It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Bugfixes in SVN rev 130 Development & Technical Discussion
Misc bugfixes in rev 130:fix -datadir with relative pathautostart is now off by…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 12, 2010, 04:20:31 PM | ||
BSD detection Development & Technical Discussion
This is in SVN rev 130. Check that it compiles right.Code:#if (defined(__unix__…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 12, 2010, 04:14:20 PM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
I believe the clients would have to keep the entire history back to the original…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 09:46:56 PM | ||
BSD detection Development & Technical Discussion
There is this piece of code in headers.h:#ifdef __WXMAC_OSX__#define __WXMAC__ 1…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 07:02:06 PM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
It would be nice to keep the blk*.dat files small as long as we can.The eventual…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 06:28:50 PM | ||
Where is the separate discussion devoted to possible Bitcoin weaknesses. Development & Technical Discussion
It doesn't have to be such a breaking change. New nodes could accept old transa…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 05:40:25 PM | ||
Lost large number of bitcoins Bitcoin Technical Support
I added to the FAQ the warning to back up after each transaction. Is it necessar…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 04:46:51 PM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
Still thinking this idea through...The only job the network needs to do is to te…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 11, 2010, 04:07:59 PM | ||
Compile error in SVN r127 Development & Technical Discussion
Updated SVN. Thanks.There's little hope of not repeatedly stumbling over that i…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 10, 2010, 08:42:30 PM | ||
Escrow Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | satoshi | August 10, 2010, 08:30:02 PM | ||
Not a suggestion Bitcoin Discussion
This is a very interesting topic. If a solution was found, a much better, easie…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 10, 2010, 07:14:22 PM | ||
Version 0.3.8.1 update for Linux 64-bit Bitcoin Discussion
SVN rev 128: disable SSE2 on 32-bit. This may only disable it for MSVC and GCC.…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 10, 2010, 06:46:00 PM | ||
Bitcoin minting is thermodynamically perverse Bitcoin Discussion
The heat from your computer is not wasted if you need to heat your home. If you…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 04:28:39 PM | ||
Connection limits Development & Technical Discussion
SVN rev 125:- Always make 8 outbound connections even if have 8 inbound- Limit o…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 03:58:45 PM | ||
Version 0.3.8.1 update for Linux 64-bit Bitcoin Discussion
That's a good point, I believe you could run with generation off if you don't ha…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 03:55:06 PM | ||
bitcoin generation broken in 0.3.8? (64-bit) Development & Technical Discussion
I uploaded 0.3.8.1 for Linux with re-built 64-bit. I ran a difficulty 1 test wi…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 03:34:06 PM | ||
What could be the transition plan to Y2038 compliant Bitcoin? Development & Technical Discussion
unsigned int is good until 2106. Surely the network will have to be totally rev…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 03:13:26 PM | ||
Version 0.3.8.1 update for Linux 64-bit Bitcoin Discussion
When we switched to Crypto++ 5.6.0 SHA-256 in version 0.3.6, generation got brok…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 02:46:58 PM | ||
bitcoin generation broken in 0.3.8? Development & Technical Discussion
I found that SSE2 only added a slight 2% speedup, which didn't seem worth the in…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 09, 2010, 01:50:41 PM | ||
4 hashes parallel on SSE2 CPUs for 0.3.6 Development & Technical Discussion
CRITICAL_BLOCK is a macro that contains a for loop. The assertion failure indica…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 07, 2010, 04:16:01 PM | ||
Escrow Development & Technical Discussion |
n/a | satoshi | August 07, 2010, 03:13:52 PM | ||
A proposal for a semi-automated Escrow mechanism Bitcoin Discussion
Due to that recourse, it is unlikely to be used as an escrow mechanism Really? …
|
n/a | satoshi | August 07, 2010, 03:04:59 PM | ||
Bitcoin minting is thermodynamically perverse Bitcoin Discussion
It's the same situation as gold and gold mining. The marginal cost of gold mini…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 07, 2010, 12:46:09 PM | ||
Slashdot Submission for 1.0 Bitcoin Discussion
BTW, I did come to my senses after that brief bout with 1.3, this release is sti…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 05, 2010, 04:31:14 PM | ||
latency and locality Bitcoin Discussion
Once you get away from a system where each node's influence is proportional to t…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 07, 2010, 11:28:17 AM | ||
A proposal for a semi-automated Escrow mechanism Bitcoin Discussion
A transaction can be written that requires two signatures to spend it next. You…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 01:08:30 PM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
Right now the transaction fee address is left "blank" and the block generator fi…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 12:49:43 PM | ||
Transaction Overload Solution Development & Technical Discussion
I can't think of a way to implement that. All the transaction fees would be add…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 12:38:21 PM | ||
bitcoind transaction to ip address Development & Technical Discussion
It's not implemented.It turned out nobody liked that mode of transfer anyway, so…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 12:28:40 PM | ||
Who's the Spanish jerk draining the Faucet? Bitcoin Discussion
Silently failing would look bad.1. Rate limit based on the first byte of the IP…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 12:06:03 PM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
The only solution to this problem is to make broadcasting of a transaction "non…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 11:39:58 AM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
Quote from: bytemasterPayments would generally be advanced, say 1 BTC at a time…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 11:30:20 AM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
Forgot to add the good part about micropayments. While I don't think Bitcoin is…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 05, 2010, 11:03:21 AM | ||
Flood attack 0.00000001 BC Bitcoin Discussion
It seems to do more harm than good because it prevents micropayment implementati…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 04, 2010, 11:25:36 AM | ||
Please upgrade to 0.3.8! Bitcoin Discussion
I guess SourceForge hasn't updated its mirrors yet. The files are there on the…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 07:29:37 PM | ||
Building initial transaction trust through "coin ripping" Bitcoin Discussion
The software is designed to support things like this. I was going to post detai…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 07:40:40 PM | ||
Content-Length header and 500 (was Re: Authentication, JSON RPC and Python) Development & Technical Discussion
bitcoin requires the Content-Length header, but several JSON-RPC libraries do no…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 04:26:26 PM | ||
Bitcoind x86 binary for CentOS Development & Technical Discussion
There are two versions, one built from stock code, the other modified to accept…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 07:09:32 PM | ||
Please upgrade to 0.3.8! Bitcoin Discussion
Version 0.3.8 adds an important security improvement. Everyone should upgrade t…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 06:40:18 PM | ||
What happens when network is split for prolonged time and reconnected? Bitcoin Discussion
creighto: I agree with that idea. After a few hours, it should be possible for…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 05:45:07 PM | ||
Bitcoind x86 binary for CentOS Development & Technical Discussion
I have successfully built it with 4.8, 4.7 never would but with 4.8 bitcoind loc…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 04:05:08 PM | ||
Builds for Ubuntu? Development & Technical Discussion
Is satoshi noWx patch in 0.3.7 already? Before that bitcoind required wx, and I…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 03, 2010, 03:56:11 PM | ||
Protocol Buffers for Bitcoin Development & Technical Discussion
The reason I didn't use protocol buffers or boost serialization is because they…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 02, 2010, 03:22:08 PM | ||
4 hashes parallel on SSE2 CPUs for 0.3.6 Development & Technical Discussion
Is it 2x fast on AMD and 1/2 fast on Intel?Btw. Why are you using this alignup f…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 02, 2010, 02:02:46 PM | ||
Mac Client Problems Outlined... Bitcoin Technical Support
"Minimize to the tray instead of the taskbar" & "Minimize to the tray on close"…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 02, 2010, 01:02:20 PM | ||
Linux version => No GUI after upgrade. WTF? Bitcoin Technical Support
Did it print anything to the console? Are you sure you didn't run "bitcoind"?Tr…
|
n/a | satoshi | August 02, 2010, 12:39:27 PM | ||
Webpage idea: Next predicted difficulty change Development & Technical Discussion
It would be neat if someone had a page (like that handy calculator at http://www…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 08:32:08 PM | ||
4 hashes parallel on SSE2 CPUs for 0.3.6 Development & Technical Discussion
That's amazing... So are you saying you use 128-bit registers to SIMD four 32-bi…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 07:29:20 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! Bitcoin Discussion
I can only imagine the pain you went through to get these builds because I'm try…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 02:53:06 PM | ||
[PATCH] implement 'listtransactions' Development & Technical Discussion
What are you needing to use listtransactions for?The reason I didn't implement l…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 02:40:54 PM | ||
Bug: "Immature" coins lost in wallet.dat during transaction Bitcoin Technical Support
I don't get how it let you send if it was not matured. Your balance would have…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 30, 2010, 02:19:05 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! Bitcoin Discussion
On Debian testing 32-bit, I get a few build errors, all resembling:Code:script.c…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 06:12:12 PM | ||
Linux distribution download Bitcoin Technical Support
Yeah, acutely aware that I should have stayed on 9.04 or 9.10. It's a lot more…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 05:17:24 PM | ||
Transaction disappeared in the void... Bitcoin Technical Support
If the transaction didn't go out immediately at first, like if you weren't conne…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 05:08:31 PM | ||
Implementation bug prior to 0.3.6 Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, it works well to just PM me. I'm the one who's going to be fixing it.…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 05:04:15 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! Bitcoin Discussion
"./bitcoin: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.11' not found (required by ./bitc…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 04:43:15 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** Upgrade to 0.3.6 ASAP! Bitcoin Discussion
0.3.6 Linux build is back to the old makefile.unix. It static links libjpeg so…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 04:20:38 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** version 0.3.6 Bitcoin Discussion
SVN is updated with version 0.3.6.Uploading Windows build of 0.3.6 to Sourceforg…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 03:30:15 PM | ||
*** ALERT *** version 0.3.6 Bitcoin Discussion
Haven't had time to update the SVN yet. Wait for 0.3.6, I'm building it now. Y…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 29, 2010, 02:55:51 PM | ||
wiki registration email? Bitcoin Technical Support
WTF? How did we get on that? AFAIK, the only e-mail is if you tell the forum t…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 28, 2010, 09:10:46 PM | ||
Scalability and transaction rate Development & Technical Discussion
The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended config…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 28, 2010, 09:00:38 PM | ||
Difficulty Development & Technical Discussion
You were looking at the wrong code. Here's the code that applies:Code:bool CBlo…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 28, 2010, 08:16:23 PM | ||
Build error SVN r115 on my Mac: workaround Development & Technical Discussion
Was that the only thing I broke in the OSX build?! Does it actually work after…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 28, 2010, 04:23:23 PM | ||
Having problems specifing -datadir Bitcoin Technical Support
It was able to reproduce this. The database doesn't like the relative path."bit…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 28, 2010, 03:58:26 PM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
OK, thanks. I'd also like to know if it runs fine as long as you don't turn on…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 27, 2010, 02:47:42 PM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
I was able to integrate the SHA256 functionality from Crypto++ 5.6.0 into Bitcoi…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 27, 2010, 01:27:30 PM | ||
Proof-of-work difficulty increasing Bitcoin Discussion
New difficulty factor 244.213223092+35%I updated the first post.date, difficulty…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 26, 2010, 10:04:58 PM | ||
Bitcoin x86 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
Crypto++ 5.6.0: http://www.cryptopp.com/Cached SHA256: http://pastebin.com/rJAYZ…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 26, 2010, 08:29:42 PM | ||
Bitcoin x64 for Windows Development & Technical Discussion
Credit to tcatm for the caching part of the SHA context - this offers absolutely…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 26, 2010, 01:41:31 PM | ||
Warning: don't use -server or bitcoind where you web browse (v0.3.2 and lower) Bitcoin Discussion
Don't use the -server or -daemon switch or run bitcoind on a machine where you u…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 19, 2010, 11:01:38 AM | ||
bitcoind without wxWidgets Development & Technical Discussion
I replaced the last of the few wxBase dependencies in bitcoind.bitcoind now comp…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 26, 2010, 12:23:33 PM | ||
Stealing Coins Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteHere is a paper that claims to find SHA-1 collisions in 2^52 crypto operati…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 03:48:01 PM | ||
Warning: don't use -server or bitcoind on a machine where you web browse Bitcoin Discussion
The JSON-RPC HTTP authentication feature in 0.3.3 solves this problem.
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 09:29:09 PM | ||
Stealing Coins Development & Technical Discussion
Sorry, actually it's ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm) not RSA.…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 05:27:36 PM | ||
md5? Bitcoin Technical Support |
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 05:06:57 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
Great catch! Simpler fix is to specify the BIO_FLAGS_BASE64_NO_NL in the rpc.cp…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 04:51:31 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
i got some problems here too trying to get this run on PHP.so far i had no luck,…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 04:44:16 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
I found what appears to be a bug: with a long enough username and password combi…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 04:34:29 PM | ||
Stealing Coins Development & Technical Discussion
If I figure out that Public Key 123456 generates Hash ABCDandPublic Key 654321 a…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 03:01:40 PM | ||
Stealing Coins Development & Technical Discussion
Red, thanks for telling me privately first! Please go ahead and post it (and re…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 02:06:23 PM | ||
Stealing Coins Development & Technical Discussion
It's best if you tell it to me privately so it can be fixed first.I just e-maile…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 12:45:22 PM | ||
Bitcoin 0.3.3 released -- PLEASE UPGRADE Bitcoin Discussion
Please upgrade to 0.3.3! Important security improvements were made in 0.3.2 and…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 11:55:09 AM | ||
a simple traffic load test run Development & Technical Discussion
Please do these tests on the test network. That's what it's for. Thanks.
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 10:29:52 AM | ||
a simple traffic load test run Development & Technical Discussion
Was that on the test network?http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=363.0
|
n/a | satoshi | July 25, 2010, 09:46:33 AM | ||
Reading/Writing Blocks and FLATDATA Development & Technical Discussion
FLATDATA was a workaround to serialize a fixed field length array. There was a…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 11:04:20 PM | ||
Version 0.3.2.5 -- please test! Bitcoin Discussion
Please test 0.3.2.5 in preparation for the 0.3.3 release! This build is looking…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 10:32:52 PM | ||
bitcoind not responding to RPC Bitcoin Technical Support
Can anyone confirm if JSON-RPC over HTTP is supposed to use status 500 if the re…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 08:15:58 PM | ||
JSON-RPC Multiple Invocations Bitcoin Technical Support
Obviously it's a bug that it repeats the header.I was trying to follow the 1.0 s…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 07:59:08 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think authentication should be disabled by default if there's no conf fi…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 03:39:03 PM | ||
Faster initial block download Development & Technical Discussion
Is there a safety reason to stop within the last 2000 blocks or can it be tweake…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 03:13:27 PM | ||
Faster initial block download (5x faster) Development & Technical Discussion
By making some adjustments to the database settings, I was able to make the init…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 01:24:56 PM | ||
bitcoind not responding to RPC Bitcoin Technical Support
If I recall correctly, 500 is the prescribed status code for JSON-RPC error resp…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 12:23:47 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
Gavin's changes look good. I think everything is complete. Here's a test build…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 12:14:31 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
Question for everybody: should I add a section to the wiki page describing, in…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 23, 2010, 12:07:40 PM | ||
They want to delete the Wikipedia article Bitcoin Discussion
Bitcoin is an implementation of Wei Dai's b-money proposal http://weidai.com/bmo…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 20, 2010, 01:38:28 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
TODO: dialog box or debug.log warning if no rpc.user/rpc.password is set, explai…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 21, 2010, 09:34:23 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
boost::program_options has the same "key=value" format. Gavin pointed out we ca…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 21, 2010, 12:31:09 PM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
I just did a quick survey of 20 .conf files in /etc on my debian system, and fou…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 21, 2010, 11:07:57 AM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
I was researching config file formats, here's a comparison.YAML is massive. I'm…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 21, 2010, 12:51:34 AM | ||
JSON-RPC password Development & Technical Discussion
Still need to know what's the most typical settings file format on Linux. Is th…
|
n/a | satoshi | July 20, 2010, 07:05:20 PM |