252Gh/s.
Yeah, starting to get more idles that usual...
Let's hope that server gets up and running soon!
Topic: [~1000 GH/sec] BTC Guild - 0% Fee Pool, LP, SSL, Full Precision, and More - page 139. (Read 379078 times)
May 25, 2011, 03:38:41 PM
May 25, 2011, 02:28:52 PM
Bit of bad luck today to make up for all the good luck we've been having. Hopefully with the new dedicated hosting provider this weekend, we can surpass 250 gH/sec by the end of the month. The current hardware will probably stop keeping up around that point.
What type of hardware/bandwidth are you running this on. I would consider hosting the pool on some dedicated hardware in my datacenter (2 GigE of bandwidth). I'll even accept BTC for payment
I have a dedicated server/host lined up, just waiting on them to get the SSD drive I requested. Still hopeful that the server will go online this weekend.
May 25, 2011, 02:24:21 PM
Bit of bad luck today to make up for all the good luck we've been having. Hopefully with the new dedicated hosting provider this weekend, we can surpass 250 gH/sec by the end of the month. The current hardware will probably stop keeping up around that point.
What type of hardware/bandwidth are you running this on. I would consider hosting the pool on some dedicated hardware in my datacenter (2 GigE of bandwidth). I'll even accept BTC for payment
May 25, 2011, 01:33:14 PM
Nice to see my prediction for 200 Gh/s for Friday was accurate. We are already at 237 Gh/s. I set the new goal at 250 Gh/s by Friday.
I'm more inclined to say 250 GH/s by tonight. Assuming the hardware doesn't explode of course.
May 25, 2011, 01:29:15 PM
Nice to see my prediction for 200 Gh/s for Friday was accurate. We are already at 237 Gh/s. I set the new goal at 250 Gh/s by Friday.
May 25, 2011, 12:04:42 PM
Oh, so is now a bad time to add 4.6 Ghash/sec to the pool?
May 25, 2011, 09:35:41 AM
Can you predict a date? If so, a bunch of us will RV-up and start crossing the country, spreading the word... 
Given the rate of growth, about 12 hours.
May 25, 2011, 09:33:55 AM
I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
If we cross 250, the server will open a portal to another dimension, releasing unspeakable horrors into our world, which will rape and pillage the lands until man kind is extinct.
Or it will start giving a lot of RPC errors/idles. I may be mixing up my prophecies. It could happen at 240, it could hold off until 300, but 250 was my rough estimate of where the next bottleneck will occur.
Can you predict a date? If so, a bunch of us will RV-up and start crossing the country, spreading the word...
May 25, 2011, 09:22:01 AM
I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
If we cross 250, the server will open a portal to another dimension, releasing unspeakable horrors into our world, which will rape and pillage the lands until man kind is extinct.
Or it will start giving a lot of RPC errors/idles. I may be mixing up my prophecies. It could happen at 240, it could hold off until 300, but 250 was my rough estimate of where the next bottleneck will occur.
May 25, 2011, 09:11:20 AM
I think I remember eleuthria saying before that 250 Ghash/sec would give us problems.
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
We're at 231.7 right now. O.o
What's gonna happen I wonder?
May 25, 2011, 08:34:29 AM
Looks like pool have no protection from common pool fraud practise - connection to pool in early stages of new block solving and after est. reward reach some constant, reconnect to other pool witch is an early stage of solving new block.
There is no reason that if you submitted 250 shares in the round that your 250 shares are worth less than my 250, just because mine were submitted evenly and yours were submitted in the beginning. It is not fraud, it is a miner trying to maximize their reward. No share should be worth more than any other. Every share had the same chance of being the one to solve the block.
May 25, 2011, 06:58:25 AM
my stale count is pretty low. no problems here
great pool btw!!
great pool btw!!
May 25, 2011, 05:58:16 AM
My statistics on stale shares not that bad, but still higher than on other pool. Looks like there is a bandwich problem from me to pool.
May 25, 2011, 05:17:07 AM
Code:
[25/05/2011 05:16:13] Result: 9c19a405 accepted
[25/05/2011 05:16:16] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
[25/05/2011 05:16:17] Connected to server
[289.52 Mhash/sec] [56 Accepted] [20 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
20 rejected and only 56 accepted. i'm used to getting 20 rejected in maybe every 2500 shares. [25/05/2011 05:16:16] Warning: work queue empty, miner is idle
[25/05/2011 05:16:17] Connected to server
[289.52 Mhash/sec] [56 Accepted] [20 Rejected] [RPC (+LP)]
May 25, 2011, 04:16:26 AM
Looks like pool have no protection from common pool fraud practise - connection to pool in early stages of new block solving and after est. reward reach some constant, reconnect to other pool witch is an early stage of solving new block.
