It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you. Very informative. Apparently difficulty will rise a lot after approxi…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 12:59:22 PM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you. Very informative. Apparently difficulty will rise a lot after approxi…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 12:50:48 PM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
YesI also like this website https://fork.lol/From what I've read, they are plann…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 12:45:27 PM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
However many people would argue that the backlog is intentionally created, with…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 12:42:05 PM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
YesI also like this website https://fork.lol/
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 12:37:17 PM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
How could they fix this backlogs? I visit the site, 174200 unconfirmed transacti…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 11:54:38 AM | ||
173000 unconfirmed transactions, 13 transactions per second Development & Technical Discussion
Relax, it will settle. Just give it another day or two.In a few hours the diffic…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 12, 2017, 11:47:43 AM | ||
Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet Wallet software
An important announcement, concerning the possible 2x fork next month.Unlike the…
|
n/a | piotr_n | October 30, 2017, 10:53:18 AM | ||
Way to calculate unspent UTXO by age? Development & Technical Discussion
How did you calculate that figure?You can quite easily program this kind of quer…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 05, 2017, 01:17:38 PM | ||
Way to calculate unspent UTXO by age? Development & Technical Discussion
Was wondering is there anyway to calculate amount of UTXO by years. For example,…
|
n/a | piotr_n | November 05, 2017, 12:03:21 PM | ||
Organizing Proper Cold Wollet Storage Development & Technical Discussion
What are possible attack vectors here? You can't really think of all the possib…
|
n/a | piotr_n | October 20, 2017, 11:03:07 AM | ||
finding a reCAPTCHA like route for use in bitcoin network instead of POW? Development & Technical Discussion
As the current state of science, it's rather a philosophical problem.Design a Po…
|
n/a | piotr_n | October 15, 2017, 11:02:45 AM | ||
finding a reCAPTCHA like route for use in bitcoin network instead of POW? Development & Technical Discussion
As the current state of science, it's rather a philosophical problem.Design a Po…
|
n/a | piotr_n | October 14, 2017, 02:04:46 PM | ||
libsecp256k1 as a library/dll/etc Development & Technical Discussion
Try this, if you want: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gocoin/files/secp256k1_w…
|
n/a | piotr_n | September 24, 2017, 09:06:09 AM | ||
libsecp256k1 as a library/dll/etc Development & Technical Discussion
Try this, if you want: https://sourceforge.net/projects/gocoin/files/secp256k1_w…
|
n/a | piotr_n | September 23, 2017, 11:39:17 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
WTF dude, please actually read, AFAICT no one ever talks about downloading block…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 12, 2017, 05:41:33 PM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
Recently you've had two invalid blocks routed by bitcoin core clients and you ha…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 10, 2017, 01:48:30 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
You are assuming that the miners supporting the hard fork will not only mine the…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 09, 2017, 05:36:48 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
IMHO miners would be crazy to go into 2MB big blocks hard fork.I agree, but I th…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 09, 2017, 04:23:20 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
The miners ONLY decide transaction ordering. If 95% of the miners go on one cha…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 09, 2017, 03:31:23 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
IMHO miners would be crazy to go into 2MB big blocks hard fork.In June the avera…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 11:57:56 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
My point is:What the system does depends on the specifics of what the disagreeme…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 11:35:29 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
So what this system is supposed to do when there is a disagreement between miner…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 11:08:29 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
OK.. QuoteThe miner (as a participant in the system) defines, guards, and adhere…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 10:52:36 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
Who:Every participant in the Bitcoin system is responsible for either defining a…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 10:28:02 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
In case nobody answers and my topic gest buried, I just want to elaborate on the…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 09:41:18 AM | ||
Disconnect network service bits 6 and 8 until Aug 1, 2018 - discussion Development & Technical Discussion
As the comments in this PR have been locked, I'd like to move the discussion her…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 08, 2017, 08:23:24 AM | ||
Does anyone know why 0.12.x nodes relay transactions faster than later versions? Development & Technical Discussion
0.14 is "faster" at relaying transactions, much faster in fact, but it has highe…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 05, 2017, 02:12:40 AM | ||
Does anyone know why 0.12.x nodes relay transactions faster than later versions? Development & Technical Discussion
Could you show us the numbers you are getting for relay time and the methodology…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 04, 2017, 02:51:13 PM | ||
Does anyone know why 0.12.x nodes relay transactions faster than later versions? Development & Technical Discussion
I was just thinking, might this lower performance be caused by the memory pool f…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 04, 2017, 01:04:51 PM | ||
Does anyone know why 0.12.x nodes relay transactions faster than later versions? Development & Technical Discussion
What I have seen by monitoring the network is that 0.14.x software has been (so…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 04, 2017, 10:59:38 AM | ||
Why I Am Not Using Hardware Wallet For Cold Storage Development & Technical Discussion
Currently there is absolutely no procedure to make a cold storage that is 100% s…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 02, 2017, 11:23:44 AM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion
If I were making graphs like yours, I think I'd logically merge all transactions…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 02, 2017, 03:16:12 AM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | piotr_n | August 01, 2017, 02:54:23 PM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you, I didn't know about that.Where is it in the code? Who made it?
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 01, 2017, 02:39:45 PM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion
Here you see it even better:It's a fresh one, mined 5 minutes ago. And it took ~…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 01, 2017, 11:47:20 AM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion
This pattern is very common, across different pools.I think it's something that…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 01, 2017, 11:32:34 AM | ||
Why transactions inside blocks are not quite sorted by the fee? Development & Technical Discussion
It's not an issue, but I find in intriguing and would like to understand the rea…
|
n/a | piotr_n | August 01, 2017, 10:58:06 AM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
ELI5What does this mean? Good or bad?Good or bad?It's bad for miners who use 1ha…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 24, 2017, 01:09:06 PM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
I have one question: What will happen to theese invalid blocks? They rejected by…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 24, 2017, 10:39:44 AM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
How do you analyse the block after the fact? I mean what tools do you use etc.I…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 24, 2017, 08:03:51 AM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
I believe 474294 had a similar problem, because I think I was checking it back t…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 23, 2017, 01:24:05 PM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
Both blocks are invalid because they included a transaction without including it…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 23, 2017, 01:18:36 PM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
One thing to notice is that both blocks contain exactly 256 transactionsI think…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 23, 2017, 01:07:04 PM | ||
1hash pool just mined an invalid block again Development & Technical Discussion
Not sure if it is on any interest for anyone here, but I remember once, when a B…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 23, 2017, 04:06:08 AM | ||
Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet Wallet software
Thanks. You need at least 8 GB of RAM. I'm unaware of any raspberry pi having th…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 12, 2017, 10:34:40 AM | ||
How to create list o richest addressees Development & Technical Discussion
install gocoin client, wait for it to sync and execute command "richest" on the…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 09, 2017, 11:02:57 AM | ||
Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet Wallet software
How can I unban a peer?You can start the client with -unban to unban all peers.
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 09, 2017, 10:50:55 AM | ||
NOOB QUESTION: Generating brain wallet offline Development & Technical Discussion
I can refer you to articles saying that using bitcoins in general is a bad idea…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 09, 2017, 04:36:20 AM | ||
NOOB QUESTION: Generating brain wallet offline Development & Technical Discussion
As you all are most likely aware of, it is possible to import any SHA256 hash as…
|
n/a | piotr_n | July 07, 2017, 02:53:59 AM | ||
Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet Wallet software |
n/a | piotr_n | July 02, 2017, 11:41:25 AM | ||
How to use OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY Development & Technical Discussion
anyway, do you have any suggestions about this OP_CSV problem? if the push does…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 09, 2017, 09:48:57 AM | ||
UASF nodes wrongly reporting IP Development & Technical Discussion
OK.So I can't explain what was happening.It stopped happening now, again.But the…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 08, 2017, 02:18:48 PM | ||
How to use OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY Development & Technical Discussion
does it mean if we need to push numbers from 1-16, we shall use OP_1 to OP_16?Y…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 08, 2017, 01:44:09 AM | ||
UASF nodes wrongly reporting IP Development & Technical Discussion
They seem to be an actual nodes, but whether they implement the entire protocol,…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 08, 2017, 01:49:54 AM | ||
UASF nodes wrongly reporting IP Development & Technical Discussion
A few hours after I started this topic yesterday, the nodes stopped broadcasting…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 07, 2017, 09:02:44 AM | ||
How to use OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY Development & Technical Discussion
@sonicskye, I think your tx is failing the "minimal push" check. it's some crazy…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 07, 2017, 03:24:55 AM | ||
UASF nodes wrongly reporting IP Development & Technical Discussion
How does bitcoin core discover own IP, which is then reported to new peers insid…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 06, 2017, 02:15:03 PM | ||
UASF nodes wrongly reporting IP Development & Technical Discussion
A number of nodes ran from the amazon cloud (all representing themselves as "UAS…
|
n/a | piotr_n | June 06, 2017, 01:39:09 PM | ||
Gocoin - totally different bitcoin client with deterministic cold wallet Wallet software
I have a new update, but first of all I'd like to know if anyone is actually rea…
|
n/a | piotr_n | May 05, 2017, 10:33:21 AM | ||
List of past soft forks and OP codes? Development & Technical Discussion
Apart from the P2SH, there was:* BIP34 (v2 blocks) - activated at block #227931.…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 21, 2017, 02:03:21 PM | ||
how many addresses from a single private key Development & Technical Discussion
However this is not a very elegant solution, as it wastes precious block chain s…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 14, 2017, 06:06:34 AM | ||
how many addresses from a single private key Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteIn other words: from a single private key k, how many different addresses c…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 14, 2017, 06:00:34 AM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
If miners had to 'find something else profitable to mine', they'd just start min…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 14, 2017, 05:27:09 AM | ||
how many addresses from a single private key Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteMy question is: if i made a Base58 encoding of "05+s" instead of "00+s" and…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 14, 2017, 05:18:53 AM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, but to be fair, from my own experience, gmaxwell has always been an active…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 13, 2017, 03:23:11 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
I think all these people would be making much less fools of themselves, if they…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 13, 2017, 01:06:07 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
So Maxwell is suddenly doing interviews coming out as pro-UASF now: http://www.c…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 13, 2017, 12:56:04 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I think what tomtomtom7 is trying to say is that the common approach (used not o…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 11, 2017, 05:24:52 PM | ||
is uacomment valid to signal for UASF? Development & Technical Discussion
But my questions remain unaswered.Is there a certain threshold where Core devs w…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 10, 2017, 03:14:34 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
And because you index both; spent and unspent transactions, you need even more m…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 10, 2017, 01:16:18 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
So you basically extract all the transactions from the blocks and store them in…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 10, 2017, 12:59:43 PM | ||
Scalable version of Bitcoin Wallet software
You might want to look into my gocoin.See how it works on a remote server throug…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 09, 2017, 03:16:31 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I think I get it. So you basically extract all the transactions from the blocks…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 09, 2017, 10:33:28 AM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
I essentially transform transactions and outputs to a "hash" with:Code:hash(tx)…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 09, 2017, 06:31:25 AM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
Oh, ok. Sorry, I didn't get the spend-index idea at first.Can you please say som…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 08, 2017, 07:37:27 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
As much as I like out of the box approaches to topics that interest me, to be ho…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 07, 2017, 08:33:53 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
Well, I will be looking forward to see this UASF of yours at work.Or to you maki…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 07, 2017, 11:06:01 AM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
FYI, Bitcoin doesn't care about what most of the 'community' wants. It's only wh…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 07, 2017, 10:00:35 AM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
The problem of spending early outputs is solved by the spend-index, which lags b…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 06, 2017, 08:27:26 PM | ||
Fast parallel block validation without UTXO-index Development & Technical Discussion
How much memory and disk space does it need?Do you keep it all in files on disk?…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 06, 2017, 07:07:29 PM | ||
just out of curiousity, why would segwit impact asicboost Development & Technical Discussion
ah i see... but i think if segwit was activated, most of network would be on it…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 06, 2017, 06:34:51 PM | ||
just out of curiousity, why would segwit impact asicboost Development & Technical Discussion
No, it would definitely have an impact.Assuming of course that asicboost is a re…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 06, 2017, 06:23:27 PM | ||
just out of curiousity, why would segwit impact asicboost Development & Technical Discussion
(moderating to keep strictly on topic):just out of intellectual curiousity, what…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 06, 2017, 04:37:20 PM | ||
What if someone set copyrighted data as a Bitcoin message? Legal
You have to ask lawyers, not devs. You may also find this interesting:https://ww…
|
n/a | piotr_n | April 05, 2017, 12:52:43 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
Sorry. When I used to work the managers always hated me for killing their 'great…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 30, 2017, 05:50:23 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
Is everybody fine here with the reduced hashpower == security?If major miners do…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 30, 2017, 04:12:34 PM | ||
Question to 0x20 Opcode and script for transaction in early blocks (2011/2012) Development & Technical Discussion
I can't say how it was used there at that time.But you should know that there ar…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 29, 2017, 02:27:32 PM | ||
Question to 0x20 Opcode and script for transaction in early blocks (2011/2012) Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, these are scripts.The "opcode" 0x20 is saying to push the next 32 bytes of…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 29, 2017, 02:14:40 PM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
I agree that BU signalling is a statement of opposition to Core. Core doesn't ge…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 25, 2017, 05:34:33 PM | ||
What does protocol version 70015 indicate? Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you.I had totally seen BIP 152 before, but now I see it's been updated wi…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 25, 2017, 12:11:15 PM | ||
What does protocol version 70015 indicate? Development & Technical Discussion
What does network protocol version 70015 indicate, as comparing to previous 7001…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 25, 2017, 10:47:31 AM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
I think they are just bluffing - both sides.Maybe, but if they are, it cannot la…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 24, 2017, 11:53:07 AM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, fear - I get it. But FUD can't change bitcoin protocol. Only majority of mi…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 24, 2017, 09:08:04 AM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
I think they are just bluffing - both sides. One side claiming that it has enou…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 24, 2017, 07:24:01 AM | ||
Moving towards user activated soft fork activation Development & Technical Discussion
You missed my point. If the mining process from the begining would have been eas…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 23, 2017, 04:41:22 PM | ||
Clarification of Segwit: how is witness data retrieved for validation? Development & Technical Discussion
You don't download witnesses data separately. You use new network API to fetch t…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 17, 2017, 11:01:17 AM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
The money is on the economy's side. The economic majority is what gives value to…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 14, 2017, 07:55:19 AM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
BIP16 had a full support from the miners. No it didn't it had support from maybe…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 14, 2017, 07:38:12 AM | ||
Who moderates bitcoin-dev mailing list? Development & Technical Discussion
This is how BIP16 was activated:QuoteTo gracefully upgrade and ensure no long-la…
|
n/a | piotr_n | March 13, 2017, 04:45:12 PM |