| Content | Score | Started by | Date posted | ||
 |
 |
BIP101: is this a typo? in Development & Technical Discussion
BIP101: is this a typo? by
uminatsu
Under https://github.com/gavinandresen/bips/blob/fd99a8ce04dbad96fb275e0300a7ee6…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 17, 2024, 04:44:51 PM |
|
|
|
Thought experiments on a potential weakness. in Beginners & Help
Thought experiments on a potential weakness. by
uminatsu
I'm contemplating a scenario where a small pool (say 10% of the total hash rate)…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 22, 2024, 09:06:09 AM |
|
|
|
Continuous & piecewise linear block reward function with 21M limit unchanged in Development & Technical Discussion
Continuous & piecewise linear block reward function with 21M limit unchanged by
uminatsu
It is well known that the bitcoin block reward (as a function of the block numbe…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 19, 2024, 11:40:02 PM |
|
|
|
Is Eligius the only major pool that accepts non-standard transactions? in Development & Technical Discussion
Is Eligius the only major pool that accepts non-standard transactions? by
uminatsu
By "non-standard" I mean the transaction redeems at least one scriptPubKey that…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 15, 2024, 04:39:46 PM |
|
|
|
Do pending transactions live forever on Eligius mempool? in Development & Technical Discussion
Do pending transactions live forever on Eligius mempool? by
uminatsu
I've been watching this 16-of-16 multisig tx for a while (2ee6d8ea223e118075882e…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 18, 2024, 11:11:09 AM |
|
|
|
Is this 16-of-16 multisig tx redeemable under current bitcoin implementation? in Development & Technical Discussion
Is this 16-of-16 multisig tx redeemable under current bitcoin implementation? by
uminatsu
I'm referring to this tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/2ee6d8ea223e118075882edba87…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 24, 2024, 08:36:29 AM |
|
|
|
proposal to avoid hardfork by perma-freezing old nodes in Development & Technical Discussion
proposal to avoid hardfork by perma-freezing old nodes by
uminatsu
If the majority of nodes agree that for all blocks after block #N (e.g. 400000)…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 17, 2024, 10:15:11 AM |
|
|
|
"high priority" tx (with fee), taking forever to confirm in Development & Technical Discussion
"high priority" tx (with fee), taking forever to confirm by
uminatsu
I crafted this raw transaction and relayed it through blockchain.info. It has th…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 19, 2024, 12:37:43 PM |
|
|
|
Does OP_INVALIDOPCODE always cause script to return false? in Development & Technical Discussion
Does OP_INVALIDOPCODE always cause script to return false? by
uminatsu
Normally OP_INVALIDOPCODE would cause script evaluation to return false, but wha…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 20, 2024, 05:40:47 PM |
|
|
|
brainwallet.org in an offline packaged Chrome app in Development & Technical Discussion
brainwallet.org in an offline packaged Chrome app by
uminatsu
Disclaimer: I made this mostly for my own convenience. Use it at your own risk.A…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 22, 2024, 08:10:43 PM |
|
|
|
Why do morons always try to redeem non-standard TX with no fee? in Development & Technical Discussion
Why do morons always try to redeem non-standard TX with no fee? by
uminatsu
Non-standard TX can only be mined on the Eligius pool and Eligius pool does not…
|
n/a | uminatsu | October 03, 2024, 03:59:18 PM |
|
|
|
More compact encoding for bitcoin QR codes? in Development & Technical Discussion
More compact encoding for bitcoin QR codes? by
uminatsu
More compact encoding for bitcoin QR codes?Most bitcoin-related QR codes encode…
|
n/a | uminatsu | August 12, 2024, 02:41:02 AM |
|
|
|
How is the base point G chosen for secp256k1? in Development & Technical Discussion
How is the base point G chosen for secp256k1? by
uminatsu
I did some research on Google but couldn't find an answer.So secp256k1 has this…
|
n/a | uminatsu | November 24, 2024, 01:48:49 PM |
Pages:
Jump to: