| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
Blockstream is nothing more than a $70M blockchain takeover attempt Bitcoin Discussion
There seems to be a lot of fear about Chinese intentions. A lot of them are quit…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 04:43:25 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.8%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (32.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
On a positive note, that means people are seriously looking at the BU code now t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 02:48:55 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.8%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (32.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
On a positive note, that means people are seriously looking at the BU code now t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 02:40:25 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.8%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (32.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Looks like someone has noticed a fix going in to the repository and has decided…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 02:26:48 PM |
|
|
|
AntPool - switch to Bitcoin Unlimited Bitcoin Discussion
Here is one article on LN:https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/understanding-the…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 08:56:33 AM |
|
|
|
How probable is a contentious Hard-fork in the next few months? Bitcoin Discussion
I don't think it will happen until late summer or fall.If this bip is approved a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 08:01:19 AM |
|
|
|
How probable is a contentious Hard-fork in the next few months? Bitcoin Discussion
I think miners "support" BU mainly to counter segwit. Their idea is most ration…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 07:55:18 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Deterioration in internet capacity. Possible. Netflix is in trouble, dump your s…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 06:26:36 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 14 mod Bitcoin Discussion
You really need to look deeper at the code to have an understanding of what each…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 05:58:28 AM |
|
|
|
Blockstream is nothing more than a $70M blockchain takeover attempt Bitcoin Discussion
Hundreds of alt coins that essentially only exist on could continue to be trade…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 14, 2017, 12:35:59 AM |
|
|
|
BIP100 updated - By Jeff Garzik and Tom Harding Bitcoin Discussion
There are many improvements in 0.13 and 0.14 that are totally unrelated to segwi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 08:20:11 PM |
|
|
|
BIP100 updated - By Jeff Garzik and Tom Harding Bitcoin Discussion
For core version 0.12... why?Maybe because Bitcoin Core 0.12 code is known by a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 07:06:14 PM |
|
|
|
Forks are highly important Bitcoin Discussion
Current signalling rate over last 1000 blocks:BU: 30.6%Segwit: 27,4%8MB: 6.5%So…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 01:53:43 PM |
|
|
|
AntPool - switch to Bitcoin Unlimited Bitcoin Discussion
will never support BU because it doesn't work. and you say that because....?Th…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 12:42:48 PM |
|
|
|
Do you think the transaction fee will kill bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Right now, I have two transactions sitting in memory pool doing nothing.I relied…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 12:07:06 PM |
|
|
|
Do you think the transaction fee will kill bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Transaction fee at times increase based on the increase in value of the bitcoin…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 08:56:09 AM |
|
|
|
Forks are highly important Bitcoin Discussion
It looks like we have consensus created during the phoney/cold war:Segwit suppor…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 08:51:26 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
If there was a real way to have a flexible block size I would support it, but th…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 07:27:44 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.2%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (28.5%) Bitcoin Discussion
If that BIP proposal forcing segwit activation goes through, we can expect marke…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 07:10:27 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
But now that bitcoin has a protocol built-in block size of 1MB, it is for ever l…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 06:46:25 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.2%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (28.5%) Bitcoin Discussion
Keep in mind that ironically, almost no miner (besides Bitcoin.com) is actually…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 06:27:04 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.2%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (28.5%) Bitcoin Discussion
There are also substantial performance improvements in core 0.13 and 0.14 that h…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 13, 2017, 06:13:15 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.2%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (28.5%) Bitcoin Discussion
Shaolin Fry has committed a bip-segwit-flagday draft that may be useful. Interes…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 02:54:04 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (26.2%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (28.5%) Bitcoin Discussion
Let's suppose SegWit is pretty good stuff but is falling behind in the public re…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 02:32:16 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
In my opinion segwit should be a hard fork. It's not safe or desirable as a soft…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 12:44:56 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Core 14 mod Bitcoin Discussion
Download a third party pre-compiled binary at your own risk.Validation.hstatic c…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 12:02:19 PM |
|
|
|
69,000 (69K) Unconfirmed Transactions! ....WTF...??? Bitcoin Discussion
Well, no, we don't. I would very much like us to solve it, but some do not want…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 09:04:54 AM |
|
|
|
Segwit IS the compromise: everybody is equally unhappy with it, including me Bitcoin Discussion
Apologies for the super massive OP. It's necessary though. No need to apolgise,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:58:18 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
if you're talking about a scenario in which Segwit is activated. The block size…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:30:00 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin/Blockhain is dead. Bitcoin Discussion
Nah, Bitcoin isn't dead. Even with slow transactions the coin still could be use…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:26:22 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
I think I misunderstood the below and thought you was talking about a post segwi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:23:10 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
5) 2 MB post Segwit (implies 100% native keys) -> higher DoS risk (quadratic has…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:15:53 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Yes and no. Writing it like that seems rather vague considering that we don't ha…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:06:39 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
I'd like to understand the reason spamming with native keys is useless after seg…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 08:01:03 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
-snip-nothing stops a native tx from sigops spammingYou still don't understand i…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 07:27:45 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
It is likely that there is already a emergency POW change HF ready for deploymen…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 07:01:39 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
So lets say 100% of miners have good connections with themselves (not relying on…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 06:49:36 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
seems dinofelis is on a scripted missionobjective try to brainwash sheep into th…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 12, 2017, 06:14:21 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
This is my biggest concern about segwit being implemented as a soft fork. All no…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 06:02:17 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
So does this mean a soft fork bypasses consensus?No. Soft forks are backwards co…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 05:33:48 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
-snip-nothing stops a native tx from sigops spammingYou still don't understand i…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 04:12:44 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
But is there any reason that this could not be implemented on the old tx's?Segwi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 03:53:55 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
What is the reason for old tx's using quadratic hashing instead of linear hashin…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 03:43:43 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
What is the reason for old tx's using quadratic hashing instead of linear hashin…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 03:38:28 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
even core deemed 8mb network safe but decided 4mb super safe.. go ask your buddi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 03:22:20 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
If you name is inherently insulting to you, you should take responsibility for c…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 02:43:21 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
You can't expect good will from those to whom you demonstrate bad will, DwarfCal…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 02:24:58 PM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
Mining will always take place where the power is cheaper. Block size isn't a fac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 02:16:20 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
The Segwit testnet mined a 4MB block, just by including alot of multi-signature…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 02:11:27 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
There is no "reserved for future use". Franky is a misleading statement incarnat…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 01:47:34 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
There is no "reserved for future use". Franky is a misleading statement incarnat…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 01:30:46 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Which is bigger, 2 MB blocks or 4 MB blocks And that 4MB is 1MB of transaction…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 01:14:15 PM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
seems dinofelis is on a scripted missionobjective try to brainwash sheep into th…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 12:53:49 PM |
|
|
|
Do you think the transaction fee will kill bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
Oh, thank you both for the sites. If BitcoinChain.com and BlockTrail.com (and m…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 12:47:15 PM |
|
|
|
Do you think the transaction fee will kill bitcoin? Bitcoin Discussion
I am willing to wait many days for a no-fee transaction 74ccfd796cf2cb404a2245f6…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 11:47:37 AM |
|
|
|
BLOG ON BITCOIN Bitcoin Discussion
I l see to make the changes to make it more beautiful .suggestions are always we…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 10:22:24 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
Thanks for the explanation. So basically miners will decide which node implement…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 10:17:16 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
I think I see what you are saying here. As long as the miners have good connecti…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 09:54:54 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
Again, the amount of non-mining nodes is essentially immaterial - apart for thei…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 09:32:46 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Which is bigger, 2 MB blocks or 4 MB blocks And that 4MB is 1MB of transaction…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 09:14:22 AM |
|
|
|
BLOG ON BITCOIN Bitcoin Discussion
thanks a lot buddy.i will improve in writing next time .i am newbie in this .i h…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 09:08:51 AM |
|
|
|
BLOG ON BITCOIN Bitcoin Discussion
Thank you for taking the effort to get this project off the ground. It is useful…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 08:16:44 AM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
P.S if your stance is only core should be on the network then admit your a centr…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 07:23:20 AM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Having a little thought about this concept of 'emergent consensus'. Is not the f…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 11, 2017, 07:15:32 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
SegWit does look like is has a tremendous advantage to hardware wallets, so goin…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 06:38:08 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
not even sure why he brings up the 4mb number as thats just an un-utilised buffe…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 06:06:22 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
Preference level for me:Segwit + dynamic block size proposal (as discussed so fa…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 05:57:33 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
So, you're scaring yourself unnecessarily. I think the price action might be get…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 04:28:29 PM |
|
|
|
SEC Announcement: ETF Denied? Speculation
Could be a good time to buy!?The sheep who follows at the back will always get e…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 04:21:31 PM |
|
|
|
What time tomorrow(friday) can we expect a BTC ETF announcement from the SEC? Bitcoin Discussion
Good news for natural bitcoin growth in my opinion.A few whales will get beached…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 04:15:51 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Over 16m BTC are held on native keys, so segwit doesn't even solve the solution…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 04:04:51 PM |
|
|
|
[POLL] Possible scaling compromise: BIP 141 + BIP 102 (Segwit + 2MB) Bitcoin Discussion
My thoughts are:Was the 1 MB cap introduced as an anti spam measure when everybo…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 03:52:28 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Not doing anything does not solve the block problem either. Over 16m BTC are hel…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 03:31:43 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
I've run 0.13.2 or BU over the same blockchain/wallet directory without issue. I…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 03:14:56 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Would someone build me a version which runs both SegWit and BU? Please.One outc…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 02:56:29 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Train, Next stop, parity with the NASDAQ? Bitcoin Discussion
This might help you:http://money.visualcapitalist.com/all-of-the-worlds-money-an…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 02:50:55 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Back on topic here I thought Bitcoin unlimited had super little support what hap…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 02:40:35 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Train, Next stop, parity with the NASDAQ? Bitcoin Discussion
This might help you:http://money.visualcapitalist.com/all-of-the-worlds-money-an…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 02:11:04 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
DASH has some super nodes, that means scale good, security bad.But even with the…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:43:37 PM |
|
|
|
Will an address with Dust be able to be used when we get LN ? Bitcoin Discussion
My understanding is that you need to move these UTXO's from the native key to a…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 02:00:59 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Train, Next stop, parity with the NASDAQ? Bitcoin Discussion
Great point! Good to have a long term strategy with BTC.You'll need one. Plenty…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:48:41 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Can Dash handle 'visa tomorrow'? Look at the transaction usage and blockchain si…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:42:18 PM |
|
|
|
Open Letter to GMaxwell and Sincere Rational Core Devs Bitcoin Discussion
"It can we can I can." Satoshis intention was to never change the blocksize limi…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:38:57 PM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
Look up incentive section in the white paper. Block rewards are the initial ince…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:24:53 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Train, Next stop, parity with the NASDAQ? Bitcoin Discussion
Now that Bitcoin has hit Gold parity, and surpassed it to a new all time high. W…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:19:08 PM |
|
|
|
Gavin to Satoshi, 2010 -- "SOMEBODY will try to mess up the network (...)" Bitcoin Discussion
It's an interesting conversation. But back then I presume Satoshi was designer,…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:04:01 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Suppose I think Core and BU won't compromise (thickheads). I want to spread my…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 01:00:25 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
DASH has some super nodes, that means scale good, security bad.But even with the…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 12:49:04 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
DASH has some super nodes, that means scale good, security bad.But even with the…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 12:29:46 PM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
..., it'll be used to hedge and invest, the fees are extremely competitive for t…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 11:55:30 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin unlimited can never anywhere because the most important thing is the cod…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 11:43:54 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Underlying capacity not big enough for an institutionalised global reserve curre…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 11:36:33 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Looks like this could very well be the end game for bitcoin.The end game for bit…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 11:13:06 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
Transaction capacity and confirmation time effects are part of the liquidity val…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 11:01:09 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
its only hard to get consensus if people do not learn consensus (such as those n…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 10:59:20 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
I disagree with IMPOSSIBLE. I think the situation makes it difficult, and so pot…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 10:18:47 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
No, the fee war is a symptom of immutability dynamics. When an economic paramet…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 09:20:24 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
how long would it take move all UTXO's over, assuming there are no other transac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 08:13:24 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
how long would it take move all UTXO's over, assuming there are no other transac…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 08:03:56 AM |
|
|
|
SegWit (25.5%) vs Bitcoin Unlimited (25.2%) Bitcoin Discussion
also the SegWit will move the blocksize to more than 2mb, which I'm sure is sign…
|
n/a | AngryDwarf | March 10, 2017, 06:08:37 AM |
Jump to: