All the associations are great. But the team has to selfish at the time that they benefit the DECENT token directly in some way. Bonuses of 10% on the partners icos doesn't seem too much. I speak as a holder of the DECENT token, which wants the best for it.
This is a very good bonus.the price during the ico going to go upstairs and just be more profitable to invest in dct.Also in a network ether may be delayed,and dct instant fee,because many will begin to pay in dct and the price will go even higher.
The total share of those who paid in dct(unlike etherium) in connection with the growth rate in dct will be higher,which will continue to push the price up dct
https://www.sophiatx.com/en/blog/30/upcoming-sophiatx-token-generation-event.htmlI agree, but this is the first thing i've seen sophiatx benefiting decent investors in any way. I am wondering how does the Dragonfly partnership benefits decent holders. It just looks like a another separate job for decent developers.
Dragonfly has 100 million users. That's very, very, very simple to understand.
As far as partnerships, the concept might no be instant to the average person. But take someone like, say Kim Kardashian. If she promotes other unknown people, and in doing so those other people become very famous because of it, the average person might think, "Well, isn't she killing her career, these people are going to steal attention from her." But in reality the association, the fact that she's the reason why their famous makes her more known to the people who follow those others.
If Paris Hilton decided to embrace Kim Kardashian right at the beginning, Paris Hilton would still be a huge star today.
That's the simplest analogy I could use to explain it.
ATMChain is associated with Decent, if ATMChain independently does good, then it helps Decent, it brings them more popularity through association. And so on. Higher market cap.
Your comparison might work if these were famous people we were talking about. But this is technology. And one thing you would like these people to work on is the product they were paid for delivering.
If you are paying a guy for delivering a platform for your website, and that guy gives that same platform freely to let's say Google or any bigger company then you. And Google starts using that platform, do you really think after that the people will go to your obscure site, and will start using that instead of Google's same product?
You don't understand my concept, and I didn't think you would since you immediately did not understand why partnerships are important. Especially when the code is essentially done, and the partnership simply requires for other companies to use Decent.
The comparison that I used with Kim Kardashin, though completely far away from the Crypto world, is logic based and also based on human nature. Cause and effect.
And yes, if Google started using Decent for free, like ATMChain is doing, not only will it increase the marketcap, but a significant amount of people will go to the obscure Decentgo website. That's something that would give Decent value and visibility. Even if they just copied the code, it would put the code on the map, Decent on the map. More visibility, more familiarity with the Decent concept, awareness of the roadmap.
Folding coins, a year ago or so ago a radio guy mentioned one particular folding coin and the value skyrocketed. And as a result, not only did that coin sky rocketed, but completely separate coins that also involved folding pumped high, even though the only similarities they have is that they are folding coins. Even though they had no partnership, that relationship was able to do that.