Simply thinking about it like this
Assume you are real Satoshi Nakamoto, are you ready to disclose yourself? I believe you won't because you know that your life will be under risk and serious observation from governments as well as Bitcoin community. If you are smart enough to create Bitcoin, you would be wise enough to have in-depth thinking about such risks. You also are fully aware that if you disclose your identity, you lose it forever.
Again another topic about Satoshi.
The List Satoshi Nakamoto Thread
I gathered every Satoshi Nakamoto thread.
I don't have interests to read all those topics but if you want, I think you can find something to support your topic.
Topic: 12 years ago this man was accused to be Satoshi - page 3. (Read 548 times)
WOULD YOU DECLINE SUCH AN ACCUSATION? 
I think any sane person would. The amount of harassment that you and your family would have to deal with as internet sleuths and reporters all dig to try and find clickbait would be enough to drive anyone crazy. Look at others who have been accused of being satoshi... It is never a welcomed thing that they enjoy. Not to mention the security issues of people knowing you have billions of dollars. It might be funny to be accused if it was obvious you weren't, but if there were any real interest being it, it would be a nightmare.
Never really saw a thread about him being Satoshi despite me being in crypto for more than 5 years.
He doesn't look like a tech guy who can code but a member of a rock band. But he advocates privacy of course he will decline just as the real Satoshi would. There is nothing worth keeping for someone who has everything but privacy. You wouldn't want to live like the actors and actresses who keep hiding from the public and can't even go to a park to walk their dogs.
Anyhow, a lot of random guys have already claimed that he is Satoshi, but nobody has been able to show proof of this as of yet. I believe we should keep Satoshi's identity a secret since he did an excellent job of creating Bitcoin, and I'm sure he is happy, from wherever he is, that Bitcoin has come a long way to achieve its current status.
I don't think that a normal/reasonable human being would even try to claim ownership of another person's achievement , let alone as a cryptographer he is, he already knew the implications involved if he had done that, Because for you to claim to be Satoshi there are proofs you need provide to be believed, Therefore this so called Faketoshi, I don't see him as normal human being, looks like someone that has ulterior motive against Bitcoin or maybe he's looking for cheap popularity.
Only a weird man would be happy accused or alleged to be Satoshi Nakamoto. What would I gain if others think that I'm Satoshi Nakamoto? I would be kinda popular but what will I gain out of that popularity? Death threats? Actual attempts even? Or even deriding remarks, mockery, criticisms, etc? Would I even earn from that popularity?
At the end of the day, the truth will come out that I'm not Satoshi, that I don't even know much of what Satoshi have gone through, can't sign a message from those old addresses, can't move those old Bitcoin, etc. I'd rather just be true to myself and save myself from all the shit that comes along with it.
At the end of the day, the truth will come out that I'm not Satoshi, that I don't even know much of what Satoshi have gone through, can't sign a message from those old addresses, can't move those old Bitcoin, etc. I'd rather just be true to myself and save myself from all the shit that comes along with it.
Interestingly enough, of all the rumoured Satoshis, this is the guy I literally haven't heard about once.
WOULD YOU DECLINE SUCH AN ACCUSATION?
An easy yes. God knows what the authorities would do to a person that actually invented Bitcoin; not-so-nice things, safe to assume. 
Yeah, first time to heard and see this guy. The only normal citizen that I know that was suspected to be Satoshi (founder of Bitcoin) is Dorian Nakamoto, which came from the country of Japan.
I am not sure for this guy (Michael Clear) why telling them that it's Satoshi, maybe of his job, as a cryptographer.
I am not sure for this guy (Michael Clear) why telling them that it's Satoshi, maybe of his job, as a cryptographer.
Never really saw a thread about him being Satoshi despite me being in crypto for more than 5 years.
He doesn't look like a tech guy who can code but a member of a rock band. But he advocates privacy of course he will decline just as the real Satoshi would. There is nothing worth keeping for someone who has everything but privacy. You wouldn't want to live like the actors and actresses who keep hiding from the public and can't even go to a park to walk their dogs.
A cryptographer named Michael Clear declined the wonderful offer, after he was said to be Satoshi. Accepting the false claim would have made him famous till date but he made the right choice. Hence, someone is in court paying lots of money to lawyers claiming to be Satoshi, what an Irony. I think the people decides who is Satoshi then its left for the person to accept or decline like Michael Clear a good man - a bad fellow would have used the opportunity to execute illicit operation on bitcoin and extorting funds from those that sent him mails.
His online activities proofs he is not Satoshi indeed!
Photo Credit; @Rizo
WOULD YOU DECLINE SUCH AN ACCUSATION?
His online activities proofs he is not Satoshi indeed!
Photo Credit; @Rizo
WOULD YOU DECLINE SUCH AN ACCUSATION?
Jump to: