Author

Topic: [~1000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fee Pool, LP, SSL, Full Precision, and More - page 108. (Read 379078 times)

newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
Same stuff, guys. Shares counter is not increasing, therefore estimated payment's failing.
By the way, does someone know how to make myself _not_ to look at btcguild stats every 10-15 minutes?
I just hate it, when some long round is going. Another 4.5 hours, damn.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
Another idea to diversify:
Offer a namecoin mining pool too.

A BIG lot of your code should be reusable, there is nearly no competition and many miners are anyways compatible to Namecoin.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
API is currently polling some stats incorrectly. This should be fixed early tomorrow morning.
It appears that my shares are not rising at all, they seem to be stuck at 456, I hope this is what you are fixing because it has really effected my payout.

I am experiencing the same thing...just checked all of my workers...they are all showing "accepted" shares being submitted, but "This Round" shares are not increasing.

Of course my estimated payout is dropping accordingly.

Hoping this is just front-end stats and not going to affect the actual payout!...we'll see when this block is completed.

Maybe this is specific to the EAST US server?
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
API is currently polling some stats incorrectly. This should be fixed early tomorrow morning.
It appears that my shares are not rising at all, they seem to be stuck at 456, I hope this is what you are fixing because it has really effected my payout.
I can confirm this, but only for "This round". "Total" shares increase as usual.
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
API is currently polling some stats incorrectly. This should be fixed early tomorrow morning.
It appears that my shares are not rising at all, they seem to be stuck at 456, I hope this is what you are fixing because it has really effected my payout.
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
Is anyone else seeing round duration displayed incorrectly?

I keep seeing it as 1:57:00 + some time or so.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
Quote
382 129425   2011-06-08 18:33:54   0:43:47   390133   Confirmed   197   0.02524780   0.00000000   View
381 129419   2011-06-08 17:50:07   0:14:00   150772   Confirmed   77   0.02553524   0.00000000   View
380 129418   2011-06-08 17:36:07   1:14:00   736568   23 until confirmed   359   0.02436977   0.00000000   View
379 129408   2011-06-08 16:22:07   1:56:00   1154773   Confirmed   590   0.02554614   0.00000000   View
378 129394   2011-06-08 14:26:07   3:23:00   1934422   8 until confirmed   1032   0.02667463   0.00000000   View
I think that's a bug.
sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 251
It's not () any more. You shouldn't really trust the hash rates on the web site, they are just a guess.
newbie
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
yeah its not working correctly. I think mhash are way off, too.

sr. member
Activity: 314
Merit: 251
In my account, shares show 0 under this round (more specifically, it shows as ()). Estimated rewards is at 0.00000000. Last share, 5 seconds, 620.31 Mhash/S. Why is it not recognizing my shares?
I've got the same problem. I am using the EU pool, I guess.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
382 129425    2011-06-08 18:33:54    0:43:47    390133    4 until confirmed    
381 129419    2011-06-08 17:50:07    0:14:00    150772    Confirmed                      
380 129418    2011-06-08 17:36:07    1:14:00    736568    23 until confirmed       
379 129408    2011-06-08 16:22:07    1:56:00    1154773    Confirmed                       
378 129394    2011-06-08 14:26:07    3:23:00    1934422    8 until confirmed    


Bug?

My blocks found total is correct, but is blank on all workers. Not a biggie to me.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
API is currently polling some stats incorrectly. This should be fixed early tomorrow morning.
Thanks, I was wondering about that. As long as I get credit for them Wink Thanks!
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
In my account, shares show 0 under this round (more specifically, it shows as ()). Estimated rewards is at 0.00000000. Last share, 5 seconds, 620.31 Mhash/S. Why is it not recognizing my shares?
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 100
My first rig on ethernet is fine now, no idles. My second rig, using wireless, is still getting idles. Is it because of the wireless or is it something else? Will forcing it to US West help?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Just switched from deepbit.net to btcguild.com. I am loving it so far! The only thing I am missing is the bitcoins made in the last 24 hours. I don't think it would be to hard for you guys to implement that. Other than that it is awesome. Thanks and keep up the good work!!
sr. member
Activity: 291
Merit: 250
lolwut 5 min block

The best kind of block Smiley

When The Guild controls over 50% of bitspace, we can sneak ourselves all the 5 minute blocks we want.  /evil plot

To bad that block was invalid... I hope everyone was donating 2.5% Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
API is currently polling some stats incorrectly. This should be fixed early tomorrow morning.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
lolwut 5 min block

The best kind of block Smiley

When The Guild controls over 50% of bitspace, we can sneak ourselves all the 5 minute blocks we want.  /evil plot
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
So wait, now that there are 3 servers with 3 separate hashing speeds, does that mean that the rewards variance is higher?

Or, in other words, is BTC Guild now 3 300 ghash/sec pools instead of one 900 one for rewards purposes? Yeah, I know it'll all even out in a week anyway but the difficulty increases about that often and I want to reduce my risk.

Rewards are combined between the 3 pool servers.  This is the exact same as running on a single large pool, I've just split it across multiple datacenters in order to provide members with the option to manually point to a closer server.


That's not why he was asking; he was asking to find out if it is now three separate independent hashing pools, each trying to find a block separately at 200 GH/s, or if the hashes are being directed to one main pool for a rate of 600 GH/s.  Three smaller pools would find blocks slower each, so the variance would be high

Uh no eleuthria answered the question
Quote
This is the exact same as running on a single large pool
sr. member
Activity: 418
Merit: 250
So wait, now that there are 3 servers with 3 separate hashing speeds, does that mean that the rewards variance is higher?

Or, in other words, is BTC Guild now 3 300 ghash/sec pools instead of one 900 one for rewards purposes? Yeah, I know it'll all even out in a week anyway but the difficulty increases about that often and I want to reduce my risk.

Rewards are combined between the 3 pool servers.  This is the exact same as running on a single large pool, I've just split it across multiple datacenters in order to provide members with the option to manually point to a closer server.


That's not why he was asking; he was asking to find out if it is now three separate independent hashing pools, each trying to find a block separately at 200 GH/s, or if the hashes are being directed to one main pool for a rate of 600 GH/s.  Three smaller pools would find blocks slower each, so the variance would be high
Jump to: