ㅤ - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

Quote from: NotATether on March 19, 2022, 12:40:12 PM

what is the point of creating the topic again with the AutoReply bot? Huh

Check the code here: https://github.com/Aero-Blue/BTalk-AutoReply, the autoreply bot works to re-pump topics after checking that it has been about 24 hours since the last "bump" and not to create new topics.

Quote

As for the reason why I do this, this is because i edit this bot AutoReply v1.0, and long topics are suitable for that im trying to do, is there a rule that prevents re-writing my topics? Huh

What I'm trying to do I explained above.

Update:

Until this moment, I have answered to all the questions, no one has proven that I violated Bitcointalk rules, and it has not been proven that I got more than one merit per topic. I will consider this topic locked, although I had hoped to find apology from Ratimov.

Sorry for the misunderstanding, I'm going to stop it using my main account and I'll do some testing with @Husires_bot though I'm thinking about setting up my SMF.

Thanks everyone, I'm going to bed now, it's a little late here.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

@Husires

I still don't understand. If it's not for merit (as you say), then what is the point of creating the topic again with the AutoReply bot? Huh

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

Quote from: ?? on ??

Husires, I hope you have the courage to admit that you are a "plagiarist" and topic duplicates abuser. The curtain.

You make yourself ridiculous, if you search a little you will find that I am writing:

Quote from: ?? on ??

Step2: Bot summarizing news and articles. I've been doing this manually in the threads that were mentioned above.

I was thinking of making a bot that would do a news feed, where it would be automatically created in press/Economics board and summarizing some good articles from Binance academy/Reddit/Quora.
The source of the news will not be RSS updates, topic will be summarized in txt file, pass to Step1 and created automatically.

Do you want to apologize for this part?

Quote from: ?? on ??

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources)
>
>

misleads other users who send him merit, write posts in his topics, and he just does these the topics are inactive,

Quote from: khaled0111 on March 19, 2022, 11:10:47 AM

@Husires, you should test your bot only on the archival or off-topic or even better: install SMF on your machine and make your tests there.

[i]just my 2 sats[/i]

I think the reason here is the paid signature. I do not take posting seriously and post from time to time (1200 posts from 2018) so I use my main account.
Today I created this bot account. @Husires_bot

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2800

Merit: 2736

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: ?? on ??

Just because you weren't sent merits by the same person twice doesn't mean that re-posting and then getting merits is normal practice.

Your merit fishing tactics were normal? Especially those plagiarized themes. Collecting information from different Russian websites, translate them in English then take credit by saying, "in this theme I will lecture you how to become a merit whore" blab blab. It's funny how a merit whore argue and wants to make a valid point.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Can you explain to forum members when you sent merits to any of my "duplicate themes" twice?

Source: https://bpip.org/smerit.aspx?to=Husires&from=Ratimov

Husires, are you saying Ratimov did not send merit to the duplicated topic? If that's true then the whore lied when said this:

Quote

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources). Personally

And now note this:

Quote

Just because you weren't sent merits by the same person twice

The merit whore also said this:

Quote

I was not too lazy and checked absolutely all your topics

It's now confusing me what part of his claim is actually true.
1. Did he checked all your topics?
2. Did he lied intentionally to make things bad for you and make his claims more solid?

If you say that Ratimov did not send any merit to the duplicated topic but he came up with these nice claims against you with also saying he was the one who sent merits to duplicate topics then I would say he exaggerated when he said I was one of such sources, and I would also say all these are nothing but another merit finishing from an elite merit whore.

Edit: Reposted as the post above^{[https://ninjastic.space/post/59574934]} it was deleted and posted again^{[https://ninjastic.space/post/59575488]}

Edit edit:

Quote

Husires, those accusations were made at the end of 2020 and they were based on the fact that I copy someone else's text and use it in my topics, but when I use someone else's text, I do not quote it or highlight it as a quote. Yes, I copied other people's texts, but I always left links, just like you, at the end of the text.

Quote from: Merit whore

In this article I would like to touch upon such a theme

Before: https://ninjastic.space/post/55742220
After: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5296174
Merit whore 😉

khaled0111

legendary

Activity: 2520

Merit: 2853

Top Crypto Casino

To be honnest, I don't think Husires' intention was to fish for merits. He started doing this a year ago and it's obvious that the duplicate threads didn't receive any signifant amount of merits, so why did he keep doing it if it's not working!
I'll give him the benifit of the doubt and believe his story.

However, he should stop doing this at least till he fixes his bot as this is not how a discussion forum is meant to be used.
@Husires, you should test your bot only on the archival or off-topic or even better: install SMF on your machine and make your tests there.
just my 2 sats

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on March 19, 2022, 09:35:21 AM

Two wrong do not make it right. Besides, something seems wrong to others don't need to be wrong for you. If you are doing this for the purpose of the bot then just continue. Don't bother of the discussion here.

All I'm looking for is an apology, if not for the whole topic, I hope Ratimov will be brave and apologize for this part, which has been proven wrong.

Quote from: ?? on ??

especially for those merit sources who sent merit to newly created duplicates of old topics (I was one of such sources).

..
.
misleads other users who send him merit,

Quote from: BitcoinGirl.Club on March 19, 2022, 09:35:21 AM

Husires did not do anything wrong in terms of breaking the forum rules. The same applied to Ratimov with his Plagiarist themes.

BitcoinGirl.Club

legendary

Activity: 2800

Merit: 2736

Farewell LEO: o_e_l_e_o

Quote from: ?? on ??

Does this prove you wrong?
Can anyone prove anything wrong I'm doing?

* Merit Source - Plagiarist (#2627711 “Ratimov”)

Two wrong do not make it right. Besides, something seems wrong to others don't need to be wrong for you. If you are doing this for the purpose of the bot then just continue. Don't bother of the discussion here.

Husires did not do anything wrong in terms of breaking the forum rules. The same applied to Ratimov with his Plagiarist themes. What makes me laugh that a merit whore is protecting his territory so that others do not become his competition LOL I would find this topic very normal if this would discovered by some other members than a guy who has devoted his entire life to fish merit on the forum.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: Husires on March 18, 2022, 10:28:59 AM

If I'm doing this for merits, why am I locking the thread and archiving it directly? Look at the number of views in my topics in the archive and you will find that it is less than 20, is this the behavior of someone looking for merits? Huh

ok, maybe you're not doing it for merit, but if your threads didn't get single merit, this means that no one recognized them as useful. this is just one more reason not to repost topics that are not accepted as useful.
it could be concluded that you are doing unnecessary spam on the forum.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Step2: Bot summarizing news and articles. I've been doing this manually in the threads that were mentioned above.

I was thinking of making a bot that would do a news feed, where it would be automatically created in press/Economics board and summarizing some good articles from Binance academy/Reddit/Quora.
The source of the news will not be RSS updates, topic will be summarized in txt file, pass to Step1 and created automatically.

your posts ^{mentioned in OP} so far don't look like a bot deals with a news feed.

Quote from: ?? on ??

I don't know what kind of exclusion you're talking about, but i expect some user/merit source already add this user to ignore list.

Probably all campaign managers can exclude them from their campaign.
user himself says that he is not particularly interested in campaign signatures

Husires_bot

newbie

Activity: 1

Merit: 0

Quote from: FatFork on March 18, 2022, 05:37:23 PM

Whether it was for merit hunting or not, this isn't an appropriate use of the forum. If all you wanted to do was test your bot, you could do it with just one topic, not a dozen.

Again:

1. I was moving topics immediately after creating them, checking the number of views for each topic.
2. I rarely participate in signature campaigns, check it out, and most of these topics are not paid (I think my all paid posts are less than 5 months since 2018.)
3. Let's say it's an offense with 49 merits (8% of my total merits) currently i have about 255 sendable merit and I can abuse it to get more merits than the above.
4. One topic or dozen, this is up to me, the point here is the abuse of merits, which I can discuss in detail.
5. Above I made two replies in a row, @mod will delete one of them and edited my reply, and I can say @mprep read this topic, specifically this part “Anyway, I will continue to do this using a bot account @Husires_bot (I will create it within 24 hours) if there is any rule that prevents re-posting articles I have written, please let me know.”, and did not take any action, which means it is not against the forum rules.
6. I will continue to do it using this account.

FatFork

legendary

Activity: 1624

Merit: 2594

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: Husires on March 18, 2022, 11:04:41 AM

Quote from: Apocollapse on March 18, 2022, 10:58:53 AM

It's not about the post got paid or not, but you create those thread intended only to earn merits for applying a campaign.

So why do I locked it and move it directly to the archive? I hope that the administrators have access to log time of moving topics, but the number of views proves that no one has seen them, so how will I get merits?

If you hadn't moved the topic to Archival, you would have violated the forum rules by duplicate posting and self-plagiarism.
Honestly, I don't buy your explanation. Whether it was for merit hunting or not, this isn't an appropriate use of the forum. If all you wanted to do was test your bot, you could do it with just one topic, not a dozen.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Anyway, I will continue to do this using a bot account @Husires_bot ...

I strongly advise you not to do this.

RapTarX

hero member

Activity: 1358

Merit: 850

Quote from: Husires on March 18, 2022, 10:28:59 AM

As for the reason why I do this, this is because i edit this bot AutoReply v1.0, and long topics are suitable for that im trying to do, is there a rule that prevents re-writing my topics? Huh

Thank you for your explanation.
Can you please explain what this bot is used or will be used for? What I have got; you are trying to auto reply on threads through the use of the bot? What's the purpose? If I'm correct, I have seen at least one user who is constantly posting through a bot in the WO thread with bitcoin chart only.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

Quote from: Apocollapse on March 18, 2022, 10:58:53 AM

It's not about the post got paid or not, but you create those thread intended only to earn merits for applying a campaign.

So why do I locked it and move it directly to the archive? I hope that the administrators have access to log time of moving topics, but the number of views proves that no one has seen them, so how will I get merits?

Quote

No, actual number is 13, I earned 667 Cheesy

Where 13 is came from?
[/quote]
your number: 49
There are 21 I miscalculated and so on for the rest of the points.

49-21+3-8-5-2-3=13

But suppose you are correct and i earned 49 out of 667, how will benefit me by joining a signature campaign? Note the number of signature campaigns I joined from the date my account was created.

Apocollapse

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 764

Quote from: Husires on March 18, 2022, 10:43:17 AM

Plus, most of these topics are not paid, I don't join a lot of signature campaigns, and anyone can check it out.

It's not about the post got paid or not, but you create those thread intended only to earn merits for applying a campaign. The higher 120 days merits earned will increase the chance you will got accepted isn't?

Quote

No, actual number is 13*, I earned 667 Cheesy

* 49-21+3-8-5-2-3

Lol, look the date.

Razmirraz

sr. member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 393

#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE

He did it very neatly, activist is copying himself is done not without a reason, I can say he is trying to mislead other users to send some merit on the same topic. He had done the same tactic over and over again, deleting then copying back to make it looks like a new thread. Excluding this user would be better as a punishment for the unethical act committed.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

Quote from: Apocollapse on March 18, 2022, 10:40:46 AM

If you want to make your thread got interested, you can bump your topic every 24 hour and delete the previous bump.

No, I am trying to modify the script above so that you can create topics without being connected*. It's not about replies, but about creating topics.

Quote

Nope, but it's unethical.

Unethical? If I am aiming for merits, I will not move them directly to the archive.
Plus, most of these topics are not paid, I don't join a lot of signature campaigns, and anyone can check it out.
I hope that the administrators have a list of timing for moving topics, you will find that most of them are moved to the archive as soon as they are created.

* offline Auto topic at XX-XX-XXXX TIME XX:XX

Quote

Count the bolded part, it's 49 merits not 4 merits Smiley

No, actual number is 13*, I earned 667 Cheesy

* 49-21+3-8-5-2-3

Apocollapse

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 764

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1582

Merit: 1284

If I'm doing this for merits, why am I locking the thread and archiving it directly? Look at the number of views in my topics in the archive and you will find that it is less than 20, is this the behavior of someone looking for merits? Huh

Check number of views

As you see, all my "duplicate themes" did not get merits for that same reason.

As for signature campaigns, I only joined 3 campaigns, and withdrew from one of the campaigns myself.
You can check the dates of creation of topics and you will find that most of them were not paid topics.

As for the reason why I do this, this is because i edit this bot AutoReply v1.0, and long topics are suitable for that im trying to do, is there a rule that prevents re-writing my topics? Huh

Quote

- Bitcoin Scripts for dummies - 36 merits - Created by July 14, 2020, 03:54:45 PM - Archive
- Bitcoin Scripts - 1 merits - Created by March 17, 2022, 01:00:23 PM - Archive

this is one of topics that get merit and this is beacuse i locked topic after 5 min from creating it. check

March 17, 2022, 03:02:17 PM: 1 from mocacinno for Bitcoin Scripts
topic created March 17, 2022, 03:00:23 PM

admin can check time to move that topic

So from 18 "duplicate themes" only 4 get Merits

Build a better argument.

_BlackStar

legendary

Activity: 1064

Merit: 1228

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on March 17, 2022, 06:08:16 PM

It's just another unethical approach to earn merit imo too.

True, I also think that it's really not a good or rather unethical thing for anyone to do especially if the goal is about merit. But I assume that the user understands the rules of the forum well enough that he dares to do it for a long time. Some people may have noticed this especially those who have contributed at the thread ^{[comment or distributing merit]} but may not have asked as Ratimov did in this thread.

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on March 17, 2022, 06:08:16 PM

Is there anyone who can list the extra ordinary ideas so far we have discovered to earn merits from different users? This could help us to use as reference when a newbie will ask to earn ways of merits :-D

Do you mean threads like this? Beginners & Help Encyclopedia [UPD: +Electrum Board]. If that's true, then Ratimov has provided it for us.

Maestro75

sr. member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 329

Quote from: AB de Royse777 on March 17, 2022, 06:08:16 PM

Is there anyone who can list the extra ordinary ideas so far we have discovered to earn merits from different users?

By praise singing and ass licking posts of merit sources.

Quote from: Findingnemo on March 18, 2022, 05:50:30 AM

That's what merit hunting is.

Actually it is not the violation if he deleted previous before posting the same content

I can say it is not possible to delete a thread one started except moderators can do that. That is why he sends them to archival or locks the threads. This is bad and deceitful. It has to be condemned. Maybe the user has to come here and explain what went on with that.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1693

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: dkbit98 on March 18, 2022, 04:44:35 AM

I just can't wait to see his explanation and justification for crap he was doing all this time Cheesy

I am very certain he is watching this thread, but won't come here to justify his actions because I don't see any realistic way he can defend himself.

What is disappointing is that most of those threads he deleted or moved to archival have some replies where members engaged in constructive discussions and could contain vital information that can be helpful to newbies, but all he cared about was merit points.

Topic: ㅤ - page 2. (Read 1263 times)