Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 106. (Read 2591920 times)
January 18, 2016, 08:15:09 PM
Block!!
January 18, 2016, 08:06:12 PM
When I attach a miner to the p2pool litecoin version, I get nothing but hash > target errors.
Things are set up according to instructions. Any idea what I am doing wrong?
Things are set up according to instructions. Any idea what I am doing wrong?
bney,
This is a Bitcoin thread so discussions on Altcoins are not warmly welcomed. :/
That being said you may be able to fix your problem with Litecoin using the following patches:
https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2pool/commit/742e97a3ddc4683b3a5bd3b0bc849de9ef8b10d1
https://github.com/CartmanSPC/p2pool/commit/614fb94eb3f9bb77a3a0991bed99fa903cdcf814
Good luck!
January 18, 2016, 04:08:22 PM
Thanks, that makes sense. However... over the long term, luck should equalize out, since by definition its just statiscal noise.
January 18, 2016, 04:00:26 PM
I know that mathematically, variance does not matter - in theory, but that theory does not take into account the changing difficulty, does it?
You are correct mathematically on the latter part and it's not just a hunch. If you have bad luck for a whole diff and the diff is rising, then you will not on average ever make up the difference after the diff rise. However the opposite is also true - if you have good luck during a period and diff is rising, then on average after the diff change you will remain ahead long term.The practical side of this for those trying to understand it - if diff continues to rise, then short term luck has more long term effects on your overall returns the smaller the pool is.
January 18, 2016, 01:54:28 PM
think we have to kill the dog boss.....
January 18, 2016, 08:20:05 AM
So....
How do we attract more hashrate to P2Pool ?
How do we attract more hashrate to P2Pool ?
January 18, 2016, 07:43:15 AM
You need a LOT more hashrate. I'm using a 40PH (more or less) pool and on back-luck weeks its variance is barely tolerable. I fear the only way this will happen is if several major pools die.
I know that mathematically, variance does not matter - in theory, but that theory does not take into account the changing difficulty, does it?
I know that mathematically, variance does not matter - in theory, but that theory does not take into account the changing difficulty, does it?
January 18, 2016, 07:11:56 AM
So....
How do we attract more hashrate to P2Pool ?
How do we attract more hashrate to P2Pool ?
January 17, 2016, 11:01:02 PM
almost 1 week since we found a block 
((
((Bitcoin Difficulty: 113,354,299,801
And Hashrate hovering around 1.14PH.
...and what happened to Bitfuy's promise to spread the love?
January 17, 2016, 10:50:20 PM
almost 1 week since we found a block ((
((Bitcoin Difficulty: 113,354,299,801
And Hashrate hovering around 1.14PH.
January 17, 2016, 07:50:01 PM
almost 1 week since we found a block ((
((Bitcoin Difficulty: 113,354,299,801
January 17, 2016, 07:46:35 PM
almost 1 week since we found a block ((
(( 
January 16, 2016, 10:37:04 PM
I know a lot of us use SSH to manage remote nodes, there was serious SSH security flaw identified, there is an easy short term fix: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20160114142733
As the flaw states, it's only a problem if you are connecting to something you don't control.Quote
The authentication of the server host key prevents exploitation
by a man-in-the-middle, so this information leak is restricted
to connections to malicious or compromised servers.
by a man-in-the-middle, so this information leak is restricted
to connections to malicious or compromised servers.
Usually a good idea to point out something like that rather than cause panic.
January 16, 2016, 09:31:25 PM
I know a lot of us use SSH to manage remote nodes, there was serious SSH security flaw identified, there is an easy short term fix: http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20160114142733
January 16, 2016, 09:19:05 PM
It's been a while but my hash rate graph has finally stopped looking like the EEG from a cardiac arrest patient. 
Well it looks like illuminati team 'A' been working around the clock on a workaround to my sandboxing. Here you can see a definite correlation between the flood of v14 clients and orphaned shares:
While illuminati team 'B' has subverted the sandboxing of my web browser with a recent update. Here you can see the results of my visit to imgur.com:
Still I'm maintaining a steady hash rate with an efficiency of 111% despite all the work they've been putting in.
January 16, 2016, 06:40:17 PM
Other than slowing down GBT latency a little if you choose 2MB should have 0 effect
What news on your domain btw? - I'm intrigued
I'm really excited about it, but can't say much at this point, I'm hoping to be able to share more in the coming week
January 16, 2016, 05:46:50 PM
Other than slowing down GBT latency a little if you choose 2MB should have 0 effect
What news on your domain btw? - I'm intrigued
January 16, 2016, 05:44:29 PM
It's not ready yet...
That's what I thought, I've compiled it on a NIX VM without issue to play with though - looking forward to seeing how it performs with p2pool compared to core.
Other than slowing down GBT latency a little if you choose 2MB should have 0 effect
January 16, 2016, 05:41:42 PM
It's not ready yet...
That's what I thought, I've compiled it on a NIX VM without issue to play with though - looking forward to seeing how it performs with p2pool compared to core.
January 16, 2016, 05:04:57 PM
Should probably ask in the emark thread in the altcoins section.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Is anyone running the Bitcoinclassic wallet with p2pool here? I was checking the github repo out & after seeing the trolling being done by a certain core dev & ex-pool admin it makes me want to start using it......
-------------------------------------------------------------
Is anyone running the Bitcoinclassic wallet with p2pool here? I was checking the github repo out & after seeing the trolling being done by a certain core dev & ex-pool admin it makes me want to start using it......
It's not ready yet...
Jump to: