| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
[Crypto] Borromean ringsig: Efficiently proving knowledge for monotone functions Development & Technical Discussion
So you can achieve circuits like ( (P1 AND P2 AND P3) OR (P4 AND P5 AND P6) ) A…
|
n/a | TierNolan | June 04, 2015, 03:55:55 AM |
|
|
|
Elastic block cap with rollover penalties Development & Technical Discussion
It also requires modifying, or at least amending consensus rules, something the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | June 03, 2015, 04:13:12 AM |
|
|
|
SPV client backed by personal full node? Development & Technical Discussion
Connecting to your own node means that there is less risk of a withholding attac…
|
n/a | TierNolan | June 02, 2015, 04:27:48 PM |
|
|
|
Block relay when pruning Development & Technical Discussion
Fair enough, and I agree with the suggest change. There is no reason not to sen…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 28, 2015, 10:04:20 AM |
|
|
|
Block relay when pruning Development & Technical Discussion
I was looking at the block relay code in master.Code: // Don't relay…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 04:30:39 PM |
|
|
|
A solution to block withholding attacks Development & Technical Discussion
I remember a paper that suggested something similar. It isn't that clear exactl…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 03:45:44 PM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin with Raspberry Pi Development & Technical Discussion
hi there,may be the following start script can someone help to start and run a b…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 02:19:11 PM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
So if a helical chain can help circumvent block propagation latency issues, then…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 09:07:38 AM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Sounds very intriguing. Are there no negative consequences to this? All the obvi…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 08:17:29 AM |
|
|
|
QoS for bitcoind Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not clear who needs to create the hash-cash "token" - do you mean any node t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 06:49:50 AM |
|
|
|
QoS for bitcoind Development & Technical Discussion
A deterrent for running a bitcoind node on a home connection is the potential ne…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 27, 2015, 04:10:06 AM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
How can double spent be prevented in this system, if a user transmits a coin bot…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 26, 2015, 04:04:21 PM |
|
|
|
Rounding error in calculation of chainwork Development & Technical Discussion
Yes, it's a softfork for both sides, not a hard one. One side will eventually wi…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 26, 2015, 07:19:15 AM |
|
|
|
Can dynamic accumulators be used to store UTXOs Development & Technical Discussion
So you can imagine a world with stateless miners and full nodes, and wallets eit…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 25, 2015, 05:54:29 PM |
|
|
|
Softfork cutoff Development & Technical Discussion
In terms of safety before lock-in: Most soft-fork features are unsafe until lock…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 25, 2015, 04:08:28 PM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting idea. I think this could work. ? Can a coin move between the chains?…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 25, 2015, 12:47:11 PM |
|
|
|
Softfork cutoff Development & Technical Discussion
That is, once you pass the 75% then all non-standard version X blocks get reject…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 25, 2015, 10:30:03 AM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Why 4? What is the principle behind this number? Why not 3?3 works too. 4 giv…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 21, 2015, 04:29:53 PM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
Sounds like a fun experiment for an altcoin... ;]It works as a soft fork too. J…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 21, 2015, 12:35:19 PM |
|
|
|
How to memory map blkindex.dat? Development & Technical Discussion
It follows the network protocol. They take the network serialization and dump i…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 21, 2015, 10:38:44 AM |
|
|
|
Helix Blockchain Development & Technical Discussion
This is a system which consists of 4 (or more) parallel chains. Coins can exist…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 21, 2015, 10:34:15 AM |
|
|
|
BIP 66 status (miners' votes) Development & Technical Discussion
I talked to f2pool last night. Asked him to switch over as well. He will be hope…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 21, 2015, 09:34:19 AM |
|
|
|
Requesting parents for orphan transactions Development & Technical Discussion
In these kind of cases there wouldn't really be any benefit to requesting the tx…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 20, 2015, 04:13:26 PM |
|
|
|
Requesting parents for orphan transactions Development & Technical Discussion
Parent transaction can be already confirmed in block.Right. In that case, it co…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 20, 2015, 11:52:46 AM |
|
|
|
Regtest Consensus Forking Behavior Introduced in Bitcoin Core in May 2014 Development & Technical Discussion
I agree this is not a bad idea, however it does mean that whatever is creating t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 20, 2015, 11:28:47 AM |
|
|
|
Regtest Consensus Forking Behavior Introduced in Bitcoin Core in May 2014 Development & Technical Discussion
Thanks for answering. Unfortunately, the regtest network is currently essential…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 20, 2015, 03:57:37 AM |
|
|
|
client 0.10.99 Development & Technical Discussion
I think x.y.99 means that someone built their own version of the client.
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 19, 2015, 12:01:49 PM |
|
|
|
Requesting parents for orphan transactions Development & Technical Discussion
An orphan transaction is a transaction where some of the parents are missing. T…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 19, 2015, 06:44:20 AM |
|
|
|
Parallel Soft-fork Handling Development & Technical Discussion
I was thinking about an even easier version. It just requires "int nBaseHeight"…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 18, 2015, 12:02:51 PM |
|
|
|
BIP 66 status (miners' votes) Development & Technical Discussion
Looks like there was a spike in the last few days. If that is maintained, it me…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 17, 2015, 04:58:39 PM |
|
|
|
Relative CLTV Development & Technical Discussion
I understand that but am just wondering if the tx will be relayed (my understand…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 17, 2015, 12:30:22 PM |
|
|
|
Relative CLTV Development & Technical Discussion
So a tx that uses these new op codes (assuming both are adopted) will still be "…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 17, 2015, 09:43:43 AM |
|
|
|
Relative CLTV Development & Technical Discussion
Is this OP_RELATIVECHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY a new op code and is it designed to basic…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 17, 2015, 09:31:54 AM |
|
|
|
how to maximize block download speed on a single local node Development & Technical Discussion
Cool I'll try that. If the problem really come from this sleep, it will be more…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 16, 2015, 10:51:25 AM |
|
|
|
Relative CLTV Development & Technical Discussion
It has the benefit of not requiring someone to know exactly when a transaction i…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 15, 2015, 06:08:04 PM |
|
|
|
how to maximize block download speed on a single local node Development & Technical Discussion
Are you using your own software as receiver? I think CPU rather than network ba…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 15, 2015, 02:32:29 PM |
|
|
|
Starting preliminary 0.94 testing - "Headless fullnode" Armory
What does headless full node mean? It just stores the UTXO data or just recent…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 14, 2015, 10:29:36 AM |
|
|
|
Should we just remove the wallet function of Bitcoin Core Development & Technical Discussion
A simplier option is to just prevent sending at all. The pop-up could be "The n…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 13, 2015, 05:23:19 PM |
|
|
|
how to maximize block download speed on a single local node Development & Technical Discussion
However by reviewing the code, I have seen no mistake : if the send buffer of th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 13, 2015, 10:24:36 AM |
|
|
|
[Theory] The optimal confirmation time Development & Technical Discussion
Not sure where you got this from... but to effectively reverse a block, you need…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 13, 2015, 09:04:44 AM |
|
|
|
Should we just remove the wallet function of Bitcoin Core Development & Technical Discussion
Conservationism here is justified especially so in that one can simply set the k…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 13, 2015, 07:28:45 AM |
|
|
|
UTXO reduction by trx-to-self? Development & Technical Discussion
How are DoS attacks prevented? Say the network is flooded with these output cre…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 13, 2015, 06:09:09 AM |
|
|
|
[Theory] The optimal confirmation time Development & Technical Discussion
A ‘confirmation’ is when a transaction exists in a block. Each subsequent block…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 12, 2015, 06:17:30 PM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
I am thinking of splitting the BIP into two parts. The first part would be the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 12, 2015, 06:41:26 AM |
|
|
|
UTXO reduction by trx-to-self? Development & Technical Discussion
That would be a hard fork. Miners could create those transactions to compact th…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 12, 2015, 10:34:08 AM |
|
|
|
When is op_return scheduled to be 80 bytes? Development & Technical Discussion
I read somewhere op_return is going to be upped to 80 bytes from its current 40.…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 12, 2015, 07:19:20 AM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
I was thinking of adding a UTXO_RAW option. This would be for historical blocks…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 11, 2015, 04:05:19 AM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
After thinking more carefully, the updated proposal with softfork bears a huge r…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 11, 2015, 03:48:09 AM |
|
|
|
Block write to disk Armory
the only way this could throw off Armory is if Core were to maintain an invalid…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 04:38:25 PM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
I updated the BIP again to address concerns raised.
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 03:07:44 PM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
I like this idea but it implicitly contradicts with BIP30 (https://github.com/bi…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 01:10:10 PM |
|
|
|
Extending Transactions to include UTXO info Development & Technical Discussion
I created a draft BIP for extended transactions.Transactions just point to the t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 11:33:45 AM |
|
|
|
Block write to disk Armory
I was looking through main.cpp and it looks like bitcoin core writes unverified…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 09:14:56 AM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
I created a draft BIP relating to etx and eblock messages.If a protocol version…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 08:26:37 AM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
Do you document your formula somewhere?It was on the mailing list.Quote from: gm…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 10, 2015, 02:49:29 AM |
|
|
|
How is UTXO currently stored in Bitcoin Core? Development & Technical Discussion
The serialized size in CCoins doesn't include the txid hash. The database GetSt…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 04:17:26 PM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
Unless P == NP, unspendability is undecidable in the general caseThere needs to…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 02:09:30 PM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
I'm not sure how accurate https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Script is. In my understand…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 01:48:42 PM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
All UTXOs are considered to be potentially spendable, unless proven otherwiseI t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 01:00:40 PM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
You don't need any extra info for P2PKH or P2SH because you can reconstruct the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 11:47:07 AM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
ok, but I don't understand the meaning of your: Hash(key_salt | txid | n) maps t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 11:16:50 AM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
How about the scriptPubKey and value of the utxo? These are not part of the spen…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 10:16:44 AM |
|
|
|
Max block size should also consider the size of UTXO set Development & Technical Discussion
I think these are the minimal amount of data needed to store utxo. the utxo set…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 09, 2015, 09:29:22 AM |
|
|
|
Should we just remove the wallet function of Bitcoin Core Development & Technical Discussion
Actually, wallets without deterministic backup (e.g. Bitcoin Core) should not be…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 08, 2015, 11:39:12 AM |
|
|
|
Do You have a Bitcoin Full Node running (24/7)? Bitcoin Technical Support
I gave up with the Raspberry Pi node. It kept running out memory and swapping ou…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 08, 2015, 07:41:44 AM |
|
|
|
A Proposal to Reduce Variation in Block Creation Times Development & Technical Discussion
The only way to make what you are proposing work is to allow multiple people to…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 08, 2015, 06:58:28 AM |
|
|
|
Effect of the Distribution of Block Interarrival Time On Blockchain Security Development & Technical Discussion
The main assumption is that hashing power can be switched on/off.There are some…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 08, 2015, 05:31:44 AM |
|
|
|
Parallel Soft-fork Handling Development & Technical Discussion
The system for handling soft forks is to increment the block version. Since the…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 07, 2015, 08:25:37 AM |
|
|
|
84 Gigabytes Per Month, Per Connection Development & Technical Discussion
the OP was referring to transfer of the entire block chain so I didn't realize i…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 07, 2015, 03:30:07 AM |
|
|
|
84 Gigabytes Per Month, Per Connection Development & Technical Discussion
The overall ratio of transfer will be much less than 1:1. No matter how many ful…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 06, 2015, 06:01:02 PM |
|
|
|
84 Gigabytes Per Month, Per Connection Development & Technical Discussion
That's what 20 MB blocks require. That means, you receive the blockchain, that'…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 06, 2015, 03:59:08 AM |
|
|
|
Locally verifiable unspent transaction output commitments Development & Technical Discussion
The RAM usage of this system could be reduced significantly by trading off CPU t…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 05, 2015, 08:49:32 AM |
|
|
|
Including merkleroot of blockheaders in coinbase? Development & Technical Discussion
it is 39136 times more difficult than then current target of 0000000000000000171…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 04, 2015, 10:05:04 AM |
|
|
|
Locally verifiable unspent transaction output commitments Development & Technical Discussion
A proposal to help SPV nodes verify blocks is to commit the root of an (unbalanc…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 04, 2015, 08:37:48 AM |
|
|
|
PubKeys, Signatures and PubKeyHash visibility on the Blockchain by output format Development & Technical Discussion
There is no multisig version of pay to public key hash. OP_CHECKMULTISIG doesn'…
|
n/a | TierNolan | May 01, 2015, 05:42:00 AM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
I'd like further softforks to switch to the new softforking system that doesn't…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 29, 2015, 03:41:03 PM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
We'll be moving on 62 once 66 is actually deployed (one flaw in the the legacy s…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2015, 11:10:37 AM |
|
|
|
Lightning Network (another proposal to make bitcoin scale) Development & Technical Discussion
The paper suggests a soft-cap to combat "Forced Expiration Spam".An attacker who…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 28, 2015, 05:59:10 AM |
|
|
|
questions about fork Development & Technical Discussion
1) if an outdated client receives a transaction with an unknown version, it inva…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 27, 2015, 03:00:08 PM |
|
|
|
Just a thought about variance. Development & Technical Discussion
Yes.The odds of a block being found is around 10% per minute.>10 mins: 34.9%> 20…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 27, 2015, 07:08:18 AM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
You only need legacy support for those UTXOs already in the blockchain. For thos…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2015, 01:37:13 PM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
I proposed this last year:(1) The txid will be the hash of the tx with all scrip…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 24, 2015, 06:06:36 AM |
|
|
|
What is the upper limit on block time? Development & Technical Discussion
The rule for stability is that the block time has to be significantly longer tha…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2015, 05:12:06 PM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
One way to avoid this is for the old clients to know at what block height their…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2015, 05:07:21 PM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
It would make it easier to do them wrong. You're expecting change A, but the ne…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2015, 01:48:16 PM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
Correct. And why shouldn't it be? It's just data. An expectation of monotonicity…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 22, 2015, 11:33:00 AM |
|
|
|
Semi-soft-fork to decrease the risk of tx malleability Development & Technical Discussion
No, because the bit becomes available for use again after the feature latches or…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 21, 2015, 03:55:35 PM |
|
|
|
Defending against 51% attacks Development & Technical Discussion
It sounds like you're reinventing p2pool?It is just a proxy that shares out hash…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2015, 04:29:26 PM |
|
|
|
Defending against 51% attacks Development & Technical Discussion
I'm thinking of a system that automatically chunks the power of the mining and d…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 20, 2015, 05:21:58 AM |
|
|
|
Bitcoin-QT/bitcoind sendtoaddress Bitcoin Technical Support
I assume you mean change addresses?A bitcoin transaction must spend 100% of all…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 10, 2015, 08:40:26 AM |
|
|
|
Pooled mining: how is a share value computed? Mining
If my understanding is correct, this implies the exceeding difficulty bits are e…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 06, 2015, 08:43:27 AM |
|
|
|
Pooled mining: how is a share value computed? Mining
For each potential share, a block header is created. The hash of the header is…
|
n/a | TierNolan | April 04, 2015, 11:13:28 AM |
|
|
|
Transactions which spend coinbase outputs early Development & Technical Discussion
Luckily that is not correct. A while back I proposed a way to expand the header…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 27, 2015, 04:18:47 PM |
|
|
|
Transactions which spend coinbase outputs early Development & Technical Discussion
If you'd like to hard fork to deal with the problem of updating the extranonce,…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 27, 2015, 12:58:52 PM |
|
|
|
Transactions which spend coinbase outputs early Development & Technical Discussion
Consensus on the bitcoin-dev IRC chat is that no other versions have penalized f…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 27, 2015, 11:41:27 AM |
|
|
|
Adding points on an Elliptic curve Development & Technical Discussion
You need to multiply both sides by the inverse of x3.What language are you using…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 24, 2015, 03:53:41 PM |
|
|
|
Transactions which spend coinbase outputs early Development & Technical Discussion
I don't think they are guaranteed to be valid eventually. For example, it could…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 24, 2015, 07:03:19 AM |
|
|
|
Likelihood of transaction hash mutating with current state of BIP062 Development & Technical Discussion
QuoteWill malleability ever be totally eliminated?No. It is an intentional and u…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 23, 2015, 09:21:58 AM |
|
|
|
Coinjoin improvement..? Development & Technical Discussion
I simplified it because no one was picking up and running with the more complex…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 20, 2015, 05:09:36 PM |
|
|
|
Transactions which spend coinbase outputs early Development & Technical Discussion
Interesting - as a potential attack vector it wouldn't be so easy but I'd guess…
|
n/a | TierNolan | March 20, 2015, 01:49:31 PM |
Jump to: