It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Do Not Use Privacy Shark - Fraud Alert Marketplace
+1 agreed, joe
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 11, 2010, 04:32:43 PM | ||
Beware of scammers! Scam Accusations
I just joined Bitcoin today and I am dismayed that scamming is even possible at…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 11, 2010, 04:26:18 PM | ||
looking for partner with paypal account (receiving payments) Services
Paypal is not the only popular payment system. Certainly much more money is tran…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 11, 2010, 04:22:08 PM | ||
Wikipedia Article Incubator Project Development
Donated. The article looks a lot better than it used to; much less "bitcoin com…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 11, 2010, 01:52:52 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
You are still Bitcoin-compliant by applying this patch.This patch creates a new,…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 07:14:51 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Define "inefficient" in this context. My understanding is that the p2p network…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 05:45:37 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
as long as the fundamental properties of bitcoin remain there could be a lady ga…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 04:04:43 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
bitcoin itself is artificial scarcity.
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 02:41:41 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
Satoshi, are you endorsing the idea that additional block chains would each crea…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 02:22:40 PM | ||
Bitcoin 0.3.18: RPC freeze Bitcoin Technical Support
[22:11:50] MT`AwAy: RE: curl and ssl: I bet you have: rpcssl=true in yo…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 02:20:43 PM | ||
Google or Amazon payments for BTC Trading Discussion
But.... "legally speaking".... or "tos speaking".... Is Bitcoin REALLY conside…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 02:17:26 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Sure, the miners collect more fees. Sure, the block limit will increase. As th…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 10, 2010, 02:02:46 AM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, it strengthens the chain -- but if the bitcoin chain is processing (say) th…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 11:11:40 PM | ||
Fees in BitDNS confusion Development & Technical Discussion
Just wondering about the following example :I broadcast a transaction, sending X…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 06:07:04 PM | ||
RFC: Comment field in Transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I think there is general agreement that arbitrary data (a comment field) should…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 06:05:45 PM | ||
The economics of generalized bitcoin Economics
Arguments of "block sizes will get bigger anyway" miss the point.If the total bl…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 05:57:33 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
seems that the miner would have to basically do "extra work". and if there's no…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 04:49:06 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
I think it would be possible for BitDNS to be a completely separate network and…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 04:32:35 PM | ||
Fees in BitDNS confusion Development & Technical Discussion
A bunch of the current debate about including BitDNS or BitX makes assumptions t…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 02:51:02 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
When a large amount of users are non-currency data users, currency users will fa…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 02:48:41 PM | ||
I2P now accepting Bitcoin donations! Marketplace
I directly emailed echelon, and he gives a different bitcoin address than "Max S…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 12:11:52 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
I also support a third transaction type for timestamp hash sized arbitrary data.…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 11:50:48 AM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
If a past transaction becomes invalid and disappears, the website cannot avoid p…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 11:13:50 AM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
by default disallow non-standard transactions that exceed 128 bytes (or whatever…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 03:38:27 AM | ||
Which IRC channel to use for non-dev discussion? Bitcoin Discussion
My preference is for #bitcoin also.According to freenode admins, there are multi…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 02:52:10 AM | ||
The economics of generalized bitcoin Economics
Another point is that BitDNS is essentially an autonomous entity that runs a pai…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 09, 2010, 02:03:37 AM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
These experiments are better suited for an alternate network and block chain. L…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 11:29:54 PM | ||
Some Simple Questions Bitcoin Discussion
For starters, I just want to say Bitcoin is awesome. I am a developer/economist…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 11:11:31 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Currency transactions would have to fight harder -- pay more fees -- to make sur…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 10:46:06 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Rather, it will increase everybody's fees, and incentivize creation of a currenc…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 10:14:00 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
No, it'll disadvantage people who refuse to pay fees.Rather, it will increase ev…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 09:57:41 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Transaction fees will pay for the generation of the chain in the future, therefo…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 09:48:28 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
We should be discussing BitX, the general block chain that in the future will su…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 08:50:23 PM | ||
The economics of generalized bitcoin Economics
Jumping over from this excellent post by appamatto...In the original formulation…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 08:49:39 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
HOWEVER: jgarzik, you're over-reacting, too. This will not cause a block chain…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 07:57:10 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
I'll and add another reason not to have a "list transactions that happened after…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 07:58:05 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Please start your own block chain, rather than forking the network like this.I h…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 07:38:17 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
The issue here is that these "GenCoins" would in effect have greater value as it…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 07:36:26 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
I think the important point is that these things are unavoidable unsafe after a…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 06:07:22 PM | ||
RFC: new IRC channel #bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
#bitcoin currently isn't registered, why not simply register it? If the Bitcoin…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 04:49:02 PM | ||
Which IRC channel to use for non-dev discussion? Bitcoin Discussion
The admins on #freenode seem to think the group registration process for #bitcoi…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 04:47:56 PM | ||
RFC: new IRC channel #bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
Who owns #bitcoin-talk?Looks free and available, to me.
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 04:04:21 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Their value is directly derived from the services offered on the "generalized pr…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 03:57:54 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
I know I've been criticized for being reluctant about listtransactions. Let me…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 03:46:03 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
Surely since the WalletTx are added sequentially to the wallet, we can assume th…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 03:22:42 PM | ||
RFC: new IRC channel #bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
The current IRC channel #bitcoin-dev on freenode is increasingly becoming a user…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:54:11 PM | ||
I2P now accepting Bitcoin donations! Marketplace
+1 donated
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:30:03 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
The alternative is for the payment to be made in coins from the alternate system…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:29:22 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I agree with jgarzik, the chain should not be used as storage.If you want to cre…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:28:08 PM | ||
Bitcoin4Cash is now Automated (well, mostly) Marketplace
As it stands now there are 5 cards available.The website shows zero. I guess th…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:25:42 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
It would be great to have a JSON-RPC method for listing new transactions that ar…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 02:01:02 PM | ||
Bitcoin4Cash is now Automated (well, mostly) Marketplace
What's the status of bitcoin2cc.com?I was wondering same. I went there and the…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 01:45:40 PM | ||
[PATCH] listaccounts for JSON Development & Technical Discussion
+1 good stuffFurther suggestion: return pairs of Objects, listing balance along…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 08, 2010, 01:03:50 PM | ||
Cooperative mining Pools
It is working with jgarzik's cpuminer, m0mchil's python miner and Diablo's java…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 10:24:09 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
I agree with jgarzik, the chain should not be used as storage.Me too. But I'm no…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 09:28:59 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
OP_DROP transactions can be ineligible for free space in blocks.So OP_DROP trans…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 09:43:26 PM | ||
[PATCH] bitcoin build fix, for new GNU assembler Development & Technical Discussion
This problem has now been fixed in upstream binutils, and trickled down to Fedor…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 08:24:02 PM | ||
Resist the urge to use block chain for generalized storage Development & Technical Discussion
This will have the effect of raising the cost of bitcoin transactions for everyo…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 05:04:54 PM | ||
svn r197: IsStandard check for transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Let's allow transactions with a single " OP_DROP" to be included. The maximum 52…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 03:48:02 PM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
Hi jgarzik, getting problem with configure on pretty old CentOS 5. Any idea, ple…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 03:56:00 AM | ||
Bitleaks Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 03:54:10 AM | ||
getnewaddress per wallet Development & Technical Discussion
This is another reason to have a more modularized bitcoin software... someone co…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 03:52:59 AM | ||
Bitleaks Bitcoin Discussion |
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 03:02:04 AM | ||
getnewaddress per wallet Development & Technical Discussion
Hey,Quote< MT`AwAy> genjix: http://pastecoin.com/
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 02:41:15 AM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
Thanks for testing. Here's another test, integrating the 4way algorithm and rem…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 02:38:12 AM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
cryptopp_asm32 = 1350khash/sThis is faster than standard bitcoin client, yes?Any…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 01:39:45 AM | ||
[PATCH] bitcoin build fix, for new GNU assembler Development & Technical Discussion
After upgrading to Fedora 14 (GNU assembler 2.20.51.0.7-5.fc14 20100318), the bi…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 01:15:50 AM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
QuoteI'm interested if this works at all.it does, installs and runs nice as usua…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 07, 2010, 12:23:47 AM | ||
The EFF thanks bitcoin donors. Bitcoin Discussion
The page that they link to in today's tweet about Bitcoin is hard to find from t…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 11:58:42 PM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
A test version of cpuminer, with crypto++ 32-bit assembly implementation, has be…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 08:27:27 PM | ||
Wikileaks... making the U.S. look good? Off-topic
Transparency in general is good, but the complete inability to have a private co…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 12:45:21 PM | ||
Small protocol changes for flexibility Development & Technical Discussion
Protocol versioning is very "coarse."Smarter protocols export lists of capabilit…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 12:20:10 PM | ||
Wikileaks... making the U.S. look good? Off-topic
Sure there's a few hiccups by a government suddenly being pried open. But in the…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 12:12:38 PM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
The 4way implementation is slower on my IntelCore2Duo. The 'c' implementation is…
|
n/a | jgarzik | November 28, 2010, 03:07:15 PM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
Version 0.2.2 released:- VIA padlock works (lfm)- minor bug fixes (lfm)SHA1: b7f…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 02:38:23 AM | ||
anyone tried running with VIA Padlock extensions? Development & Technical Discussion
git updated with sha256_via, sha256_4way fixes.
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 01:01:38 AM | ||
Iran and ‘radical’ Islam Off-topic
Unless you have been to Tehran, you are getting your information from the contro…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 06, 2010, 12:53:40 AM | ||
Wikileaks... making the U.S. look good? Off-topic
They don't like the idea of free radical hackers undermining those in power.I do…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 10:53:10 PM | ||
anyone tried running with VIA Padlock extensions? Development & Technical Discussion
jgarzik:trying your cpu-miner on via:bug in main pprogram segment violation: ne…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 11:19:25 PM | ||
Political Assessment Off-topic
A bus is more fuel efficient and should benefit from the economy of scale.There…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 10:43:14 PM | ||
Protocol Buffer example file for Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
The draft spec on the wiki is incomplete crap.Your example is missing obvious da…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 10:35:55 PM | ||
Wikileaks... making the U.S. look good? Off-topic
Yep -- the diplomats and wanna-be's over at http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/ seem…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 10:30:50 PM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
Or, to put in military terms, we know that wikileaks' entire financial infrastru…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 03:29:50 AM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
Also, it would be nice if you explain what kind of "pressure" you're doing. You…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 03:15:21 AM | ||
PayPal "permanently restricts" Wikileaks account Off-topic
Nitpick: One need not be a node, in order to use bitcoins.
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 01:56:53 AM | ||
Official DiabloMiner Thread CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
The open source driver bits are mostly there. The driver folks know how OpenCL…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 05, 2010, 12:47:00 AM | ||
Official DiabloMiner Thread CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Do you know of open source drivers that I can use instead?Open source drivers wo…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 10:25:06 PM | ||
Weed4Bitcoin.com Bitcoin Discussion
2. (Yeah, i know, that i can't stop anybody from doing anything, but I'm just st…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 09:10:32 PM | ||
PayPal "permanently restricts" Wikileaks account Off-topic
The end result is likely to be the same. It doesn't matter if someone in this c…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 08:43:30 PM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
This is also about doing what is right, and this is the right thing to do. I ge…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 06:28:45 PM | ||
libBitCoin, a good idea? Development & Technical Discussion
It's very, very easy to hook up to the JSON-RPC interface of the daemon with pyt…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 05:43:26 PM | ||
Weed4Bitcoin.com Bitcoin Discussion
IMO, bitcoin should remain an underground currency. While there are legitimate u…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 05:29:03 PM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willi…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 05:25:45 PM | ||
bitcoin:// Bitcoin Discussion
MIME type is clearly superior to "bitcoin://" type URL. Because after all, you…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 05:18:06 PM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
in the wikileaks case its a great danger.+1, I agree completelyWe know that priv…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 04:59:27 AM | ||
Segfault on hardened Linux systems Bitcoin Technical Support
Not sure about C++, but in C, "static bool foo;" is guaranteed to initialize 'fo…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 04:22:13 AM | ||
Weed4Bitclin Bitcoin Discussion
Based on the thread subject spelling, I bet I know what inspired this post... S…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 03, 2010, 10:09:02 PM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
Fantastic work. Are you able to get the 4way algorithm into the main client? I…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 12:42:58 AM | ||
Weed4Bitcoin.com Bitcoin Discussion
Yeah, I really don't see the advantage of bitcoin over cash for in-person transa…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 04, 2010, 12:40:26 AM | ||
add/withdraw mtgox with paxum Marketplace
Yes, true. Full automation is possible. Maybe you just need to ask.I did. Multi…
|
n/a | jgarzik | December 03, 2010, 05:40:56 PM |