So it means reports go to global mods by default even if the local mod is there?
If FH did not deleted then it must be a global mod.
Topic: 0 - page 2. (Read 1173 times)
It's such a shame that people who aren't English have to struggle to establish their positions in the world dominance structure. Now there is a good politically incorrect statement for you guys to comment on. 
I think Flying Hellfish did a brilliant job in cleaning up the political board, but I don't visit it very much. It seems to be more focused on the daily machinations of the minor players, rather than the more serious issues. I have tried to start a few threads, but they seem to be ignored by most readers. Topics such as the activities of the Five Eyes group, and the fact that Iran was one of the countries that helped the US to replace the Pound Sterling with the Dollar as the world's reserve currency, don't seem to garner much interest.
I think Flying Hellfish did a brilliant job in cleaning up the political board, but I don't visit it very much. It seems to be more focused on the daily machinations of the minor players, rather than the more serious issues. I have tried to start a few threads, but they seem to be ignored by most readers. Topics such as the activities of the Five Eyes group, and the fact that Iran was one of the countries that helped the US to replace the Pound Sterling with the Dollar as the world's reserve currency, don't seem to garner much interest.
Bobby Kennedy's Speech for Humanity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fArgCaFb1c <- Listen 1 minute, what is the first liberty this man mentions FREEDOM OF SPEECH and he means for all of the people.
Does freedom of SPEECH apply to a forum? After all, there are very different laws and penalties for the written and spoken word.
I have mentioned it before, but Canadians cannot stay online for long periods of time, because heat from the electronics melt our roof. :/
I think he means stop being a nationalist is the correct word right. You can be biased for anything but nationalist is the right word right
The word you and Vod are looking for is Xenophobic. Used in a sentence it would be: TECSHARE is a proud, stupid xenophobic twat.
Thanks Suchmoon and Nutildah for pointing out the blatantly obvious that it WAS NOT me that removed the stupid trolls posts, however this is BTCT so we should never let something like facts get in the way of a good old fashion conspiracy theory!!!!!!!
I would have removed them but I have a life outside the forum and was spending time doing that for the last few days and not worrying about the super trolls like TECSHARE, CH and of course the over achiever Bitwhateverthefuckyourstupidusernameis.
Xenophobe is just a synonym for racist. Because I want to live in a nation with laws and borders doesn't make me racist or xenophobic. Thinking that Canadians are a race does make you pretty ignorant though. Your salt filled reply demonstrates your lack of self control and overriding emotional motivations. You have a hard time coping with people disagreeing with you and resort to attacks in lieu of a logical argument. This is not a good look for some one who is supposed to maintain impartiality in a subforum where one would be most tempted to abuse these motivations.
^ you may have not seen it, but I have experienced it, and if you read a lot of peoples views on bitcoin talk, there is many people who feel the same way, violated of their freedom of speech, many even calling this forum hijacked and cult like.
Well how it would work it`s the majority of active voters. Although without the blockPOP I speak of (proof of person/population) before blockstream yoinked and dubbed the abbreviation something else (a week after I coined the term) people would just make multi accounts. That is why we need blockPOP to identify 1 account to 1 person *we don`t need to identity the person publicly the system can do it in private*
So if those 20 active voters voted to remove a law or a post, and 51% of them voted yes, even though there is a network of 200,000 users, It would still pass. People will start voting if there is rewards(those rewards being what we pay politicians as now we all are politicians), and if they see the active voters are fucking the system up I am sure they will become active.
Anyways, going to stop posting here before I get banned for another 14 days for multi posting for having a conversation with someone.
You won't get a majority of votes here anyway. Of the 200K users maybe 20 will bother to vote. It will be the usual battles between the same people.
Well how it would work it`s the majority of active voters. Although without the blockPOP I speak of (proof of person/population) before blockstream yoinked and dubbed the abbreviation something else (a week after I coined the term) people would just make multi accounts. That is why we need blockPOP to identify 1 account to 1 person *we don`t need to identity the person publicly the system can do it in private*
So if those 20 active voters voted to remove a law or a post, and 51% of them voted yes, even though there is a network of 200,000 users, It would still pass. People will start voting if there is rewards(those rewards being what we pay politicians as now we all are politicians), and if they see the active voters are fucking the system up I am sure they will become active.
Anyways, going to stop posting here before I get banned for another 14 days for multi posting for having a conversation with someone.
Then let the consensus (users on the forum), vote on a devs decision before it is applied
-guy banned for mentioning fair distribution and time mining 6 years ago.
If moderation was decentralized and based on consensus I think this forum would be interestingly quiet. Some "posts" would not be accepted by the majority.
Innocent until proven guilty, let people post what they want, let a mod flag it and put it up to vote for removal and if the majoirty has spoken in a 24 hour timed poll. If 51% say remove it, remove it.
I do see why some things are needed to be removed instantly (porn etc) but yah, some of the stuff getting removed or users getting removed is just because a mod gets butt hurt about what is said and that is the damn truth.
TLDR: if you are a mod use "block", not "ban" and not "remove".
free·dom of speech
noun
noun: freedom of speech; plural noun: freedoms of speech
the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.
Bobby Kennedy's Speech for Humanity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fArgCaFb1c <- Listen 1 minute, what is the first liberty this man mentions FREEDOM OF SPEECH and he means for all of the people.
The Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ are actually remarkably easy to follow and avoids post deletion. Other than the occasional error made when moderating I have not seen consistent abuse of power.
You won't get a majority of votes here anyway. Of the 200K users maybe 20 will bother to vote. It will be the usual battles between the same people.
Then let the consensus (users on the forum), vote on a devs decision before it is applied
-guy banned for mentioning fair distribution and time mining 6 years ago.
If moderation was decentralized and based on consensus I think this forum would be interestingly quiet. Some "posts" would not be accepted by the majority.
Innocent until proven guilty, let people post what they want, let a mod flag it and put it up to vote for removal and if the majoirty has spoken in a 24 hour timed poll. If 51% say remove it, remove it.
I do see why some things are needed to be removed instantly (porn etc) but yah, some of the stuff getting removed or users getting removed is just because a mod gets butt hurt about what is said and that is the damn truth.
TLDR: if you are a mod use "block", not "ban" and not "remove".
free·dom of speech
noun
noun: freedom of speech; plural noun: freedoms of speech
the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.
Bobby Kennedy's Speech for Humanity https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fArgCaFb1c <- Listen 1 minute, what is the first liberty this man mentions FREEDOM OF SPEECH and he means for all of the people.
Then let the consensus (users on the forum), vote on a devs decision before it is applied
-guy banned for mentioning fair distribution and time mining 6 years ago.
If moderation was decentralized and based on consensus I think this forum would be interestingly quiet. Some "posts" would not be accepted by the majority.
EDIT:
That would also defeat the purpose of conversation. While some people are obnoxious and annoying they sometimes have an interesting different viewpoint. Majority voting is not the best solution for free speech.
Really though, with bitcoin`s values, this forum should have 0 mods unless they are banning pure spam bots not post they do not agree with, PERMISSIONLESS, DECENTRALIZATION.
Without moderators this place would be unreadable. The amount of junk they delete is not just limited to spam bots.
There is nothing to stop anyone to set up their own forum and run it the way they like.
PERMISSIONLESS and DECENTRALIZATION doesn't mean without consequences.
If someone exploits something from bitcoin code the devs will modify the code and consensus will determine if it is accepted.
Like what happened with Strange block 74638
Then let the consensus (users on the forum), vote on a devs decision before it is applied
-guy banned for mentioning fair distribution and time mining 6 years ago. They won`t even let me reactivate my main account. My account was banned because of the leaks of this site to, not because I broke any rules. Although before it got shadow banned because of the time mining/fair distribution/end of mining of bitcoin post (I think the title "end of bitcoin" I could of worded better) and I had to appeal to get it unbanned.
Really though, with bitcoin`s values, this forum should have 0 mods unless they are banning pure spam bots not post they do not agree with, PERMISSIONLESS, DECENTRALIZATION.
Without moderators this place would be unreadable. The amount of junk they delete is not just limited to spam bots.
There is nothing to stop anyone to set up their own forum and run it the way they like.
PERMISSIONLESS and DECENTRALIZATION doesn't mean without consequences.
If someone exploits something from bitcoin code the devs will modify the code and consensus will determine if it is accepted.
Like what happened with Strange block 74638
Sadly, our canadian friend of the politics space has done his time, I think it's time for another moderator... It's a great opportunity for Flying Hellfish to explore other venture and grow personally...
Generally, his has become way too politically implicated to provide an impartial moderation.
Specifically, his latest post deletion, because the editor of vanity fair having erased and article about weinstein/pedogate was canadian, and our proud defender of the northern state took it badly... it's so childish...
at least that's my feedback !
Generally, his has become way too politically implicated to provide an impartial moderation.
Specifically, his latest post deletion, because the editor of vanity fair having erased and article about weinstein/pedogate was canadian, and our proud defender of the northern state took it badly... it's so childish...
at least that's my feedback !
I made a post kind of exposing cdn farmers and what they spray on the crops and water they use (which would only make us look bad) and he merited it not blocked it, he does not seem to biased other than his "impeach 45" but moderators are allowed to have personal views, I don`t see him abusing his powers personally, also Canada is not a northern "state" brother. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVC677-YmfM We have provinces and territory`s not states.
There is other mods that actually do abuse their powers, he is not one of them.
Really though, with bitcoin`s values, this forum should have 0 mods unless they are banning pure spam bots not post they do not agree with, PERMISSIONLESS, DECENTRALIZATION.
The block function becomes a ban function, when you give tyrants power. Who are they to judge, it is alright for all the people the banned and silenced, they will do it to themselves in the next life and see why they have no power there.
If you disagree with him, you are a racist.
Of course disagreeing with me doesn't make you racist but it does make you wrong!
FH identifies as being right
Wrong. He's a leftist pothead in an ice hut, everyone knows that.
I can not confirm nor deny the existence of ice huts!
FH identifies as being right
Wrong. He's a leftist pothead in an ice hut, everyone knows that.
FH identifies as being right
Wrong. He's a leftist pothead in an ice hut, everyone knows that.
I would have removed them but I have a life outside the forum and was spending time doing that for the last few days and not worrying about the super trolls like TECSHARE, CH and of course the over achiever Bitwhateverthefuckyourstupidusernameis.
You have a life outside the forum???!?!
I have to organize the Canadian Deep State at some point... I mean full on LEFTIST pedo rings don't just show up in Pizza Shops by themselves...
I would have removed them but I have a life outside the forum and was spending time doing that for the last few days and not worrying about the super trolls like TECSHARE, CH and of course the over achiever Bitwhateverthefuckyourstupidusernameis.
You have a life outside the forum???!?!
Jump to: