| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
What should i do with my bitcoins against the next fork Bitcoin Discussion
I'll hedge my bets and just hold on to both forks and let market forces (or more…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | November 06, 2017, 01:50:55 AM |
|
|
|
The Barry Silbert segwit2x agreement with >80% miner support. Bitcoin Discussion
A good and witty summaryhttps://www.quora.com/Why-is-everyone-talking-about-how-…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | June 27, 2017, 03:09:04 AM |
|
|
|
big transaction fee in Bitcoin , really down the future of btc ? Bitcoin Discussion
It's known as the quadratic issue. As fees in satoshi's double, and the price of…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | June 12, 2017, 05:34:03 AM |
|
|
|
The Barry Silbert segwit agreement with >80% miner agreement. Bitcoin Discussion
That's a lot of DCG portfolio companies disagreeing with the road map put forwar…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 23, 2017, 12:53:01 AM |
|
|
|
time to admit its not "spam" , blocks are full Bitcoin Discussion
When a system is running at max capacity, it only takes a little demand/supply b…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 11, 2017, 05:51:37 PM |
|
|
|
Major crash no. 5 for BU nodes. Bitcoin Discussion
I count about 11.Honestly though, I don't care either way. I just want to stir t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 09, 2017, 02:35:33 AM |
|
|
|
Been away some 10 days, what's up w/ price and SW vs. BU? Bitcoin Discussion
There seems to be an influx of new money into the cryptomarkets. Most coins are…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 09, 2017, 01:47:51 AM |
|
|
|
[Poll] How can we rescue Bitcoin from the hand of BlockStream? Bitcoin Discussion
blockstream has it's own brand and coin and it's called BTC.Bitcoin has been pri…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 09, 2017, 01:17:03 AM |
|
|
|
ViaBTC Twitter Polls Bitcoin Discussion
Questioning whether a technical solution has been implemented in the best manner…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 07, 2017, 05:07:32 AM |
|
|
|
ViaBTC Twitter Polls Bitcoin Discussion
The below are my thoughts. People are free to develop their own.In my view, we p…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 07, 2017, 04:07:59 AM |
|
|
|
ViaBTC Twitter Polls Bitcoin Discussion
ViaBTC have produced two twitter polls:Should we increase Blocksize:https://twit…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 07, 2017, 04:07:12 AM |
|
|
|
Is it possible services have special contracts with miners? Bitcoin Discussion
... low fee like bittrex with 20k satoshi, and get a fast confirmations on my wa…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 06, 2017, 11:40:27 AM |
|
|
|
Is it possible services have special contracts with miners? Bitcoin Discussion
How many confirmations on the input? Many pools still take coin age into account…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 06, 2017, 11:21:48 AM |
|
|
|
Is it possible services have special contracts with miners? Bitcoin Discussion
How many confirmations on the input? Many pools still take coin age into account…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 06, 2017, 10:57:54 AM |
|
|
|
I don't get it?! Bitcoin Discussion
Ok perfect now I got all of this! Last question where can I see if the simple ma…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 06, 2017, 09:01:19 AM |
|
|
|
Mempool ATH - 140K unconfirmed transactions Bitcoin Discussion
This is cores vision. A full block chain settlement layer with high fees.We shou…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 06, 2017, 06:35:42 AM |
|
|
|
Last Time. In small words. Why 2MB impossible. Why Soft Fork. Why SegWit First.. Bitcoin Discussion
4. There are two possible ways to deploy/implement SegWit, as a softfork or as a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 05, 2017, 12:50:55 PM |
|
|
|
Save the Chain! Whale puts $500,000 Bounty up for grabs to miners Bitcoin Discussion
Great now we have another consensus mechanism, PoB (Proof-of-Bribery).We can now…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 04, 2017, 05:14:08 AM |
|
|
|
Last Time. In small words. Why 2MB impossible. Why Soft Fork. Why SegWit First.. Bitcoin Discussion
In the event of a soft fork we have:1.) The old chain exists with a more permiss…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 04, 2017, 04:50:47 AM |
|
|
|
BTC is DYING, LONG LIVE THE NEW KING LTC Altcoin Discussion
Segwit is already active on LTC. The user just doesn't have the ability to use i…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 04, 2017, 02:50:30 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 08:16:34 AM |
|
|
|
Is diversity in bitcoin client implementations a good or a bad thing? Bitcoin Discussion
So is there some kind of succession bloodline to who is the rightful heir and di…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 07:47:28 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
If you make, as a miner, smaller blocks, you have less fees than your competitor…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 07:44:36 AM |
|
|
|
Last Time. In small words. Why 2MB impossible. Why Soft Fork. Why SegWit First.. Bitcoin Discussion
Quote from: The OneWouldn't segwit hard fork be better than soft fork?2.) There…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 07:24:43 AM |
|
|
|
Is diversity in bitcoin client implementations a good or a bad thing? Bitcoin Discussion
So is there some kind of succession bloodline to who is the rightful heir and di…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 07:08:55 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
They don't need to spam the network to create fee pressure. They can just create…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 06:45:54 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
It is really strange that you ask this questionAs I got from your previous post,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 06:03:53 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
IMO, the simplest solution is to remove the hard cap limit from the protocol. A…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 05:54:35 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
/sighBitcointalk has really become a shitshow lately.Firstly, we need both on-ch…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 04:27:54 AM |
|
|
|
Alleged Bitcoin Founder Satoshi Nakamoto creating Bitcoin Core Competitor Bitcoin Discussion
Why would Satoshi Nakamoto require fiat funding to create a new bitcoin node imp…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 04:14:28 AM |
|
|
|
How bitcointalk level increases from newbie Meta
How do you get an answer to your question, with a poll that is complete nonsense…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 04:07:13 AM |
|
|
|
Is diversity in bitcoin client implementations a good or a bad thing? Bitcoin Discussion
Some people argue that there should be one dominant "reference" client (e.g., Co…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 02:19:58 AM |
|
|
|
Last Time. In small words. Why 2MB impossible. Why Soft Fork. Why SegWit First.. Bitcoin Discussion
Quote from: d5000A soft fork is always better if possible because of the "danger…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 03, 2017, 01:12:51 AM |
|
|
|
Last Time. In small words. Why 2MB impossible. Why Soft Fork. Why SegWit First.. Bitcoin Discussion
Why on earth did you start a thread trying to dispel the nonsense of the march o…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 02, 2017, 05:52:27 AM |
|
|
|
Is Bitcoin digital gold or digital cash? Bitcoin Discussion
Now, bitcoin is even expensive than gold, it already surpassed it.Really? I thou…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 02, 2017, 04:37:26 AM |
|
|
|
Anyone else HAVE most or maybe ALL of their money in btc/crypto? Bitcoin Discussion
dear taxman i have x% of my money in bitcoin and have not been paying my taxes,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 01, 2017, 02:50:42 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
The problem with LN is not so much the "fractional reserve banking", but the fac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 01, 2017, 02:19:06 AM |
|
|
|
LN+segwit vs big blocks, levels of centralization. Bitcoin Discussion
What I wrote basically is that the "maximum block size" parameter, which is cruc…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | May 01, 2017, 12:48:15 AM |
|
|
|
What will happen with Bitcoin if it never scales? Bitcoin Discussion
BTC market dominance now down to 59.5%. I guess that's what happens.
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 30, 2017, 02:49:17 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin.com owned by rogerk ver removed Bitcoin Core wallet. Bitcoin Discussion
They don't remove Bitcoin Core, but they simply hide it (Full > Select All Walle…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 30, 2017, 01:12:39 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin.com owned by rogerk ver removed Bitcoin Core wallet. Bitcoin Discussion
It's still there.https://www.bitcoin.com/choose-your-wallet?category=fullFUD pos…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 30, 2017, 12:47:08 PM |
|
|
|
First LTC SegWit TXN ? Altcoin Discussion
It will need a further release for that to be enabled.Can you elaborate ?I thoug…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 27, 2017, 05:27:16 AM |
|
|
|
First LTC SegWit TXN ? Altcoin Discussion
It will need a further release for that to be enabled.
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 27, 2017, 05:18:31 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin scaling: Looks like all roads lead to LTC Bitcoin Discussion
This thread contains some interesting claims about cross-chain lightning transac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 27, 2017, 05:01:02 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin scaling: Looks like all roads lead to LTC Bitcoin Discussion
Litecoin will go to roof and break the highest price possible for an altcoin aft…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 27, 2017, 04:43:48 AM |
|
|
|
Will LN Hubs require a Banking License / Banking Cartels will take over Crypto Bitcoin Discussion
Lightning network risks section lists more bad movies than the horror channel.Bi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 07:00:36 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
You could end up with a network with a multitude of different excessive block an…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 06:56:41 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
You could end up with a network with a multitude of different excessive block an…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 05:23:03 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
Sorry franky1, but I think under BU's acceptance depth mechanism, every time som…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 05:14:55 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
Sorry franky1, but I think under BU's acceptance depth mechanism, every time som…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 05:04:54 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
BU's acceptance depth approach, I consider it to be a terrible approach to bigge…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 04:27:46 AM |
|
|
|
Big Block support at 50% Bitcoin Discussion
Bigger block support and BU's mechanism to achieve this are not synonymous.
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 26, 2017, 03:03:43 AM |
|
|
|
The impossible has been reached: LTC has 100% SW support! Can BTC ever do it? Bitcoin Discussion
Looks like bitcoin core is going to become a clone of litecoin core!While I unde…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 25, 2017, 03:56:45 AM |
|
|
|
OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.10.0 Mining software (miners)
Bit concerned at the 'No symbol table info available' so maybe I haven't done it…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 25, 2017, 03:31:11 AM |
|
|
|
The impossible has been reached: LTC has 100% SW support! Can BTC ever do it? Bitcoin Discussion
Impossible for BTC, Jihan Wu hates Core too much, it will never happen.UASF is a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 25, 2017, 03:18:04 AM |
|
|
|
OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.10.0 Mining software (miners)
JSON failed to decode GBT solo mining cgminer segmentation faultHi, I've found a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 25, 2017, 02:35:48 AM |
|
|
|
Yep.. BU absolutely definitely possibly maybe ready for prime time.. Bitcoin Discussion
fail to mention another bug. https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/labels/BugCan't…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 03:53:58 PM |
|
|
|
Why ASIC BOOST is necessary. Bitcoin Discussion
If in, say, 2020, there are still 1 MB blocks, and nothing has changed, I think…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 01:41:32 PM |
|
|
|
OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.10.0 Mining software (miners)
JSON failed to decode GBT solo mining cgminer segmentation faultHi, I've found a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 12:15:29 PM |
|
|
|
4th Major Crash Bug Exploit on BU Bitcoin Discussion
'Pollution' is obviously subjective as whether you agree with the segwit soft fo…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 06:43:05 AM |
|
|
|
4th Major Crash Bug Exploit on BU Bitcoin Discussion
Reading further into comments it's not even clear this is an exploit being attac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 06:23:40 AM |
|
|
|
4th Major Crash Bug Exploit on BU Bitcoin Discussion
Of course they have forked from bitcoin core 0.12.x, as they are against the seg…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 06:16:25 AM |
|
|
|
4th Major Crash Bug Exploit on BU Bitcoin Discussion
can someone explain to me in a non-drama kind of way, why is this becoming a com…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 06:09:19 AM |
|
|
|
4th Major Crash Bug Exploit on BU Bitcoin Discussion
Okay you win on the direct title thread, but I prefer my ironic one Popularity o…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 04:59:38 AM |
|
|
|
Popularity of XT/Classic nodes rise in proportion to BU nodes Bitcoin Discussion
Funnily enough, this attack seems to have come about a month after the last ones…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 04:48:36 AM |
|
|
|
Popularity of XT/Classic nodes rise in proportion to BU nodes Bitcoin Discussion
Yes, but compared to Bitcoin Core nodes, they are still insignificant. This real…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 04:34:34 AM |
|
|
|
Is there a new policy on miner's fee? Bitcoin Discussion
I don't think there is a new policy for miners in terms of fee because it is sam…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 04:10:33 AM |
|
|
|
Is there a new policy on miner's fee? Bitcoin Discussion
I heard that for fix this problem, maybe you can "clean up dust", by sending all…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 03:53:47 AM |
|
|
|
Is there a new policy on miner's fee? Bitcoin Discussion
I think some people somehow are tricking the system by sending a small amount wi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 03:52:47 AM |
|
|
|
Is there a new policy on miner's fee? Bitcoin Discussion
Thanks, i didn't want to tamper with the transaction fees since it appears I'm…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 03:36:55 AM |
|
|
|
Is there a new policy on miner's fee? Bitcoin Discussion
Thanks everyone, at least I'm receiving answers that doesn't seem automated. H…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 03:05:45 AM |
|
|
|
Shocking: Small amount of chinese miners block 88% of segwit support by services Bitcoin Discussion
The link you refers to shows 46% explicit support, and 42% prepared / ready.My s…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 02:55:30 AM |
|
|
|
Popularity of XT/Classic nodes rise in proportion to BU nodes Bitcoin Discussion
Time and time again, we've seen that the number of nodes means absolutely nothin…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 02:46:37 AM |
|
|
|
Popularity of XT/Classic nodes rise in proportion to BU nodes Bitcoin Discussion
Popularity of XT/Classic nodes rise in proportion to BU nodes:https://coin.dance…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 02:42:18 AM |
|
|
|
Where to find safety in a hard fork? Bitcoin Discussion
Lol you could always transfer everything into USDT hahaha. Then you don't have…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 02:32:27 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
I don't see >90% of the Core nodes being taken down within the same day. Therefo…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 24, 2017, 02:23:08 AM |
|
|
|
Segregated Witness vs Bitcoin Unlimited vs Do Nothing Bitcoin Discussion
you only gain 12.5btc after 100 confirms.I dont get this 100 confirms part. Does…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 03:25:07 PM |
|
|
|
Fuck: SegWit, LN, Blockstream, Core, Adam Back, and GMazwell Bitcoin Discussion
You must be smoking too much of that killer pot leaf. If miners allow limitless…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 02:30:13 PM |
|
|
|
Shocking: Small amount of chinese miners block 88% of segwit support by services Bitcoin Discussion
Follow the link. The OP is talking about businesses polled not hashpower. Even t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 01:29:50 PM |
|
|
|
Shocking: Small amount of chinese miners block 88% of segwit support by services Bitcoin Discussion
Selective use of statistics. The link you refers to shows 46% explicit support,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 01:10:04 PM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
Your opinion has been unconfirmed for so long, it has been dropped from the free…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 11:12:58 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
(*) ... but you give me an idea: if anyone wants actually to PAY me for me conti…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 10:52:39 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
i wonder what Thomas thinks of Bip100.What BIP100?https://github.com/bitcoin/bip…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 10:20:37 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
i wonder what Thomas thinks of Bip100.What BIP100?https://github.com/bitcoin/bip…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 10:04:35 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
Since old nodes are clueless about segwit and are filtered manipulated data, it…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 07:43:33 AM |
|
|
|
Electrum Developer Thomas Voegtlin: Bitcoin Unlimited Is Not a Good Idea Electrum
Hard forks allow for cleaner code fixes than soft fork kludges.The ironic thing…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 07:10:56 AM |
|
|
|
Big Block support at 50% Bitcoin Discussion
Considering BitClub BU's coinbase string contains 'love gregs' and 'loves core',…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 23, 2017, 04:47:33 AM |
|
|
|
Big Block support at 50% Bitcoin Discussion
***SPV wallets for normal users.3rd party to trust ?What if 3rd party will be co…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 06:07:55 PM |
|
|
|
Where to find safety in a hard fork? Bitcoin Discussion
I'll just leave my coins untouched if the shit hits the fan. It's going one of t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 06:03:20 PM |
|
|
|
Big Block support at 50% Bitcoin Discussion
it looks like it was considered a necessity at the time and that's fine and it d…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 05:46:51 PM |
|
|
|
Big Block support at 50% Bitcoin Discussion
What everyone are missing-> consensus in a decentralized environment won't happe…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 05:45:48 PM |
|
|
|
Jihan blocks segwit on LTC: price crashes Bitcoin Discussion
LTC has enough hash rate support to perform a UASF, so Jihan fighting against it…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 04:18:47 PM |
|
|
|
Banks have bought the Core Team Bitcoin Discussion
I agreed with everything until you said centralization of miners. I've been arou…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 01:09:25 PM |
|
|
|
Jihan blocks segwit on LTC: price crashes Bitcoin Discussion
Wake me up when LTC has a decent level of blockchain usage. The price is a specu…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 01:05:54 PM |
|
|
|
Banks have bought the Core Team Bitcoin Discussion
Yes, I think Satoshi made a fundamental error by giving the "keys to the kingdom…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 01:04:10 PM |
|
|
|
Dear Satoshi Nakamoto Bitcoin Discussion
Only one shall prevailI remember I had been discussing this issue with someone,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 22, 2017, 12:49:45 PM |
|
|
|
Why ASIC BOOST is necessary. Bitcoin Discussion
You aren't really arguing that AsicBoost itself is necessary. You are arguing th…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 21, 2017, 03:52:47 PM |
|
|
|
So what is this proposal BIP100? Bitcoin Discussion
Update to BIP100 by Jeff Garzik and Tom Harding discussed here:https://bitcointa…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 21, 2017, 03:19:14 PM |
|
|
|
So what is this proposal BIP100? Bitcoin Discussion
https://github.com/jgarzik/bip100/blob/master/bip-0100.mediawikiThat's it. Thank…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 21, 2017, 03:00:48 PM |
|
|
|
Why ASIC BOOST is necessary. Bitcoin Discussion
I think you make some good arguments for it.What about the difference between ov…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | April 21, 2017, 02:57:15 PM |
Jump to: