Pages:
Author

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 17. (Read 2591876 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
To get the per miner graphs..
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
Hey all we are currently Operating P2Pool Nodes for the following coins. Come support decentralized mining

DASH NY : http://dash-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:7903/
DASH GA: http://dash-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:7903/

LTC NY : http://ltc-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:9327/
LTC GA: http://ltc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:9327/

BTC GA: http://btc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:9332/

FIRST P2Pool for Bitcoin Cash
BCC NY: http://bcc-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:5964/
BCC GA : http://bcc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:5964/

I have also started my own github fork for dash P2Pool implementing some custom changes. We are currently testing the changes on our Dash P2Pool Nodes and will be implementing them on the other pools shortly
https://github.com/mindtrip101




This is part of the problem of bcash hijacking the brand... Your "BTC" pool says "Bitcoin Cash" in the header yet is mining on the BTC network.
legendary
Activity: 1167
Merit: 1009
Running on any node is better then supporting centralization like antpool. Some people don’t have the technical expertise to get these setup
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
Hey all we are currently Operating P2Pool Nodes for the following coins. Come support decentralized mining

...
Decentralised is running your own node, not mining on someone else's node Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1167
Merit: 1009
Hey all we are currently Operating P2Pool Nodes for the following coins. Come support decentralized mining

DASH NY : http://dash-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:7903/
DASH GA: http://dash-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:7903/

LTC NY : http://ltc-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:9327/
LTC GA: http://ltc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:9327/

BTC GA: http://btc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:9332/

FIRST P2Pool for Bitcoin Cash
BCC NY: http://bcc-ny.pools.mindtrip.us:5964/
BCC GA : http://bcc-ga.pools.mindtrip.us:5964/

I have also started my own github fork for dash P2Pool implementing some custom changes. We are currently testing the changes on our Dash P2Pool Nodes and will be implementing them on the other pools shortly
https://github.com/mindtrip101

newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
Hello all,

47 minutes ago p2pool main net found a block. According to blockchain.info it contains 1749 transactions, its size is 971.35 kb and its weight is 3626.63 kb.

yipie, i changed my minter to Mainnet 3 days before.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
Hello all,

47 minutes ago p2pool main net found a block. According to blockchain.info it contains 1749 transactions, its size is 971.35 kb and its weight is 3626.63 kb.

newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Alard, are you using btc1? Segwit2x was cancelled, and there was an off-by-one bug in btc1 on the fork height that might be causing your problem.
btc1 v.1.14.5 and v1.15.1, same error
hero member
Activity: 818
Merit: 1006
Alard, are you using btc1? Segwit2x was cancelled, and there was an off-by-one bug in btc1 on the fork height that might be causing your problem.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Hi
stopped working pools mainnet and jtoomnet. what is the problem? p2pools ltc and dash working

2017-11-18 17:06:02.025526 p2pool (version 15.0-68-g9692d6e)
2017-11-18 17:06:02.025581
2017-11-18 17:06:02.025610 Testing bitcoind RPC connection to 'http://127.0.0.1:8332/' with username 'name'...
Error getting work from bitcoind:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 653, in _runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1442, in gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1384, in _inlineCallbacks
    result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 408, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
    return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
--- ---
  File "/home/alard/p2ptest/p2pool/util/deferral.py", line 41, in f
    result = yield func(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1384, in _inlineCallbacks
    result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 408, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
    return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
  File "/home/alard/p2ptest/p2pool/bitcoin/helper.py", line 69, in getwork
    work = yield go()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/defer.py", line 1384, in _inlineCallbacks
    result = result.throwExceptionIntoGenerator(g)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/python/failure.py", line 408, in throwExceptionIntoGenerator
    return g.throw(self.type, self.value, self.tb)
  File "/home/alard/p2ptest/p2pool/util/jsonrpc.py", line 133, in _http_do
    raise Error_for_code(resp['error']['code'])(resp['error']['message'], resp['error'].get('data', None))
p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -1 CreateNewBlock: TestBlockValidity failed: bad-blk-length-toosmall, size limits failed (code 16)
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
hey people,

isent it time to go back to main Branche ? to get a payouts again  ? Roll Eyes
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
I miss a p2pool summary website for p2pool/master sharechain so I setup my own. It bases on p2pool.in website with minor changes I find more interesting.

https://nastyfans.org/p2pool

The URL is the only reference to nastyfans. The page content is dedicated to P2Pool.

http://p2pool.org is on p2pool/master?

Thank you for confirming that. I was not clear since you mention switching/upgrading in past posts. Also you are missing block 480646. This block is from master chain. Solved by nastyfans node.
Well, if it is i don't see any payout!
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
I miss a p2pool summary website for p2pool/master sharechain so I setup my own. It bases on p2pool.in website with minor changes I find more interesting.

https://nastyfans.org/p2pool

The URL is the only reference to nastyfans. The page content is dedicated to P2Pool.

http://p2pool.org is on p2pool/master?

Thank you for confirming that. I was not clear since you mention switching/upgrading in past posts. Also you are missing block 480646. This block is from master chain. Solved by nastyfans node.
legendary
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
I miss a p2pool summary website for p2pool/master sharechain so I setup my own. It bases on p2pool.in website with minor changes I find more interesting.

https://nastyfans.org/p2pool

The URL is the only reference to nastyfans. The page content is dedicated to P2Pool.

http://p2pool.org is on p2pool/master?
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
I think it is no longer sustainable mining in p2pool.
Four months without any profit and with the arrival of winter the
electricity doubles reaching astronomical values !

https://imgur.com/a/g5I3Y


And to make things worse, a hacker lowered my trust level  Undecided
Not orphan. Invalid.

Code:
2017-11-11 04:31:23 CreateNewBlock(): total size: 1089769 block weight: 3996706 txs: 2844 fees: 416742649 sigops 26195
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-weight, ContextualCheckBlock : weight limit failed (code 16)
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 00000000000000000093cc2a72c8ae2db421fb2316145ceba3f951b3296fc741 is marked invalid
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED

My guess at this point is that p2pool is not correctly calculating the weight of the coinbase transaction, and needs to remove a few more transactions from the block template. As a temporary workaround, I suggest adding this to ~/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf:

Code:
blockmaxweight=3900000

I'll look into what actually went wrong and try to get a full fix this weekend.

It's possible that this bug affects mainnet as well.
When your generation transaction is factored in, your block size is too large.
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
I miss a p2pool summary website for p2pool/master sharechain so I setup my own. It bases on p2pool.in website with minor changes I find more interesting.

https://nastyfans.org/p2pool

The URL is the only reference to nastyfans. The page content is dedicated to P2Pool.
legendary
Activity: 1308
Merit: 1011
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
I think it is no longer sustainable mining in p2pool.
Four months without any profit and with the arrival of winter the
electricity doubles reaching astronomical values !

https://imgur.com/a/g5I3Y


And to make things worse, a hacker lowered my trust level  Undecided
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
Not orphan. Invalid.

Code:
2017-11-11 04:31:23 CreateNewBlock(): total size: 1089769 block weight: 3996706 txs: 2844 fees: 416742649 sigops 26195
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-weight, ContextualCheckBlock : weight limit failed (code 16)
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 00000000000000000093cc2a72c8ae2db421fb2316145ceba3f951b3296fc741 is marked invalid
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED

My guess at this point is that p2pool is not correctly calculating the weight of the coinbase transaction, and needs to remove a few more transactions from the block template. As a temporary workaround, I suggest adding this to ~/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf:

Code:
blockmaxweight=3900000

I'll look into what actually went wrong and try to get a full fix this weekend.

It's possible that this bug affects mainnet as well.
When your generation transaction is factored in, your block size is too large.
hero member
Activity: 818
Merit: 1006
Not orphan. Invalid.

Code:
2017-11-11 04:31:23 CreateNewBlock(): total size: 1089769 block weight: 3996706 txs: 2844 fees: 416742649 sigops 26195
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlock: bad-blk-weight, ContextualCheckBlock : weight limit failed (code 16)
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: AcceptBlockHeader: block 00000000000000000093cc2a72c8ae2db421fb2316145ceba3f951b3296fc741 is marked invalid
2017-11-11 04:31:35 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock: AcceptBlock FAILED

My guess at this point is that p2pool is not correctly calculating the weight of the coinbase transaction, and needs to remove a few more transactions from the block template. As a temporary workaround, I suggest adding this to ~/bitcoin/bitcoin.conf:

Code:
blockmaxweight=3900000

I'll look into what actually went wrong and try to get a full fix this weekend.

It's possible that this bug affects mainnet as well. Edit: likely.
Pages:
Jump to: