It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Having troubles with DER signatures Development & Technical Discussion
This is the code I've written for creating Bitcoin signatures: https://github.co…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 06:51:17 AM | ||
Having troubles with DER signatures Development & Technical Discussion
Here is another example of a DER signature that is being rejected:Code:304402206…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:24:00 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Whose doing the coding?https://github.com/ciyam/ciyam/commits/masterFYI - last c…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 10:47:37 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
QuoteNielsen's Law of Internet bandwidth states that: a high-end user's conne…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 10:42:17 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
@CIYAM what is your opinion of the merits of side chains to solve the 10 minutes…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 01:10:20 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
You are arguing with a paid troll (NotLambChop)Don't expect to come out on the w…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 12:43:38 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Nope, not at all. I'm merely pointing out that you are talking rubbish when you…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 12:35:54 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Oh ok. So nothing meant by your opening gambit then:I see - you have made some s…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 12:09:59 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Who's side are you on again? I don't "take sides" but just try and work out wh…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:59:54 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
subchains. means every 30 seconds tx's are locked into blocks and these are then…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:56:59 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
i personally liked the idea of subchains(weakblocks) combined with upping the bl…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:39:10 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
atleast for now, if bitcoin blocked standard usage and went remittance only, for…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:29:38 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
So even with coffee out of the equation, the block size problem remains on the t…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:21:57 AM | ||
the future transaction fee debate Bitcoin Discussion
sending $5000 from australia to china:= 23263.52 via western union the recipient…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 11:17:25 AM | ||
the future transaction fee debate Bitcoin Discussion
well yea,, lucky once.. when BTC rose.. but thats not an every day event. bitcoi…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 10:29:04 AM | ||
the future transaction fee debate Bitcoin Discussion
Also your argument about INR and AUD is rather pointless (although seemingly of…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 10:17:08 AM | ||
the future transaction fee debate Bitcoin Discussion
still not the "virtually free /low fee and instant transactions" that many peopl…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 10:04:00 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
i will actually bother to watch all andrea's videos again, just for the sake of…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 07:00:38 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
i personally do not accept zero confirms.. which is where i disagree with you on…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 07:45:44 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Well - I've tried doing this with regtest but unfortunately there seems to be a…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 06:12:28 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
thats why even the big names, andreas, gavin, and hundreds of others sayprice of…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 06:03:38 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
It should be noted that this kind of low fee zero confirmation theft does increa…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 06:00:56 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
coffee can be bought using zero confirms.. not due to there being no malle.. but…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 05:57:55 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I wonder if the CLTV is not deployed in testnet yetIt could well be that not eno…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 03:13:53 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Overall Bitcoin needs to be more popular before we can do anything.Actually it i…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 02:47:53 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
Absolutely you can rely on zero confirmations since few people are going to risk…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 01:25:51 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
It's fine for any size transaction as amounts large and small are supportedby th…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 02, 2016, 12:53:36 AM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
anyway i disagree with you. Bitcoin is perfectly suitable for coffees.Apparentl…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 11:20:12 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
It is a pity that people want to worship Satoshi and don't recognise the mistake…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 11:11:15 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
bitcoin 0 fee's technically or 0.0001 if you cant wait.. i agree.. but when you…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 04:00:50 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
0 fee's?Yes - when I sent the 200 BTC back to the forum do you think I paid a fe…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:51:46 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
I am not telling anyone "what they should think" but instead just asking people…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:40:10 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
i did not write anything about coffee.lets assume i use it to remittance and wan…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:30:12 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
To expand on what I am saying I think that you need to consider this:Companies l…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:25:17 PM | ||
Can we just stop with the block size panic crap? Bitcoin Discussion
It is becoming apparent that there are paid shills participating in every topic…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:20:26 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
PROBLEM: Some people like to tell other people what bitcoin "should" be used in,…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 03:08:10 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
indeed, but we would win time and could come up with a good solution. there woul…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:42:06 PM | ||
Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn Bitcoin Discussion
I believe I covered the concept when I directly stated "offline solution". You…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:28:19 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
Sorry, now you are just walking into the mud pit, and challenging me to crawl in…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:26:03 PM | ||
Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn Bitcoin Discussion
Well, correct me if I am wrong, but isn't CIYAM in its own way a sidechain / off…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:21:46 PM | ||
Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn Bitcoin Discussion
And nobody pays me to shill. I have my own agenda.... justice, equality, fair p…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:07:00 PM | ||
Stupidly slow bitcoin core syncing Bitcoin Technical Support
You can find extra-fast nodes to connect to here: https://blockchain.info/hub-no…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:05:56 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
ROFL.... Here's your only real problem.... I don't support sidechains as an excl…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 02:04:09 PM | ||
Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn Bitcoin Discussion
What you are proposing is WORSE than the current Fiat System.That's interesting…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:58:28 PM | ||
Stupidly slow bitcoin core syncing Bitcoin Technical Support
For your case I wonder if you cant connect to one of the miner nodes. They proba…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:52:24 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
Don't be intentionally stupid.Again - you just can't help yourself but to be a f…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:44:31 PM | ||
Stupidly slow bitcoin core syncing Bitcoin Technical Support
What does the core build in bandwith monitor show?Unfortunately when I was in Au…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:39:37 PM | ||
Stupidly slow bitcoin core syncing Bitcoin Technical Support
I have been unable to sync for the last six months at least (if I run Bitcoin it…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:24:52 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
It is simple enough for an 8 year old to understand....You should try and be les…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 01:07:50 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
If I issue a signrawtransaction with (basically) the same tx I see this:Code:{ …
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 12:43:15 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Looks like 629420 to me too.So if the block number isn't the issue then is the s…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 12:27:13 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
FUD. Lying FUD. Again, no one is suggesting that we JUST raise blocksize and t…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 12:03:02 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
Yet, Blockstream Players have decided that to follow almost universal majority c…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 12:02:00 PM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
BTW if your holy number was choosen 256 KB instead in the past, where we would b…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 11:59:37 AM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
No - this is political. It is pretty much purely political at this point. Inde…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 11:49:06 AM | ||
Small blocksize increase should be done first and SegWit second Bitcoin Discussion
Just increasing the block size "does not scale" (keep doing that and you'll end…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 11:35:48 AM | ||
Maxwell + Wiuelle = Hearn Bitcoin Discussion
I really would like to hear someone offer some good supporting debate on the oth…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 10:58:15 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Hmm... I wonder if the problem is the CLTV value itself:Code:["ac9a09"]What bloc…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 10:39:14 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I think I basically have the correct raw tx but still Bitcoin won't allow me to…
|
n/a | CIYAM | January 01, 2016, 10:21:18 AM | ||
Transaction fee will rise, regardless of blocksize Bitcoin Discussion
I think the miners who are willing to take lots of transactions and risk the blo…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 04, 2015, 01:11:01 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I don't really understand the question. Do you mean you cannot produce a valid s…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 11:43:46 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I am guessing if I can work out the format that is suitable for signing (which w…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 11:02:50 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Unfortunately no such luck:Code:{ "hex" : "0100000001bbc6c76fd91bee5badfb0746…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 10:57:58 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Shit - just realised I was running 0.11.1 not 0.11.2.After downloading and re-ru…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 10:45:04 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes - I am trying to do the CLTV redeem (but without a sig it will never work of…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 08:36:23 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Actually the error now makes me wonder if testnet3 even currently supports CLTV?…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 06:33:01 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Hmm... I have nearly got there (perhaps):Code:0100000001bbc6c76fd91bee5badfb0746…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 05:35:13 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Am trying now to get this to work with testnet but I'm having troubles working o…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 31, 2015, 05:17:37 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I was trying to add another branch of OP_ELSE to mimic Gmaxwell's CoinSwap but I…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 30, 2015, 09:19:15 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
So far I have now come up with the following P2SH template:76a82087637576a91488a…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 30, 2015, 12:27:43 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
What software are yous using to make these transactions? Or are you writing the…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 30, 2015, 12:33:17 PM | ||
Need help releaseing funds from time locked address Bitcoin Discussion
Edit: I think I found your problem. It isn't the time specified in your transact…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 30, 2015, 12:04:57 AM | ||
Need help releaseing funds from time locked address Bitcoin Discussion
In the testing that I've been helping out with (https://bitcointalk.org/index.ph…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 11:52:34 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
After taking a closer look at the code I found this (scroll down to the bottom):…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 11:16:38 PM | ||
A new generation of encryption that would change the world... and bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
"Can't" and "never" are not exactly the right words when it gets to evolution.I…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 02:13:49 PM | ||
A new generation of encryption that would change the world... and bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
Seriously I am surprised the OP doesn't have an ad sig to be posting such nonsen…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 01:56:26 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Also, I don't think that code is in production since I didn't find it in the sou…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 01:44:03 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
however if at least one txin has a sequence that is not 0xffffffff then the CHEC…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 01:25:13 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
The one thing that is bothering me (taken from the BIP) is the following:Code: …
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 08:43:02 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
I think we have basically nutted it out (https://webbtc.com/script/7fec1a3773443…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 29, 2015, 06:26:34 AM | ||
Some one paid 1.0394BTC as fee for 2 transactions. Bitcoin Discussion
they just didnt calculate the amount to send back correctlyOh - yes - hmm... tha…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 28, 2015, 10:49:33 AM | ||
Some one paid 1.0394BTC as fee for 2 transactions. Bitcoin Discussion
As @franky1 suggests it is most likely a mistake with creating a "raw transactio…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 28, 2015, 10:02:32 AM | ||
To the Mods regarding post quality here... Meta
Yes banning signature campaigns would help greatly (probably removing over 90% o…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 28, 2015, 09:35:37 AM | ||
To the Mods regarding post quality here... Meta
And honestly it is only ever ad sig posters that keep making posts like the one…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 28, 2015, 07:35:51 AM | ||
To the Mods regarding post quality here... Meta
As was pointed out by myself and others in @deepceleron's topic blocking the sig…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 11:28:18 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
The script construction is as followsQuoteOP_DUP OP_SHA256 OP_EQUALOP_IF OP_D…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 09:58:01 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Yup - by using OP_1 instead of OP_0 it will now always execute the OP_IF steps (…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 07:18:15 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Again I'm pretty sure that the IF..ELSE shown in the BIP65 example is not the sa…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 05:45:59 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, when I read the explanation from the link you provided, OP_0 skips the firs…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 05:23:27 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Actually looking further into OP_IF I think we have a problem as what is between…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 03:52:50 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteOP_0 is included only to deal with an off-by-one error in Bitcoin Core when…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 27, 2015, 02:53:52 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
So with the help of that online tool and my existing knowledge of the structure…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 07:42:44 AM | ||
Wanted: Bitcoin merge mined clone coin that can atomically trade with Bitcoin. Altcoin Discussion
My main interest though is in getting this tech into bitcoin merge mined coins.…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 01:24:17 PM | ||
Wanted: Bitcoin merge mined clone coin that can atomically trade with Bitcoin. Altcoin Discussion
An update about the status of the current research being done with ACCT via Bitc…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 12:11:16 PM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
BTW - for those who are wondering what the value of getting this stuff right you…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 11:58:42 AM | ||
Just remove signatures already. As in delete, disable, gone. Meta
The reality is that very helpful forum posters such as @DannyHamilton are talkin…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 11:10:26 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
Assuming it is standard then if HASH160 was to be changed to say SHA256 would it…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 04:32:49 AM | ||
Is this BIP65 sample script standard? Development & Technical Discussion
It seems there was something wrong with that redeem script (still trying to work…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 26, 2015, 03:39:19 AM | ||
Wanted: Bitcoin merge mined clone coin that can atomically trade with Bitcoin. Altcoin Discussion
Can you provide any other info or links to this project?At this stage we are jus…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 24, 2015, 09:16:23 PM | ||
Wanted: Bitcoin merge mined clone coin that can atomically trade with Bitcoin. Altcoin Discussion
Another forum member is actually working with me to test the use of CLTV (CHECKL…
|
n/a | CIYAM | December 23, 2015, 09:42:28 PM |