Topic: . - page 13. (Read 49286 times)
I2P was not issue for me.. got the client compiled but it crashed:
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
db-5.3.28--> http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-5.3.28.tar.gz
I2P was not issue for me.. got the client compiled but it crashed:
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
db-5.3.28--> http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-5.3.28.tar.gz
I2P was not issue for me.. got the client compiled but it crashed:
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
db-5.3.28--> http://download.oracle.com/berkeley-db/db-5.3.28.tar.gz
can new source be compiled with windows?(no linux cross anymore)
Why not cross compile? I had the same issue with I2P on Windows and Linux cross compiling.Your advice on secp256k1 worked. Thanks!
I2P was not issue for me.. got the client compiled but it crashed:
(want to still find the reason..)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/building-headless-bitcoin-and-bitcoin-qt-on-windows-149479
what db version did you use?
can new source be compiled with windows?(no linux cross anymore)
Why not cross compile? I had the same issue with I2P on Windows and Linux cross compiling.Your advice on secp256k1 worked. Thanks!
Found the switch!
one for overview. 1 for menu settings
This is a view of Version Oxytocin I -
I have sucessfully implemented
DGW,
PoW,
PoW Reward = Fees,
PoS Rewards Does Not Have Fees,
Hiked Transaction Fees
Remaining:
DarkSend UI
Masternode Vulnerability Fix
can new source be compiled with windows?(no linux cross anymore)
new new wallet is version v1.4.5.0-g32a928e, correct?
That is correct. You should see the Urge Market menu item.As I only compiled it for craved (make -f makefile.unix)... I know not, of this "menu" of which you speak.
However, I do see a "market" directory in the datadir, that I don't think was there before.
Anyway, I've got two new nodes up, one a masternode and one staking. Both are synced and seem to be running just fine.
new new wallet is version v1.4.5.0-g32a928e, correct?
That is correct. You should see the Urge Market menu item. 
This is a view of Version Oxytocin I -
I have sucessfully implemented
DGW,
PoW,
PoW Reward = Fees,
PoS Rewards Does Not Have Fees,
Hiked Transaction Fees
Remaining:
DarkSend UI
Masternode Vulnerability Fix
There is already a link to the new version of the console? (On the server). We need to update the console version to masternode work. And did not you link to update Niitassin.
Thank You!
Next version DGW, Masternode Vulnerability Fix and DarkSend UI
Next version DGW, Masternode Vulnerability Fix and DarkSend UI
Masternode Vulnerability Fix is the issue, dash has been informed but only empty answer so far.
i could also stop your crave chain at this point if i wanted, i did it to hxx.( because we will have a swap)
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/hxx/
there is many reasons why i say that you may also face coinswap..
i will work on hxx and give all the help i can to your code.
i am about to take dash as latest code base but now i am not sure if it is a safe coin.. need to study it.
Please help in the vulnerability
it will take me some time to have a solution... this is not full time job
look at dash now, they have some serious problems
Haha. Lots of bagholders, 0 support, no volume. What do you expect really ?
Bagholders are not even playing the swings.
Check cloakcoin, took 1 year for a rising price after the takeover.
Bagholders are not even playing the swings.
Check cloakcoin, took 1 year for a rising price after the takeover.
Cloak isn't Crave,is it?
Imagine you are a new investor, you check this thread, what can you see ? A large amount of bagholders, an old PnD, no innovation, a takeover... What would you do as a rationnal investor ? Investing in a new fresh coin with a potential PnD move and not on crave. If you are on crypto its because you are looking for profits. We all know that only bitcoin is able to go mainstream. Crypto is all about speculation.
Haha. Lots of bagholders, 0 support, no volume. What do you expect really ?
Bagholders are not even playing the swings.
Check cloakcoin, took 1 year for a rising price after the takeover.
Bagholders are not even playing the swings.
Check cloakcoin, took 1 year for a rising price after the takeover.
Cloak isn't Crave,is it?
Crave is in strong hands. This List: TOP 30 ::
http://www.richlist.eu/crave
These are strong hands for the long term. None of them were sold when it was 0.008 BTC.
Is not it puzzling for you? Crave is only 600 000 CRAVE. Even the price of 0,008 BTC is too low. The current price is very funny
Now new investors, very strong hands. We're back above 0,003 BTC. It will be faster than one year.
http://www.richlist.eu/crave
These are strong hands for the long term. None of them were sold when it was 0.008 BTC.
Is not it puzzling for you? Crave is only 600 000 CRAVE. Even the price of 0,008 BTC is too low. The current price is very funny
Now new investors, very strong hands. We're back above 0,003 BTC. It will be faster than one year. September 7 :: crave > 0.001 BTC
The sale was only 76000 crave. Such a low rate crave as it is now will never happen again.
The sale was only 76000 crave. Such a low rate crave as it is now will never happen again.
Do not encourage a bubble for Crave, Remember the Mt. Gox Days?
Bubble is bad. But 0,001 of BTC is the minimum that should be crave. The current price is absurd.
There must be a constant steady growth over 0.001 BTC. If the exchange rate will be fixed as now it will not be any interest.
You guys are just over optimistic, the PnD scenario is over now and crave already lost 90% of its attractiveness last 2 months, so dont expect something higher than 30k in the next 2 months which is already an high target.
20-25k range seems more reachable.
It will not be any PUMP. You call it wrong. It is now 3000% dump. And now back to normal levels. Technical erase DUMP. Back above 0,003 BTC is a matter of time.
September 7 :: crave > 0.001 BTC
The sale was only 76000 crave. Such a low rate crave as it is now will never happen again.
The sale was only 76000 crave. Such a low rate crave as it is now will never happen again.
Do not encourage a bubble for Crave, Remember the Mt. Gox Days?
Bubble is bad. But 0,001 of BTC is the minimum that should be crave. The current price is absurd.
There must be a constant steady growth over 0.001 BTC. If the exchange rate will be fixed as now it will not be any interest.
You guys are just over optimistic, the PnD scenario is over now and crave already lost 90% of its attractiveness last 2 months, so dont expect something higher than 30k in the next 2 months which is already an high target.
20-25k range seems more reachable.
Jump to: