Regardless, that seems more of a reason to ignore me than to try and retaliate via the trust system even if you do wrongly believe I was involved as anything other than the target of an extortion scheme.
I have not read full details about your case. I like you and Vod for your Bitcointalk contributions. And I like your criticism against centralized mixers. 
Topic: 🖤😏 (Read 546 times)
Maybe people just disapprove your ... feud.
It's a shame that I could be retaliated against for defending myself from an extortion attempt, but I understand that people don't want to read through the mess that literally gave the troll perpetrating it a stroke. I think it's pretty obvious that "feud" was just me being attacked by a mentally ill troll and even the Administrator of this site doesn't trust him while they trust me... Regardless, that seems more of a reason to ignore me than to try and retaliate via the trust system even if you do wrongly believe I was involved as anything other than the target of an extortion scheme. Which is why I pointed out that DaveF's use of the trust network is irrational and seems emotion based from my perspective or at the very least misguided.
EDIT: DaveF reached out to me regarding this issue and it seems to have stemmed from a miscommunication back in 2015 that I believe we've worked through now.
Given that I have probably one of the most friendly trust networks on this site and have one of the longer trading histories here
Successful trading history doesn't mean also good judgement: Don't confuse your Trust list with feedback
Trust feedback: leave feedback to people you trust or don't trust. Or leave neutral comments.
Trust list: a list of people who's judgement on others you trust or don't trust.
Trust feedback: leave feedback to people you trust or don't trust. Or leave neutral comments.
Trust list: a list of people who's judgement on others you trust or don't trust.
Someone can be a successful trader but have horrible judgement (and cause drama a lot) and still end up excluded on a trust list.
Maybe people just disapprove your and Vod's feud.
I don't know who DaveF is or what he's done for Bitcoin or this forum either, but I did notice he's (presumably a man with the name Dave) in DefaultTrust and has also chosen to exclude my trust network. Given that I have probably one of the most friendly trust networks on this site and have one of the longer trading histories here so you have to assume the guy makes decisions based on some weird personal feelings or emotions. That or he's just plain a bad judge of things that happen around here. I guess take some solace in knowing you aren't alone in your curiosity of DaveF's use of the trust system.
I don't rely on others to tell me what is right & wrong. I'm keeping open mind when I'm reading posts or feedbacks. I don't take ppl's word as truth unless I've read references. Sometimes feedback isn't used properly so when opinionated ppl express feelings they're accused of abusing it. It isn't a perfect system but it'll get better.
Yet you seem to ignore the fact that what he has tagged me for is totally stupid, here are the reasons:
1- I posted a topic about some cia agent hiring people here and then after seeing people noticed it, in order to prevent spam I locked it, so doing that deserves a red tag?
2- I posted with my alt (known to everyone, didn't tried to hide it) on a topic I had posted on, because people were harassing me saying I was spamming, so I used my alt sometimes, does that deserve a red tag?
Next time you come to a thread, be your own person, don't rely on others to tell you what is right and wrong. 😉
1- I posted a topic about some cia agent hiring people here and then after seeing people noticed it, in order to prevent spam I locked it, so doing that deserves a red tag?
2- I posted with my alt (known to everyone, didn't tried to hide it) on a topic I had posted on, because people were harassing me saying I was spamming, so I used my alt sometimes, does that deserve a red tag?
Next time you come to a thread, be your own person, don't rely on others to tell you what is right and wrong. 😉
I have never engaged with this person and don't know what I did to deserve a negative trust(which is about trade risks).
OP you've received negative trusted feedback from others so will you make topics about them or your complain's just about DaveF. I've noticed ppl stop using accounts after they've had negative feedback you aren't slowing. Your negative trust's 7 so why didn't you stop using the account.4) I am not going to waste the time & effort to trace your alts. Have better things to do with my time.
-Dave
Users usually give up their accounts after tag are added but OP's using his. I don't know why he's wasting his time. -Dave
A friendly bump. I wish I had the skills of GB to gather everything on someone and expose them. 😉
Please don't mind me, this is for public view/reference.
~dig the troll. 😏
Previous post :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63242550
Before this recent development, I thought you are actually a worthy adversary, but it turns out you are the same as other cut throats who'd close their eyes and take anything no matter what.
I guess now we know what a stand up guy and trustworthy you are. Posting your last post count to get paid for your sig campaign even if it means it's stolen money, funny you have linked the press release where it says the funds are considered as stolen money and having them is against the law.
Let us all support this trustworthy DT, after all we are here for the same as he is, right?
If no, should we now express our concerns on his trust page? And remove him from our trust list? Whatever you decide, shows your own character, whether you remain in support of such people or not. Your call, but after this if you keep supporting such people, you'll lose any credibility you have. @DT supporters of DaveF.
But of course, who cares, right? Well people care and I love to have a laugh in such moments of truth.
By all means, wait for no one to take action, if you can't understand what is good or bad, better to stay off DT since such people can't really contribute but rather milk this forum.
Edit: doc I can't hear you, someone will have to quote you so I can see you. Lol he can't even say my name correctly.
Please don't mind me, this is for public view/reference.
~dig the troll. 😏
Previous post :
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63242550
Before this recent development, I thought you are actually a worthy adversary, but it turns out you are the same as other cut throats who'd close their eyes and take anything no matter what.
I guess now we know what a stand up guy and trustworthy you are. Posting your last post count to get paid for your sig campaign even if it means it's stolen money, funny you have linked the press release where it says the funds are considered as stolen money and having them is against the law.
Let us all support this trustworthy DT, after all we are here for the same as he is, right?
If no, should we now express our concerns on his trust page? And remove him from our trust list? Whatever you decide, shows your own character, whether you remain in support of such people or not. Your call, but after this if you keep supporting such people, you'll lose any credibility you have. @DT supporters of DaveF.
But of course, who cares, right? Well people care and I love to have a laugh in such moments of truth.
By all means, wait for no one to take action, if you can't understand what is good or bad, better to stay off DT since such people can't really contribute but rather milk this forum.
Edit: doc I can't hear you, someone will have to quote you so I can see you. Lol he can't even say my name correctly.
1) Actually (not that it's any of your or anyone's business) I have not kept ANY significant (I have used *some*) funds from ANY campaign in over 18 months
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.60018674 still holds true although the addresses have changed several times. And yes I posted my last post count and if you look I think the funds are still there since I don't have access to that wallet.
1a) The post # was more of a reference for me with a time & date stamp too as to when I pulled it then for Royce777 once we all saw that address was on a 'list' most participants knew they were not getting paid.
2) Feel free to do whatever you want to my trust page and anyone else can too. It's not going to change what I and everyone else have left on yours: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=806776 so are you saying that they are all wrong?
3) You do you and leave your opinions on whosoever feedback page you want and I'll do me and leave my opinions. That's the way it works. Since I left my negative for you seem to have gotten 2 more negatives and 2 neutrals. Perhaps you need to take a look in the mirror.
4) I am not going to waste the time & effort to trace your alts. Have better things to do with my time.
-Dave
I had added the OP to ignore so I have missed some of the things he said but
1) He started this ludicrous thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5469107
2) In this post where his primary user is posting he comes in with his alt account
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-dilemma-of-division-in-ecc-secp256k1-5472485
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6139/61399318.html
Which although not prohibited just makes you wonder why.
3) As others have pointed out seems to be engaging in some form of trust feedback abuse, not that I care that much about it.
4) He also seems to be a fan of CSW: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63218133 / https://loyce.club/archive/topics/547/5475439.html
So either he is really a BSV supporter OR a troll.
5) Not particularity relevant but as I mentioned to him trust is somewhat based on opinion, and as we all know opinions are like assholes everyone has one and most of them stink. This is just my opinion. Form your own about the OP.
6) As of now I'm DT2 so it should not be Earth Shattering deal to him
7) If you have not seen it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5470847
I mentioned to the OP when they PMd me to post in a public thread, remembering this one. So either they didn't remember, there are multiple people using the account, it was sold - traded AFTER that post, or??? Although they did sign a message, we have all see the account sales threads that come with private keys.
Either way, my neg stays and the OP is now fully ignored unless someone else points it out. Should probably take a look at his alt account and also make sure there are no others out there that need tagging.
*I keep referring to the OP as him / his but have no real idea of their sex so if they are a she / her no offense intended.
-Dave
1) He started this ludicrous thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5469107
2) In this post where his primary user is posting he comes in with his alt account
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-dilemma-of-division-in-ecc-secp256k1-5472485
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/6139/61399318.html
Which although not prohibited just makes you wonder why.
3) As others have pointed out seems to be engaging in some form of trust feedback abuse, not that I care that much about it.
4) He also seems to be a fan of CSW: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.63218133 / https://loyce.club/archive/topics/547/5475439.html
So either he is really a BSV supporter OR a troll.
5) Not particularity relevant but as I mentioned to him trust is somewhat based on opinion, and as we all know opinions are like assholes everyone has one and most of them stink. This is just my opinion. Form your own about the OP.
6) As of now I'm DT2 so it should not be Earth Shattering deal to him
7) If you have not seen it: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5470847
I mentioned to the OP when they PMd me to post in a public thread, remembering this one. So either they didn't remember, there are multiple people using the account, it was sold - traded AFTER that post, or??? Although they did sign a message, we have all see the account sales threads that come with private keys. Either way, my neg stays and the OP is now fully ignored unless someone else points it out. Should probably take a look at his alt account and also make sure there are no others out there that need tagging.
*I keep referring to the OP as him / his but have no real idea of their sex so if they are a she / her no offense intended.
-Dave
I did to deserve a negative trust(which is about trade risks).
I see it's a neutral, no trade risk involved.
Perhaps troll is too strong a word, fudder would be better. When you are posting things like this when they have been discussed time and time again can make some people wonder if BTC / crypto is really secure. Add in the fact that you are a member that has been here for close to 7 years you should know better or be able to use the search button.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61831381
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61838431
Yes, trust is about trade risks, so I edited and made it neutral for now.
No idea about what goddes you are talking about.
-Dave
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61831381
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.61838431
Yes, trust is about trade risks, so I edited and made it neutral for now.
No idea about what goddes you are talking about.
-Dave
Jump to: