. - page 12. | Bitcointalksearch.org

CryptoVote

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: CDarvin81 on September 07, 2015, 12:15:25 PM

Quote from: CryptoVote on September 07, 2015, 12:12:05 PM

Quote from: CDarvin81 on September 07, 2015, 08:10:09 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi @all.
I have a problem whith my try to compile the new wallet for my MN here the error msg:
key.cpp:711:70: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
key.cpp: In member function 'bool CPubKey::Derive(CPubKey&, unsigned char*, unsigned int, const unsigned char*) const':
key.cpp:730:69: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1

Has someone a idea to solve. ..
Is the same environment which i has comipled the old sozrce....
Thanks.

secp256k1 Error

And how can i solve this?
Is there any howto?

What OS and environment are you using?
Are trying to compile craved or the qt wallet?

Try to compile on a umix one time on a precise32 linux box other time on Ubuntu 12x
On every environment the same error...
I dont understand these because i've compiled the first source on these systems....

Does the old source compile on these?

I compile the new Craved and the Qt wallet on Ubuntu 14.x 64bit without any issues but haven't tried a 32 bit system.

CDarvin81

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

Quote from: CryptoVote on September 07, 2015, 12:12:05 PM

Quote from: CDarvin81 on September 07, 2015, 08:10:09 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi @all.
I have a problem whith my try to compile the new wallet for my MN here the error msg:
key.cpp:711:70: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
key.cpp: In member function 'bool CPubKey::Derive(CPubKey&, unsigned char*, unsigned int, const unsigned char*) const':
key.cpp:730:69: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1

Has someone a idea to solve. ..
Is the same environment which i has comipled the old sozrce....
Thanks.

secp256k1 Error

And how can i solve this?
Is there any howto?

What OS and environment are you using?
Are trying to compile craved or the qt wallet?

Try to compile on a umix one time on a precise32 linux box other time on Ubuntu 12x
On every environment the same error...
I dont understand these because i've compiled the first source on these systems....

CryptoVote

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: CDarvin81 on September 07, 2015, 08:10:09 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi @all.
I have a problem whith my try to compile the new wallet for my MN here the error msg:
key.cpp:711:70: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
key.cpp: In member function 'bool CPubKey::Derive(CPubKey&, unsigned char*, unsigned int, const unsigned char*) const':
key.cpp:730:69: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1

Has someone a idea to solve. ..
Is the same environment which i has comipled the old sozrce....
Thanks.

secp256k1 Error

And how can i solve this?
Is there any howto?

What OS and environment are you using?
Are trying to compile craved or the qt wallet?

Kamatezo

full member

Activity: 154

Merit: 100

Masternode ONE CLIK is working or not working?

CDarvin81

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 10

Quote from: ?? on ??

Hi @all.
I have a problem whith my try to compile the new wallet for my MN here the error msg:
key.cpp:711:70: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
key.cpp: In member function 'bool CPubKey::Derive(CPubKey&, unsigned char*, unsigned int, const unsigned char*) const':
key.cpp:730:69: error: 'class {anonymous}::CSecp256k1Init' has no member named 'ctx'
make: *** [obj/key.o] Error 1

Has someone a idea to solve. ..
Is the same environment which i has comipled the old sozrce....
Thanks.

secp256k1 Error

And how can i solve this?
Is there any howto?

BitCoinNutJob

legendary

Activity: 1316

Merit: 1000

Today is fork? Clients are up to date?

daveolake

sr. member

Activity: 415

Merit: 250

Liking the new wallet. been running my mn since a day after new wallet came out, very smooth... lets see what the fork brings. good luck, hope it goes smoothly. great work so far. looking forward to blur wallet also.

JJ12880

hero member

Activity: 671

Merit: 501

Blockchain and stuff

Random reply so I get updates on this thread

Shunak

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: EmilioMann on September 05, 2015, 10:34:18 AM

Quote from: Shunak on September 05, 2015, 10:29:17 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Version Oxytocin I:

Dark Gravity Wave - DONE
AuxPoW - NOT DONE
Spork Enforcement Fork - DONE
Block Explorer - DONE

Whats next.....

Blur (Counterparty for CRAVE) Online Wallet

What do you mean with AuxPoW? a new PoS?

turn the currency on hybrid mining (POW + POS) to make the network more secure
The reward of POW mining will be the fees of transactions or maybe another merged mining coin, and no new crave.

Ok, i understand, thanks!!!

EmilioMann

legendary

Activity: 2184

Merit: 1028

#mitandopelomundo

Quote from: Shunak on September 05, 2015, 10:29:17 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Version Oxytocin I:

Dark Gravity Wave - DONE
AuxPoW - NOT DONE
Spork Enforcement Fork - DONE
Block Explorer - DONE

Whats next.....

Blur (Counterparty for CRAVE) Online Wallet

What do you mean with AuxPoW? a new PoS?

turn the currency on hybrid mining (POW + POS) to make the network more secure
The reward of POW mining will be the fees of transactions or maybe another merged mining coin, and no new crave.

Shunak

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

Version Oxytocin I:

Dark Gravity Wave - DONE
AuxPoW - NOT DONE
Spork Enforcement Fork - DONE
Block Explorer - DONE

Whats next.....

Blur (Counterparty for CRAVE) Online Wallet

What do you mean with AuxPoW? a new PoS?

8-bit-Party

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

8b 16b DEMOSCENE FTW

cihasa, the problem is that enforcement makes a fork
updated nodes will reject cheated blocks while others will accept them

cisahasa

legendary

Activity: 910

Merit: 1000

i just populated hexxcoin network with clients that have all the masternode payment enforcement rules turned on to the source code. also the "tweaked" wallet has rules on.

result:
enforcement clients still accept zero paid masternode blocks to the chain even that masternode payment enforcement rules are turned on. i expected fork to happen, it did not happen.
so, this did not stop this "hardly a vulnerability" thing.

will test more later time, next test will be with another coin based on current dashsource.
if that coin fails, hexx will move out of this code.

Starin

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Infected Mushroom

Quote from: 8-bit-Party on September 03, 2015, 10:55:40 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

that is no time in crypto world..

thinking about all the pools compiling their clients from git..
and dash people say they have it on..

You have no idea what are you talking about mate.

Whats the real deal? This guy said he could finish dash.

8-bit-Party

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

8b 16b DEMOSCENE FTW

Quote from: ?? on ??

that is no time in crypto world..

thinking about all the pools compiling their clients from git..
and dash people say they have it on..

You have no idea what are you talking about mate.

8-bit-Party

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

8b 16b DEMOSCENE FTW

Interesting.

Tinkles

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: 8-bit-Party on September 03, 2015, 08:31:32 AM

Quote from: Tinkles on September 03, 2015, 06:06:22 AM

what are the details of the vulnerability?

This guy "discovered" masternode payment enforcement. I guess DASH devs enjoy it.

so the vulnerability, is just when enforcement isn't turned on? hardly a vulnerability, you can only exploit by not paying masternodes part of mined blocks?

8-bit-Party

legendary

Activity: 1036

Merit: 1000

8b 16b DEMOSCENE FTW

well...

CryptoVote

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

Quote from: ?? on ??

A Peek of the new version:

Nice work!

Tinkles

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

Quote from: cisahasa on September 01, 2015, 10:54:34 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Thank You!

Next version DGW, Masternode Vulnerability Fix and DarkSend UI

Masternode Vulnerability Fix is the issue, dash has been informed but only empty answer so far.
i could also stop your crave chain at this point if i wanted, i did it to hxx.( because we will have a swap)

https://chainz.cryptoid.info/hxx/

there is many reasons why i say that you may also face coinswap..
i will work on hxx and give all the help i can to your code.
i am about to take dash as latest code base but now i am not sure if it is a safe coin.. need to study it.

Please help in the vulnerability

it will take me some time to have a solution... this is not full time job
look at dash now, they have some serious problems

what are the details of the vulnerability?

Topic: . - page 12. (Read 49286 times)