Topic: .1 BTC loan - page 2. (Read 2773 times)
lol
I have a couple thousand USD, will have $26 in paypal within three days when transaction from tunecore is confirmed.
I noticed there was something wrong with your screenshot, so here's the fixed text: [email protected]
From one scammer to another. 
You really should look into why people have received neg trust/scammer tags. If you look carefully you'll see I actually have positive trust and was tagged a precaution as it is suspected this account was used to defraud the ripple giveaway.
This account doesn't belong to me, by looking at the post history I see at least 3 people have posted on it. The original owner used it to advertise his hidden service marketplace and the other users are now using it to post anonymously and in one case, troll.
I give you 8/10 as you made me reply.
I feel it is appropriate at times, perhaps it lets information absorb into those that disagree with my word solely based off me saying it, idk, just happens.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
TY Dank TY, good job fellow
perfect timing too, just as I needed it to rent out a VPS for some stuff.Dank has repaid another loan in full with extra and on schedule. Trustworthy user.
From one scammer to another.
I feel it is appropriate at times, perhaps it lets information absorb into those that disagree with my word solely based off me saying it, idk, just happens.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
TY Dank TY, good job fellow
perfect timing too, just as I needed it to rent out a VPS for some stuff.Dank has repaid another loan in full with extra and on schedule. Trustworthy user.
I feel it is appropriate at times, perhaps it lets information absorb into those that disagree with my word solely based off me saying it, idk, just happens.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
Anyways, dank paid off the rest of the loan with a little extra.
I understand that, which is an issue with the system of labeling people as scammers. Somehow BFL operates on these forums, yet someone who messes up one out of hundreds of transactions is definitely a malicious scammer. Hypocrisy?
I think the community wanted to believe dank was a scammer from the start, so the instance he messed up he's instinctively labeled a scammer rather than being understood from both perspectives.
Can you please just take a break, vod? I'm doing what I can to get squall his money back but you're not helping. He doesn't care about it enough to be posting about it in all my threads, so why should you?
WHy do you refer to yourself in 3rd person. I think the community wanted to believe dank was a scammer from the start, so the instance he messed up he's instinctively labeled a scammer rather than being understood from both perspectives.
Can you please just take a break, vod? I'm doing what I can to get squall his money back but you're not helping. He doesn't care about it enough to be posting about it in all my threads, so why should you?
An update.
Dank has followed through and repaid 0.109btc.
I think he has the rest but wants to try out some investment so I'm giving him all the time he needs to finish off the loan.
TY Dank.
Dank has followed through and repaid 0.109btc.
I think he has the rest but wants to try out some investment so I'm giving him all the time he needs to finish off the loan.
TY Dank.
Maybe you can make some money selling the movie rights to your story. It all sounds pretty wild.
Take care
Not sure who to talk to for that one. Indeed though, it'd make a crazy movie.Take care
Be easy
Two scammers trading rep. Awesome.
nope.avi
This account is scammer tagged by maged for scamming the Ripple giveaway or something. This account...fell off a truck...I was using it to post when registration was disabled, I didn't scam nobody and I don't even want to trade or borrow BTC.
Check out my trust rating of 181.
I assure you that my loan to Dank was a legitimate deal. He deserves another chance, people forget that he paid back other loans before and only fucked up on half a loan to squall when BTC price went from $10 to $266.
Besides if he doesn't pay, many lulz will be had when he comes out with his excuses...
No he does not deserve a second chance. He stole money, then acted like it was normal and now he's trying to say it was because Bitcoin rose in value? Bull shit, he just stole money.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
Quote
Dank will always be a thief.
There's not much in this world I don't like more than thieves. Call me a fuck up if you want, but not a thief.I hope one day you can practice forgiveness and withhold judgement towards me.
Defaulting == stealing
Damn, so Iceland's banks stole a few billion then, eh? I demand criminal charges to be brought against them for that.
Of course it was? That there is no-one to punish with our law system doesn't make it any less stealing. Man how brainwashed are you?
He will be unable to repay Squalls loan as debt keeps compounding. May be some day Squall will accept a settlement but Dank will always be a thief.
The interest was frozen a long time ago.
If it was, it certainly wasn't by choice.
Defaulting == stealing
Damn, so Iceland's banks stole a few billion then, eh? I demand criminal charges to be brought against them for that.
He will be unable to repay Squalls loan as debt keeps compounding. May be some day Squall will accept a settlement but Dank will always be a thief.
The interest was frozen a long time ago.
No he does not deserve a second chance. He stole money, then acted like it was normal and now he's trying to say it was because Bitcoin rose in value? Bull shit, he just stole money.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
STOLE money?
He took out a loan. In USD terms he paid it back, in BTC terms he hasn't due to the value of BTC rising 26x. He still acknowledges the debt exists, he still attempts to repay it. Yes, it's his fault for getting a BTC denominated loan, he knew this risk was possible, but being very late repaying a loan is not stealing, defaulting on a loan isn't "really" stealing either although it is likely scam-tag worthy.
It would be stealing if he obtained the loan by lying, which he didn't, he told the lender the truth the lender knew the risks and it didn't work out, the lender is partly at fault in a way.
I do think that one day he will repay squall's loan, he repaid all the other loans.
Defaulting == stealing (and he was acting like it was normal which made it that much worse). He will be unable to repay Squalls loan as debt keeps compounding. May be some day Squall will accept a settlement but Dank will always be a thief.
Crazy legit.
What was the transaction ID?
What was the transaction ID?
What would that prove? I could give you any recent tx for 0.1BTC, such as:
https://blockchain.info/tx/e4aa2fd703078af450081d85b307d9a98d49ba4e5dbc63c1edf46d2940511694
(thats not the tx)
A tx proves nothing. All giving you a tx would do is infringe on Dank's financial privacy, which is something I'm sure he values. Everyone reading this can safely ignore this loan as rep.
No he does not deserve a second chance. He stole money, then acted like it was normal and now he's trying to say it was because Bitcoin rose in value? Bull shit, he just stole money.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
STOLE money?
He took out a loan. In USD terms he paid it back, in BTC terms he hasn't due to the value of BTC rising 26x. He still acknowledges the debt exists, he still attempts to repay it. Yes, it's his fault for getting a BTC denominated loan, he knew this risk was possible, but being very late repaying a loan is not stealing, defaulting on a loan isn't "really" stealing either although it is likely scam-tag worthy.
It would be stealing if he obtained the loan by lying, which he didn't, he told the lender the truth the lender knew the risks and it didn't work out, the lender is partly at fault in a way.
I do think that one day he will repay squall's loan, he repaid all the other loans.
Two scammers trading rep. Awesome.
nope.avi
This account is scammer tagged by maged for scamming the Ripple giveaway or something. This account...fell off a truck...I was using it to post when registration was disabled, I didn't scam nobody and I don't even want to trade or borrow BTC.
Check out my trust rating of 181.
I assure you that my loan to Dank was a legitimate deal. He deserves another chance, people forget that he paid back other loans before and only fucked up on half a loan to squall when BTC price went from $10 to $266.
Besides if he doesn't pay, many lulz will be had when he comes out with his excuses...
No he does not deserve a second chance. He stole money, then acted like it was normal and now he's trying to say it was because Bitcoin rose in value? Bull shit, he just stole money.
But throw your money away any way you like. Personally I wouldn't lend him a fraction of a penny. Ever.
Crazy legit.
What was the transaction ID?
Two scammers trading rep. Awesome.
nope.avi
This account is scammer tagged by maged for scamming the Ripple giveaway or something. This account...fell off a truck...I was using it to post when registration was disabled, I didn't scam nobody and I don't even want to trade or borrow BTC.
Check out my trust rating of 181.
I assure you that my loan to Dank was a legitimate deal. He deserves another chance, people forget that he paid back other loans before and only fucked up on half a loan to squall when BTC price went from $10 to $266.
Besides if he doesn't pay, many lulz will be had when he comes out with his excuses...
Two scammers trading rep. Awesome.
0.1BTC has been sent to Dank!
Jump to: