Topic: [0Th]Ozcoin Pooled Mining |DGM 1%|Stratum+VarDiff port 80|NEW CN mining| - page 107. (Read 398185 times)

one thing I need to ask is are people looking for a rolling 24 hour total or a say 0:00UTC ->0:00UTC type 24hour?

Regarding the API sort of holding off making changes until https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/pool-api-standard-83027 is sorted

you could take a look on payouts - and calculate the average for 24h.

@great
what about wider api to request such data? doan know if thats interesting to more ppl. could be simpler to add 24h-earnings to current api (?)

Not as a running total.

Hey,

is there a way to see how much BTC i earned within the last 24 hours ?

ahh ok
phew

Lots of connection failures but only for short times.

Edit: all is back normal now

um? no?
what's happening for you?
I have miners on there and its running 281Ghash, which is normal for that server

DDOS party on EU server ?

Good news
Glad to help

Graet thanks a lot, it works!

Kind Regards


[/quote]

ok
user pass combination is usually
 "user":.
 "pass":
 unless you use auto worker then its just
"user":13833   
"Pass": FKpTDG   
this is a newly created auto worker for an example)
let me know if that is a help
[/quote]

thanks Epoch
well put

Um .... I dont think Lukes 32txn strategy worked, we just won an orphan race with a 522 txn block, timestamps are screwed too lol


Height   Age   Transactions   Total Sent   Relayed By   Size (kB)
184933   4 minutes   95   17,613.94 BTC   67.210.248.14   25.47
184932   4 minutes   522   738.56 BTC   OzCoin   245.86
184932   10 minutes   32   50.02 BTC   Eligius   11.19

I think Epoch's post is right on.

In the interest of protecting this thread's topic cohesion,
perhaps the SatoshiDice, and its impacts, conversation should be taken to here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=86679.40

I have no wish to continue/prolong this somewhat off-topic tangent, but thought I'd chime in on this. I do not use the SatoshiDice service but, like most of us here, have been (negatively) affected by its effects on the network.

However, I agree with Graet and LazyOtto in that SatoshiDice is playing by the rules. They shouldn't be penalized for that. Moreover they are paying a transaction fee (0.0005/trans I believe) for every transaction they generate. Yes, they can operate more efficiently than they are now, but that is a separate discussion.

The main point is that the bitcoin protocol has been designed such that early mining would be encouraged by large rewards (50BTC/block). A 'carrot' if you wish. As time progresses, this 'carrot' will slowly be taken away by design. Come December, the reward will drop in half to 25BTC/block. The intention is to eventually replace the block reward with transaction fees as the miners' primary income stream. For that to happen smoothly, we need 2 things: (1) we need an increased # of transactions, and (2) we need more of those transaction to include transaction fees.

SatoshiDice is exactly the type of client the network needs. It is generating a large amount of transactions, and those transactions are paying fees.

Someone doesn't like the fact that a paying sender (SatoshiDice) gets a higher priority in getting their transactions into a block than freeloaders (most of us) who pay no transaction fees?  Wondering why your 'no-fee' freeloading transaction doesn't get confirmed for 9 blocks when a paying client gets confirmed right away? Time to wake up!

If someone wants a transaction included in a block, just set your fee to 0.02 (1 penny!) and you will get priority over any SatoshiDice transaction. Transaction fees may not be common at all now, but they will have to be over the coming years. We're still in the very early stages of the bitcoin network.

I'm glad you closed with that line.

I can understand Luke-Jr's frustration, but strongly do not approve if, as you say, Satoshi-Dice is following the rules.

Transaction handling is the reason for existence of the 'bitcoin network' / pool miners / solo miners (if any left), et al. Coins for miners is a by-product. If that priority gets inverted, then Bitcoin as a currency has failed.

I will be watching this thread, or more directly relevant ones if I so find, with great interest.

ok
user pass combination is usually
 "user":.
 "pass":
 unless you use auto worker then its just
"user":13833   
"Pass": FKpTDG   
this is a newly created auto worker for an example)
let me know if that is a help

quoted from Eliguis thread

We are very aware of this issue and are looking at the ways to mitigate the impact on our pool (I was up until 5:30am discussing this stuff :/).
I can not be 100% sure of course but my strong feeling is our last 2 orphans were caused by this issue - Ozcoin has been one of the pools putting the most txns in blocks.

I see this as an issue for all aspects of the Bitcoin network

Currently most pools bitcoinds are lagging causing slow longpolls and more stales than ususal, this affects miners

Pools are making big blocks that take long to propagate and are orphaned too regularly, that is a pool problem

satoshi dice are paying above default txn fee, so thier micro-payments are affecting EVERY Bitcoin user that sets default or 0 txn fees in sends
so the que of transactions to be included in blocks is growing

you see the posts in forums about pool payouts, used to be 1 confirm, can take up to 9 blocks now before it gets a confirmation  - thats another effect

basically its screwing the network over from several angles
BUT they are operating within Bitcoin's rules so we need the devs and the pools working together to resolve this issue I feel.

Graet thanks for your attention.

I think my problem basically is that I'm typing the url, user and pass not correctly.

It's a bit confusing because there are double users and passwords to chose.
Normal user and password + worker user and password, I think I don't get it.
Could you clarify what should I type.
Is the URL correct?
"url" : "http://us.ozco.in:8332",
      "user" : "xxxxx.xxxxxx",
      "pass" : "xxxxxxx"

Regards

This round (0d 0h 1m) we have 30736 shares (1376 stales; 4.477%), avg 1337.09 GH/s | 1.94% of diff | 257 users
what can I say

ChiangYay I am trying to find someone to help you, I dont have any BFLs and use a .bat file

Can Not connect with CGminer:
OS Windows7
FGPA BFL Single
I'm located in Thailand

cgminer.exe -o http://eu.ozco.in:8332 -u graet.g2 -p 1234 -I 8 --auto-fan --gpu-engine 810-910 --gpu

-vddc 1.05 --gpu-memdiff -125 --gpu-powertune 5

526  Password: xxxxxx
 [2012-06-16 15:14:59] Press any key to exit, or cgminer will try again in 15s.
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Pool 0 slow/down or URL or credentials invalid
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Unable to get work from pool 0 http://us.ozco.in:8332
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] No servers were found that could be used to get work from
.
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Please check the details from the list below of the serve
rs you have input
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Most likely you have input the wrong URL, forgotten to ad
d a port, or have not set up workers
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Pool: 0  URL: http://us.ozco.in:8332  User:xxxxx.xxxxxx  Password:xxxxx
 [2012-06-16 15:15:16] Press any key to exit, or cgminer will try again in 15s.
qvd

My config fle that works wiyh others pool is:

{
"pools" : [
   {
      "url" : "http://us.ozco.in:8332",
      "user" : "xxxxx.xxxxxx",
      "pass" : "xxxxxxx"
   }
],

"api-port" : "4028",
"disable-gpu" : true,
"scan-serial" : [ "bitforce:COM3", "bitforce:COM4", "bitforce:COM5", "bitforce:COM6", "bitforce:COM7" ],
"expiry" : "180",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"log" : "5",
"net-delay" : true,
"protocol-dump" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"retry-pause" : "5",
"scan-time" : "60",
"temp-hysteresis" : "1",
"shares" : "0",
"load-balance" : true,
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

Any help would be appreciated.

Regards

Sorry to hear :/
It is a network wide issue and has been discussed in several forum threads.
If there was more Ozcoin could do - we would