Topic: 🖤😏 (Read 858 times)

Did you just threaten me? Being happy of what? News flash, your trust buddy is a massive trust abuser involved in extortion, defamation, wrongful accusation etc, maybe before you pass your one sided and biased judgement, try to read the other thread, next door.

But if you have a reason to tag me, GO AHEAD, all this scare tactics has been exposed already. But thanks for the warning.

My problem and many other people's problem is on your trust list, I know you are unable to digest whatever I say, but you guys clearly didn't read the other topic about his blackmailing attempts which actually happened, and obviously none of you care about community members, it's your points of views that is skewed and you only think you are on DT because you are special.

Which makes it clear that you are not trustworthy, if you were, you'd care for 1miau's victims. Just hold on a bit longer to whatever you have your claws and teeth in, it won't last much. Now that you publicly declared war.

Now you are out of the ocean and in my territory, welcome to the woods.

I'm posting here for reference, hopefully this will be enough for anyone to make up their minds.


Enable him more by your silence and inaction, here is the proof for my claim.

@BlackHatCoiner
@Stalker22
@FatFork
@Rikafip
@zasad@
@lovesmayfamilis
@morvillz7z
@bitmover
@witcher_sense
@GazetaBitcoin
@Bitcoin_Arena = answer = justice can not be served to a stupid troll.
@o_e_l_e_o
@Igebotz
@Lafu
@NeuroticFish
@Buchi-88
@jeremypwr
@fronti = answer = I see no problem here.
@qwk

---

I hope you have notification enabled, the latest trust list I could find on 1miau, above members DT1 have him included on their list, already 1 has expressed his opinion, as you can see.
Are you in the loop about the recent developments regarding 1miau behaviour and lack of sound and reasonable judgement?

Are you all Ok with such behaviour going unchecked, meaning do you condone the use of trust feedback in this way being used by 1miau or not?

If you don't have him on your list and your name is in the list above, you don't need to post anything, just knowing about this should be enough, you might want to edit your trust lists accordingly.

If you are on the list, then as a DT the least of your responsibility is to keep an eye on those included on your trust list, here it is, I'm holding the spotlight for better clarity.

If you don't approve of such behaviour please take necessary action, however if you do approve, you don't have to say anything, your inaction will be enough.

I'm specifically interested to identify who is my enemy and who is the enemy of this community.
Thank you for reading.

So instead of being happy you didn't draw enough attention to get even more negative trust.. you do this.
Now you've got my answer. And some of the days I have more time you may get the trust rating too, if you want it so badly.

There is no deep meaning here. I remember digaran obviously, he's been one of the most deranged trolls, just curious why he's back after years of absence and trolling again but now managed to get paid for it. "Purchased account" could have been a plausible explanation but that's not the case apparently.

Yeb it looks like that way , and this reminds me a little bit on our old Trollfriend Cryptohunter.
I guess CH and d would be good friends with there point of view and how they starting Drama.

This depends on the point of view you looking at it.
The ignore feature and the ~ is an nice option that will now be activated for you.
Clear your personal problems you have with 1miau or use also the ignore button.

Just my 2 Cents and i am out here.

Thanks for proving once again, that you are just here for trolling, derailing any possibility to find a solution and sowing discord among DT members. And it's visible for everyone, that you are the problem!

But when we are at it, let me address this. Each DT member, who was mentioned in the post above, if you want to review the issue:
The following post is my current suggestion how to solve the issue, where I've already conceded ground:

Any DT member voices if this is a reasonable approach are appreciated.

Another approach could be just to lock the topic and if mikeywith still feels it's an issue, he can re-open it on 1st January 2024. That way, some time would pass to find a more level-headed solution as we will be able to review it with a bit distance. Then, a better solution could be found with much less drama.

Happy to hear any answers.  

So, everyone can see that I'm really interested to find common ground, that we can move on and avoid this unnecessary drama.

@fronti
Thanks for your post, I've already suggested the solution above, where I've even conceded ground.

is it really needed to answer on such trolling?
After reading some of the posts (which take my time) i do not see a problem here. But true i need to revise the Trust List from time to time and i remember i can use the ~ as well..

Justice can't certainly be served to a stupid troll, can it?

I am broadly talking about the posts you made back then, Way beyond 2022 which was there just yesterday. Heck, you were even too ashamed you had to edit them and send them to archival 

What a loser.

It's funny that it's you talking about this because you are an example of those stupid trolls that you loathe 

Yeah, you didn't. Do you feel good about yourself now?

Did "they" started this topic?  You cant kill fire with fire.

Looks like you have a high affinity for drama digaran and you want to pick up fights with anyone you come accross. Back in the day, I actually used to feel sorry for you when you wanted that old feedback you had removed. Maybe because I didn't know who exactly you are, but after this recent comeback of yours. I think my opinion might have changed after all.

Maybe that is just the way you are and nothing can change that. Enjoy your new reputations board wars. We shall read through whenever we are bored and have some time.

I don't quite understand the move.

Out of curiosity, I have looked a bit at the OP's post history and it seems to me that he is the same troll today as when he registered. I even discovered that he was red tagged as early as 2016, that is, 3 months after registering on the forum.


In spite of this he got the tag removed.

If fail to sign a message from that address would somehow show that he is not the original owner of the account, as everyone does not agree to red tag for that, I think you could still add a couple of new red tags or 3 for that reason, at most, but if for example it was you tagging him for this, it would actually count as one.

And I don't know what the merit is for, but I would say that if you employ someone who has 6 red tags, you won't care much if he has 8 or 9.

Although, obviously, the reading I make, could be incorrect. In which case I would be grateful if someone could enlighten me about it.

Would you like to sign a message with 18Gykh4jE6fuyARzbC3XEzrALuKWFNHra4 ?

Your negative tags are all within the limits of negative trust due to your abuse in the forum and you can be happy that you are not banned due to your massive trolling. But even plagiarizers don't get banned these days so, thats no benchmark at all.

You are well aware about your abuse, still you are trolling everyone who dares to point this out. Are you surprised why no one trusts your flawed judgement here? Is everyone wrong on DT but our troll digaran is always misunderstood?
And guess what? I can put you on ignore as well and don't give out ans Merit for your troll posts and thats also completely fine (or are you saying otherwise?  )
And still, you are calling me and others on the Forum "Nazi" for no reason.

You would be surprised that I've come over digaran's troll posts quite often and some of them also contained "political b.s.", in addition to the things we know so far. Most of his feedbacks are from 2023 and that's no surprise because digaran keeps engaging in excessive trolling, derailing topics etc..
I could have done that way sooner and should have done this way sooner.
I try to avoid trolls as often as possible but like we know from digaran he's quite obsessed with his excessive trolling.

And that pass expired the moment he disagreed with your political b.s ? And suddenly "a troll" is no longer a waste of time?

It's not allowed to use existing links in our trust feedbacks anymore? Who are you to decide that?
And once again, you are spreading unproven accusations because I'm well aware of the wrongdoings of digaran.
As I've said I gave him a pass way earlier because trolls are a waste of time.

But with your accusation, that I wouldn't have read about the issue, you are once again engaging in pure speculations.
Not the first time, where you've run out of arguments and instead of proof, you are trying to push your weak and unproven accusations like "might", "could" or "probably".
What a weak Clown Show from you but I didn't expect anything else from you. Truly disappointing that you need to resort to such shady practice of defamation to score points here.
Just disgusting.

He basically used the previous rating as well as the references, just copy-paste, probably did not even bother reading them, he was in a rush to punish everyone, aint got time for references.

He admitted  that he evaluated digaran's profile long time ago, and back then he saw no need to tag him, but everything changed the moment he found out about his political stand on the political conflict.

He found an excuse to punish him, and then for me because he could not just tag me, he excluded me, and then for another person who also disagreed with him, he removed the positive feedback he left him, so this rating was just one among a streak of 1miau emotional breakdown.

The moment you disagree with 1miau, basically after insulting you in public, sends you a PM full of hate and disrespect, then finds a way to use the trust system against you, because how dare you disagree with his mighty points of view.

Had digaran not disagreed with 1miau on a political subject, that rating would not be there, 1miau can lie all he wants about it but it is crystal clear.

I'm of the opinion that people shouldn't be negged today for 5-year-old offenses, especially if they already have a negative (or more than one) for the offense.

For whatever reason I didn't notice digaran back then, but now I find his takes for the most part humorous and not overly annoying. Let's break down 1miau's trust rating on him:


This much is true but this in itself is not a good reason to red tag somebody. Many (most?) of us that have been around for a while have been a troll in some capacity or another, at least briefly.


I'm not sure about the "spreading lies" part, would need a clearer example than what is referenced in the trust rating. As far as harassing DT members is concerned, yes I believe that would constitute a negative, but only if they are being harassed about DT-related matters. "Stirring shit" is definitely more neutral rating territory.


Well the asking money for negative rating removal was certainly a faux pas, but again it was 5 years ago and I don't think another negative is warranted.