Pages:
Author

Topic: - (Read 3421 times)

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
-
September 24, 2012, 04:41:04 AM
#29
Nefario is a prick regardless for their rule changings.

How so ?
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
September 24, 2012, 03:28:25 AM
#28
Nefario is a prick regardless for their rule changings.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
September 24, 2012, 02:42:54 AM
#27
Unfortunately PowerPeePee is a college student. So dealing with the real world is the farthest thing from his insulated and oblivious ass. Expected everyone to chip in for his little class project, and when his scam wasn't accepted, he gets demanding about his refund.

What a maroon!
Hey, that's offensive to maroons!
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
September 23, 2012, 10:38:20 PM
#26
Unfortunately PowerPeePee is a college student. So dealing with the real world is the farthest thing from his insulated and oblivious ass. Expected everyone to chip in for his little class project, and when his scam wasn't accepted, he gets demanding about his refund.

What a maroon!
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 1009
September 23, 2012, 04:10:26 AM
#25
This looks like Ppowerp pulling a Matthew, using a technicality to try and pull out of paying a fee that any reasonable person would expect to be non-refundable regardless of the audit results. Because that's essentially what nefario is doing. Auditing the asset before listing. Has anyone ever heard of an auditor going "Oh, you failed the audit, here's you money back."? No? Because this doesn't happen in real life.
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
Buy this account on March-2019. New Owner here!!
September 22, 2012, 02:41:11 PM
#24
After reading the other post, I am glad he took he did not allow you to post you sec listing. Seems he was being quite fair with you, and you wanted to raise a stink. He is a known member of this community and I have had nothing but good dealings with his staff, from password problems to security listings Adam was a great help. So why should we take your word with no proof VS A standing community member with something to lose?

I totally agree.

The 8 BTC fee is totally reasonable considering you are trying to list a company on the stock market.  I would expect a fee like this at a minimum to be on all submissions, accepted or not.  We are lucky the fee isn't 40 BTC, in that situation only "serious" companies would be listed in the stock exchange, like it should actually be. 

You guys are trying to lynch him over this fee?  He runs the stock exchange.  This is his business, he has to read over and review all the business ideas, and consider them for listing or not.  Surely a person's time is worth money. 

I had my GLBSE listing initially declined, but after a period of waiting and revisions to my contract, he let my company list on the exchange. 

It's a non-refundable fee, he clearly states that on the site, I don't know how you can call someone a scammer over this.  The fact that he is refunding you just blows my mind.

+1

Nefario has contributed a lot to Bitcoin, and this accusation is preposterous.

donator
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
September 22, 2012, 01:33:40 PM
#23
That 'known in community' line doesn't fly anymore..

Exactly everyone in the community should be looked at like an equal, and scam accusation should be serious if it is a newbie, or satoshi. No one should be safe until they are proven innocent.
Wow that's a reverse logic. Normally everyone is innocent until proven guilt but apparently not in Bitcoin land here everyone is a crook until they are proven not to be...
this community...
//DeaDTerra

did you read the contract?? ? ?? ?? ?? dumbass sweed

Did you read it? Apparently he still owns him 1 btc maybe not the full 8 btcs but he ows 1 and that is enough for a scammer tag.
oh god kill me now....
Fuck it I am juts going to stop posting on these stupid posts. There's no saving off you guys.
//DeaDTerra
donator
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
September 22, 2012, 01:31:31 PM
#22
That 'known in community' line doesn't fly anymore..

Exactly everyone in the community should be looked at like an equal, and scam accusation should be serious if it is a newbie, or satoshi. No one should be safe until they are proven innocent.
Wow that's a reverse logic. Normally everyone is innocent until proven guilt but apparently not in Bitcoin land here everyone is a crook until they are proven not to be...
this community...
//DeaDTerra

did you read the contract?? ? ?? ?? ?? dumbass sweed
Oh you goat.
I wasn't commenting on this case but the general idea of that someone is guilty until proven innocent.
Go back to your boat.
//DeaDTerra
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
September 22, 2012, 01:18:20 PM
#21
After reading the other post, I am glad he took he did not allow you to post you sec listing. Seems he was being quite fair with you, and you wanted to raise a stink. He is a known member of this community and I have had nothing but good dealings with his staff, from password problems to security listings Adam was a great help. So why should we take your word with no proof VS A standing community member with something to lose?

I totally agree.

The 8 BTC fee is totally reasonable considering you are trying to list a company on the stock market.  I would expect a fee like this at a minimum to be on all submissions, accepted or not.  We are lucky the fee isn't 40 BTC, in that situation only "serious" companies would be listed in the stock exchange, like it should actually be. 

You guys are trying to lynch him over this fee?  He runs the stock exchange.  This is his business, he has to read over and review all the business ideas, and consider them for listing or not.  Surely a person's time is worth money. 

I had my GLBSE listing initially declined, but after a period of waiting and revisions to my contract, he let my company list on the exchange. 

It's a non-refundable fee, he clearly states that on the site, I don't know how you can call someone a scammer over this.  The fact that he is refunding you just blows my mind.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
September 22, 2012, 01:04:28 PM
#20
That 'known in community' line doesn't fly anymore..

Exactly everyone in the community should be looked at like an equal, and scam accusation should be serious if it is a newbie, or satoshi. No one should be safe until they are proven innocent.
Wow that's a reverse logic. Normally everyone is innocent until proven guilt but apparently not in Bitcoin land here everyone is a crook until they are proven not to be...
this community...
//DeaDTerra

did you read the contract?? ? ?? ?? ?? dumbass sweed

Did you read it? Apparently he still owns him 1 btc maybe not the full 8 btcs but he ows 1 and that is enough for a scammer tag.
member
Activity: 103
Merit: 10
September 22, 2012, 01:03:17 PM
#19
I use GLBSE n a very regular basis, and I have never had an issue with the site or Nefario (minus a few site tech difficulties caused by my own stupidity). If Nefario is a scammer, I'm the Pope.

How many BTC for complete, and everlasting Absolution?
donator
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
September 22, 2012, 12:59:30 PM
#18
That 'known in community' line doesn't fly anymore..

Exactly everyone in the community should be looked at like an equal, and scam accusation should be serious if it is a newbie, or satoshi. No one should be safe until they are proven innocent.
Wow that's a reverse logic. Normally everyone is innocent until proven guilt but apparently not in Bitcoin land here everyone is a crook until they are proven not to be...
this community...
//DeaDTerra
full member
Activity: 322
Merit: 100
September 22, 2012, 12:47:40 PM
#17
That 'known in community' line doesn't fly anymore..
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
September 21, 2012, 08:24:14 AM
#16
After reading the other post, I am glad he took he did not allow you to post you sec listing. Seems he was being quite fair with you, and you wanted to raise a stink. He is a known member of this community and I have had nothing but good dealings with his staff, from password problems to security listings Adam was a great help. So why should we take your word with no proof VS A standing community member with something to lose?
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
W Investment Technology Research Center
September 21, 2012, 08:02:32 AM
#15
Nefario, please return my 8BTC to me.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
September 20, 2012, 07:24:25 PM
#14
Fee
You will be charged 8.0BTC to create this security, this charge is not refundable.


Per this wording did GLBSE create this security? I think this needs to be changed to say if GLBSE doesn't approve your security this charge is not refundable.

I agree. The security was not created. Refund or scammer tag.

Theres plenty of other exchanges out there such as cryptostocks or even move to litecoin and use litecoinglobal both of which have far less stringent verification requirements. Most of the rules at glbse exist for a good reason.
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
September 20, 2012, 02:17:03 PM
#13
Nefario has historically been very, very slow at responses. It took him three months to recover from a car accident and move from China to the UK, during which time his communication was abysmal. However, I think most here will agree he is a man of his word, and if he told you that you will be refunded, then you will be refunded.

Probably not in the ten second turnaround time frame that most whiners want, but you will be refunded. Since you, and the Butthurt Schoolboy, are both such sticklers for the letter of the agreement... please note there is no time frame offered on the application for when you might be paid back. Be glad he said you will get it back, now wait patiently, you are amongst the lowest of priorities for the man, and nobody has a reason to bump you to the front of the line.
member
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
W Investment Technology Research Center
September 20, 2012, 12:56:51 PM
#12
I just feel curious about Nefario. He takes action very slow.

His GLBSE must be very profitable these days. He doesn't need to scamming 8 BTC or eat his words for 8 BTC.

Nefario is responding to people quite slow recently. He has not reply my email and PM for the requesting to return my 8BTC for days until now. As discussed in the previous post, before the change of fee structure, GLBSE did not state that the fee is for application. It is for listing. And Nefario has agreed to repay the 8 BTC back. ( He has not reply to me, however.)  But he just did not take an action.

hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
September 19, 2012, 09:17:35 PM
#11
Fee
You will be charged 8.0BTC to create this security, this charge is not refundable.


Per this wording did GLBSE create this security? I think this needs to be changed to say if GLBSE doesn't approve your security this charge is not refundable.

I agree. The security was not created. Refund or scammer tag.

You gonna get scammer tagged first. Get lost.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
The king and the pawn go in the same box @ endgame
September 19, 2012, 07:20:47 PM
#10
I use GLBSE n a very regular basis, and I have never had an issue with the site or Nefario (minus a few site tech difficulties caused by my own stupidity). If Nefario is a scammer, I'm the Pope.
Pages:
Jump to: