Topic: [~1000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fee Pool, LP, SSL, Full Precision, and More - page 122. (Read 379078 times)
June 03, 2011, 07:39:14 PM
soooo... about deleting workers?
June 03, 2011, 07:38:07 PM
Will you be implementing https anytime in the future?
https has been implemented for almost a week now.
June 03, 2011, 07:31:03 PM
Will you be implementing https anytime in the future?
June 03, 2011, 07:27:46 PM
Well now it's fine again..
My miners just spazzed out for a minute XD
My miners just spazzed out for a minute XD
June 03, 2011, 07:25:53 PM
Woah woah...just got like 10 idles on each worker in a span of a minute...
Problems again?
Problems again?
0 idles across 10 miners in the last 35 minutes.
June 03, 2011, 07:23:23 PM
Woah woah...just got like 10 idles on each worker in a span of a minute...
Problems again?
Problems again?
June 03, 2011, 07:21:27 PM
What % of blocks found by btcguild have later turned out to be invalid? I need to know this so I can calculate a real figure of how much more you can expect to make with btcguild over deepbit.
In the long run, you will make 3% less at deepbit because that's how much they charge for fees. Anything else is inconclusive.Ah yes my bad. I forgot that you paid for invalid blocks too. Well there you go.
Most of the pools are good. Just pick the one that has features that appeal to you. In the long run, the amount of BTC mined from each pool should be the same.
June 03, 2011, 07:20:00 PM
What % of blocks found by btcguild have later turned out to be invalid? I need to know this so I can calculate a real figure of how much more you can expect to make with btcguild over deepbit.
Donate 2.5% and you won't have to worry about it. But to answer the question: 3 invalids so far out of 268. Sample size is too small to draw realistic conclusions though.
June 03, 2011, 07:15:58 PM
What % of blocks found by btcguild have later turned out to be invalid? I need to know this so I can calculate a real figure of how much more you can expect to make with btcguild over deepbit.
In the long run, you will make 3% less at deepbit because that's how much they charge for fees. Anything else is inconclusive. June 03, 2011, 07:12:55 PM
Yay everything is up and running again!
Thanks Eleuthria!
Thanks Eleuthria!
June 03, 2011, 07:05:33 PM
What % of blocks found by btcguild have later turned out to be invalid? I need to know this so I can calculate a real figure of how much more you can expect to make with btcguild over deepbit.
In the long run, you will make 3% less at deepbit because that's how much they charge for fees. Anything else is inconclusive.
June 03, 2011, 06:59:29 PM
What % of blocks found by btcguild have later turned out to be invalid? I need to know this so I can calculate a real figure of how much more you can expect to make with btcguild over deepbit.
June 03, 2011, 06:58:36 PM
My BTC Guild miners did not pick up the following 2 new blocks that were picked up by miners connected to other pools:
03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
As stated in my previous post, some miners which auto-reconnected to the pool may have lost their LP connection. From what I can tell, poclbm isn't regaining the connection automatically. Restarting the miner fixes this issue.03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
June 03, 2011, 06:53:11 PM
Going to be adding a number of IP bans to the server over the next few hours for miners which were requesting more than 250x more work than they were sending back.
If you find yourself unable to access the website and pool, send me a PM with your username and the ban may be lifted.
If you find yourself unable to access the website and pool, send me a PM with your username and the ban may be lifted.
June 03, 2011, 06:43:43 PM
My BTC Guild miners did not pick up the following 2 new blocks that were picked up by miners connected to other pools:
03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
As stated in my previous post, some miners which auto-reconnected to the pool may have lost their LP connection. From what I can tell, poclbm isn't regaining the connection automatically. Restarting the miner fixes this issue. 03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
June 03, 2011, 06:39:19 PM
My BTC Guild miners did not pick up the following 2 new blocks that were picked up by miners connected to other pools:
03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
03/06/2011 19:10:35, long poll: new block 000002a2a5aaadae
03/06/2011 19:14:59, long poll: new block 00001239399053ae
Time zone is ET. While this was happening the pool was happily accepting a bunch of (possibly stale) work.
Was this just me or did everyone else on BTC Guild miss these 2 blocks?
June 03, 2011, 06:32:49 PM
Server is back up, logs were tweaked to automate some of this process. Restarting pushpool involved a fairly long period of idles/connection errors due to the absolute flood of reconnects miners attempted for every milisecond that it was offline apparently (no reconnect delay). Took a while to settle down, but now that it has things are going good.
Some miners -may- have lost their long poll connection, so restarting a miner briefly could fix the issue if you're not seeing any LPs issued.
Some miners -may- have lost their long poll connection, so restarting a miner briefly could fix the issue if you're not seeing any LPs issued.
thanks eleuthria. everything looking good now.
June 03, 2011, 06:28:33 PM
Server is back up, logs were tweaked to automate some of this process. Restarting pushpool involved a fairly long period of idles/connection errors due to the absolute flood of reconnects miners attempted for every milisecond that it was offline apparently (no reconnect delay). Took a while to settle down, but now that it has things are going good.
Some miners -may- have lost their long poll connection, so restarting a miner briefly could fix the issue if you're not seeing any LPs issued.
Some miners -may- have lost their long poll connection, so restarting a miner briefly could fix the issue if you're not seeing any LPs issued.
June 03, 2011, 06:17:28 PM
any chance to delete workers?
=/
=/
June 03, 2011, 06:10:58 PM
2 miners/workers of the same pool in the same GPU can work better than just one?
Jump to: