Pages:
Author

Topic: 0.2btc to verify yourself in BitStamp Account for me (Read 2959 times)

420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
issue resolved; locking
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
already bipassed my friend

and never used bitStamp account for a silk road transfer
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want

But you passing that burden for a measly 0.2 BTC goes with your own moral code?

[moral code]
FREE MARKET
NON-AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE
[/ moral code]

The free market said you need to identify yourself if you want to see those 3 BTC ever again. Live with it. Nobody's going to tie his name to your silk road purchases for €20...
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
How can one be sure to withdraw the 3 BTC after uploading the scans? They can come up with more BS.
escrow maybe
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
How can one be sure to withdraw the 3 BTC after uploading the scans? They can come up with more BS.
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want

But you passing that burden for a measly 0.2 BTC goes with your own moral code?

[moral code]
FREE MARKET
NON-AGGRESSION PRINCIPLE
[/ moral code]
legendary
Activity: 2271
Merit: 1363
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want

But you passing that burden for a measly 0.2 BTC goes with your own moral code?
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
What's to stop the OP from seeing all your information in the account, and using your identity for god knows what.  I sure as hell don't want a surprise tax audit at the end of this year
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
I have some offers; hold on
full member
Activity: 252
Merit: 100
MARKETPLACE FOR PAID ADVICE LIVE BROADCASTS
Do you still need it?
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
In all seriousness though my offer is still out there, I can try and verify your account, but I won't send 2.8 BTC ahead of time.

You can also just purchase the documents, that's pretty easy too.
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
If they wanted to make BTC illegal, they wouldn't have to necessarily change any laws, they'd just say that "blah blah this old law from back here already made it illegal, we just didn't rule on it yet since it never got brought to court."

exactly
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
If they wanted to make BTC illegal, they wouldn't have to necessarily change any laws, they'd just say that "blah blah this old law from back here already made it illegal, we just didn't rule on it yet since it never got brought to court."
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want
retroactively? i doubt that could ever work in practice.

I doubt it too but retroactive law changing does happen. I remember (hopefully correctly Tongue) a couple of years back in the UK some guy admitted publically to murder after the the statute of limitations ran out. There was big social unrest for this 'injustice' and they retroactively changed the statute of limitations for murder to be indefinite and convicted him based on his confession.

Even though the guy is a scumbag that seemed totally unfair to me.

i guess they don't want any future cold case murders to be solved by confession even if the men aren't convicted. They'd rather just not know. Yay for the victim's families!

If the truth comes out it emphasizes the failure of the investigation team.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
It's cheap to link an identity with an account "we don't know what it was used for" and your avatar says our identity will be linked to silkroad logs hosted on FBI servers Grin

Haha, payments to SR.
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want
retroactively? i doubt that could ever work in practice.

I doubt it too but retroactive law changing does happen. I remember (hopefully correctly Tongue) a couple of years back in the UK some guy admitted publically to murder after the the statute of limitations ran out. There was big social unrest for this 'injustice' and they retroactively changed the statute of limitations for murder to be indefinite and convicted him based on his confession.

Even though the guy is a scumbag that seemed totally unfair to me.

i guess they don't want any future cold case murders to be solved by confession even if the men aren't convicted. They'd rather just not know. Yay for the victim's families!
legendary
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
What's the downfall with verifying your identity? Unless I'm missing something I can do this for you, shoot me a PM if you want.

Nothing, I guess people don't like sending their ID to shady sites.

government(s) could grow a database of people that if they determine bitcoin was illegal they could prosecute us. they do whatever they want
retroactively? i doubt that could ever work in practice.

I doubt it too but retroactive law changing does happen. I remember (hopefully correctly Tongue) a couple of years back in the UK some guy admitted publically to murder after the the statute of limitations ran out. There was big social unrest for this 'injustice' and they retroactively changed the statute of limitations for murder to be indefinite and convicted him based on his confession.

Even though the guy is a scumbag that seemed totally unfair to me.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
Whoever does this for the OP, please replace step one with "Place 2.8 BTC in escrow with reputable intermediary"

+1

Exactly what I was thinking, but if not i have a bridge in California I want to sell you Cheesy
420
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
Whoever does this for the OP, please replace step one with "Place 2.8 BTC in escrow with reputable intermediary"

john dog
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
Whoever does this for the OP, please replace step one with "Place 2.8 BTC in escrow with reputable intermediary"
Pages:
Jump to: