[1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 463.

matthewh3

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1003

Quote from: xyzzy099 on November 29, 2013, 09:27:09 AM

Quote from: matthewh3 on November 29, 2013, 07:34:15 AM

Is anyone mining October Jupiters on P2Pool with cgminer successfully. I know when we tried the other week it would mine OK but every so often cgminer would crash. So it'd just go unhashing for hours until we realised. We have two October Jupiters and a November one on the way that we'd like to hash on P2Pool.

I just started mining my Jupiter on P2Pool 2 days ago, but so far it has been running great - no problems at all.

CGMiner reports a low average hash rate - ~450 GH/s while I typically see a very consistent 566 GH/s on other pools - but P2Pool reports close to the actual hash rate, and the payouts are correct for my actual hash rate.

[EDIT: I should say that this is with the latest 0.99-tune firmware. It was running the same on the plain 0.99 before I updated.]

Yeah it too a good few days between crashes but we was losing that many coins we had to move them off P2Pool.

xyzzy099

legendary

Activity: 1066

Merit: 1098

Quote from: matthewh3 on November 29, 2013, 07:34:15 AM

Is anyone mining October Jupiters on P2Pool with cgminer successfully. I know when we tried the other week it would mine OK but every so often cgminer would crash. So it'd just go unhashing for hours until we realised. We have two October Jupiters and a November one on the way that we'd like to hash on P2Pool.

I just started mining my Jupiter on P2Pool 2 days ago, but so far it has been running great - no problems at all.

CGMiner reports a low average hash rate - ~450 GH/s while I typically see a very consistent 566 GH/s on other pools - but P2Pool reports close to the actual hash rate, and the payouts are correct for my actual hash rate.

[EDIT: I should say that this is with the latest 0.99-tune firmware. It was running the same on the plain 0.99 before I updated.]

matthewh3

legendary

Activity: 1372

Merit: 1003

Is anyone mining October Jupiters on P2Pool with cgminer successfully. I know when we tried the other week it would mine OK but every so often cgminer would crash. So it'd just go unhashing for hours until we realised. We have two October Jupiters and a November one on the way that we'd like to hash on P2Pool.

zkfq123

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

i dont think the pool :http://mine.yuyi.tw:9332/ is more efficent. it just only more unfair !

i had put 2 avalon abuout 210g in this pool for few days (5day)

it give me about fewer 70% share than other 180g worker!!!!!

i had found only the more speed you havd one machine avalon or knc 180g，you can got more share than others

have 2 two 110g , the shares will be eated by firest worker with 180g 。

this is the reson why my speed 210g is only got 70% btc of the 180g work

now, i found only one address just like 13rK1JeimK5PdZf9oBJSUeF2RyP6VDEYah is more efficent
but others worker is more fewer

yuyi

newbie

Activity: 6

Merit: 0

Quote from: wlz2011 on November 21, 2013, 03:53:26 PM

Quote from: zvs on November 20, 2013, 08:15:32 PM

Quote from: wlz2011 on November 20, 2013, 03:42:13 AM

Quote from: zvs on November 16, 2013, 11:30:10 PM

OK, so I'm guessing people probably use 204.10.105.113:9332/static because of the domain p2pool.org... even though it's horribly set up & has a 2% fee. quite sad really, when one looks at the one month/one year chart. (oh and ofc he never took me up on my offer, no mails from that guy)

now, second question, why do people use elizium.name?... or is it just all local traffic? though I'd be shocked if 95% or more of it wasn't just from random people using a remote p2pool. 400 shares I think is enough to get a trend & 55 orphans is bad. I can see there's 11 outgoing connections, but I guess I'll assume that those are just random outgoing connections? It looks like my node @ 198.12.127.2 used one of its random outgoing connections to hook up w/ it, but not connected to me at the other two places. normally i'd add it to --p2pool-node since it seems to be on a fast enough computer & good connection, but i've just been observing the sub 100% efficiency for the last few days & curiosity killed the cat. Is it all just because of that interface? The most important part is busted (the share explorer).

I also don't understand why so many people use 183.136.216.39:9332/static/graphs.html?Year when it's absolutely horrid. 10 outgoing connections, that are either totally random or not good choices. For location (China), he's not connecting to some critical western US & Russian nodes that he should be on. I *think* it's also on an old version of bitcoind. at least it's at 0% fee

But why would you use that over this: mine.yuyi.tw:9332 a far superior pool in Taiwan with 1/10th the hashrate. This one runs 0% fee too, so that's not it

is there some place i'm missing where these sites are being advertised? reddit? asic hardware manufacturer forums? lol.

some people want to use p2pool for whatever reason, but don't want to spend money on hosting for their own node (I'll assume they live in a crap rural area like myself w/ shit for bandwidth). but why always choose the wrong pools? then you get all the bullshit misinformation about how p2pool pays out less than . yeah, probably cause you were on one of these low efficiency pools or running a local node that was getting 15% orphans and 5% DOA.. though if it weren't for those people, I guess the rest wouldn't be picking up the bonus

but, seriously, who is mining on one of those 3 pools right now and why? is there anyone that reads this thread that does? if not, where are they coming from?

你懂中文吗？我不懂英文，183.136.216.39：9332是我建立的，但是我不懂编程这些技术，这是个普通的P2POOL节点矿池。我不知道如何去固定节点，或者应该怎么固定你说的美国俄罗斯节点。我只是和朋友在一起挖矿，可能是最差的池，来自一个完全不懂电脑程序的人，服务器是朋友提供的，没有打算收取任何费用。很高兴能引起你的关注，同时我也希望能得到技术上的帮助。如果你懂中文，是否可以用中文来帮助我解决这些问题，谢谢。钱包是的0.85版本。

I had to use google translate. Grin

I'd say talk to this guy: mine.yuyi.tw:9332

https://twitter.com/TaiwanPool (for one, you'd want him to --p2pool-node to your pool, since he has 0 incoming)

I've been saying for a while it's by far the best server in Oceania area.... it looks like he picked up a lot of hashing power recently and is still doing well on orphans

LOL，我看懂了，你和我一样需要谷歌翻译。好吧，你的意思是说台湾 mine.yuyi.tw:9332池子效率很高。我昨天叫矿友们去测试了，效率是要好一些。我很羡慕你们懂的如何提升矿池效率，我不懂编程这些，能力非常有限，但是我尽量让矿池效率提升。我让矿友一部分算力进入mine.yuyi.tw:9332，分散一些算力，因为P2POOL节点矿池有个瓶颈，无论你的池子效率多高，都会遇见程序的瓶颈。

当算力大于3T，会出现吞噬小算力，如图

http://i44.tinypic.com/2i8ho21.jpg

这个算力被吞噬了，完全失去了效率。

另外一个BUG，当算力大于3.5T或者4T以上，会出现算力溢出，如图

http://i42.tinypic.com/30wqqdi.jpg

这些算力是溢出的，当4.5T可以看见有100G-300G算力被溢出。

如果你能联系上P2POOL程序的作者，应该让他优化程序，对P2POOL的发展是有帮助的。对大家都有好处，P2POOL算力值有50T - 70 T，目前的难度和矿机算力看，P2POOL需要尽快修改这些BGU。

如果能P2POOL使用stratum协议，效率会更高，为什么是目前的Getwork协议？效率很低！！！

请帮助我转达给P2POOL的作者，谢谢。我的英文不好，让他来看图吧。

另外你说的 https://twitter.com/TaiwanPool 添加为节点。IP = 59.24.3.173

请问bitcoin.conf该如何写呢？请帮助我，我真的不懂编程，这些命令我一点不懂。谢谢

rpcuser=abc
rpcpassword=123
server=1
rpcport=8332
port=8333
rpcconnect=127.0.0.1
addnode=59.24.3.173
addnode=

这样写正确吗？？？

可以给我一份这个bitcoin.conf的内容吗？请写上你认为更多的非常好的节点。谢谢！！！

如果你能帮助我，将会获得更多的算力加入P2POOL！

来自中国的P2POOL矿友 Wlz2011

1. DOA變100%的問題我也有注意到，目前重開挖礦程式就會好，似乎和運算能力沒關係，比較像是隨機出現。

2.

我目前沒有大於4.5T的環境可以測試，而且最近在我礦池上都沒發生null。

比對之前有出現短暫null時，整體礦池也沒有超過4.5Thash/s過。

是否可以試著換挖礦程式 cgminer 或 bfgminer 試試。

3. taiwan pool的配置無法從外面連線，我有先將你的IP加入我連線的清單，伺服器下次重啟就會連上你的礦池。

如果有任何問題歡迎pm跟我討論

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

ok now it start, but cgminer(7.2) don't go ahead seems dead(black screen)

zvs

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1000

https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com

Quote from: Amph on November 28, 2013, 04:13:12 AM

my p2pool don't even start, with litecoin

turn listen on litecoind?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

my p2pool don't even start, with litecoin

twmz

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 500

Quote from: zkfq123 on November 27, 2013, 09:32:05 AM

p2pool is got a very few block recent days,i dont know why?

Luck

zkfq123

newbie

Activity: 49

Merit: 0

p2pool is got a very few block recent days,i dont know why?

twmz

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 500

And p2pool.info has been moved to forrestv's servers. If you get any errors right now, they are probably related to us making DNS changes and the errors will go away over the next hour as your DNS cache expires. If you still see errors after a few hours, let us know.

lanfanblue

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Quote from: Red Emerald on November 25, 2013, 01:45:04 PM

Quote from: lanfanblue on November 24, 2013, 10:13:24 AM

Hi forrestv and all contributors of p2pool,

Many thanks to this fantastic mining pool. It's really fun to tuning p2pool to maximize miner's income for geeky users like me.

But I wonder if you have any plan to enable IPv6 support of p2pool?
Since official bitcoin client has IPv6 enabled by default, I think enabling IPv6 support will make p2pool network even more pervasive and well connected.
More importantly, IPv6 will help those users with both v4 & v6 network, but behind firewall or NAT in v4 network, just like me.
I do have a very good connectivity to v6 network and can accept income connections.
But v4 network is NATed with high latency, and I think that might be the source of my high orphan rate.

I have checked that twisted library used in p2pool support IPv6 network, at least partially.
I'm not familiar with python, so I don't know for sure.
I wonder if it is possible to enable IPv6 network in p2pool?

Thanks again to this great mining pool. :-)

I'm all for IPv6, but will adding IPv6 support be enough for you? I think you will still likely need to talk to IPv4 peers for a while since I doubt everyone in the pool can make the switch.

Well... Adding v6 support doesn't mean disabling v4 network. We can have both networks up and running. p2pool will talk to both existing v4 peers and new v6 peers, just like the official bitcoin client does now.

phillipsjk

legendary

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1001

Let the chips fall where they may.

Quote from: Red Emerald on November 25, 2013, 01:45:04 PM

I'm all for IPv6, but will adding IPv6 support be enough for you? I think you will still likely need to talk to IPv4 peers for a while since I doubt everyone in the pool can make the switch.

It does not have to be all or nothing. You can run dual-stack as IPv4 addresses slowly become more and more scarce. APINC has run out years ago, so many of those new Chinese users are likely to be on IPv6.

twmz

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 500

Quote from: Exidous on November 25, 2013, 01:12:25 PM

Quote from: twmz

The source code is now on GitHub: https://github.com/ervwalter/p2pool.info

I'll work with forrestv to get it up and running on a new official server and then will transfer the domain name to him. It's open source and so other are welcome to setup their own unofficial copies of the site, if they want to play with it for some reason. Out of the box, the easiest (but not the cheapest) way to deploy it is on Windows Azure. It's as simple as setting up a web server and a database server there and then pushing the code to the web server using git. Setting it up on a non-Azure windows server is probably relatively straightforward as well (and may be much cheaper), but the specifics are left as an exercise for the reader.

Any way to convert the .bacpac to sql?

Not that I know of. However, I re-exported the database as .sql files as well. Note, these are still SQL Server specific. Also, they are massive (as compared to the binary .bacpac file), so I moved all the data exports to its own repository:

https://github.com/ervwalter/p2pool.info-data

Red Emerald

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

Quote from: lanfanblue on November 24, 2013, 10:13:24 AM

Hi forrestv and all contributors of p2pool,

Many thanks to this fantastic mining pool. It's really fun to tuning p2pool to maximize miner's income for geeky users like me.

But I wonder if you have any plan to enable IPv6 support of p2pool?
Since official bitcoin client has IPv6 enabled by default, I think enabling IPv6 support will make p2pool network even more pervasive and well connected.
More importantly, IPv6 will help those users with both v4 & v6 network, but behind firewall or NAT in v4 network, just like me.
I do have a very good connectivity to v6 network and can accept income connections.
But v4 network is NATed with high latency, and I think that might be the source of my high orphan rate.

I have checked that twisted library used in p2pool support IPv6 network, at least partially.
I'm not familiar with python, so I don't know for sure.
I wonder if it is possible to enable IPv6 network in p2pool?

Thanks again to this great mining pool. :-)

I'm all for IPv6, but will adding IPv6 support be enough for you? I think you will still likely need to talk to IPv4 peers for a while since I doubt everyone in the pool can make the switch.

Exidous

full member

Activity: 239

Merit: 100

Quote from: twmz

The source code is now on GitHub: https://github.com/ervwalter/p2pool.info

I'll work with forrestv to get it up and running on a new official server and then will transfer the domain name to him. It's open source and so other are welcome to setup their own unofficial copies of the site, if they want to play with it for some reason. Out of the box, the easiest (but not the cheapest) way to deploy it is on Windows Azure. It's as simple as setting up a web server and a database server there and then pushing the code to the web server using git. Setting it up on a non-Azure windows server is probably relatively straightforward as well (and may be much cheaper), but the specifics are left as an exercise for the reader.

Any way to convert the .bacpac to sql?

twmz

hero member

Activity: 737

Merit: 500

Quote from: forrestv on November 21, 2013, 11:03:38 PM

Quote from: twmz on November 21, 2013, 01:37:21 PM

The Future of p2pool.info

As some of you know, I developed the p2pool.info website back when p2pool first started to take off because I was looking for a way to understand the blocks that p2pool finds, the pool's hashrate over time, etc. This was at a time before p2pool has its own local web interface built in.

I no longer mine on p2pool info myself, but I've been happy to continue hosting p2pool info for the benefit of those that do because it currently runs on the same web server as one of my other non-bitcoin related project, and I'm already paying for those servers anyway.

Thank you, twmz, for the long time you've spent supporting p2pool.info and P2Pool. Having p2pool.info around undoubtedly helped P2Pool become as popular as it is now.

P2Pool's built-in web interface definitely doesn't satisfy the same needs that p2pool.info does, and so I'd like to take on maintenance of p2pool.info. I'll bring up a suitable host and then I'd like to take ownership of the domain name and move it to that host for now, and then probably in the long term rewrite it to work on a Linux VPS.

The source code is now on GitHub: https://github.com/ervwalter/p2pool.info

I'll work with forrestv to get it up and running on a new official server and then will transfer the domain name to him. It's open source and so other are welcome to setup their own unofficial copies of the site, if they want to play with it for some reason. Out of the box, the easiest (but not the cheapest) way to deploy it is on Windows Azure. It's as simple as setting up a web server and a database server there and then pushing the code to the web server using git. Setting it up on a non-Azure windows server is probably relatively straightforward as well (and may be much cheaper), but the specifics are left as an exercise for the reader.

lanfanblue

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

Hi forrestv and all contributors of p2pool,

Many thanks to this fantastic mining pool. It's really fun to tuning p2pool to maximize miner's income for geeky users like me.

But I wonder if you have any plan to enable IPv6 support of p2pool?
Since official bitcoin client has IPv6 enabled by default, I think enabling IPv6 support will make p2pool network even more pervasive and well connected.
More importantly, IPv6 will help those users with both v4 & v6 network, but behind firewall or NAT in v4 network, just like me.
I do have a very good connectivity to v6 network and can accept income connections.
But v4 network is NATed with high latency, and I think that might be the source of my high orphan rate.

I have checked that twisted library used in p2pool support IPv6 network, at least partially.
I'm not familiar with python, so I don't know for sure.
I wonder if it is possible to enable IPv6 network in p2pool?

Thanks again to this great mining pool. :-)

Carlton Banks

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 3083

Quote from: Red Emerald on November 24, 2013, 01:16:47 AM

I stopped mining awhile ago, but I've left my p2pool node up. It's averaged 36 peers in the last year and it's bitcoind node is well connected. It has a high speed internet connection and has had excellent uptime.

Is a node like mine actually helpful for p2pool? I'm assuming that having a well connected node is good for spreading transactions and protecting p2pool from some kind of network attack. Am I right, or is a non-mining node not helpful? It's just a git pull and a restart ever now and then, so it's not much effort.

If a non-mining node is helpful, is there anything else I can do to make it more useful? Maybe set the max connections to something a lot higher so the pool sees more transactions? I'm just guessing.

More importantly, your node will help with propagating blocks found by p2pool users. The more pervasive the p2pool network is, the fewer blocks are likely to get orphaned. forrestv apparently has something in the p2pool code that distributes the block super fast to prevent as many orphans, but I think that more nodes will also help to do the job too.

p2pool is unique in this respect, I don't think any other pool has a dedicated network of relay nodes running code to help propagate blocks, the centralised pools probably have to keep an eye on who their bitcoind nodes are connecting to and make sure they are using the most reliable nodes, the most well placed and those with the most capacious bandwidth.

Red Emerald

hero member

Activity: 742

Merit: 500

I stopped mining awhile ago, but I've left my p2pool node up. It's averaged 36 peers in the last year and it's bitcoind node is well connected. It has a high speed internet connection and has had excellent uptime.

Is a node like mine actually helpful for p2pool? I'm assuming that having a well connected node is good for spreading transactions and protecting p2pool from some kind of network attack. Am I right, or is a non-mining node not helpful? It's just a git pull and a restart ever now and then, so it's not much effort.

If a non-mining node is helpful, is there anything else I can do to make it more useful? Maybe set the max connections to something a lot higher so the pool sees more transactions? I'm just guessing.

Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool - page 463. (Read 2592017 times)