It was the Bitcointalk forum that inspired us to create Bitcointalksearch.org - Bitcointalk is an excellent site that should be the default page for anybody dealing in cryptocurrency, since it is a virtual gold-mine of data. However, our experience and user feedback led us create our site; Bitcointalk's search is slow, and difficult to get the results you need, because you need to log in first to find anything useful - furthermore, there are rate limiters for their search functionality.
The aim of our project is to create a faster website that yields more results and faster without having to create an account and eliminate the need to log in - your personal data, therefore, will never be in jeopardy since we are not asking for any of your data and you don't need to provide them to use our site with all of its capabilities.
We created this website with the sole purpose of users being able to search quickly and efficiently in the field of cryptocurrency so they will have access to the latest and most accurate information and thereby assisting the crypto-community at large.
Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
Treat dust outputs as non-standard, un-hardcode TX_FEE constants Development & Technical Discussion
Minimum transaction output is (conservatively) calculated from the minimum relay…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 02:00:06 PM | ||
Distributed/scaled bitcoind Development & Technical Discussion
I disagree about the wallet part.If you are going to the effort of recoding bitc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 01:43:55 PM | ||
Treat dust outputs as non-standard, un-hardcode TX_FEE constants Development & Technical Discussion
The changes make sense. Right now Bitcoin has a large variety of what we call "m…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 01:41:17 PM | ||
Treat dust outputs as non-standard, un-hardcode TX_FEE constants Development & Technical Discussion
So: if you have a better suggestion for fixing the problem of new users wasting…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 10:30:47 AM | ||
Preventing double-spending attacks with semi-trusted 3rd parties Development & Technical Discussion
No. Imagine that it is like sending bunch of bitcoin to an "M of N address" befo…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 06:52:39 AM | ||
Treat dust outputs as non-standard, un-hardcode TX_FEE constants Development & Technical Discussion
Also, doesn't this kill coloured coins? They would require a separate relay ne…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 04:33:41 AM | ||
Treat dust outputs as non-standard, un-hardcode TX_FEE constants Development & Technical Discussion
What about adding a way to poll nodes that will accept a given relay fee.This wo…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 30, 2013, 04:05:37 AM | ||
Anyone use raspberry pi with armory? NT Armory
Oh yeah! Nice find!Can anyone confirm this would easily mate with the RPi?Lookin…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 02:42:03 PM | ||
PURE Java Miner Development & Technical Discussion
So - because it's total POT luck if you get the correct HASH.. It doesn't matter…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 01:00:35 PM | ||
Anyone use raspberry pi with armory? NT Armory
Was doing some Googling and found this. It is $12 but includes a touch screen.
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 11:43:06 AM | ||
Do these things work? Development & Technical Discussion
That is pretty interesting.You could make it completely secure by having the enc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 11:10:03 AM | ||
Block size targeting algo based on average propagation times for blocks? Development & Technical Discussion
The detection mechanism for orphan blocks makes sense for miners, but it does no…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 09:59:28 AM | ||
PURE Java Miner Development & Technical Discussion
Hello,I am trying to write a pure JAVA miner, a nice webstart app or applet that…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 08:27:22 AM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
So, how do you prevent that from basically being the same as "everyone flip a co…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 04:36:39 AM | ||
Block size targeting algo based on average propagation times for blocks? Development & Technical Discussion
Ideally it should be possible to compute difficulty updates based purely on the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 04:28:40 AM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
What about just defining a fork more than 10k blocks from the main chain as just…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 03:55:33 AM | ||
How does the initial sync is done? Development & Technical Discussion
Yes make a lot of sense. So the longer a blockchain exist, the more difficult to…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2013, 03:53:33 AM | ||
How does the initial sync is done? Development & Technical Discussion
OK I got it. Once the peer network established, everything is fine. You can calc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 05:09:34 PM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
Errr. I thought dev-hardcoded checkpoints prevent a complete reversal even in th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 01:57:11 PM | ||
Anyone use raspberry pi with armory? NT Armory
Here we go:Cool.Armory will definitely have to be modified to get it usable on s…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 01:16:57 PM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
It doesn't seem to me that bitcoin's "the hashiest chain wins" approach is "brok…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 12:26:00 PM | ||
Anyone use raspberry pi with armory? NT Armory
I submitted a pull request to help with this.Assuming the pull request is accept…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 27, 2013, 02:52:20 PM | ||
Using difficulty as a proxy for price Development & Technical Discussion
Exactly. What do you think about a BIP being created proposing default fees be l…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 08:16:20 AM | ||
Anyone use raspberry pi with armory? NT Armory
I tweaked the PR slightly. It now checks that "python" returns a version of 2.x…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2013, 05:18:01 AM | ||
How to report and warn on protocol incompatibilities between clients? Development & Technical Discussion
This would be too much traffic, I think. It's effectively rebroadcasting dozens…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 26, 2013, 01:30:44 AM | ||
Is there any plan to support crowdfunding (Assurance contracts) on armory? Armory
A Kickstarter to make Kickstarter unnecessary ?
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 04:23:11 PM | ||
How to report and warn on protocol incompatibilities between clients? Development & Technical Discussion
As far as I know, there are no re-implementations of Bitcoin where the authors s…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 10:09:31 AM | ||
How to report and warn on protocol incompatibilities between clients? Development & Technical Discussion
I think a better way is multiple verification by miners.Create a new message "ch…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 09:13:41 AM | ||
New block exactly every 10min? how? Development & Technical Discussion
If so, what if the difficulty is so low (has so many zero's up front), that ther…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 08:55:41 AM | ||
Is it known that every block CAN produce a hash under target? Development & Technical Discussion
There's also the timestamp field in the header, which can also be updated (and d…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 07:53:57 AM | ||
Fixed denomination coins with Armoury Armory
This would be where the online system generates lots of standard addresses from…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 07:48:11 AM | ||
How do Paper Wallets work? I'm completely mystified Development & Technical Discussion
Unfortunately, that's the "cost" of security.Have you considered fork detection?…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 25, 2013, 04:30:33 AM | ||
Is it known that every block CAN produce a hash under target? Development & Technical Discussion
I think the OPs question is more "given a set of transactions and a single times…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 05:39:41 PM | ||
Satoshi Client: Improving time from "Start" to "Usable" Development & Technical Discussion
verification of all transactions in the block. this usually isn't a limiting fac…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 11:09:09 AM | ||
Satoshi Client: Improving time from "Start" to "Usable" Development & Technical Discussion
What does database verification involve?
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 10:16:32 AM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
If Bitcoin thinks that 100/120 is the *safe* point to allow spending from coinba…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 06:35:08 AM | ||
Limits to accepting a new longest chain to prevent >50% Development & Technical Discussion
Although perhaps not a very likely scenario such an attack would be a massive co…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 06:26:47 AM | ||
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $1000USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
What you want is a rule that is a Nash equilibrium. It is in the best interests…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 04:21:52 AM | ||
Backup if Armoury is discontinued Armory
What happens in that case? I am thinking of a case where you have coins in cold…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 04:11:51 AM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
The bug is that the timestamp difference is calculated on the wrong blocks. If…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 01:36:23 PM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
Amusingly, you are also totally wrong. No node on the network will accept a blo…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 04:00:38 AM | ||
Forked block chain Development & Technical Discussion
If I found myself at all tempted to use both forks, I think I'd create a set of…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2013, 03:48:46 AM | ||
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $1000USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
* Proof-of-work system must follow one main rule: longest valid chain wins. If…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 05:16:25 PM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
P.S. The bug cannot be fixed with a soft fork. It is an absolutely hard fork t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 11:17:37 AM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
Any asymmetric function for difficulty adjustment can be gamed.Your concerns are…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 10:52:59 AM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
This is an insanely bad idea, just like it was the last 20 or so times it was su…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 08:22:10 AM | ||
The minimum transfer fee is not trivial anymore Development & Technical Discussion
Because dust have a unique cost. They likely will never be spent. They just re…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 06:50:47 AM | ||
What (if any) mechanism is there to protect against a massive hash rate drop? Development & Technical Discussion
A simple rule is build on the valid chain with highest POW.A chain is valid if-…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 06:37:05 AM | ||
difference between blocksize and inconsistent hash record. Development & Technical Discussion
It seems not a good idea to make orphaned blocks in the main chain, or there is…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 06:23:18 AM | ||
Quantum Computers META THREAD Defacto STICKY Development & Technical Discussion
If quantum computers was capable of breaking ECC but not breaking RIPEMD-160, th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 23, 2013, 05:17:42 AM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
There's not a way around this, other than just having full nodes store the entir…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2013, 12:26:47 PM | ||
amortizable hashcash & zero-trust poolfree Development & Technical Discussion
I think I have to read about p2pool before I can understand what you wrote on th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2013, 10:57:22 AM | ||
Forked block chain Development & Technical Discussion
I don't understand your objection. The coins that are valid on both sides of th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2013, 03:50:40 AM | ||
amortizable hashcash & zero-trust poolfree Development & Technical Discussion
I called hypothetically directly claimable micro (low denominatoin) bitcoins mic…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 06:17:17 PM | ||
amortizable hashcash & zero-trust poolfree Development & Technical Discussion
Amortizable hashcash (my later 2002 variation following on from hashcash) means…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 03:49:54 PM | ||
How do Paper Wallets work? I'm completely mystified Development & Technical Discussion
What's really going on here?The number is the root of your wallet. From that nu…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 03:10:32 PM | ||
Need Test-Net Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
Again...?I meant "do they change". So, I can take that as a yes?
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 02:37:19 PM | ||
Need Test-Net Bitcoins Development & Technical Discussion
There is a mention of resetting TestNet. Does they change the root or something…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 02:20:13 PM | ||
quantaum computers Development & Technical Discussion
I thought that if 51% of miner adopted a client change eg 50 millcoins that wou…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 12:07:50 PM | ||
a better bot net use & software assurance (Re: defending ahead the p2p nature) Development & Technical Discussion
But also there is an indirect human utility to having botnets being used for min…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 08:10:47 AM | ||
SIGHASH_WITHINPUTVALUES: Super-lightweight HW wallets and offline data Development & Technical Discussion
What about using something like a 2 step transaction.I create a transaction whic…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 05:51:30 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
I think I really haven't understood what your goal is or how you're achieving it…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 04:44:50 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
An even larger extension to this would be to have the sub-chain made up of singl…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2013, 03:10:17 AM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
Another feature (or disadvantage) is that it allows dropping of extra info added…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 07:45:46 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
This is yet another area where the trie-based structures win -- since there is b…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 01:40:30 PM | ||
defending ahead the p2p nature of bitcoin - blending hashcash & scrypt Development & Technical Discussion
Certain practicalities (like "motivating miners of the meta-chain") aside, monoc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 01:29:02 PM | ||
Ultimate blockchain compression w/ trust-free lite nodes Development & Technical Discussion
I was thinking about this as a pure system that would allow dropping the blockch…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 01:24:48 PM | ||
Will the size of the blockchain file continue to increase indefinitely? Development & Technical Discussion
Ledger clients would simply be unresponsive when polled for blocks older than 5…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 12:04:50 PM | ||
Proposed solution to "lost coins" Development & Technical Discussion
I will be lazy instead of learning to read the code. Can the block size increase…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 11:51:41 AM | ||
Proposed solution to "lost coins" Development & Technical Discussion
blockchain space doesn't relate to coins?There is 1 MB of data per block at the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 11:01:46 AM | ||
Proposed solution to "lost coins" Development & Technical Discussion
But actually what happens is you approach an asymptote of peak oil, and alternat…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 10:51:20 AM | ||
Support for Hierarchical Multi-Signature Transactions? Development & Technical Discussion
Ah thank you Vitalik. That's exactly what I was looking for.But most of this is…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 08:09:34 AM | ||
Generic client tester Development & Technical Discussion
This may have already been created, but in addition to each client software havi…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 08:04:01 AM | ||
Solving the fast payments problem Development & Technical Discussion
How about forwarding whenever, from our perspective, a new input is used ?Sounds…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 07:25:17 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
An even larger extension to this would be to have the sub-chain made up of singl…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 06:23:16 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
This still only has one probability, which will only vary with the target and no…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 05:53:42 AM | ||
Mining Codex Mining
2.) First in, first minedTransactions will not be replaced by double spends with…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 04:38:58 AM | ||
Using difficulty as a proxy for price Development & Technical Discussion
That's assuming the max block size cap is not lifted. If it is, I think a rule o…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 04:35:01 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
Unless I misunderstand you, that's still a single probability for any given targ…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 04:31:49 AM | ||
defending ahead the p2p nature of bitcoin - blending hashcash & scrypt Development & Technical Discussion
Seriously though, with all due respect (and with admittance of my conflict of in…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 04:05:33 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
Bitcoin txns are based on proof not trust, or reputation.Substituting trust for…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2013, 03:01:57 AM | ||
Solving the fast payments problem Development & Technical Discussion
if the devs made this change people would accept it. I hope Gavin takes notice b…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:33:21 PM | ||
P2P Exchange for bitcoin Project Development
Why just one asset pair / chain? I was trying to keep that chain clean and hopef…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:10:42 PM | ||
Solving the fast payments problem Development & Technical Discussion
interesting. A problem that is clearly a problem on paper but in the real world…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:03:00 PM | ||
P2P Exchange for bitcoin Project Development
So, what about the following framework.Transactions would be kept to a few limit…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 06:50:09 PM | ||
Solving the fast payments problem Development & Technical Discussion
what incentive does the individual node have to rebroadcast suspected double spe…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 06:11:55 PM | ||
An idea on how to reduce the risk of a 51 % attack Development & Technical Discussion
When were you informed about the fork, after or before it became a hard fork (th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 05:24:56 PM | ||
Solving the fast payments problem Development & Technical Discussion
This kills in the bud all race attacks, where the merchant is unaware that a fra…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 04:51:56 PM | ||
Using difficulty as a proxy for price Development & Technical Discussion
From this spreadsheet, the price vs difficulty ratio has been reasonably consta…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 04:09:09 PM | ||
Detecting lost records in distributed hash tables Development & Technical Discussion
Distributed hash tables (DHTs) are a way to store key -> value pairs in a distri…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 03:43:43 PM | ||
defending ahead the p2p nature of bitcoin - blending hashcash & scrypt Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not really the To Go Guy in this regards, but it seems to me that for variou…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 11:19:08 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
This does not make any sense.Faster (lower difficulty) blocks = less secure bloc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 11:17:33 AM | ||
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $500USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
1) Go to the counter2) Get a Whopper®3) Pay with bitcoin4) Go out5) Attempt a do…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 08:57:10 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
What's the implication for mining pools? Do they need to communicate with miner…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 08:56:41 AM | ||
defending ahead the p2p nature of bitcoin - blending hashcash & scrypt Development & Technical Discussion
Well, distributing the verification "back" would be nice, but it seems to me (fr…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 08:35:28 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
One other question - how do you suggest the block reward be distributed? Every b…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:37:37 AM | ||
defending ahead the p2p nature of bitcoin - blending hashcash & scrypt Development & Technical Discussion
When you account for pooled mining, ASICS become completely irrelevant - it does…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:35:07 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for the explanation. I think I mostly understand what you propose, but I…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 07:22:58 AM | ||
Reminder: zero-conf is not safe; $500USD reward posted for replace-by-fee patch Development & Technical Discussion
Another compromise rule would be that double spending would result in both trans…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 06:40:13 AM | ||
Decoupling transactions and POW Development & Technical Discussion
If you have a transaction that is 100 blocks deep in the chain, it is very unlik…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 19, 2013, 06:00:48 AM |