May 25, 2011, 03:25:12 AM
So you have any idea why its doing this?
Code:
[24/05/2011 02:42:46] Disconnected from server
[24/05/2011 02:43:01] Result: e9866ea1 accepted
[24/05/2011 02:43:02] Warning: work queue empty, miner is id
[24/05/2011 02:43:02] Failed to connect, retrying...
[24/05/2011 02:43:18] Connected to server
[24/05/2011 02:43:19] Disconnected from server
[24/05/2011 02:43:31] Result: 5ecda2f6 rejected
[24/05/2011 02:43:01] Result: e9866ea1 accepted
[24/05/2011 02:43:02] Warning: work queue empty, miner is id
[24/05/2011 02:43:02] Failed to connect, retrying...
[24/05/2011 02:43:18] Connected to server
[24/05/2011 02:43:19] Disconnected from server
[24/05/2011 02:43:31] Result: 5ecda2f6 rejected
I haven't heard any other reports of that level of idle/disconnects showing up. What speed is your miner running at, and where are you located geographically? A few idles wouldn't surprise me right now as the pool is growing far faster than the current server can handle it, but constant disconnects are a completely different issue.
Feature request:
Would you consider having the "My Workers" view flag the worker field "Last Share" that have gone ~300 seconds (5 min) with a yellow background and ~900 seconds (15 min) with red? In your spare time of course
Would you consider having the "My Workers" view flag the worker field "Last Share" that have gone ~300 seconds (5 min) with a yellow background and ~900 seconds (15 min) with red? In your spare time of course
This functionality is coming soon, I was waiting to implement it until I had emails & confirmations added, since there is an additional premium service (email alerts) that will be tied into it.
May 24, 2011, 09:17:38 PM
Few problems with that one:
1) I'm a computer hobbyist, not a professional. I'd be embarrassed to release my PHP code
.
1a) I'm a procedural style programmer. Separating design from the processing engine is something I'm working on, but they still get mixed together quite frequently.
2) The only major defining feature of a pool is its front-end. On the back end, most pools are fairly similar. If I released my PHP code, there would be nothing my pool offers that couldn't be cut & pasted somewhere else.
On the update side of things: I've reworked how the system handles emails, and it is now sending valid MIME emails with both plaintext or HTML. A few users were having their confirmation emails rejected by systems that refused to accept a non-MIME formatted email.
you could at least release a "stripped" version of the code, with only the basic functionality. just enough to set up a small private pool. 1) I'm a computer hobbyist, not a professional. I'd be embarrassed to release my PHP code
.1a) I'm a procedural style programmer. Separating design from the processing engine is something I'm working on, but they still get mixed together quite frequently.
2) The only major defining feature of a pool is its front-end. On the back end, most pools are fairly similar. If I released my PHP code, there would be nothing my pool offers that couldn't be cut & pasted somewhere else.
On the update side of things: I've reworked how the system handles emails, and it is now sending valid MIME emails with both plaintext or HTML. A few users were having their confirmation emails rejected by systems that refused to accept a non-MIME formatted email.
May 24, 2011, 03:47:05 PM
The payout lock warning doesn't actually go away when I click the link to hide it.
May 24, 2011, 01:40:24 PM
1) I'm a computer hobbyist, not a professional. I'd be embarrassed to release my PHP code .
.That's one of the neat things about "opening" up your code. There are far more people who are willing and able to find and fix all the suboptimal bits of existing code than there are folks like yourself who can build that useful code from scratch in the first place.
May 24, 2011, 01:13:29 PM
Has anybody tried Diablominer with BTCGuild from behind a proxy firewall?
I can get diablominer to work with Eligius, but would rather use BTCGuild. Here's my command line that works just fine on Eligius:
I can get diablominer to work with Eligius, but would rather use BTCGuild. Here's my command line that works just fine on Eligius:
There's an update to pushpool I have to roll into the server that should fix the proxy issue. I'm waiting to find out when I can move to a dedicated host to make the switch.
Jump to: