It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
[OLD THREAD] Bitcoin version 0.2 development status Bitcoin Discussion
We've been working hard on improvements for the next version release. Martti (s…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 27, 2009, 05:48:39 PM | ||
Added some DoS limits, removed safe mode (0.3.19) Development & Technical Discussion
There's more work to do on DoS, but I'm doing a quick build of what I have so fa…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 12, 2010, 01:22:33 PM | ||
PC World Article on Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
It would have been nice to get this attention in any other context. WikiLeaks h…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 11, 2010, 06:39:16 PM | ||
minimalistic bitcoin client on D language? Development & Technical Discussion
I'd like to hear some specific criticisms of the code. To me it looks like an im…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 11, 2010, 05:07:04 PM | ||
Bitcoin and buffer overflow attacks Development & Technical Discussion
direct to IP address transfers seems like a obvious surface area to attack.If yo…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 11, 2010, 08:32:37 AM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
@dtvan: all 3 excellent points. 1) IP records don't need to be in the chain, jus…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 11, 2010, 08:08:30 AM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
I agree. All transactions, IP changes, renewals, etc. should have some fee that…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 10, 2010, 03:19:39 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't s…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 10, 2010, 12:29:28 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
additional block chains would each create their own flavor of coins, which would…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 10, 2010, 02:55:12 PM | ||
Accounts example code Development & Technical Discussion
Some sample pseudocode using the new Accounts based commands in 0.3.18.print "se…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 10, 2010, 02:21:03 PM | ||
Fees in BitDNS confusion Development & Technical Discussion
Not locktime.There's a possible design for far in the future:You intentionally w…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 06:58:54 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
seems that the miner would have to basically do "extra work". and if there's no…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 05:46:50 PM | ||
BitDNS and Generalizing Bitcoin Bitcoin Discussion
I think it would be possible for BitDNS to be a completely separate network and…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 04:02:42 PM | ||
Automated nightly builds Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for setting this up Cdecker. Is there any chance of getting it to build…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 01:28:45 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
I agree with you and satoshi about "txs after ". My listtransactions (now xlist…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 01:08:08 PM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
I came to agree with Gavin about whitelisting when I realized how quickly new tr…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 10:17:53 AM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
New transaction templates can be added as needed. Within a few days, there will…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 09, 2010, 09:37:05 AM | ||
Version 0.3.18 Development & Technical Discussion
Changes:- Fixed a wallet.dat compatibility problem if you downgraded from 0.3.17…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 08, 2010, 06:19:24 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not talking about the normal risk for a given minconf level, I'm talking abo…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 08, 2010, 07:12:17 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
Then how do you cope with the issues I listed in the message you quoted?
|
n/a | satoshi | December 08, 2010, 05:36:45 PM | ||
JSON-RPC method idea: list transactions newer than a given txid Development & Technical Discussion
It's not safe to use listtransactions this way.I know I've been criticized for b…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 08, 2010, 03:21:49 PM | ||
Wikileaks contact info? Project Development
Basically, bring it on. Let's encourage Wikileaks to use Bitcoins and I'm willi…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 05, 2010, 04:08:08 AM | ||
RFC: ship block chain 1-74000 with release tarballs? Development & Technical Discussion
That's a good optimisation. I'll add that next time I update SVN.More generally…
|
n/a | satoshi | December 01, 2010, 04:25:39 PM | ||
Incompatible wallet format with latest bitcoin-git ? Development & Technical Discussion
What was this wallet used with? An early accounts patch or git build?It's while…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 30, 2010, 02:02:31 PM | ||
RFC: ship block chain 1-74000 with release tarballs? Development & Technical Discussion
It seems like you're inclined to assume everything is wrong more than is actuall…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 29, 2010, 03:19:12 PM | ||
RFC: ship block chain 1-74000 with release tarballs? Development & Technical Discussion
Despite everything else said, the current next step is:Another new user on IRC,…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 28, 2010, 12:13:01 PM | ||
Is safe running bitcoins with the same wallet on more computers simultaneously? Bitcoin Discussion
QuoteWill it be synchronized automatically?Very much not. Using multiple copies…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 28, 2010, 01:06:39 PM | ||
Cooperative mining Pools
ribuck's description is spot on.Pool operators can modify their getwork to take…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 28, 2010, 11:03:30 AM | ||
New demonstration CPU miner available Mining software (miners)
You should try it with tcatm's 4-way SSE2 SHA in sha256.cpp. It compiles fine a…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 26, 2010, 05:02:41 PM | ||
New getwork Development & Technical Discussion
That's what it does, it returns true/false.
|
n/a | satoshi | November 26, 2010, 04:31:13 PM | ||
Version 0.3.17 Development & Technical Discussion
Laszlo does them, but I haven't asked him to do one for a while because there wa…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 26, 2010, 01:23:30 PM | ||
RFC: ship block chain 1-74000 with release tarballs? Development & Technical Discussion
I tested it on a slow 7 year old drive, where bandwidth and CPU were clearly not…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 26, 2010, 12:32:01 PM | ||
Version 0.3.17 Development & Technical Discussion
Version 0.3.17 is now available. Changes:- new getwork, thanks m0mchil- added tr…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 25, 2010, 03:07:36 PM | ||
RFC: ship block chain 1-74000 with release tarballs? Development & Technical Discussion
It's not the downloading that takes the time, it's verifying and indexing it.Ban…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 25, 2010, 12:51:39 PM | ||
OpenCL miner for the masses Mining software (miners)
A revised version of getwork is now in the official client, but the miners need…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 24, 2010, 12:53:09 PM | ||
New getwork Development & Technical Discussion
I suspect something weird going on with ByteReverse (or lack thereof). It's qui…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 24, 2010, 12:21:01 PM | ||
New getwork Development & Technical Discussion
I uploaded a redesign of m0mchil's getwork to SVN rev 189 (version 31601)m0mchil…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 23, 2010, 02:50:12 PM | ||
New getwork Development & Technical Discussion
It's not an exact drop-in replacement. I wanted to clean up the interface a lit…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 23, 2010, 03:55:27 PM | ||
OpenCL miner for the masses Mining software (miners)
updated to SVN 186Thanks m0mchil for keeping up on the updates!GPU miners, pleas…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 20, 2010, 12:24:20 PM | ||
Transaction / spam flood attack currently under way Development & Technical Discussion
Perhaps in addition to the age priority rule recently implimented, there should…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 19, 2010, 06:50:24 PM | ||
Need OP_BLOCKNUMBER to allow "time" limited transactions Development & Technical Discussion
We can't safely do OP_BLOCKNUMBER. In the event of a block chain reorg after a…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 15, 2010, 01:37:44 PM | ||
Some testing that I did on the testnetwork, my findings. Development & Technical Discussion
Of course, if the network is not being flooded and you're not overly concerned a…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 14, 2010, 11:53:19 AM | ||
Version 0.3.15 Development & Technical Discussion
Version 0.3.15 is now available.Changes:- paytxfee switch is now per KB, so it a…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 13, 2010, 06:26:40 PM | ||
Some testing that I did on the testnetwork, my findings. Development & Technical Discussion
Thank you for limiting flood tests to the testnet.Version 0.3.15 combines severa…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 13, 2010, 06:25:26 PM | ||
New icon/logo Bitcoin Discussion
I'm happy if someone with artistic skill wants to contribute alternatives. The…
|
n/a | satoshi | November 12, 2010, 07:55:51 PM | ||
New icon/logo Bitcoin Discussion
New icons, what do you think? Better than the old one? Full size 530x529 i…
|
n/a | satoshi | February 24, 2010, 04:24:23 PM | ||
Win7 64bit since last patch Tues now crashes Bitcoin Technical Support
The only thing I can think of is to see if there are other versions of mingwm10.…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 25, 2010, 12:27:47 PM | ||
Multiple Wallets, one computer Development & Technical Discussion
Here's some pseudocode of how you would use the account based commands. It sure…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 25, 2010, 11:53:53 AM | ||
Multiple Wallets, one computer Development & Technical Discussion
I have the beginning of something like this. It's mostly like what Gavin descri…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 24, 2010, 02:17:51 PM | ||
Suggestion: Allow short messages to be sent together with bitcoins ? Development & Technical Discussion
ECDSA can't encrypt messages, only sign signatures.It would be unwise to have pe…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 23, 2010, 02:02:57 PM | ||
Win7 64bit since last patch Tues now crashes Bitcoin Technical Support
Fault Module Name: mingwm10.dllThis is the important clue. I believe it's s…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 23, 2010, 01:52:02 PM | ||
ERROR - PLEASE HELP ME! Bitcoin Technical Support
OK, if it really won't get past block 1698 on redownload, then we're in stranger…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 23, 2010, 01:38:04 PM | ||
ERROR - PLEASE HELP ME! Bitcoin Technical Support
his block count remains "stuck" at 1698.He was generating invalid blocks at diff…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 23, 2010, 01:22:49 PM | ||
Website and software translations Development & Technical Discussion
The order matters not to the program, but it matters to me maintaining it. If i…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 21, 2010, 05:50:47 PM | ||
Version 0.3.14 Development & Technical Discussion
Version 0.3.14 is now availablehttp://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bit…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 21, 2010, 11:39:27 AM | ||
The Niche List Marketplace
1. Download site like rapidshare and other crappy host. Inconvenient captcha and…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 06, 2010, 06:10:31 PM | ||
Porn Economics |
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 12:56:55 PM | ||
Key pool feature for safer wallet backup Development & Technical Discussion
SVN rev 163 (ver 0.3.13.3) has the key pool feature. Pre-generated new keys are…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 09, 2010, 03:19:33 PM | ||
Tor connections not working reliably, many seednodes offline Development & Technical Discussion
Maybe you were just unlucky to have an exit node without reverse lookup.The IRC…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 06, 2010, 12:36:41 PM | ||
I broke my wallet, sends never confirm now. Development & Technical Discussion
That's going to be more of a SelectCoins thing.SVN rev 161 has a refinement to r…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 06, 2010, 11:54:23 AM | ||
Website and software translations Development & Technical Discussion
poedit reorganised the file for some reason. I re-ran update from sources and i…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 06, 2010, 10:42:39 AM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
Version 0.3.13 is now available. You should upgrade to prevent potential proble…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 07:34:35 PM | ||
[PATCH] increase block size limit Development & Technical Discussion
It can be phased in, like:if (blocknumber > 115000) maxblocksize = largerlimi…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 04, 2010, 02:48:40 PM | ||
Website and software translations Development & Technical Discussion
Where can I find the latest English .po file to keep the translation up-to-date?…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 04, 2010, 02:21:01 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! Bitcoin Discussion
So that last command should simply besudo apt-get install libboost1.37-devExcept…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 04:44:04 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 Bitcoin Discussion
Please upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! We fixed an implementation bug where it was possi…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 02:13:06 PM | ||
Linux distribution download Bitcoin Technical Support
It can be built with Boost 1.37 or later.
|
n/a | satoshi | July 31, 2010, 09:38:52 AM | ||
Website and software translations Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks eurekafag, Russian translation added to SVN rev 160.
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 08:44:41 PM | ||
How to overthrow the GPU Oligarchs Bitcoin Discussion
Can you tell more about it:"they have to do weird things with extraNonce, which…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 04:30:04 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
Make sure you keep your node online so it'll keep rebroadcasting transaction b41…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 06:46:19 PM | ||
Memory leak Bitcoin Technical Support
You're connecting to yourself. All 21 connection attempts were to a node with v…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 05:07:00 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
ShadowOfHarbringer, is yours faster with -4way?If it is, then I'm thinking that…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 04:43:20 PM | ||
[PATCH] increase block size limit Development & Technical Discussion
Applying this patch will make you incompatible with other Bitcoin clients.+1 the…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 04:07:28 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
ArtForz is already running with no fees, and he has 20-30% of the network's CPU…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 03:54:07 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
Code:diff -u old\main.cpp new\main.cpp--- old\main.cpp Sun Oct 03 20:57:20 2010+…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 03:02:24 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
983 Mhash/s box.Seriously? What hardware is that?
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 02:49:32 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13, please upgrade Development & Technical Discussion
Could a few people please run this special build? It'll amnesty the dust spam t…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 02:39:06 PM | ||
Version 0.3.13 Development & Technical Discussion
That's nice, however the automatic 4way detection is not working on my Gentoo AM…
|
n/a | satoshi | October 03, 2010, 01:17:06 PM | ||
0.3.13 RC1 for Windows, please test Development & Technical Discussion
Too late for 0.3.13, but I'll try to find time to add it to the next version.
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 07:32:46 PM | ||
Prioritized transactions, and tx fees Bitcoin Discussion
It ramps up the fee requirement as the block fills up:
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 01:11:56 PM | ||
Remote RPC access Bitcoin Technical Support
It can be safe if you're using it over your own LAN, like if you have multiple s…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 01:27:41 PM | ||
Prioritized transactions, and tx fees Bitcoin Discussion
True, the switch should be something more dynamic that pays per KB. It's harder…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 01:22:22 PM | ||
BitCoin Wikipedia page DELETED!!! Project Development
If you do, I think it should be a very brief, single paragraph article like 100…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 12:50:32 PM | ||
0.3.13 RC1 for Windows, please test Development & Technical Discussion
0.3.13 release candidate, to be released soon so please test:http://www.bitcoin.…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 12:04:15 PM | ||
I broke my wallet, sends never confirm now. Development & Technical Discussion
0.3.13 release candidate, please test:http://www.bitcoin.org/download/bitcoin-0.…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 11:59:00 AM | ||
I broke my wallet, sends never confirm now. Development & Technical Discussion
As you figured out, the root problem is we shouldn't be counting or spending tra…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 30, 2010, 11:38:53 AM | ||
How To Make a Distributed BitCoin Escrow Service Development & Technical Discussion
It's not implemented yet, but the network can support a transaction that require…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 26, 2010, 12:34:26 PM | ||
Internal version number Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think it should cause any problems for version comparisons. 31300 > 312…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 01:46:20 PM | ||
How divisible are bitcoins - the technical side Development & Technical Discussion
I would not encourage using the extra decimal places. They're only intended for…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 01:39:56 PM | ||
Warning : Check your system ( Help me ) Bitcoin Technical Support
I don't understand, are you under the impression that the program sets the syste…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 11:28:25 AM | ||
Internal version number Development & Technical Discussion
In the next release (0.3.13), I'm going to change the format of the internal ver…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 11:19:08 AM | ||
Always pay transaction fee? Bitcoin Discussion
The current threshold is 200KB per block, or about 1000 transactions per block.…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 23, 2010, 11:08:35 AM | ||
Message Encryption as a built-in feature? Bitcoin Discussion
Theymos already said this... ECDSA does not support encrypting messages. Only…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 19, 2010, 05:47:00 PM | ||
The case for removing IP transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Probably best to disable receiving by IP unless you specifically intend to use i…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 19, 2010, 04:49:30 PM | ||
Bug? /usr/bin/bitcoind "" Development & Technical Discussion
I don't know anything about any of the bug trackers. If we were to have one, we…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 19, 2010, 02:58:11 PM | ||
Issues building bitcoin on Windows 7 Development & Technical Discussion
The lines it's tripping on:Code:ERROR extern map mapAddressBook;ERROR extern CCr…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 19, 2010, 01:46:46 PM | ||
Memory leak Bitcoin Technical Support
Bouncing between 0 and 2 connections could be if it's connecting to itself. Are…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 19, 2010, 12:22:03 PM | ||
Switch to GPL Development & Technical Discussion
If the only library is closed source, then there's a project to make an open sou…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 12, 2010, 02:24:53 PM | ||
RFC: remove DB_PRIVATE flag Development & Technical Discussion
Trying it without the DB_PRIVATE flag in rev 153. We need to keep an eye on wha…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 12, 2010, 01:00:39 PM | ||
Running on a port other than 8333 Development & Technical Discussion
Also, does Bitcoin open the BerkeleyDB as exclusive, precluding the need for a f…
|
n/a | satoshi | September 12, 2010, 12:40:20 PM |