant) Off-topic
Thanks for the reply, yet I need more resources and documentaries and if there i…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 18, 2018, 05:56:23 AM |
|
|
|
"gujun algorithm"(a RSA algorithm variant) Off-topic
Thank you for sharing. I believe thinking out of the box deserves support becaus…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 18, 2018, 03:54:34 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
I just published my work on blockchain height divergence issue on a separate thr…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 16, 2018, 06:08:26 AM |
|
|
|
Analysis of Vitalik's 'A Guide to 99% Fault Tolerant Consensus' Development & Technical Discussion
The only shortcoming in your article is its comparative approach, imo. I admit t…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 17, 2018, 03:24:00 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
No matter what algo are you using, electricity is limited, and most of it will g…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 16, 2018, 01:07:13 PM |
|
|
|
Analysis of Vitalik's 'A Guide to 99% Fault Tolerant Consensus' Development & Technical Discussion
The only shortcoming in your article is its comparative approach, imo. I admit t…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 16, 2018, 10:53:18 AM |
|
|
|
A Guide to 99% Fault Tolerant Consensus by Vitalik Buterin Development & Technical Discussion
I think you're reading too much into it. Leslie's paper was published in the 198…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 13, 2018, 07:49:26 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
It is good to see, @gmaxwell has made something out of this discussion. He is of…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 12, 2018, 10:04:36 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
@DoomadI don't understand how your example would help proving your point? @Evil-…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 10, 2018, 12:01:00 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
It is the first time I'm hearing about this fork Just check their web site, To…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 10, 2018, 11:15:04 AM |
|
|
|
How devil competes with its own mined blocks. Development & Technical Discussion
I think it's because they have two or more "competing" pools, i.e. eu.antpool, a…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 10, 2018, 04:23:12 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
@Wind_FURY,It is the first time I'm hearing about this fork Just check their we…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 10, 2018, 05:54:42 AM |
|
|
|
How to Build Your Own Cryptocurrency Exchange Website Exchanges
WTF? Open source software is not secure and "white label" shit is?Bitcoin is op…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 09, 2018, 01:26:22 PM |
|
|
|
How devil competes with its own mined blocks. Development & Technical Discussion
It is really crazy dudes, investigating proximity problem in bitcoin blockchain…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 09, 2018, 07:06:52 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
"t0 2.5 min then at t1 90s" sounds a bit reckless.I don't see anything reckless…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 08, 2018, 12:43:11 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Sure, when you scale up the number of connections each node has to have, you can…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 08, 2018, 12:13:52 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteStep 3: Decrease block time even more, down to 90 seconds and touch 100 tps…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 08, 2018, 04:33:37 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
@cellardNo block size increase is required or recommended for 100 tps: Step 1: D…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 07, 2018, 04:45:13 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
@amishmanishMore people have correctly reminded me of political obstacles rather…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 07, 2018, 10:29:17 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
... a reliable layered protocol capable of off-chain transactions. Why not? It m…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 07, 2018, 07:03:25 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Then why is it hard for Bitcoin to scale while trying to maintain security and d…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 06, 2018, 09:25:05 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
According to my suggested threshold of 60480, it doesn't fail.No but it would fa…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 05, 2018, 08:37:29 AM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
If there are no further arguments raised in this thread, I suppose this will be…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 05, 2018, 08:49:29 PM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
Obviously, the criteria is:Any fork, being the longest chain or not, is not allo…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 04, 2018, 07:35:18 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Vitalik Buterin trilemma is pure garbage. I think the kid has recently read some…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 04, 2018, 10:49:42 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
My intuitive assumption is that no legit node will suggest/accept forks with a c…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 04, 2018, 07:54:44 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (test data wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
A conclusive proposal for this issue:1- I suggest that when there is no drawback…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 03, 2018, 01:44:50 AM |
|
|
|
Finding a Technical Writer Development & Technical Discussion
No offense, but I think the whole idea of hiring a technical writer is bullshit.…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 02, 2018, 04:07:18 PM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
As of your 200K loop, and 20% increase in cpu usage: It is huge, imo. With just…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 01, 2018, 02:00:24 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
@Doomad, @cellardUnderstanding Bitcoin as an electronic, p2p cash system (sounds…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 02, 2018, 09:28:49 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
we should take care not to have bitcoin frozen like in its ice age,You state thi…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 02, 2018, 06:16:18 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Vitalik Buterin trilemma is pure garbage. I think the kid has recently read some…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 02, 2018, 06:24:52 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
Our 'stakers' will eventually join pools to get rid of availability requirements…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 02, 2018, 05:43:15 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Although @gmaxwell in the above post is basically correct and there are always n…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 01, 2018, 03:53:29 PM |
|
|
|
An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
@gmaxwellReviewing this thread, I found that you have done almost a complete rew…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 01, 2018, 08:34:00 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
@d5000Although I have things to say regarding your post, I deliberately focus on…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 01, 2018, 11:15:15 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteBeing "interesting" or not, this IS a DoS vulnerabilityNo information has b…
|
n/a | aliashraf | August 01, 2018, 09:55:14 AM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
Shelby, is such a dedicated author, just look at the above post of him. I'm so…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 29, 2018, 04:38:18 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
Look here aliashraf , to even attempt said attack, requires a Multistaking PoS c…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 29, 2018, 02:05:57 AM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
It is not how we discuss attacks (in this forum at least), we don't say this or…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 28, 2018, 04:51:00 PM |
|
|
|
POW vs. POS Development & Technical Discussion
Anyway, PoS "nothing at stake" and "long-range attack" are real problems, not a…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 28, 2018, 03:13:46 AM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
I received the following rebuttal verbatim from Shelby (aka AnonyMint) via Crypt…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 26, 2018, 01:03:11 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
...Who said anything about bigger blocks as an ultimate or urgent scaling soluti…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 24, 2018, 02:28:04 PM |
|
|
|
An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
A day ago you were claiming that there were no reasons to not radically increase…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 07:20:08 AM |
|
|
|
An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
An analysis of Mining Variance and Proximity Premium flaws in BitcoinPrefaceThe…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 16, 2018, 10:07:29 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Even if you were to be right, you would need to argue this with the people that…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 01:30:40 PM |
|
|
|
Getting rid of pools: Proof of Collaborative Work Development & Technical Discussion
To be precise you should think abstract. Abstractly speaking, efficiency of a de…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 11:11:40 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
there's no free ride, you pay a price with some % of centralization due node re…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 10:21:44 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
there's no free ride, you pay a price with some % of centralization due node re…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 08:29:52 AM |
|
|
|
Getting rid of pools: Proof of Collaborative Work Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteOne should be careful here. What we fix is mining variance and its centrali…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 08:09:15 AM |
|
|
|
Getting rid of pools: Proof of Collaborative Work Development & Technical Discussion
@aliashraf First, thank-you for this proposal and for moving the ball forward o…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 21, 2018, 04:12:47 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Yeah, I think Satoshi was smart enough to foresee this and he could've implement…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 20, 2018, 11:57:07 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Yeah, I think Satoshi was smart enough to foresee this and he could've implement…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 20, 2018, 10:31:35 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
...Bitcoin core, is what I've chosen too, for now, not forever! Naive forks are…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 20, 2018, 03:18:44 AM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, you guys are making me sick these days. What's happening here in bitcointalk…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 19, 2018, 03:52:36 PM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
You are making a debate just to make a debate. You can still use Bitcoin onchain…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 19, 2018, 02:46:45 PM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders (rewievers wanted) Development & Technical Discussion
I just came back to this topic, and found myself wrong about the issue OP has br…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 19, 2018, 02:03:09 PM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
Let's leave rank out of this for a moment, because I think it is irrelevant to t…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 18, 2018, 05:14:15 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
Anyway, I leave you guys, with your 'high level' experience with an electronic c…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 09:24:44 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Seriously? I specifically refuted your (Core's) reasoning about the infamous ins…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 09:12:05 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Above post by @bob123 is almost the Core's scalability manifesto. I don't agree…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 06:20:19 PM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
Back to shelby issue: I think there are things both sides can do about it:Shelby…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 05:59:30 PM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
My argument: Projecting scalability to second layer protocols, is cheap practice…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 05:01:07 PM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
Projecting problems to the second layer, stacking up protocols on protocols lead…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 04:38:44 PM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
I can't be bothered to read anyone's arguments about LN back here, but let's be…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 04:25:42 PM |
|
|
|
Why can Core not Scale at a 0.X% for blocksize in the S-Curve f(X) Development & Technical Discussion
Above post by @bob123 is almost the Core's scalability manifesto. I don't agree…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 03:20:52 PM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
I have stated my objection against banning anonymint, I'm not here to discuss t…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 10:24:32 AM |
|
|
|
Hardware Wallets & Security flaws Hardware wallets
Ledgers wallet (software) checks whether the firmware on your nano s is geniuine…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 05:57:23 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders Development & Technical Discussion
I was discussing getblockheader instead of your inquiry about getheaders. My mis…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 05:05:52 AM |
|
|
|
Bogus locator in getheaders Development & Technical Discussion
I suppose getblockheader doesn't accept multiple inputs, you send one hash you g…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 03:24:41 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
WTF, We are not trying to destroy Bitcoin, we are just discussing the Pro's and…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 02:03:44 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin is not an infrastructure, it is the system, remember? Projecting problem…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 01:48:46 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
Once a problem looks to be a challenge on first layer, one should firstly think…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 01:38:37 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
WTF, We are not trying to destroy Bitcoin, we are just discussing the Pro's and…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 01:07:45 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
a request from Shelby. to be considered a last contribution, and perhaps further…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 17, 2018, 12:50:58 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network Discussion Thread Development & Technical Discussion
If we say that the Lightning Network is a 2cnd layer application, targeted at mi…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 16, 2018, 02:57:51 PM |
|
|
|
Deanonymization of BTC Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, I'm not productive, I'm bad, I should be assassinated, call 911, my posts sh…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 14, 2018, 04:20:05 AM |
|
|
|
Deanonymization of BTC Development & Technical Discussion
No kidding, Seriously? What a co-accident ...So deanonymization, and not de-anon…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 14, 2018, 03:29:56 AM |
|
|
|
Deanonymization of BTC Development & Technical Discussion
Yes there is a technique for "de-anonymizing" bitcoin network, not a state-of-th…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 14, 2018, 03:08:15 AM |
|
|
|
Anunymint ban Meta
You are telling me anunymint was the real anonymint?He confirms that to me via C…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 14, 2018, 02:58:41 AM |
|
|
|
Getting rid of pools: Proof of Collaborative Work Development & Technical Discussion
I got this pm from @mpremp (the supreme leader) regarding my posts being deleted…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 13, 2018, 10:40:06 AM |
|
|
|
Getting rid of pools: Proof of Collaborative Work Development & Technical Discussion
Every post from @anunymint apparently was deleted. The thread is now very diffic…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 13, 2018, 09:11:53 AM |
|
|
|
Using references in order to compress the byte size of transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Another issue is that any fork in the block chain might result in transactions t…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 02:40:22 PM |
|
|
|
Using references in order to compress the byte size of transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Transaction inputs involve previous outputs on the chain. If in place of recordi…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 06:03:27 AM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
I bet you someone comes up with a fee-less POW based chain that doesn't centrali…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 09:42:29 AM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
For very low fees, No need to wait 100 years. I think I'm coming to something, w…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 08:14:59 AM |
|
|
|
Using references in order to compress the byte size of transactions Development & Technical Discussion
...You should be more cautious about calling transaction input a reference, tech…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 07:35:15 AM |
|
|
|
Why doesn't Trump arrest hillary and put her in jail for life? Serious discussion
Thanks god, I'm not a US citizen and don't have to deal with such a high degree…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 03:45:28 AM |
|
|
|
POW via training/validating Deep Neural Networks Development & Technical Discussion
A naive perception of PoW, specially in the first stages of everybody's journey…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 12, 2018, 02:31:20 AM |
|
|
|
Using references in order to compress the byte size of transactions Development & Technical Discussion
How would two different wallets agree on the IDs of the outputs when they constr…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 11, 2018, 03:03:40 PM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
As I said before, better to focus on blockchain technology. My Proposal for impr…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 11, 2018, 10:58:31 AM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
Even if you removed transaction fees and put in a perpetual block reward, it wou…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 11, 2018, 07:50:35 AM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
Devs don't research! Research sucks.There have been very prolific programmers wh…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 11, 2018, 01:57:28 AM |
|
|
|
Is POW systematically doomed to get a huge monster in its midst? Development & Technical Discussion
I rather prefer senior programmers (20+ years of professional experience, minimu…
|
n/a | aliashraf | July 10, 2018, 06:27:19 PM |
Jump to: