It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Main developers don't give a damn about us, bitcoiners! Bitcoin Discussion
Gavin is including very, very few patches and features people have requested. Ev…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 30, 2013, 05:32:07 PM | ||
Pool fees for an asic users are somewhat amusing Hardware
Sure hasn't been my experience.
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 29, 2013, 11:38:32 AM | ||
Transaction propagation speed - experimental results Development & Technical Discussion
If you do it with small number of peers, your results will be overly - optimisti…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 29, 2013, 03:56:01 AM | ||
Transaction propagation speed - experimental results Development & Technical Discussion
Reprocessed plot (counted each (tx_id, peer) pair only once):One thing you want…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 29, 2013, 01:57:35 AM | ||
Is a 0 confirmation double spend for retail possible? Development & Technical Discussion
I sea, So a POS device using the blockchain is never going to be feasible then?…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 28, 2013, 04:13:20 AM | ||
random person on irc reports strongcoin compromised Service Discussion
For your consideration, #bitcoin on freenode (times US Pacific):00:04 -!- R0x0rM…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 28, 2013, 02:40:22 AM | ||
[ANN] BitEN - bitcoin erlang node Development & Technical Discussion
Insular attitudes make insular code which makes fragile and brittle code.This is…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 27, 2013, 11:35:51 PM | ||
Revealing public key (address re-use) Development & Technical Discussion
However, at times I also have this silly illogical action-outcome monkey brain w…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 27, 2013, 09:58:25 PM | ||
BFGMiner: modular FPGA/GPU, clk/fans, GBT, RPC, Linux/OpenWrt/PPA/Win64 2.10.5 Mining software (miners)
Be careful! If this (or anything else) bricks your Avalon's controller, you will…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 27, 2013, 08:15:26 PM | ||
Pool fees for an asic users are somewhat amusing Hardware
Don't see what the problem is, 3% (or even 10%) of a lot of money is a lot of mo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 27, 2013, 12:58:05 PM | ||
Pool fees for an asic users are somewhat amusing Hardware
It's perhaps an argument that some asic users should chip in to buy Forrestv a d…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 27, 2013, 11:33:50 AM | ||
Batch #3 Not selling as fast.... Hardware
Batch 1 took weeks to sell out— and the same thing happened: people put in order…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 26, 2013, 10:18:24 AM | ||
BIP32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets) code available in Java Development & Technical Discussion
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'ee'See the other link in the post…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 26, 2013, 10:13:44 AM | ||
BIP32 (Hierarchical Deterministic Wallets) code available in Java Development & Technical Discussion
The draft is already published at https://github.com/prusnak/mnemonic but it doe…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 26, 2013, 09:55:42 AM | ||
Add user interface to set dust limit and filtered addresses Development & Technical Discussion
That's 2200TB. Which is 37 of the best 2016 HDDs.[...]Would it be outlandish to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 26, 2013, 02:38:02 AM | ||
BFL is keeping a portion of first batch chips for their own mining farm Off-topic
Not hardware related. geesh.
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 10:58:51 PM | ||
Wiki governance Project Development
It seems like this whole discussion has arisen out of some people on Reddit bein…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 10:20:47 PM | ||
Wiki governance Project Development
I don't think think the wiki needs "governance"— or at least the word sort of im…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 09:15:28 PM | ||
White Paper - Receipt of BTC From Unknown Person Legal
Luke-Jr & gmaxwell, would you like to raise these concerns on GitHub too? The la…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 08:26:44 PM | ||
White Paper - Receipt of BTC From Unknown Person Legal
"UP purposely entered in JD’s bitcoin address information and initiated the the…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 05:00:30 PM | ||
Dedicated bitcoind node, 1gb ram ="errors" : "EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc \nstd::bad Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, bitcoind memory usage seems to grow fairly steadily at the moment.I haven't…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 05:52:03 PM | ||
Add user interface to set dust limit and filtered addresses Development & Technical Discussion
these "dust" transactions will no longer be dust.Are you really anticipating an…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 10:39:48 AM | ||
Funding of network security with infinite block sizes Development & Technical Discussion
Isn't this just a complicated way of saying, "if the majority hashpower is disho…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 10:21:01 AM | ||
bitcoind memory and cpu footprint: oh my! Strategies? Development & Technical Discussion
Fair enough, I've compiled it on Centos 6.4 but to my surprise it's now using al…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 24, 2013, 10:15:39 AM | ||
coinbase transaction when block reward is 0 Development & Technical Discussion
A corner case to keep in mind if we ever want to prohibit zero value outputs!
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 23, 2013, 09:04:18 PM | ||
Add user interface to set dust limit and filtered addresses Development & Technical Discussion
Would people who support this also support an alternative which strongly de-prio…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 23, 2013, 09:03:10 PM | ||
Funding of network security with infinite block sizes Development & Technical Discussion
1. Miners VOTE for the next block size every X blocks, using special transaction…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 23, 2013, 08:52:31 PM | ||
Funding of network security with infinite block sizes Development & Technical Discussion
A transaction pays me 1000 BTC in block X.I want to make sure that payment stays…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 23, 2013, 07:35:21 PM | ||
Bitcoin and me (Hal Finney) Bitcoin Discussion
There is at least a small group of the technical crowd around here who has been…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 19, 2013, 04:05:57 PM | ||
UTXO set size does not increase storage costs, you just suck at computer science Development & Technical Discussion
you just don't store UTXO set locally. [...]But, of course, it's also possible t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 18, 2013, 08:01:48 AM | ||
How to force a rule change by bloating the UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
If running a full node becomes impractical for home users, but millions of small…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 17, 2013, 11:08:46 AM | ||
UTXO set size does not increase storage costs, you just suck at computer science Development & Technical Discussion
For all practical intents and purposes it is enough to have N latest blocks + UT…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 17, 2013, 10:43:14 AM | ||
No-recompilation fix for the "Lock table is out of available lock entries" Development & Technical Discussion
Don't you think it is about time the "majority" decided what is best for the blo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 12, 2013, 02:46:14 PM | ||
A successful DOUBLE SPEND US$10000 against OKPAY this morning. Bitcoin Discussion
gmaxwell pointed out that this could happen if an attacker started by flooding t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 12, 2013, 02:20:09 PM | ||
Alert: chain fork caused by pre-0.8 clients dealing badly with large blocks Bitcoin Discussion
0.8 is not flawed. The flaw lied in 0.7 and below. If an upgrade was hastened, t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 12, 2013, 01:09:55 AM | ||
In re Bitcoin Devs are idiots Bitcoin Discussion
Another way to state the real problem: There is no Bitcoin Protocol Spec, most s…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 12, 2013, 12:18:22 AM | ||
Alert: chain fork caused by pre-0.8 clients dealing badly with large blocks Bitcoin Discussion
0.8 is not flawed. The flaw lied in 0.7 and below. If an upgrade was hastened, t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 11, 2013, 09:50:49 PM | ||
Predicting Time to Finish Downloading Chain Development & Technical Discussion
The download time is linear in the number of transactions. 0.8.1 (current git) u…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 10, 2013, 04:04:53 PM | ||
Discouraging dust without hurting exotic uses of small valued coins Development & Technical Discussion
My crazy list of things mostly only suitable for altcoins has what I believe to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 10, 2013, 05:14:20 AM | ||
Dust Collection Development & Technical Discussion
True, it doesn't require any protocol changes... but it does require miners to c…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 03:42:56 PM | ||
why did bitcoin choose secp256k1 over secp256r1? Development & Technical Discussion
i've always been a bit wary of djb crypto, despite the guy being a pretty big pr…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 02:31:39 PM | ||
Bitcoin 1 and Bitcoin 2: A solution to the block size problem Development & Technical Discussion
If UTXO tree is maintained via merged mining which has only 1/1000 of hashing po…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 12:59:07 PM | ||
why did bitcoin choose secp256k1 over secp256r1? Development & Technical Discussion
yeah, i had seen that it does offer some speed advantages. i don't believe signa…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 08:57:37 AM | ||
[ANN] Fast blockchain C++ parser w/ source code Development & Technical Discussion
Ah, and since he changed this back— I suppose I should point this out here:This…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 08:37:14 AM | ||
[ANN] Fast blockchain C++ parser w/ source code Development & Technical Discussion
After interacting with znort987 on IRC I'd advise being very careful in using th…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 09, 2013, 08:13:25 AM | ||
Transaction Spam Awareness: What YOU Can Do! Bitcoin Discussion
It cannot be pruned because it has to stay around in fast storage to detect doub…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 08, 2013, 01:59:09 AM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
So some discussions from the inflationproofing thread provided two additional re…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 08, 2013, 01:46:50 AM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
This overall upgrade strikes me as quite important for scaling beyond the curren…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 08, 2013, 01:26:53 AM | ||
Satoshi Nakamoto's words regarding nodes, mining and blocksize 100GB TX/Day! Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, but defenders of Block size limit should not say ”Satoshi said 1MB so that'…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 08, 2013, 01:22:48 AM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
It's not wrong, because it's not the entire solution. I forgot to add that you a…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 08, 2013, 01:08:16 AM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
Why not simply require fees == 50 - subsidy before the block size can be raised…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 10:13:12 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
to take other steps to hassle SD (client changes to encourage higher fees to le…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 08:38:56 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
OK, there is a patch for miners to blacklist SD tx's from being included in bloc…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 08:13:05 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
Some fun stats I posted in another thread earlier:Here are some recent blocks, t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 07:53:46 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
Is that what I asked? If so, can I send the 1 BTC to the address on your sig or…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 07:45:05 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
That's a slippery slope gentlemen.Ehh... I don't agree— when Bitcoin is used cor…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 07:42:17 PM | ||
Soft block size limit reached, action required by YOU Mining
Code:diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cppindex 9a06dbf..d3fba73 100644--- a/…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 07:35:08 PM | ||
Now that we've reached the 250kb soft limit... Development & Technical Discussion
Some people might be interested in some analysis of recent blocks.There seems to…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 06:09:06 PM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
Since SPV clients anyways need to trust full clients,The point of this is fixing…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 07, 2013, 11:53:35 AM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
Oh, and a shared disadvantage of both colored coins and 2PR is that they can't p…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 05, 2013, 03:29:45 PM | ||
I taint rich! (Fun with raw transactions and disrupting 'taint' analysis) Bitcoin Discussion
Code:0100000003c8e2c94e969d9d66aae4812b6cf156f32267b773fb2118db696bb847ebd3454a1…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 28, 2013, 09:25:03 PM | ||
Trouble recovering wallet Beginners & Help
What you can do is try to salvage the wallet.Salvage doesn't work too well right…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 03, 2013, 09:37:32 PM | ||
Can anybody stall Bitcoin for 72BTC per hour? ANSWER: PARTIALLY? Development & Technical Discussion
But For 2400 satoshis Per Block In transaction fees, you can make It that only p…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | March 02, 2013, 09:57:07 PM | ||
Finney Attack against SatoshiDice or how to get 250 BTC per solved block. Development & Technical Discussion
blockchain on a non- ECC RAM machine. There's going to be a lots of folks follo…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2013, 10:59:57 PM | ||
Finney Attack against SatoshiDice or how to get 250 BTC per solved block. Development & Technical Discussion
The blockchain and transaction information is still not stored in a database, bu…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 27, 2013, 06:23:39 PM | ||
[Announcement] Avalon ASIC Batch #1 Ships Hardware
Just confirming I haven't missed some thread— have no US customers (beyond the t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2013, 05:32:24 PM | ||
A clean solution to ALL Bitcoin problems: SatoshiDice, Block size, future fees. Development & Technical Discussion
If the maximum block size is increased, then this proposal will prevent fees fro…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 26, 2013, 03:16:11 PM | ||
Ripple Altcoin Discussion |
n/a | gmaxwell | February 25, 2013, 12:10:31 AM | ||
Save any files to namecoin blockchain Altcoin Discussion
Namecoin has nothing on bitcoin testnet:Code:(bitcoind -testnet getrawtransactio…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2013, 11:18:16 PM | ||
Should bitcoin move to SHA-3 ? Development & Technical Discussion
You're also forgetting that ditching SHA256 will make all mining software and cu…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2013, 11:12:53 PM | ||
[WTS] Ripple coins for sale Altcoin Discussion
I have Ripple coins for sale.I sell them in quantities of 1,000 XRPPM me your of…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2013, 01:52:19 PM | ||
Not a alt-coin, but better. Alt-communications Altcoin Discussion
I noticed that when you send a message the CPU maxes to 100% for about 2.5 minut…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 24, 2013, 11:36:45 AM | ||
Ripple Giveaway! Altcoin Discussion
Bitstamp ate mine, so hey, maybe if I ask for more I'll get it.rHs4j8RLTdgGiF3cB…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 10:33:26 PM | ||
Bitcoin BIP 16 /P2SH/ is bad, your action is needed! Mining
"Standard" scripts is merely miner bias. It's a flaw that the software developer…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | January 13, 2012, 04:08:13 PM | ||
Not a alt-coin, but better. Alt-communications Altcoin Discussion
A lot of the decisions in it seemed weird and unfortunate to me— E.g. it uses gi…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 08:39:13 PM | ||
[ANN] [PPC] PPCoin 0.3.0 Release - Upgrade Required Altcoin Discussion
I am not aware of any centrally controlled clock that you are talking about. Cou…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 08:08:56 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
There is a reasonable fix for this though, just set a reorg limit say 100 blocks…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 07:46:25 PM | ||
[ANN] [PPC] PPCoin 0.3.0 Release - Upgrade Required Altcoin Discussion
Yes, but at the same time people can lead dishonest discussions of design decisi…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 06:18:06 PM | ||
And it's gone: losing all your ripples in 0.01 seconds Altcoin Discussion
They said they're working with bitstamp to auto-return the XRP. Maybe you'll get…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 05:17:39 PM | ||
And it's gone: losing all your ripples in 0.01 seconds Altcoin Discussion
Turns out ripple has no way for an address to identify if it's supposed to accep…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 03:31:08 PM | ||
I'VE CHANGE MY MIND! Development & Technical Discussion
Can you explain this in more laymen terms of why it needs to be increased to at…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 23, 2013, 03:01:07 AM | ||
solution for blockchain scalability problem Altcoin Discussion
E.g. suppose transaction spends outpoint 123456:1. We need to confirm that this…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 22, 2013, 07:08:41 PM | ||
A proposal for fast POS transactions with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
Ripple could use bitcoin to settle up, settling only when rippling failed or asy…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | July 13, 2011, 08:21:12 PM | ||
A proposal for fast POS transactions with Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
So, what do you think? Is this a useful addition to the Bitcoininfrastructure? D…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | July 13, 2011, 03:31:13 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
If you mean a mesh of trust with link X being some validator who trusts validato…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 22, 2013, 05:50:42 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
And what happens with small world topologies like this:Code: *full-mesh of 32…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 22, 2013, 04:54:09 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
I largely agree. It comes down to the practical question of which scheme will be…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 22, 2013, 12:40:20 AM | ||
I defend Ripple - “Premined” is more decentralized Altcoin Discussion
QuoteSubsidy is so important in mining it promotes the creation of large mining…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 22, 2013, 12:07:31 AM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
Is there a similar compact and fairly comprehensive expression of Ripple's secur…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 11:44:33 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
We have a lot of ideas for how to manage this. But we won't get to decide. We ca…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 10:27:55 PM | ||
WTF happened to ripple? Altcoin Discussion
It qualifies as peer-to-peer in my book as long as you've got enough people to r…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 09:23:23 PM | ||
review of proposals for adaptive maximum block size Development & Technical Discussion
Any "sum of transaction fees" reduces to miners picking whatever they want, sinc…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 07:18:01 PM | ||
Economics of block size limit Development & Technical Discussion
I've wrote on my blog about various economic forces behind block size limit. Her…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 07:11:11 PM | ||
How a floating blocksize limit inevitably leads towards centralization Development & Technical Discussion
It's hard enough to sell the idea of a distributed cryptocurrency without also n…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 07:07:53 PM | ||
Save any files to namecoin blockchain Altcoin Discussion
Most of the insertion slowness is probably the recursive IsFromMe / IsConfirmed…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 06:53:37 AM | ||
Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) Bitcoin Discussion
Or does the fork mean that the current money supply gets divided between those t…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 05:02:13 AM | ||
[Announcement] Avalon ASIC Batch #1 Ships Hardware
Could someone with a low Batch 1 number call DHL and check if they have any trac…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 04:29:55 AM | ||
Ripple Giveaway! Altcoin Discussion
rHs4j8RLTdgGiF3cBGv28tjVA5yfSi5C2L
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 01:56:38 AM | ||
Mutually dependent transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I'm wondering how the network would handle mutually dependent transactions (I'm…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 01:51:19 AM | ||
Finney Attack against SatoshiDice or how to get 250 BTC per solved block. Development & Technical Discussion
Why would miners drop transactions for SD? That makes no sense. Sure they might…
|
n/a | gmaxwell | February 21, 2013, 01:32:50 AM |