It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Applying Ripple Consensus model in Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
In case you do not aware, checkpoints (https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/m…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 15, 2013, 03:13:20 AM | ||
Blockchain.info coin mixer TOTAL RIPOFF Service Discussion
I am not adverse to lowering the fees. Those of you who feel a 1.5% fee is too h…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 13, 2013, 11:41:12 AM | ||
coinbase.com sending unconfirmed? Huge risk? Service Discussion
Wow! It surprises me how many people are willing to accept a long chain of uncon…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 13, 2013, 11:33:08 AM | ||
coinbase.com sending unconfirmed? Huge risk? Service Discussion
FWIW one way this may have happened is if they accepted one (or possibly two) co…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 13, 2013, 02:35:10 AM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIn a radix tree what you would do is first add each transaction to the tree…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 13, 2013, 12:00:19 AM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
This requires the tree to be completely regenerated for each block, since the ha…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 12, 2013, 08:11:04 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, here is an idea that could work: rather than making the generated UTXO…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 12, 2013, 04:05:39 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
You can't make that assumption because an attacker might create a bunch of trans…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 12, 2013, 03:20:15 PM | ||
Purchasing fidelity bonds by provably throwing away bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Just to jump in and agree with Mike; I would guess the Foundation would prefer n…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 12, 2013, 02:59:43 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Have you considered that since the hashes are well distributed, you could mostly…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 12, 2013, 02:46:25 PM | ||
Creating Bitcoin passports using sacrifices Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIs this really an issue? Well, I think the the question really is why would…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 11, 2013, 09:31:51 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
I've quite successfully double-spent non-final transactions by just putting a re…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 11, 2013, 06:33:54 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
nLockTime isn't killed "for good", it's just considered non-standard so the defa…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 11, 2013, 04:27:47 AM | ||
Creating Bitcoin passports using sacrifices Development & Technical Discussion
Someone else should chime in with the math to work it out explicitly - I know wa…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 11, 2013, 04:12:10 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Gavin's pull request looks like it is disabling a feature needed by transaction…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 11, 2013, 12:37:29 AM | ||
[BOUNTY] 200 BTC for lightweight colored coin client(s) Project Development
Have you seen my post on fidelitybonds and contracts? Fidelity bonds are a close…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 08, 2013, 07:25:05 AM | ||
Creating Bitcoin passports using sacrifices Development & Technical Discussion
Hmm. I'm not sure this undermines my argument I never heard of a "bonded guard"…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 06, 2013, 02:27:23 AM | ||
Creating Bitcoin passports using sacrifices Development & Technical Discussion
I posted my first draft of something approaching a proper tech spec for this fid…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 05, 2013, 01:16:26 AM | ||
what is -checkblocks for, and why does it default so high? Development & Technical Discussion
FWIW the default has been reduced to 288 blocks (2 days) for 0.8: https://github…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 04, 2013, 08:53:42 PM | ||
Creating Bitcoin passports using sacrifices Development & Technical Discussion
FWIW I posted about consecutive miners fees (and the whole bank idea) months ago…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 02, 2013, 01:08:51 PM | ||
Odd testnet block Development & Technical Discussion
Two things are going on: block explorer does t understand multisig transactions,…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 02, 2013, 04:47:55 PM | ||
New Bitcoin vulnerability: A transaction that takes at least 3 minutes to verify Development & Technical Discussion
I respect very much all the hard work all the core devs do designing and writing…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | February 02, 2013, 02:10:02 AM | ||
New Bitcoin vulnerability: A transaction that takes at least 3 minutes to verify Development & Technical Discussion
Has anyone tried this on testnet yet?EDIT: and while we're at it, you realize ho…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 31, 2013, 07:04:41 PM | ||
A simple definition of "lost" coins Bitcoin Discussion
As an example 157i5gK7iN4bNAN39Ahuoiq6Tx5TaQukTE is owned by Hal, who has public…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 31, 2013, 06:56:49 PM | ||
Purchasing fidelity bonds by provably throwing away bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
We can have list of 20 trustworthy organization like wikipedia, btc foundation,…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 31, 2013, 02:44:33 PM | ||
error message: "Unknown transaction type found" Development & Technical Discussion
Basically, when listtransactions runs, it looks at every output of every transac…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 31, 2013, 02:29:10 PM | ||
Enable OP-Codes & Scripting? Development & Technical Discussion
They are enabled already on Testnet so you can try your experiments there.
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 30, 2013, 01:36:31 PM | ||
[SUCCESS] Double Spend against a satoshidice loss Development & Technical Discussion
That is a very good point! Anybody at all can create modified versions of any t…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 30, 2013, 11:15:03 AM | ||
[SUCCESS] Double Spend against a satoshidice loss Development & Technical Discussion
So the input wasn't even re-signed. The old signature was simply left-padded wi…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 30, 2013, 12:15:46 AM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
Check out chronobit. The merged mining system allows arbitrary numbers of alt-c…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 03:31:18 PM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin timestamping has one huge advantage over other services; it is plainly a…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 02:55:32 PM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
Is there a lot of demand for timestamping? Are people willing to pay for it?Lots…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 02:49:23 PM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
I suspect you built your system in significantly less time than I did mine. Not…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 01:22:55 PM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
Hidden on my webserver, of course. I tested the interface and the automation (b…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 12:52:35 PM | ||
Let's Embrace BTC Trusted Timestamping Development & Technical Discussion
Agreed. This isn't something that should be in the reference client, nor widely…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 28, 2013, 12:04:01 PM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Yup, that's another known attack. bitcoinj is going to support recursive analysi…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 26, 2013, 07:15:30 PM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
And diceoncrack fell on to this attack, it seems... https://bitcointalk.org/inde…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 26, 2013, 05:18:18 PM | ||
[ANN] cbitcoin 2.0 - A Bitcoin Library in C Project Development
OK, since you aren't the only one to complain, I've changed the title.Thanks, it…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 24, 2013, 12:51:02 PM | ||
2013-01-23 motherboard.vice.com - Ripple, a Peer-to-Peer Financing Network, Coul Press
If Ripple succeeds I think it'll turn out to be much more useful for business-to…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 24, 2013, 11:03:36 AM | ||
smart property as an alternative to invoicing Development & Technical Discussion
I'm afraid you're cargo-culting this. It doesn't matter how much hard work they…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 01:38:47 PM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
Well, the question becomes how did you find out about the transaction in the fir…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 12:45:28 PM | ||
smart property as an alternative to invoicing Development & Technical Discussion
What if there was bitmitt.net which looks exactly like bitmit.net, but doesn't s…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 12:23:46 PM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
SPV can't check fraud challenges at all other than to assume they are valid unle…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 12:13:30 PM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
SPV can't check fraud challenges at all other than to assume they are valid unle…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 10:57:01 AM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
Here's sort of a recent continuation of that discussion gmaxwell pointed you to…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 03:48:45 AM | ||
colored bitcoin tech discussion Development & Technical Discussion
EDIT: etotheipi, never mind, I can't read... (took mixing as talking about divis…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 21, 2013, 10:38:05 PM | ||
Inflation-proofing via fraud notices Development & Technical Discussion
(cleaned up repost of https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=106449.msg1469608#…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 22, 2013, 12:44:32 AM | ||
Shouldn't we start using safer keys from now instead of waiting for problems? Bitcoin Discussion
Guys, stop worrying about the maximum blocksize. There are lots of ways to do of…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 17, 2013, 10:35:20 AM | ||
What benefit does leaving my client on provide to the network? Bitcoin Technical Support
So it's effectively destroying some bitcoins.Correct. This is one of the many p…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 10, 2013, 02:56:53 PM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
I'd really like to thank retep and Mike for their responsible disclosure and hel…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 15, 2013, 11:32:29 PM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
From a site that swaps unconfirmed coins for confirmed coins. That is not at all…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 14, 2013, 08:08:39 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Unless you're talking about a totally different issue to the one reported to the…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 13, 2013, 07:34:25 PM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
If you do not accept zero-confirmation transactions this vulnerability does not…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 11, 2013, 06:14:37 PM | ||
Speeding up signature verification Development & Technical Discussion
If having to wait ten minutes to an hour is what makes you not want to use Bitco…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 13, 2013, 12:11:38 PM | ||
Speeding up signature verification Development & Technical Discussion
To answer your question "Why risk it?": To not lose more and more potential new…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 13, 2013, 11:30:17 AM | ||
Speeding up signature verification Development & Technical Discussion
Since nearly 2 years has gone but no activity for this "batch verification"-algo…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 13, 2013, 10:24:21 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
This debate is pointless in the absence of context regarding the transaction in…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 13, 2013, 10:06:10 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Is this something completely new?Let me rephrase that. Are you aware of this top…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 12, 2013, 04:51:21 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Is this finding based on work backed by the Bitcoin Foundation? Do the Foundatio…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 12, 2013, 04:15:12 AM | ||
SERIOUS VULNERABILITY related to accepting zero-confirmation transactions Bitcoin Discussion
Users of the Bitcoin-Qt GUI are not affected.That's unfortunately not true. Bitc…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 12, 2013, 02:33:35 AM | ||
Help wanted: QA test spendfrom.py (coin control utility) Development & Technical Discussion
Dunno why github says 'authored 6 days ago', commit 2e922 was pushed yesterday a…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 10, 2013, 02:33:27 PM | ||
Help wanted: QA test spendfrom.py (coin control utility) Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for helping test! Latest version fixes the p2sh issue.I think you haven'…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 10, 2013, 01:32:24 PM | ||
I entered the police station as a suspect. When I left the officer loved Bitcoin Legal
I agree that the courts need to understand the issue, but involuntarily receivin…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 10, 2013, 01:10:50 AM | ||
I entered the police station as a suspect. When I left the officer loved Bitcoin Legal
While that is a nice touch from a UI / accessibility point of view, it's not qui…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 09, 2013, 06:24:06 PM | ||
getting the input addresses of a transaction. Development & Technical Discussion
If you add the option 1 after the transaction hash in your getrawtransaction cal…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 08, 2013, 01:09:11 PM | ||
Purchasing fidelity bonds by provably throwing away bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, and where I say "hash of a transaction" in the above, replace that with "has…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 08, 2013, 09:50:18 AM | ||
scathing incitement of the FED's settlement in the HSBC money laundering case Bitcoin Discussion
Excellent post Mike.You know, by pointing to HSBC and saying they failed to stop…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 08, 2013, 09:37:42 AM | ||
addresses in vout in rawtransactions Development & Technical Discussion
It's for multisig transactions where more than one address can/is required to re…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 08, 2013, 09:14:27 AM | ||
Purchasing fidelity bonds by provably throwing away bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
For stuff like looking for forum sock puppets, sure, donations are ok. But in th…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 08, 2013, 07:38:43 AM | ||
Purchasing fidelity bonds by provably throwing away bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
EDIT: changed titleCode:0100000001d1b311d665b94ad270007deeaa696d487ea0bcd2d11e2c…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 05, 2013, 04:15:11 AM | ||
bitcoin/application/user-program supporting own scripts available? Development & Technical Discussion
One of them is that some goverment (probably USA) will subvert all observable ti…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 06:21:17 PM | ||
Provably throwing away Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Ok, I see where you are going, but personally I still think the destruction of c…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 06:50:20 PM | ||
Delayed transactions (using nTimeLock) Development & Technical Discussion
Speaking of, here is an exercise for you: why must the locktime be an absolute n…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 06:36:54 PM | ||
bitcoin/application/user-program supporting own scripts available? Development & Technical Discussion
Not just 'not very important' but would be actually against the goals. You point…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 06:33:39 PM | ||
Provably throwing away Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Personally, I think jl2012 is right, throwing away money wouldn't be a popular w…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 04:01:50 PM | ||
bitcoin/application/user-program supporting own scripts available? Development & Technical Discussion
Obviously we understand "sane" much different. And a time stamp, say < 30 sec of…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 03:43:28 PM | ||
Delayed transactions (using nTimeLock) Development & Technical Discussion
Speaking of, here is an exercise for you: why must the locktime be an absolute n…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 08:36:43 AM | ||
Provably throwing away Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
The same could be achieved by donation to well-recognized organizations: bitcoin…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 05:28:30 AM | ||
Provably throwing away Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Burning banknotes for reputation? No way.....It's just game theory. Lets suppose…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 06, 2013, 03:48:01 AM | ||
Delayed transactions (using nTimeLock) Development & Technical Discussion
I'm still a bit confused, because right after sending them, I could spend the…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 05, 2013, 08:15:49 PM | ||
bitcoin/application/user-program supporting own scrips availible? Development & Technical Discussion
HiAre there bitcoin-applications available which support the bitcoin-qt/bitcoin…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | January 05, 2013, 07:02:22 AM | ||
Block 0 created Jan 3 2009 - 4 year anniversary Bitcoin Discussion
Also it's interesting how the difficulty of the hash satoshi found for the first…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 24, 2012, 08:48:00 PM | ||
zero transaction fee payments Bitcoin Technical Support
Can a transaction be included into the same block that some of it's input transa…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 21, 2012, 04:35:54 PM | ||
Smeared private key on bitcoin bill. Bitcoin Discussion
If you give up, at least post a scan of the bill here on the forums. Maybe someo…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 21, 2012, 03:13:56 PM | ||
Core Development Status Report #2 - Discussion Bitcoin Discussion
It's nice to have decentralized node and wallet software that people use and kee…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 21, 2012, 03:11:38 PM | ||
Smeared private key on bitcoin bill. Bitcoin Discussion
If you give up, at least post a scan of the bill here on the forums. Maybe someo…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 21, 2012, 02:30:43 PM | ||
Correct header data for block 1 Development & Technical Discussion
FWIW I wrote some Python code that recreates the raw hex block header, the part…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 19, 2012, 12:22:35 PM | ||
Delay BlockReward=0 Forever Development & Technical Discussion
I still think that we will switch up to 128 bit values to match future CPU-width…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 18, 2012, 11:56:31 PM | ||
New incorruptible time-stamp source? Development & Technical Discussion
Of course, I haven't actually tried it for this. But I've absolutely done correl…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 07:40:56 PM | ||
Is this idea to counter lost bitcoins possible? Development & Technical Discussion
Meh. 2^56 operations would still be roughly the equivelent of difficulty 16 mil…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 01:13:18 PM | ||
Is this idea to counter lost bitcoins possible? Development & Technical Discussion
Please provide a single example. It took roughly 15 years for MD5 to go from th…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 12:35:19 PM | ||
Is this idea to counter lost bitcoins possible? Development & Technical Discussion
What would be elite about this group. If ECDSA is broken wide open without warn…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 11:45:14 AM | ||
Is this idea to counter lost bitcoins possible? Development & Technical Discussion
I think we need to consider agreeing that some time after the signature algorith…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 11:24:39 AM | ||
Is this idea to counter lost bitcoins possible? Development & Technical Discussion
I would like to mention in this context something which does not get the attenti…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 17, 2012, 01:00:45 AM | ||
PROPOSAL: Move all "lost bitcoins" threads to "Alternate cryptocurrencies" Development & Technical Discussion
Rational: Any attempt to "recover" lost bitcoins that involves rules like coin e…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 16, 2012, 05:19:59 PM | ||
Toronto Bitcoin Meetup #3 - Saturday, January 12, 2013 4pm Meetups
The "intro to bitcoin" talk is one I've given once before; it's really a layman'…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 15, 2012, 05:32:47 PM | ||
New incorruptible time-stamp source? Development & Technical Discussion
You need to think a bit harder about what exactly you are proposing and exactly…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 14, 2012, 08:30:21 PM | ||
How to detect the change output? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, I saw that project, I'm curious to try it out myself, although I'll have to…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 14, 2012, 07:22:34 PM | ||
New incorruptible time-stamp source? Development & Technical Discussion
You need to think a bit harder about what exactly you are proposing and exactly…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 14, 2012, 06:58:49 PM | ||
How to detect the change output? Development & Technical Discussion
I think Hal's donation wallet address has a flaw. The problem is that balance()…
|
n/a | Peter Todd | December 14, 2012, 06:43:47 PM |